Dell's New Monitors Have a Dedicated Microsoft Teams Button (theverge.com) 115
Dell is launching three new monitors next month, and all of them come with a dedicated Microsoft Teams button. The Verge reports: Dell claims it has created the "world's first video conferencing monitors certified for Microsoft Teams," after Microsoft started certifying displays, webcams, and headsets last year. Three monitors will be available next month, all offering quick access to Microsoft Teams. The button will let Microsoft Teams users quickly launch the app to make and receive video calls. Hands-free commands will also be supported through Cortana and the built-in microphone.
The Teams button is the main surprise with these displays, but Dell's trio of videoconferencing monitors also have some useful specs designed for an era where remote work and video calling is key. Each includes a 5-megapixel pop-up infrared camera, which supports facial recognition with Windows Hello. Dell also bundles a noise-canceling microphone and dual 5-watt integrated speakers. There's even a built-in mode to reduce blue light emissions. Dell is launching a 24-inch (FHD) version for $519.99, a 27-inch (QHD) model for $719.99, and a curved 34-inch (WQHD) variant for $1,149.99. All three will launch on February 16th. In other Dell-related news, the company has announced new versions of its Latitude laptops with Intel's new 11th Gen vPro chips and new features like an automated, integrated webcam shutter to physically block your camera when it's not in use.
The Teams button is the main surprise with these displays, but Dell's trio of videoconferencing monitors also have some useful specs designed for an era where remote work and video calling is key. Each includes a 5-megapixel pop-up infrared camera, which supports facial recognition with Windows Hello. Dell also bundles a noise-canceling microphone and dual 5-watt integrated speakers. There's even a built-in mode to reduce blue light emissions. Dell is launching a 24-inch (FHD) version for $519.99, a 27-inch (QHD) model for $719.99, and a curved 34-inch (WQHD) variant for $1,149.99. All three will launch on February 16th. In other Dell-related news, the company has announced new versions of its Latitude laptops with Intel's new 11th Gen vPro chips and new features like an automated, integrated webcam shutter to physically block your camera when it's not in use.
Does it come with an skip windows update button (Score:5, Insightful)
Does it come with an skip windows update button??
Man this is an big 1M sales call I can't update now.
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone buying this monitor that isn't 100% in control of their Windows updates need to fire their entire IT department. ... Or find out who hacked their WSUS server.
If it subsidizes the price of the monitors (Score:1)
...I'm all for it! Put a Ctrl-Alt-Delete, BSOD, and Bing button on while at it. (Probably the same thing anyhow.)
Re: (Score:2)
I would have given you the Funny mod if I ever had a point to give.
Ugh. Like, gag me with a running chainsaw! (Score:4, Insightful)
Are people so stupid they REALLY need a Teams button?
REALLY?
Re:Ugh. Like, gag me with a running chainsaw! (Score:5, Insightful)
Since when has Microsoft (and let's face it, this is Microsoft buying space on Dell's products) based their decisions on what people need?
This is all about what Microsoft needs: to make Microsoft Teams ubiquitous and thereby crush Slack.
Re: (Score:1)
Microsoft needs to just buy Slack. Shut that turd down and put Stewart back to work at Tiny Speck as a Microsoft employee..
Get to work Stoot. You're done dilly dallying with crap.
Glitch [wikipedia.org] would make a great addition to the X-Box Game collection.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't suggest there was anything wrong with it. My comment was a reply to the previous poster's assertion that the button is being added because people are too stupid to know how to run Teams without a dedicated hardware button; which is not the case.
Re:Ugh. Like, gag me with a running chainsaw! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
It seemed pretty crap when the company I worked for last year started using Teams, although it was strictly the text features and not video conferencing.
I used Pidgin in a work context 6 years ago, I think with the XMPP protocol, I would much rather use that or even Telegram if it absolutely had to be something people could throw on their trackphones that had a hip-looking interface.
Hell, even Skype was better, but admittedly I haven't used that since 2012, which is I think about the time MS bought it.
Re: (Score:2)
Teams is still pretty crap. It has potential, but Microsoft pushed it out before it's really ready. On the Mac at least it is badly integrated, it won't show notifications using normal Mac notifications, and you won't see the Teams notifications unless you are looking at the screen that has Teams (maybe Microsoft forgets that many people use multiple virtual screens). If you miss the beep, then it's likely you can miss your meeting. Plus once every week or two I need to shut it down and restart it becau
Re: (Score:2)
My condolences for having to deal with Microsoft on top of Apple. That's like arsenic sauce on a turd sandwich.
Where I was, the workstations were a mixed environment where some ran Windows 7 and some were a new flat-UI variant, not sure if it was Windows 8 or 10, I upgraded in my last month there when I was already warming down to quit and never bothered to discern which one. But I do remember I checked Teams a few times on the new OS, and it wasn't any better. It's not about Teams' UI being inconsistent wi
Re: (Score:2)
At what point did an OS agnostic monitor become obsolete? This reminds me too much of those keyboards with special "Internet" and "Mail" keys that would automatically open up Internet Explorer or Outlook Express if you pushed them, but only if you installed the necessary drivers. Worthless stuff that didn't last long that no one used, and even the intended audience who didn't understand computers were being taught to just point and click and not touch the keyboard...
Maybe the earlier commentary was accura
Re: (Score:2)
Are the Teams notifications still coming up behind the native notifications? Not only are they harder to see than native ones, they've even attempted to hide them anyway!
What is it with Microsoft implementing shit they don't need to and behaving differently to native platform apps? Did they hire some of the "UI" people who worked on GIMP?
Re: (Score:2)
Even on Windows: the text boxes aren't native and use a different half-baked spellchecker, etc. The notifications aren't native and are often not noticed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Notifications show up only on the screen that Teams is on, and then they vanish after a few seconds.
Microsoft seems to act a lot like a small company. They hire random people, hope their resume is accurate, then find out they're not very good at their jobs but assign them to customer visible actions anyway. So, bad software design, developers who think they know more than they do (I know how dates work, I know how wide characters work, I spent 12 seconds looking at an i18n page, I know how keyboard layout
How about Signal? (Score:2)
Signal does group video chat now.
No need to use (unencrypted) Telegram.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously we have the technology to send someone a message that they can get later, but to us that defeats the purpose of "instant message" so to Google's in-browser UI we say pound
Re: Ugh. Like, gag me with a running chainsaw! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The little Teams icon in the taskbar is more than sufficient.
Are you some kind of a monster that hates automation and shortcuts? Why have keys at all, there's an onscreen keyboard right? I personally demand users that they *have* to open up Teams in the way that I decide. We should prevent teams from responding to anything other than being clicked on in the taskbar! I'm with you. Who else is with us! Let's chant our battle cry:
No shortcuts
No shortcuts
No shortcuts.
*tab* *enter* NO NO NO wait. I'm sorry. *grabs mouse and clicks continue editing* *use mouse to hit previ
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if you'll be able to do something else with it, or the only options will be Teams, or disable. Like that super useful Bixby button everyone raves about.
Although I can't think of anything useful I'd want to do with a button that you have to reach up to the monitor to press all the time. If you were going to put a button like this anywhere, why not your branded keyboards???
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You think that's stupid? I have a windows button on my keyboard, and it actually does something in Linux. Who is Linux pretending to be. Why do we even have buttons!
Who am I controlling when I hit control?
Why does my hair not die itself blue when I hit alt?
This post brought to you by 104 buttons. Because that's how many it takes to point out how stupid you are for attempting to call out other people for being stupid simply because they have a shortcut button.
Re: (Score:2)
Look at the bright side: if this becomes commonplace, it'll be repurposed for something usetul in serious operating systems, like the Win keyboard key has been. I'm all for more input options for free, even if it bears a Microsoft logo.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like the stupid Netflix button on your remote. It's an ad, it's not there to help you access the service.
The one on my Nvidia shield pisses me off and makes me not want to subscribe to Netflix. It's right in the way, too easy to press by mistake. It can be disable for some reason that breaks the BBC iPlayer app. Maybe I should just stop watching the BBC.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like the stupid Netflix button on your remote. It's an ad, it's not there to help you access the service.
Roku's remote also says hi!
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I hate stuff like this.
Why a Teams button? Why not an Outlook button, or a File Explorer button? Is Microsoft so bad at building UIs that they can’t come up with a way to launch applications in software?
When I buy hardware that I intend on keeping for years, I don’t want the design to be determined by what Microsoft’s marketing team believes will make me use the product that they’re pushing this month. I want something generic and future-proof, so it’ll continue to
MSN Messenger button? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can you simlink (or whatever the windows equivalent is) the msn exe with some other command?
Can I please get.... (Score:2)
All I'd like is a friggin' on/off button for my phone. If we can get a Teams button, can I get a button that simply turns off my phone no matter what app I'm in?!
--
You go around the circle to sanity, and on the other end of the circle, close to insanity, but not insanity, is unsanity. - Sidney Cohen
Re: (Score:2)
I just want the button that evil-parallel-universe Captain Kirk had in his quarters. Yeah, that button.
Re: (Score:1)
zoom-zoom creimer?
Zoom? [youtube.com]
Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
If your company is using teams then the app is open all time anyway to receive notifications and calls. Thus rendering the button useless.
If you aren't using teams then a dedicated button is useless.
So what is the point?
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. It'll never be used except maybe in some pointless demonstration.
Re: (Score:2)
If your company is using teams then the app is open all time anyway to receive notifications and calls. Thus rendering the button useless.
If you aren't using teams then a dedicated button is useless.
So what is the point?
You're forgetting the 15 times a day your computer bluescreens, decides to install Windows Updates, or some other stupid app can't update files so it needs to reboot. Of course Teams might just crash on its own too--so you'll be hammering the hell out of the button...
Re: Why? (Score:2)
Wait, Windows STILL doesn't have persistent session state?
Re: (Score:1)
Oh no, this wasn't put in to be useful for users, it was put in so Dell could extract money from Microsoft and a manager there could collect a fat bonus.
Re: (Score:2)
I suspect every so mildly useful, to the point of being trivially useful, when you have full screen apps all the time. Thus a light or button or some element that says "yes, I know you can hear voices still but I'm reminding you that you're still in a meeting in the background so don't make any funny bathroom noises!" And I suspect there are still clueless people at Microsoft that think people use their stupid Windows 10 full screen apps on their 4K 32" monitors instead of the desktop.
But no, people with
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thus rendering the button useless.
If it's anything like the teams button on other devices it will allow you to answer calls without unlocking your PC. Quite useful when you've been slacking off at the TV and suddenly hear the home office PC ring.
Gross (Score:3)
>"Dell is launching three new monitors next month, and all of them come with a dedicated Microsoft Teams button"
Gross. Good thing I have no interest in Dell equipment!
driver/software (Score:2)
Why have a Teams button when you can have a pr0n button instead?
Re: (Score:2)
No, seriously. I've literally never used it, so I don't know. But if it is so widespread then of course someone has worked out how to make it serve pr0n.
In fact, I can work out the USP already : select one of your windows for (say) that bitch from Human Remains, and the Pr0nTeam add-in (see, it's got a name already) searches pr0nTube (you know what I mean) for video of someone similar-looking getting done doggy-style by a Gloucester Old Spot, and overlays the DeepFaked
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking more of a Boss Key implementation that flips between pr0n, Desktop, and Teams.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I like your idea. I have kids at home and my wife isn't going to appreciate Teams meeting deepfakes of my female coworkers. Its one of those choose your battles things.
Its funny, I still go to the office. We social distance by having meetings from our desks on Teams, while wearing masks. Such joy. The boss could be walking by, or one of my coworkers that does not sit at a desk all day.
Clearly we agree that the button should be configurable. Pr0nTeam should support the button, perhaps as enable/disable.
Re: (Score:2)
That way went Roku... (Score:2)
Yes, I know. Dell is taking the cash and running with it to the bank.
I need a new 16x10 (Score:2)
I have a couple of Dell U2412M (1920x1200). I hope they last for a LOOOONG time, because I don't see any replacements.
They are good for daily use, with the extra vertical real estate, but for multimedia work they are almost priceless. Being able to have a full-screen 1920x1080 AND room for controls on the same screen saves a tremendous amount of head turning and lifting (side by side or vertically stacked monitors).
I would buy a new 3840x2400 (24 inch to 32 inch) tomorrow, if I could find one, even if it
Re: (Score:2)
I would buy a new 3840x2400 (24 inch to 32 inch) tomorrow, if I could find one
Just go to Costco or Walmart and buy a 4K TV.
Years ago, a dedicated computer monitor had a faster response time and better pixel density. That is no longer true. The only difference between a modern TV and a "monitor" is the price.
My "computer monitor" is a 60-inch 4K TV from Costco. I can display 8 letter-sized pages with no overlap. I paid $329.
Re: (Score:2)
A 4K television is going to be 3840x2160. It's also going to be huge, since they don't make smaller 4K televisions. I have a 4K 24" monitor. I don't want a big honking 60" TV on my desk. Well, maybe if it was one of the 8K televisions.
I actually don't know of any 16:10 3840x2400 (such as used by the IBM T221) monitors still in production. There's a handful of 4096x2160 monitors out there, which I assume are aimed at the cinema market since movies actually use a slightly wider than 16:9 ratio. They are
Re: (Score:2)
A 4K television is going to be 3840x2160. It's also going to be huge, since they don't make smaller 4K televisions. I have a 4K 24" monitor.
Walmart has 32" 4K TVs. Is that small enough?
Re: (Score:1)
So get two $329 monitors. Or a second smaller one for the 'space left over' stuff.
Re: I need a new 16x10 (Score:1)
Re: I need a new 16x10 (Score:2)
No you don't.
Re: I need a new 16x10 (Score:1)
Those of you old enough... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, that was more of a late 90's - early 2000's thing.
I've found that if you dig up one of these keyboards, most of the buttons will still work with Windows 10, though the IE button most likely will load up Edge by default.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
2020 keyboard here. Mine still has buttons to open up browsers, mail, search, errr.. there's three other buttons there that I don't know what they do. Comically I have an "eject" button too although I've not had a computer with a CD drive this decade. I do actively use my brightness buttons, my play, stop, back, and forward buttons a lot though.
So what you're saying is you expect the teams button to be here still in 30 years after Microsoft has abandoned teams? That actually is quite a likely outcome.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been using various Microsoft Natural keyboards for a few decades now. I don't think I ever used the web, search, or mail buttons. The favorites buttons I did use for a short time, but no longer. The volume buttons have always been useful. But the one extra button I use all the time is the calculator button. It's right there by the numeric keypad that I'll be using to enter my calculation, so it makes total sense (at least to me).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I remember when mice had three buttons, and no other controls on the top or sides. For scrolling a page, you had a lot of options: (a) arrow keys, (b) PgUp/PgDn, (c) dragging the scrollbar (or the page itself) with the mouse. To me, a scroll wheel is a bit like those IE/email keys. It also makes middle clicking much harder, so it actually gets in the way of doing unixy things.
I get the impression that everything that we used to do on keyboards is moving to dedicated appliance buttons and knobs on mice, a
And for security ...? (Score:2)
Each includes a 5-megapixel pop-up infrared camera, which supports facial recognition with Windows Hello. Dell also bundles a noise-canceling microphone and dual 5-watt integrated speakers.
Does it come with a hardware off switch for the camera and microphone? (TFA doesn't say)
'Cause, otherwise, no sale. (Ignoring the unwanted and stupid "Teams" button and Cortana integration.)
Re: (Score:2)
Your very quote says pop-up. Which (usually) means if you pop it back down it physically can’t see you. So not only in the article, but actually in your quote!
Re: (Score:2)
Your very quote says pop-up. Which (usually) means if you pop it back down it physically can’t see you. So not only in the article, but actually in your quote!
True, but it could still be on while not popped-up -- obviously, it *shouldn't* see anything like that, but that's not definitive at the moment and it says it's also IR so it could see heat through whatever it's in... Furthermore, what if it pops up on its own and/or the latch gets broken and won't stay down ...
Just sayin' a dedicated HW switch would be nice.
Re: (Score:2)
True, but it could still be on while not popped-up -- obviously, it *shouldn't* see anything like that, but that's not definitive at the moment and it says it's also IR so it could see heat through whatever it's in
That's not how IR cameras work. Despite TV and movies pretending otherwise, thermal cameras can't see through most materials. All you can see is the surface temp of the material you are looking at, or for highly IR reflective surfaces like glass you will see reflections from your side of the glass. So if the camera is on, it could only see the IR emissions from the plastic or whatever is in front of it. Even if you pressed your face against the monitor where the camera is, your "image" would most likely be
Sorry, boss (Score:3)
Every time I'm asked to join a Teams conference, I mess up and hit the power button instead.
Re: (Score:1)
Calling it a "button" is generous (Score:1)
It's more like a faint impression on a flat panel that's probably going to be annoying to anyone who prefers a little tactile feedback in their buttons.
Product placement (Score:5, Insightful)
Dell isn't doing this because customers want it, or because they think it will be helpful to their customers. It's paid product placement, pure and simple.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah it's standard business integration through devices. I'm not sure why this surprises anyone. What with Lync phones or Skype for Business products or whatever the damn things have been called through history. These business apps have always had products with dedicated buttons for functionality, not so different than my keyboard at home having dedicated buttons for controlling music playback.
Hell my Dell monitor had not only *two* dedicated Lync buttons but was also the place I plugged in my headset, and t
Remap That Button (Score:1)
Who can come up with creative ideas of what that button should be remapped to?
Why would Microsoft be supporting (Score:2)
That's bold pricing. (Score:2)
I guess if you really hate cables, or the
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably aimed at Enterprise, where you always pay substantially more for substantially less. I think it's a law or something.
At my last job, they bought us $500 HP monitors to replace the Dell monitors we had (nevermind what they spent on actual computers themselves just to switch vendors!). My HP monitors were essentially like-in-kind replacements for my Dells (size, resolution, refresh rates, etc.), but over twice the price, new. I still can't fathom why they spent over $1000 on two basic 24" FHD
Why not a CueCat? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Typical Dell (Score:2)
They always sucked on the teet of Microsoft, Intel, and typically, both.
How about customizable button? (Score:2)
Let the users customize it!
How does it work? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
These Dell Business monitors almost always have a USB hub with ports built in. My guess is that USB cable will have to be plugged in.
Re:How does it work? Sadly not so cool (Score:1)
Teams isn't bad, if versions were in sync (Score:2)
I've had to use basically every conferencing software out there, in the past months. Teams is probably the most comfortable, and provided Windows/Mac/Linux versions. I just wish those versions would stay in sync. It's really irritating for different people on different platforms to have different features available to them. Assuming a decent architecture, it really doesn't even make sense - it ought to be relatively easy to push features on all versions at the same time.
Those of us on the technical side of
Re: (Score:2)
Sure..... (Score:2)
More future useless app specific buttons that can't be reprogrammed like my roku remote. yay
Not 4k, not for me (Score:2)
Once you have a 4k monitor, you never want to do without. Unless you can get your hands on a 5k monitor...
subsidize (Score:1)
Everybody has to subsidize ms now.
Teams is fine, app-enabled hardware is bad (Score:2)
Look, I use Teams every day. My company tried out Mattermost and Slack, but we're a big old corporation that is already in the Microsoft ecosystem, so we use Teams because it's 'free'. It's fine. It's not the best, but they update it faster and more often than any other piece of Microsoft software I've ever used.
But hardware should never have any buttons for anything that are specific to a single App. Not even Apple hardware does that. Hardware being tied to specific apps just means twice as many things to
Monitors was the only Dell' products worth buying (Score:2)
was is the key word here
But I jsut spent all that time eradicating Teams! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Remember: (Score:2)
There is no "I" in "Teams". You're right but there's an M and a E.
Re: (Score:2)
But I checked, there is no U in Teams either.