Biden To Require EV Charging Stations Every 50 Miles On Federal Highways (usatoday.com) 334
The Biden administration on Thursday pledged to have 500,000 public charging stations for electric vehicles in place by 2030. "The proposed standards, which will be published next week in the Federal Register, dictate that a charging station be located every 50 miles along the interstate and no more than a mile off the highway," reports USA Today. "Stations would be required to maintain a minimum number and type of chargers capable of serving multiple customers." From the report: Stations would be prohibited from requiring drivers to have a membership or be part of a club to use their chargers. Real-time information on pricing and location would have to be available to help motorists using a GPS app better plan their trip. The Federal Highway Administration's proposed standards will apply to federally funded charging stations in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The goal is to ensure a seamless system of charging stations that can be used by motorists no matter what car they drive, where they live or how they pay. [...] The administration is providing more than $5 billion to states over the next five years to build a network of charging stations along the nation's interstates.
Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Funny)
Solar Roadways!!!
*ducks*
Re: (Score:2)
Why are you ducking? The few places where there are large gaps between gas stations tend to be in deserts that tend to be brightly lit. However, I'm pert' shure there's electricity available on the Interstates, so maybe you were conned into feeding a troll, because the answer is obviously "Yes." If you thought it was Funny, I sure wouldn't give you the mod point (if I ever had one to give).
Having said that, I think it's better to use tax-related incentives and disincentives than mandate-style policies.
Howev
Re: (Score:3)
what seems to make sense is a two-pronged approach.
A third prong for a ground wire would probably be more sensible... I'm sorry, I'll see myself out.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Following the gas station model for EV charging, as it appears this proposal is doing, is not profitable. In order to do this, prices will have to be high. Until battery technology improves to the point of max 5 minute charges, charging will be a low volume business requiring high margins. Gas stations make money on low margins because they can push lots of cars through quickly. Fueling stalls are also drive through rather than sit and park allowing for efficient lines and use of space.
EV charging has to take a different model. It's going to be based on supplementing other businesses such as restaurants. Places that people will be spending 30+ minutes at. Providing charging as a value add for customers with little profit. The point being it will attract customers for their main business. The problem is how many such places can exist every 50 miles in the middle of no where.
Tesla superchargers are not cheap, but they're also not trying to be profitable. They're a value add to buying Teslas. They exist to support the car business, not as an EV charging business. Electrify American and such are pricey and not making money. Part of that is EV market share is still small, so a small customer pool. But even in areas where there is more demand, they can't get the volume needed to cover costs of infrastructure (installing the power lines, the DCFC chargers and the cost of the property).
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Insightful)
This plan makes no attempt to address your issues. It was never intended to be everything, everywhere, for everyone, all the time. It is one piece of the picture.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:2, Interesting)
Take a map of America, break it down into a 50 mile square grid, and approximately everywhere the lines intersect, they want to subsidize a charging station with multiple chargers.
Of course, there will be areas without chargers (because there's no federal Highway to be within one mile of), but this plan subsidize exactly ONE charging station inside DC, as DC is a 10 mile X 10 mile city. As an exercise for the reader, how many chargers will this fund in SF, NYC, Chicago, Detroit? (Remember, once you build o
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Interesting)
As opposed to the drivable bomb you currently own?
https://www.autoinsuranceez.co... [autoinsuranceez.com]
Gasoline car fires are far more common than electric fires, even controlling for the number on the road. Hybrid fires are more common than both, probably because they have the problems of both.
Re: (Score:3)
Exactly. It's to fill in the gaps that are uneconomical (most people don't realize that most fast charger costs are fixed, not per-kWh - amortized capital and monthly per-peak-kW rates). The higher density areas are already economical and so you don't have to worry about them. The market responds to increases in demand in a given area (albeit not in realtime).
My issues with this "plan" are:
* It's only mandating 150kW. That's "fine", but it's really lower than you want, and not at all forward-looking. It sh
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Some years ago, I saw a Tesla in Yellowstone National park. I don't suppose it teleported there, so perhaps things are not a bleak as you think.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Funny)
Some years ago, I saw a Tesla in Yellowstone National park. I don't suppose it teleported there, so perhaps things are not a bleak as you think.
That was me. I had diesel power generator, as well as big barrel of gas in the trunk of my Tesla. When batteries got low, I filled the generator with gas from the barrel, fired it up, and plugged Tesla in. Not too inconvenient, also being the only guy with Tesla in Yellowstone really gave me the kicks.
Smallprint: I don't own a Tesla and I've never been to US, much less Yellowstone.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Informative)
There are two fast charging stations at entrances to Yellowstone (West Yellowstone Supercharger and Gardiner Sinclair), 8 charging stations within or on the edge of the park (including at Old Faithful Lodge), and of course you can plug in to the RV outlets at any camp / RV site that has power.
Beyond the two fast chargers at the north and west park borders, there's fast chargers at (all of these can get to a park entrance with 75+ miles range to spare on a Tesla Model 3 (358mi), not counting any plugging in at a slow-charger during a meal stop - slow chargers being much more common; half-hour stop on 22kWh = +44mi, 1-hour stop = +88mi):
* Big Sky: 46mi
* Jackson (2): 57mi
* Boseman (3): 80mi
* Rexburg (2): 85mi
* Billings (1 + 2): 85mi
* Big Timber (1 + 1): 91mi
* Lima: 106mi
* Idaho falls (2): 110mi
* Dell: 114mi
* Hardin: 132mi
* Dillon (+1): 144mi
* Butte (2): 149mi
* Pocatello (3): 161mi
* Sheridan: 170mi
* Helena (1 + 1): 178mi
* Deer Lodge (+1): 185mi
* Garden City: 203mi
* Great Falls (1 + 1): 227mi
* Missoula (3): 243mi
* Rock Springs: 235mi
* Casper (2): 239mi
* North Logan (1 + 1): 242mi
* Gillette (2): 258mi
* Rawlins: 281mi
* Ogden (2+1): 281mi
I'm sure I missed quite a few. I'll reiterate that the numbers in parentheses are the numbers of charging *stations*, not the number of chargers. A plus means "under construction".
Re: (Score:3)
Back in the olden days, when there was no meaningful charging infrastructure, much less at hundreds of kilowatts, there was a clever solution I really liked from AC Propulsion (who made the predecessor to the Tesla Roadster... history gives them way too little recognition). It was called the "Long Ranger", and it was a self-steering (aka easy to back up with) genset trailer - had its own generator, petrol tank, and charging infrastructure, and could effectively convert the EV towing it into a PHEV. So you
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:3, Insightful)
Every charging station will have a supervisor and likely 5 or 6 full-time attendants (working 40 hour/week jobs, allowing for round-the-clock supervision of station) and for every 5 or 6 charging stations, a regional supervisor, plus maintenance crews to provide upkeep... all at government wages.
Oh, and of course the 'investment' is spread over the next 5 years, and after that, who knows?
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:2)
That is not how charging stops work now. There are a few kiosks. Next to a store, in a parking lot, or just by the side of the road. You pull up and plug your own car in. If there's a problem there's a number on the kiosks that you can call. They'll try to help you over the phone and may remotely reboot a kiosk. If that doesn't work they'll send a crew to fix it, eventually.
About the only thing this might change is that the crew might respond more quickly.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Interesting)
Since you apparently are not from/in the US, you missed the joke.
The joke is that IF the Federal Govt. is involved, it will naturally come with more red tape and bureaucracy layers of people than necessary by default.
And that pretty much IS the way our federal govt works...it's why we, in general, try to avoid govt. run institutions in favor of the private sector.
You do not get efficiency with govt programs, but we do need them at times for areas that the private sector can't or just won't do that is necessary.
I hope that helps.
Re: (Score:3)
Have an agenda do you?
Most charging stations I visit have 0 (zero) humans around. I pull up and connect, or swipe a card and then connect. I doubt that anyone related to the owners stops by more than once a week, if even that.
That is the case for the Level 2 chargers and Level 3 chargers I use.
There is only one station I use that requires any human interaction, and that is because it is a research site run by innovators in this space. They turn it on for you, and record what vehicle is using it so they ca
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Insightful)
How did this bunch of FUD get modded insightful? Lol. I didn't know it took 45 minutes to stick a gun in someone's face. I've heard stories of someone pulling into a gas station just to buy a pack of smokes (ie: 2 minutes) and getting a gun stuck on their face. Yes somehow that hasn't seemed to prevent gas stations from popping up all over the countryside. What an absurd bunch of claims.
Re: (Score:3)
You don't travel with your own gun in the car?
Geez, most states have carry concealed licenses, or even constitutional carry....and respect each other states' licensed carriers.
So, BYOG...
It so rarely happens, but better to be prepared and have one when not needed, than to need one and not have one.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
You do realize the majority of profit a gas station makes is not from the gas they sell but the beer, cigarettes, candy, groceries and other items they sell. Gas itself is not highly profitable. The gas prices just entices the customer to visit them and buy what actually makes money. I see no reason why electricity would be any different. And the station owner probably isn't going to have to pay for that electricity like they do the gas or store it so these stations are instantly going to be much more profitable and they won't have to deal with epa regs on their gas tanks. No more abandoned gas tanks leaching old gas into the ground either. I see no down side to this at all. Pretty damn forward thinking if you ask me. Just need to reign in the car makers to standardize on a single charging connection.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
My wife drives a Tesla. This is in keeping with our experience on road trips. Most of the chargers we stop at are actually at gas stations. We spend roughly the same amount of time inside as we did with a gas car, hitting the restroom, grabbing food and drink, and generally walking around for a minute or two to get blood flowing. Admittedly, if our trips were on major, major highways on major travel weekends, these stations with ~8 chargers might not be able to handle a sudden influx, but they do ok with a constant stream of cars. And the chargers seem to be easy to build out, as another stop we often make is at a mall with ~20 chargers and not a significant amount more infrastructure space for transformers, etc. I'm really interested to see what happens when Buc-ee's starts putting in chargers at their mega travel stops.
I actually see another benefit of all these chargers going in: setting up infrastructure that encourages lots of local grid sized batteries for emergency power. The chargers need power infrastructure and network infrastructure to allow for payment, etc., so it's only a little extra work for someone to put in a battery that can be connected and controlled by/with a smart grid. The people owning the batteries can buy/sell to their hearts' content, and the local station makes a decent monthly lease for the space and keeping the area safe for the systems. Like you said, it's a lot easier than dealing with leaking underground tanks and needing to pay a person to be there 24/7 (or as much as they're open) in case they need to hit the emergency stop/fire suppression button.
Re: (Score:3)
Last weekend I was passing through York, PA, and my son wanted to stop at Sheetz (gas station/convenience store for the uninitiated) for food, so we went there. As I pulled in, my son pointed out the Tesla superchargers in the corner of the parking lot there. It seemed like the perfect pairing actually. The people pulled up, plugged in, and walked into the Sheetz to get food, which since it is prepared after ordering, takes pretty much 15 minutes anyways.
It seems like it will lead to more sales than the
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Interesting)
High prices on highways aren't a big issue. Most people will charge cheaply at home or work or the supermarket, and only use high speed highway chargers when doing occasional long journeys.
Profitability will come from having other services at the same site. Shops, restaurants, valeting, gambling etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Well if you add in the push for solar he just announced it starts to make sense that solar + charging = no need to run cables for long distances.
So every 50 miles you have acres of solar panels and a shit-ton of batteries?
Re: (Score:3)
Sounds kind of like the national highway system, and the same arguments against it at the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In areas without as much power available, there are a few options that I've seen. First, the usual answer for areas with power nearby, the power company charges for running more power to the area and they build it out. Second, in areas without available power, they can set up batteries with the superchargers, and either trickle-charge them from available power, or use solar power, or both. Batteries work nicely, because the power supply, either solar or grid, only has to cover the average utilization, so th
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Informative)
I'd also point out that highways always have some power, because there are road lights and often rest stops. And where there are rest stops with restaurants, bathrooms, etc., the HVAC uses vastly more power than EV charging, so that's logistically easy to add. Well, as easy as anything involving permits and approvals is...
I think you are greatly underestimating the power involved here. AC charging along a highway is borderline useless. You need HVDC charging. And a typical HVDC charger draws 60-100 kW per stall on average while in operation (and that's if you use batteries to augment the supply and spread the load over the entire day). The air conditioner for a rest stop likely draws on the order of 3 kW per building.
And you don't need just one charging stall. Even for the small number of Tesla cars on the road, they have 50-stall chargers every couple of hundred miles, with smaller stations more frequently. For the whole country to go electric, count on needing 50 to 100 stalls every 50 miles. That's potentially on the order of 10 megawatts of power consumption every 50 miles. That's about the average power consumption of a town of 5,000 people (though somewhat less than that if you assume low charger utilization at night).
And the bigger question is who will build it and pay for it. Having it as part of a highway standard is well and good, but somebody has to own and maintain 50,000-ish HVDC charging stalls totaling around $10 billion dollars AND own the land under it AND build big enough parking lots to accommodate it. All in all, that's not a small amount of money even before you factor in any extra 480V feeders required. If private industry owns it, they won't build enough infrastructure to handle the traffic long-term and they'll take significant profits on the power and probably charge the federal government a lot of money to do it. If the government does it, they'll probably find a way to screw it up. I'm not sure which is worse. :-)
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Interesting)
Thing is, if you need to run that much power along the Interstates, using it to charge cars sitting still is dumb.
Build a roll on/roll off auto-train down the middle, with stops outside major towns every 50-100 miles instead. Park on the train, plug in the car, and take a nap. As a bonus, it turns ICE cars electric for long trips, and you don't have to have range anxiety, because you'll have a full(er) battery when you get where you're going.
Re:Is there power available along interstates? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:2)
The goal here, last I heard, is four 150kW chargers at each station. A 3MW wind turbine with a 20% capacity factor would provide enough net energy for continuous use of all four chargers. One Tesla megapack per charger (four per station) should be plenty to buffer the power. And these are rather overly cautious specs for a charger in the middle of nowhere anyway.
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Two minutes of google-fu indicates a utility scale windmill costs $1.3 million to $2.2 million per megawatt, meaning your installation is about $4 million to 6.6 million each, before you get around to installing chargers. Furthermore your Tesla megapack is $1.25 million each. Running tab for each charger is $5.15-7.9M before any maintenance at all--and you need to realize that maintenance on windmills can be considerable.
Interstate highways are 48k miles and some change, round up to 50k for easy maths and allow for some growth. So, you'll need 1000 of these setups; total bill $5.15-8 billion, which sounds surprisingly feasible on the face of it, given that we give some $4+ billion a year to Israel, and recently another $40B to Ukraine, and untold billions to every other corner of the globe. It would be nice for the USA to spend some money on USA infrastructure for a change.
Naturally, it would be completely silly to not interconnect them with some grid level power, simply for the reason that it might not be windy in a particular area, or the windmill went down (which they do), or because the highway goes right through a populated area and the people might not take kindly to a giant noisy windmill as a neighbor--not to mention it would be more practical to gang those windmills together away from populated areas for ease of maintenance and such, and perhaps throw some solar installations in the works too, for when it's not windy, or too windy. That would add a considerable amount.
Of course, since it's a federal project, you probably need to multiply that by 10x, to account for pork, etc...
Re: (Score:3)
Hence the plan to jumpstart the process by building out some of the required stalls.
I mean, a hundred years ago, people were wondering why we'd bother with automobiles when they can't really travel outside of the city due to a lack of suitable roads, and a lack of fuel and maintenance. A horse can go way more places, and will happily eat grass. Who would ever dream of a network of paved roads covering the entire country, and an entire infrastructure of fuel stations!
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe read the second sentence.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, sufficient power does exist in almost all cases. Gas stations require power, and it's rare to go more than 50 miles without one. We probably won't get charging stations in those stretches, which, like when driving a legacy car, will require some attention to avoid running out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's already power, but that won't stop them from spending the $5 bil anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry but that's a silly way to look at this. 90% of the gas burned on highways everyday was purchased within 2 miles of people's home or work. For electric cars the majority will be charged by the time they hit the highway every day, and unlike gas they will be topped up almost every single night.
The idea of deploying electric chargers along the federal highways is not just a good thing but a very obvious thing to do.
It's so obvious that really attempts to say this is a bad idea is just being transparently contrarian. Can talk about implementation but the precedent of the US government subsidizing energy and it's distribution has a long history.
In 10-20 years when chargers are just as obvious and blended in as gas stations are now nobody is going to think about or care about how they got there
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:3)
Absolutely and I would support a program to require chargers in all new construction apartment lots (I think a couple states are doing this already?)
For homeowners it's pretty straightforward, apartments admittedly is trickier but as more are sold there should be an incentive for complex owners to install chargers. Most complexes around my area have at least a few chargers now.
Those problems are not a reason to not do this plan on the highway system, an area where the federal government can play a direct r
Re: (Score:3)
Currently most people in the US, will have a tough time of it "topping off" at night at home.
Currently we are using an unsustainable system to power our vehicles, which is giving the whole world a "tough time". The status quo is not desirable — it is destroying the biosphere. So what is currently happening, while relevant as a starting point, is not what needs to happen.
There are a LOT of people living in apartment complexes, and I don't see them investing a lot of money to tear up all the parking lots and putting chargers in front of every parking slot any time soon.
They don't need chargers, only decent outlets.
Many people live with no garage/carport or even off street parking.
Convert light poles to LED and there's a bunch of power formerly used for a HID lamp available for charging a car. In this context you do need to provide a charger, so that people
Re: Is there power available along interstates? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> inexpensive and convenient as driving a vehicle with an internal combustion engine
ICE vehicles are, by and large, neither inexpensive nor convenient. The average price paid for a new car in 2020 was over $40K so it's not like people go for the cheapest option by default.
The technology isn't really the problem. Neither is the cost, though both could always be improved... the key is public perception and education. Fortunately more EVs on the road mean people see them more, and they become more "normal,"
Re: (Score:2)
You lose efficiency of scale by producing everything locally. You also need raw materials for local production, so transport still must exist. Trains are not efficient as they're not point to point. They work well in a hub and spoke model where trucks are used for the spokes. There's a reason why tucks replaced many train routes after trucks were invented.
Yes, let's tell people that they can't freely travel for the fun of it. The hallmark of Progressive policy is to forbid people from doing things the
Re: (Score:3)
I knew he was old and weak, but *that* weak? (Score:2, Troll)
*Tadum* *Crash* *Thud*
Thank you, thank you, I love you too.
But will they maintain them? (Score:2, Informative)
I remember stopping at a rest area on a major toll road recently and it had a large "FAST EV CHARGING" sign at the entrance.
When you got to the charger, located right next to the entrance to the bathrooms, it had a laminated sign on it that read "Charger Out of Order" that had clearly been there for quite some time. The charger also appeared to be quite badly broken.
And this was on a toll highway that supported a quite nice rest area with multiple fast food places, a convenience store, and a large gas stati
Re: (Score:2)
You make some very valid points, but didn't mention that what this is going to be good for is long-haul truckers. They'll need to have charging available coast-to-coast.
Hmm...might be a good time to look into opening an EV charger repair service.
Charging EV semis (Score:5, Insightful)
what this is going to be good for is long-haul truckers. They'll need to have charging available coast-to-coast.
Maybe. The thing is, electric semis will save so much money on not buying diesel that there's a strong incentive to use them; therefore there is a strong incentive to solve the problems, and companies operating semis are probably pretty good at solving logistical problems. So I think the companies that buy the semis aren't going to wait for the Federal government to solve their problems... they are going to install the chargers they need, where they need them.
Elon Musk commented that a driver of a diesel semi cannot go on break while the semi is being refueled. Diesel is nasty and can be dangerous so someone needs to supervise. But electric charging is safe to leave unattended, and drivers need to go on breaks at regular intervals. Therefore, Elon Musk reasoned, it's important to get the regulations changed so that electric semi drivers are allowed to plug in their semi and then take a break. If "refueling" can be overlapped with mandatory breaks, it will help electric semis be competitive with diesel semis, even though electric semis will take half an hour to an hour to charge.
The above two points make me wonder if companies that buy Tesla semis will install chargers at the warehouses that load and unload the semis. Back the semi up to the warehouse loading dock, plug in the semi, and while it charges start loading cargo onto it. Arrive at the destination, back the semi up, plug it in and start unloading cargo.
Just as people with electric cars actually spend less time "refueling" than people with combustion cars (because while the car takes a lot longer to charge than gas pumping takes, they can walk away from the car and leave it) maybe electric semis will also wind up effectively taking less time for "fueling".
The energy content of liquid hydrocarbon fuel is awesome so an EV will never with a flat-out race with a combustion vehicle, but in practice an EV should not take an excessive amount of time.
Re: Charging EV semis (Score:2)
This is all very true and Musk's ideas here are sound and this policy will help move that transition.
Also the fact that everything does not have to get solved at once, by the time electric semis are really commonplace a good amount of convential cars will have already been replaced, this reducing dependence on oil allowing refineries to make more diesel instead until the trucks are displaced. Replacement will happen in waves.
Re: (Score:2)
this reducing dependence on oil allowing refineries to make more diesel instead until the trucks are displaced.
Diesel and gasoline are fractional distillates from the same barrels of oil. You can't just say we'll use these barrels to make diesel instead of gasoline.
Re: Charging EV semis (Score:2)
True to a degree but there is some variability in terms of what refiners can produce;
US Refiners Shift into Maximum Diesel Mode [spglobal.com]
To be clear I have no idea where that line is which brings and interesting issue, if we have 40 percent EVs displacing gas but we now have a glut of gas what's to be done with it? End up converting it to some diesel compatible fuel? Is that even possible? Interesting times.
Re: (Score:2)
True to a degree but there is some variability in terms of what refiners can produce;
US Refiners Shift into Maximum Diesel Mode [spglobal.com]
To be clear I have no idea where that line is which brings and interesting issue, if we have 40 percent EVs displacing gas but we now have a glut of gas what's to be done with it? End up converting it to some diesel compatible fuel? Is that even possible? Interesting times.
I believe maximum gasoline mode is typically used in summer and maximum fuel oil mode is typically used in winter. So yes, there is some flexibility in the process which is dictated by economics of upgrading and post-processing of the various fractions. Here is a really good overview;
https://ektinteractive.com/ref... [ektinteractive.com]
Back before it found use as a motor fuel, gasoline was considered an unwanted byproduct in the production of kerosene and was usually just burned off. Nowadays producers have found mark
Re:But will they maintain them? (Score:5, Informative)
Road trips in EVs are quite pleasant, actually. We've been doing them since 2018. It only takes 15-20 minutes to charge, then you can go another 200+ miles, and a short break every 3-4 hours is a pretty natural pace - we've driven the entire length of the east coast several times over the years, and it was if anything a bit more pleasant in an EV than it was in a gas car, since when the car is recharging you can go to the restroom and get a bite to eat, so you're never actually waiting.
I do agree that there also need to be slow/cheap overnight chargers. What several countries do is require parking, houses and apartments to include EV charging, or at least the ability to add charging, as a part of building codes.
Re: (Score:2)
Teslas are great for long trips. Other EVs, not so much. (At least in North America, over in Europe, there is tons of charging for any EV.) I'm planning a huge cross-country road trip, and there are very few places where charging is of any concern. We'll have a few minor detours, and we'll be a bit tight going to Craters of the Moon, but the only real issue is not having chargers going north-south in Nevada. Those aren't the largest highways, but they're really useful for certain trips. I expect we wo
Re: (Score:2)
I mean we have a gumball rally time for a Tesla now. For those unfamiliar it’s the fastest time you can drive from NY to LA without being arrested.
Re: (Score:2)
Chargers aren't, for the most part, the issue with EVs. You don't need chargers every 50 miles to make EVs practical. Going on long trips with an EV will simply never be practical.
Well that simply isnt true at all.
Even with current battery tech a model 3 with the long range option can go around 350 miles which is plenty long enough to get you to your next meal stop where you can charge your car while you eat.
And as for your "never" part, you are aware that there are extremely large amounts of money being put into new and more powerful batteries don't you?
Re: (Score:3)
Chargers aren't, for the most part, the issue with EVs. You don't need chargers every 50 miles to make EVs practical. Going on long trips with an EV will simply never be practical. EVs are great for local driving, where you can just recharge to cover all your daily driving overnight.
As someone who has done more than one trip across the country in an EV, I disagree. It does add time for charging, but unless you're driving by yourself, you're probably going to want to stop somewhere to eat and use restrooms anyway, so it doesn't add nearly as much time as you might think.
If the Biden administration really wants to make EVs more practical, they should be finding ways to get chargers in places where people actually live and work and shop. The problem is that, right now, unless you own a house with a garage, you can't charge.
I have a carport. I can charge. I can also charge at work, at various hotels, at various grocery stores, Target stores, etc. A lot of apartment complexes have charging, too. The only thing preventing it from being m
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not saying it is super practical, but another solution would be instead of charging the batteries in the car, having a system such that the battery is swapped out with a fork-lift type system from under the vehicle. It would need to work much like empty propane tanks are exchanged for full ones at many locations. But as the batteries are a huge cost, I don't see how practical this would be. I couldn't imaging swapping a brand new battery and getting a random-aged one, say near the end of its life.
But
Re: (Score:2)
That used to be true just a few years ago, but nowadays folks take their electrics on long trips regularly, as half an hour of fast charging get majority of range, then full charge at hotel overnight, continue on. Sure it's a different style of driving stopping to stretch your legs and eat every few hours as a predetermined location, well, not really, as in old cars we'd stop to gas up and eat as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Going on long trips with an EV will simply never be practical.
EVs are perfectly fine with slightly more range and as long as your destination has a charger. The human body needs breaks at least every 250 miles or so. An EV with a true 300 mi range where you need to stop and pee or eat anyway is perfectly adequate with current technology.
The current pain points are:
1) Lack of charging at the destination. So you drive 250 miles and then need to come back some amount of distance.
2) Not having charging at home so departing with a near dead battery.
3) The rarity of actu
Re: (Score:2)
I see the problem is that it has to be BEV-only or bust. I think there is room for longer-range hybrid (40-60 mile) which would be excellent for the rental market. Then when you want to go out of town on a road trip, you rent one of those which has an essentially unlimited range range and only needs fuel stations every 300 miles or so..
Re: (Score:2)
If the Biden administration really wants to make EVs more practical, they should be finding ways to get chargers in places where people actually live and work and shop. The problem is that, right now, unless you own a house with a garage, you can't charge. Chargers every 50 miles isn't going to help that.
If they want to make EVs more practical, the Biden administration needs to force apartments to provide a sensible way to charge the residents' cars. (not the current state of 2 stalls for a 500-unit complex, and not using a monopoly to gouge people)
It's insane that brand new apartments with parking garages are being built without even a regular 120 or 240V outlet at each space.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't need chargers every 50 miles to make EVs practical.
Have you seen the kind of jalopies some people drive? We're not talking about highways filled with late model Teslas, the future is also going to include old Nissan Leafs held together with prayers and duct tape. You gotta remember, there are no smog checks for BEVs - some people will be keeping theirs on the road until the wheels literally fall off.
You better believe they'll be topping off their extremely degraded batteries every 50 miles.
It's not just that. Tesla has frequent chargers, too. Think about:
That last one is the big one. Tesla makes about one in ten cars bought in California, but probably make
West Texas? (Score:2, Insightful)
I've been in some pretty remote parts of Texas on I-10 and I would guess there's barely a gas station every 50 miles. There's definitely no gas station between Marathon and Big Bend NP on US-385 and that's way more than 50 miles. US-385 between I-40 and Hartley also breaks the 50 mile gas station rule and it's a reasonably trafficked road (if you are driving between Dallas and Denver you'll pass through here).
I think this idea is really great in principle to guarantee that one can travel across the count
Re: (Score:2)
One difference with the charging stations is you don't need to have someone available to run it, and you don't need to truck in tankers of gas to be stored. At most they should require a restroom and garbage disposal which would be the areas needing the most service.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like an excellent target for teenage vandals. How long before they're rife with graffiti and toppled chargers?
Re: West Texas? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So are restrooms, traffic signs, etc. The solution is simple: Do maintenance. If the problem gets too bad, do some cameras. These vandals got there in a car. Cars have license plates. Also, teen usually carry cell phones. Maybe add a nice sign "Vandalizing this charging station carries a $1000 fee just for the repair technician to get here. You have been warned."
Seriously. This is a solved problem. You just need to _care_ to use one of the established solutions.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. The usual naysayers only see potential problems, they do not see the advantages. Building a charging station you need to get power there (bury a cable next time you do road maintenance...). OTOH, if you have cell-reception, there will already be power nearby. Other than that they can be easily combined with a regular rest stop.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's reasonable to assume that an electric car with a 50-100 mile range isn't going to travel coast-to-coast.
What about a vehicle with a 150 mile range? What if one of the charging stations is out of order? Every 50 miles is a perfectly reasonable plan if your goal is to stop use of fossil fuels for transportation, but you want to keep the cars viable. Because here's the deal Jack, Biden still has to court corporations because he's still an establishment candidate. And that means not kicking big oil in the dick completely. And both the roads and the tires are made out of petroleum products.
From an efficiency and p
Re: (Score:2)
You are not wrong about the need for a working rail system in the US. But establishing these takes a lot of time and most countries found out that usually these need to be done by the state as private rail does not work very well overall and is more of a niche solution.
With the irrational love of cars in the US, this just faces too much resistance IMO. The examples that this is superior and works well are all over the planet after all.
Re: (Score:2)
I-10 has Tesla Superchargers about a hundred miles apart. 50 miles is a nice aspiration, but it won't work on every highway. I believe this is a grant program, so odds are there will be no applications for some of those.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Presumable over the next 8 years private businesses will open or add to their property. I imagine in Texas BucEEs would love the subsidies as half hour charging mean a captive customer to buy their $10 chips. Which are a bargain. Made in store.
I would suggest the congress needs to pas a law making destruction of charging stations a felony wi
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't driven West Texas, but I've done Nevada on US 50. At one point, there was a broad valley with absolutely nothing in that I could see except for a wind farm. I'm given to understand that much of Texas is also prime for wind power. This could work out.
As if that needs a mandate (Score:2)
Think for a moment: Even fast charging takes well over half an hour. What will people do while waiting for their car to charge? They'll sit down at your restaurant and eat. I mean, if I have to wait for my car to charge, I can as well eat here instead of somewhere else, right?
But I'm sure gas stations will lament and demand compensation for having to upsell their crap.
Re:As if that needs a mandate (Score:5, Insightful)
Think for a moment: Even fast charging takes well over half an hour.
It does if your battery is totally empty and you charge it to 100%, but that's not a good plan. Deep discharges reduce battery lifespan. And 100% charges take a long time. What you want is to keep it above 50 miles of reserve capacity, and then charge it to 90% or so, and that's likely going to take well less than half an hour. Keeping capacity in it means that if the charger is out of order, you can get to the next one (or the last one) and not charging it fully is both faster, and better for the battery as well (although not super-relevant when you're going to discharge it immediately anyway, to be fair.)
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's really more of an aspiration and a grant program than a mandate. The mandate is only specifications for what qualifies for the grant money.
Oh, and your half hour number is wrong. You don't want to fast charge over 80%, as that's where it really slows down, and you don't show up at zero. You can charge Model Y from 20% to 80% in 20 minutes at a 150 kW Supercharger, and faster at a 250 kW charger. I would expect that with new chargers and cars that are designed to take good advantage of them
Re: (Score:2)
The first 20%, if you actually come in at zero, would be really fast. The last 20% isn't something you would bother with when charging stations are plentiful. I'm taking a long EV road trip this summer, and there are only two places where I'll need to charge past 80% to be comfortable.
Re: (Score:2)
60% charge in a model Y equals 200 miles. So assuming you're driving across the country at 80 mph, you'd have to stop every 2.5 hours for 20 minutes.
Re: (Score:2)
Think of it as:
The "emergency/reserve" tank goes from 0->10.
The "normal" tank goes from 20->80.
The "long range/extra" tank goes from 80->100.
You want to be using the "normal" tank most of the time.
Use the "long range"+reserve tank when the stops between stations are longer than you can do with the normal tank.
I think this is great... (Score:2)
I think that this is exactly what federal funding should be doing, building out the infrastructure for high-speed charging for road trips, because for road trips you need expensive, high speed chargers, and there have to be a critical mass of them nationally for EVs to be viable for road trips. For overnight charging, those are cheap, slow chargers that should simply be a part of all parking structures, road parking, etc. Keep in mind that for charging overnight for average daily driving, even a standard 12
plug standard? Tesla station must let any change (Score:2)
plug standard? Tesla station must let any change (and let non dealer repaired Teslas change?)
Re: (Score:3)
USB-C of course.
Re: (Score:2)
Tesla station wouldn't have to let anyone but Tesla customers charge. But it couldn't be counted by state authorities toward the 50 mile requirement, so they'll have to put in a competing, open station. The plug standard will no doubt be specified in the regulation, and will be non-proprietary.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The standard is J1772-CCS1. Every car sold in North America uses it except Tesla, and Tesla has an adapter.
And Tesla is in the process of rolling out CCS1 cords to their supercharger network [electrek.co].
Just to drive the point home: The standard is J1772-CCS1.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Sandy Munro has suggested that some of their models would be profitable to build even without the credits, though not very. However, that did include all variants of Model 3. It would still therefore make more sense to build them than to not build them, since it would keep the lights on while they tacked.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like when American motor company we
Re: (Score:2)
So the problem with that is car prices are really inflated right now and Tesla didn't get hit as hard by rising part and material costs. So those numbers are really only valid in the current market.
Nah, this was from long ago. All that means is that they're even more profitable now.
When you can suddenly go out and get a BMW or a Mercedes or Lexus or the lower end a high-end well-spect Honda Accord all of them in EV flavors Tesla's just not going to be able to compete.
Possibly true. They do have the advantage of having their name now strongly associated with EVs. Young people don't give as much of a shit about legacy brands.
It's like when American motor company went out of business. It's the kind of thing nobody would have seen coming and then there it is.
They were only ever occasionally successful. Mostly they were built like shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Also Tesla is synonymous with their CEO and for reasons unknown he just flipped the bird to every young person in the country by siding with the regressives. This means as soon as there are viable alternatives his sales are going to collapse.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. That's the risk of having a pers
Yeah but they'll work with everyone's EVs (Score:2)
Without that money they barely if ever make any money on cars. And that's in a market with almost zero competition due to shortages and the fact that if you want an EV they've been the only serious game in
Re: (Score:3)
It seems that the "never say Tesla" policy is still firmly entrenched in the Biden administration. As a Biden supporter and a Model Y owner I find that all very dis-appointing.
And then Musk announces he is now a Republican.
The Democrats made Musk's business model possible, Tesla would never have reached profitability without credits to carry them through the early days. Musk responded by being a douchebag all day every day, and you want the Democrats to give him a handy? Fuck that guy.
Memo to Democratic politicians: Is anyone listening? Do you really want about a million per year new citizens who bought a Tesla to start learning to be annoyed with this petty picking of corporate winners?
What? Start making sense. The government isn't stroking Musk, so to you that's picking winners?