LCD Pixel Response Time Halved 163
kagaku writes "Japanese newspaper the Nihon Kaizai Shimbun (evil registration required) said that Mitsubishi has mastered a technology to improve the response speed of pixels on LCDs by 100 per cent or more. It's done this by getting rid of the afterimages on screens which known as "ghosts", said the newspaper, and invented a proprietary system called Dual Domain Bend.
It cites unnamed sources at Mitsubishi saying that this method produces a response speed of one millisecond when power is applied and five milliseconds when the lights go off and the power goes down. That, the paper said, compares to up to forty milliseconds to switch pixels on and off. While the technique, when it gets to the manufacturing stage, will have immediate benefits for PC monitors, it will also help narrow the gap between LCD TVs and plasma displays, which have a quicker response speed. Here's a non-registration required link."
The Samsung 710T has basically no ghosting. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Plasma Televisions are not ready for primetime. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Improving outdated technologies (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Plasma Televisions are not ready for primetime. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Plasma Televisions are not ready for primetime. (Score:2, Informative)
I've had a Fujitsu Plasma for about a year, on for a several hours a day. Still looks the same. Perhaps you had yours set in "Exibition mode", with the brighness upped to extreme levels, and you've worn it out too soon. If not, maybe something's wrong with it and you can get it fixed under warranty.
Re:Bragging with percentages (Score:4, Informative)
In your example, that's where the deception is:
"100% faster" means 2 times faster.
Re:Bragging with percentages (Score:2, Informative)
Here, all of a sudden, we start defining speed as "events per time unit". Then, "twice as fast" means "twice as many events per time unit", i.e. 100% faster.
Now, if you think about it, "50% shorter time per event" really does mean "100% more events per time unit", so my argument is correct and complete. I've just proven that "50% faster" is the same as "100% faster"
Meanwhile (Score:4, Informative)
Re:But.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Improving outdated technologies (Score:4, Informative)