Electric Car Sales Triple In Race To Meet Europe CO2 Rules (arstechnica.com) 167
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: One in 10 new cars sold across Europe this year will be electric or plug-in hybrid, triple last year's sales levels after carmakers rolled out new models to meet emissions rules, according to projections from green policy group Transport & Environment. The market share of mostly electric cars will rise to 15 percent next year, the group forecasts, as carmakers across the continent race to cut their CO2 levels. The projections are based on sales data for the first half of the year, as well as expected increases as manufacturers scramble to comply with tightening restrictions in 2021.
Under the rules, carmakers must reduce the average emissions from their vehicles to 95g of CO2 per km or face fines that could run into billions of euros. In the first six months of the year, average emissions fell from 122g to 111g, the largest six-month drop in more than a decade. While five percent of the cars sold this year are excluded from the calculations, a concession from the EU to help carmakers ease into the new regime, every vehicle counts towards the total from next year. [...] Several carmakers are still lagging behind the new rules, according to T&E calculations, requiring a late spurt of electric sales, or the purchase of credits from a rival that has already exceeded the rules if they are to avoid large fines. The system allows those who have generated "credits" by selling pure electric cars or plug-in hybrids to sell them to rivals that are struggling to meet the rules. The value of credits falls over time.
Under the rules, carmakers must reduce the average emissions from their vehicles to 95g of CO2 per km or face fines that could run into billions of euros. In the first six months of the year, average emissions fell from 122g to 111g, the largest six-month drop in more than a decade. While five percent of the cars sold this year are excluded from the calculations, a concession from the EU to help carmakers ease into the new regime, every vehicle counts towards the total from next year. [...] Several carmakers are still lagging behind the new rules, according to T&E calculations, requiring a late spurt of electric sales, or the purchase of credits from a rival that has already exceeded the rules if they are to avoid large fines. The system allows those who have generated "credits" by selling pure electric cars or plug-in hybrids to sell them to rivals that are struggling to meet the rules. The value of credits falls over time.
It's a mystery (Score:4, Insightful)
Driving my Model Y I often wonder why the vast majority of people seem to have to be forced into making a better decision for themselves.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
That's likely true, at least once. But the repair to the fuel system afterward might dwarf the one-time utility.
Re: (Score:3)
"I can pour just about any volatile flammable into my car's gas tank and get some degree of locomotion out of it." Hey, I tried that once! My old VW bus ran out of gas on the SFOakland Bay bridge. Didn't have AAA roadside towing, but reached for the Coleman "white gas" camping fuel is what I did. It survived the rest of ride with noticeable "knock", but it worked. Now I'm a Tesla driver with no range anxiety whatsoever.
I can feed my horse grass (Score:4, Funny)
Re:It's a mystery (Score:5, Insightful)
Snark aside, electrics are certainly the way to go if you're willing to plan your journeys
I'm using my Renault Zoe mainly for work, and my daily commute is 140 km (88 mi), which is usually considered higher than average. There's no range anxiety, nor any planning whatsoever.
"Willing to plan your journeys" is not a huge consideration, in my opinion. When I look back on 4 years of driving this car, I've had to plan my journey maybe twice a year.
But then again, maybe I live a boring life :D
Re: (Score:2)
It's such a good little car. I've now gone to a Zoe 50, and it's really excellent. You might want to join Renault Zoe Owners Club (RZOC), if you haven't already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Snark aside, electrics are certainly the way to go if you're willing to plan your journeys
I'm using my Renault Zoe mainly for work, and my daily commute is 140 km (88 mi), which is usually considered higher than average. There's no range anxiety, nor any planning whatsoever.
"Willing to plan your journeys" is not a huge consideration, in my opinion.
I drive long distances semi-regularly, long enough that planning is required... but not by me. I get in the car (Tesla) and tell it where I'm going, and it figures out where I need to stop and charge. I suppose if I were driving far enough that I need to spend nights at hotels, I would want to do a little planning myself to make sure I pick hotels with chargers.
But, I agree, in practice planning isn't really an issue.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We had two chargers in the next street over (about 5 minutes walking) but now the municipality has added four! additional chargers right across our house as well (N/W Europe). My parents have their own driveway so if I need to charge there, I do so with a 220V charger.
Electric cars here have been getting affordable, due to second-hand vehicles getting available.
Re: (Score:2)
The days of needing to plan are largely over in developed countries with half decent charging infrastructure. In any case many EVs have decent navigation systems that can do most of the work for you.
Affordable EVs in the GBP 30k range will get you a solid 250 miles on the motorway, so it's actually extremely difficult to run out of energy.
Re: (Score:2)
if you're willing to plan your journeys
That's funny because the only time I've ever had to "plan" a part of my journey is when driving a petrol vehicle which may or may not need a refill along the way. Comparatively I've never refilled an electric car mid journey, and pretty much every time I've gotten in it the battery has been full.
If you're planning then you're either doing something wrong, or going on a seriously epic adventure which should really be planned out anyway ;-)
Re: It's a mystery (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm confused. I do. How's that affect the charging station at my parking spot?
Re: (Score:3)
That depends where you live. Where I live (Montreal Canada) the power company has been adding street chargers [gouv.qc.ca] based on how often the existing chargers are used.
Re: It's a mystery (Score:2)
It wasn't cheap and it'd be quite the chore to get an SUV in.
Re: (Score:2)
electrics are certainly the way to go if you're willing to plan your journeys
While it may be true, I really don't get the thought process behind sentences like these. How many Priuses do you see kitted out as work vehicles for plumbers and electricians? When was the last time you saw a realtor driving someone around in an F-350s? No one says, "sedans are fine, so long as you're willing to rent a U-Haul to move", or, "convertibles are great if you're able to borrow a friend's truck for trips to Home Depot". Different vehicles are suited to different tasks, with most vehicles able to
Re: (Score:2)
When was the last time you saw a realtor driving someone around in an F-350s?
F-350? Never, that I can recall (nor any 'dually'). F-250, Suburban, Excursion, Land Cruiser, Land Rover... somewhat often. Realtors I can give a pass to, as in Texas, many properties are rather rural, and something that can reliably make it out of
Re: (Score:2)
When was the last time you saw a realtor driving someone around in an F-350s?
F-350? Never, that I can recall (nor any 'dually'). F-250, Suburban, Excursion, Land Cruiser, Land Rover... somewhat often.
Hah, yeah, I hear you. I specifically picked the F-350 just because I have seen realtors in exactly the sorts of other vehicles you mentioned, what with it being Texas and all. Of course, the point I was trying to make was simply that we pick different vehicles for different use cases, so if you know that you'll be driving 500 miles every single day, a typical EV would likely not make much sense (yet?), in the same way that a Prius would make a poor work vehicle for a plumber, yet none of us dish on Priuses
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are a lot more electric points than fossil fuel outlets. Electric grid is available just about everywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Naturally resistant to upheaving the status quo
Probably have concerns about infrastructure/range
Put off by the large up-front cost of a new vehicle
Re: (Score:2)
concerns like the nearest charging station not even within the range of the vehicle so you're stuck with up to 12 hours in the garage or on an outiet somewhere provided you didn't get arrested for stealing electricity, yeah. a "concern" LOLZ.
Face it, for most in the USA, it would be incredibly DUMB to buy an electric car in 2020. Internal combustion is the only path forward.
Re: (Score:2)
ICE has pretty much reached its limit of efficiency so no, Internal combustion is not the way forward
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if you've noticed but electricity is available everywhere.
I bought an electric car 5 years ago. Since then I've saved about $25,000 on fuel and maintenance (electric cars don't need maintenance).
Even Consumer Reports says that 5 year total cost of ownership for EV is $10,000 to $15,000 less than ICE.
Only DUMB people are buying ICE cars. "A fool and his money"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
TCO over 5 years is $10,000 to $15,000 less than ICE.
(Reminds me of those fools a few years ago who got "free" phones but were locked into costly service contracts. Fools only look at price.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap is usually more expensive in the long run.
Sorry about your current financial condition.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought you didn't have enough money to buy a Model Y
Re: (Score:2)
Re: It's a mystery (Score:2)
So why haven't you bought a Model Y?
Re: (Score:2)
Cost and holdover.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Biggest reason? Cost..
Yes, it works out cheaper over time, but EVs are still 1/3 to twice what you can get an equivalent car(This includes shopping around to find an functional equivalent from another manufacturer.)..
Between that and the perceived range limitations(Something you get used to and isn't a problem after the first few weeks and will become less as fast charging spreads more and more EVs are on the road) it makes people hesitant..
This method will make petrol/diesel cars more expensive over time and at the same time EV costs will come down so if you REALLY need 1000km of range and can refuel in 5 mins, you can get them, you'll just pay for that.. In the same way you pay a premium if you want to get a 7 seat minivan or a SUV instead of a little hatchback..
I'm doing an EV conversion and it'll still cost me about AU$20k to do it all up and it'll only give me about 150km of range if I'm lucky.. And can get a brand new petrol car with a 500km range for that price.. Where the cheapest EV is about AU$40-50k.. (And Teslas are a LOT more, proper luxury car money)
Re: (Score:2)
i'm still not entirely sure why people who want to be frugal about cars or environmentalism don't just spend somewhere about $2000 - $3000 (freedom bux) on a late 90's or so geo or similar econobox.
cheap, plentiful parts
40+ MPG
more than sufficient for daily driving
the environmental impact on something like that has to be far, far lower than a newly minted car made out of the tears of minor miners and puppy dog tails. It doesn't look glamour, and lacks the green-washing street cred, but financially it would
Re: (Score:2)
It's also not just the cost of fuel, but also shedding of consumables(belts, break pads, clutch pads, etc) and frequent oil changes and other stuff.. This does balance against heavy EVs and their increased tyre wear.
In my case, I'm taking a tiny car from the early 80's and making it into a fun and cheapish EV.
Total kerb weight will be about 700-800kg.. And about for $2/100km of driving and near zero wear on any consumables.
Service every 2-3 years should be 'change gearbox oil, check break pads and fluids'..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here in BC, there seems to be a lot of Japanese used cars, vans and SUv's on the road, all right hand drive. They're relatively cheap, you can get models that are none existent here, 4x4 diesel vans, little cab over 4x4's, nice looking Landcruisers, Nissan Skylines etc. What I don't know is parts availability.
New vs Used (Score:2)
As somebody with "good credit", I have to agree - last 3 times I've checked, the prices for "newer used" and "new" were so close that once you factored in the higher interest rate for used, balanced in the increased warranty for new, unknown service history for used, and such that new came out to be the better deal.
A little more money, but an increased chance to get precisely what I want, along with full warranty and all that.
Re: (Score:2)
Tesla uses bait and switch on their website, showing the price of a Tesla which includes "savings" all the way through to checkout. And even with a very generous bullshit estimate (that every owner drives 10,000 miles in a day) the savings only work out to $4500 over 6 years that still doesn't close the pr
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on your spending habit I guess (Score:2)
That's quite fast. That would cost me $18 to get it that fast. Usually takes me a week.
I think that depends on how much you charge, how old your card is, etc... Might depend upon your bank as well.
I know that last time I called up to report that my card was failing(IE the magnetic stripe was starting to get iffy on swipes), they offered to overnight me a new one for free.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Driving my Model Y I often wonder why the vast majority of people seem to have to be forced into making a better decision for themselves.
Driving my Model Y I often wonder why the vast majority of people seem to have to be forced into making a better decision for themselves.
The reason you wonder is apparently that you don't understand other people have different tastes and values from you.
And if all Model Y owners are as arrogant and condescending that is sure to be a big turn off as well. I'll pass on being part of that club.
Re: (Score:2)
The vast majority of people can't spend $50K or more on a car.
Re: (Score:2)
Driving my Model Y I often wonder why the vast majority of people seem to have to be forced into making a better decision for themselves.
I often wonder how some people can't imagine what life is like outside of their affluent bubble. The vast majority of people can't afford a car that starts at $50,000 and needs a parking place with an electric hookup.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's only a mystery when your horizon is limited (Score:5, Informative)
You see, people have different needs based on how and where they live.
For example, we live in terraced houses, and there's only on-street parking available --> No way you could possibly charge an electric, the next 2x set of chargers (22kW) is about 300m from here (very close by local standards!), and it's always crowded (by an e-scooter company's electric trucks - the ones they use to collect all their electric scooters at night and charge them in a garage nearby... hey, the future!).
Let's go back two weeks: We drove to family (SO's mother) to live & work from there for a week. Within 8 hours of arrival, our toddler became severely ill with respiratory symptoms (just like toddlers sometimes do!), and due to concerns for her and her grandmother's wellbeing (Covid-19?), we immediately drove home again to see our pediatrician at home.
With any electric car, this would have been impossible, as their range is always less than twice the distance we need to see any part of family, and a simple wall outlet where any of our family lives only provides 2.3 kW for charging, leaving us with less than the needed range after a few hours of sleep. We would have had to find a *very fast* charging station on our way home, or opt for an ambulance, or see a foreign pediatrician - all with the risk of locking us in quarantine for 14 days, depending on the ever-changing corona rules.
Then, charging is not cheap: With about 0.27 €/kWh at the very least, and about 18 kWh/100km on average (Tesla), it would have cost 4.86 €.
Our BMW 330e (PHEV) consumes about 5.5 l/100km when no additional electricity is used, resulting in 6,60 €/100km - not a difference you would base a buying decision on (on Covid-terms, being reduced to 10000 km/year due to home office) it means about 130 € per year more than an electric would use.
Also, it's significantly cheaper to lease than a Tesla 3 (about 70€/month). The only "economy" a PHEV or electric provides right now is reduced taxation for private use of company cars (like mine).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
One word: Price.
A model 3 costs 50 000+ euros and my current car cost 9 000 euros.
Re: It's a mystery (Score:2)
You're 0 for 2 (Score:2)
The Model Y starts at $49,990 and is a compact SUV.
The Model 3 is the sedan and starts at $37,990. There is a $35K version that's available "off menu" in that you must call Tesla to order it.
Re: (Score:2)
The Model Y starts at $49,990 and is a compact SUV.
The Model 3 is the sedan and starts at $37,990. There is a $35K version that's available "off menu" in that you must call Tesla to order it.
Or you can be both economical and green by driving your old car instead of manufacturing a new one.
My 1999 Lexus SUV hit 314,000 miles recently, runs and looks great.
No plans to replace it, but when I do it will probably be a good used car.
Re: (Score:3)
Was just pointing out that Russki3433 was basing his rant on erroneous information.
I agree it's not feasible for everyone to go out and buy a new vehicle. For those that do, KBB report the average transaction price for a light vehicle is now $38,635 [kbb.com]. So the Model Y's still a bit up there, but the Model 3 fits that nicely. Add in the fuel savings and it makes even more sense - if you spent $2K a year for gas it'll become $500 a year for charging. That $1500 a year savings adds up.
I kept my last car 13 y
Re: (Score:2)
Was just pointing out that Russki3433 was basing his rant on erroneous information.
I agree it's not feasible for everyone to go out and buy a new vehicle. For those that do, KBB report the average transaction price for a light vehicle is now $38,635 [kbb.com]
That's why a lot of people buy used. I got my kid a 2011 Subaru Forester last year for $7500. It looks and runs great and she's very happy with it. The 4 cylinder engine isn't as fuel efficient as I'd hoped but with the amount of driving she does it's like $25/month in gas. I don't think there are any charging stations at her college anyway.
I looked at some used hybrids and EV's but had concerns about the long-term reliability. I just have no experience with them, and articles telling me things like "T
Re: (Score:2)
Nice first car. Mine was a 74 Honda Civic that I bought in 83 - ran great, though no AC which would have been nice in south Texas (lived just outside of Corpus Christi).
Understandable, I did a bit of research on battery life before taking the plunge - especially after reading about the issues with the early Nissan Leaf. Nissan did not use a thermal management system, which resulted in short battery life in hot parts of the country. Tesla seems to have battery management down, just before I bought my 3 th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
15k / 10 years.
And that's only on fuel.
Maintenance savings can be as low as 10k, or triple that if you compare to a shit brand ICE.
LOL (Score:3)
Detailed analysis by...
I see you increased the $0.13/kWh average electric price that Rei used to $0.30 kWh, which means you're being rather deceitful in trying to pass off what you posted as though it were her analysis.
...long time slashdot reader Rei
You do know what that number means, don't you?
Based on the EPA Fuel Economy, my Model 3 uses 26 kWh/100 miles [fueleconomy.gov]. Based on their test procedures [fueleconomy.gov]:
After running the successive city cycles, the battery is recharged from a normal AC source and the energy consumption of the vehicle is determined (in kW-hr/mile or kW-hr/100 miles) by dividing the kilowatt-hours of energy to recharge the battery by the miles traveled by the vehicle.
that 26 kWh/100 includes all the losses incurred by charging and discharging the battery. This negates your justification for almost tripp
Re: (Score:2)
...long time slashdot reader Rei
You do know what that number means, don't you?
Not sure what you're getting at there... Low uid epeen measuring aside, someone with a uid in the 120k range has been here around twenty years. That qualifies as "a long time" for most humans, and your 4-digit uid isn't more than 2-3 years older than his.
Re: (Score:2)
You have a strange interest in Elon's genitals (Score:2)
As far as real world data, I covered that in this topic [slashdot.org], short summary:
I suspect that anonymous coward was you as well considering how interested they were in Elon's genitals.
Re: (Score:2)
It's certainly not necessarily greener to buy a new low-emissions car rather than keep running an old one, although calculating the cut-off is going to require some guesswork as to how much emissions in new cars will improve over time. But "SUV" and "economical" in the same paragraph feels like an oxymoron.
Re: (Score:2)
It's certainly not necessarily greener to buy a new low-emissions car rather than keep running an old one, although calculating the cut-off is going to require some guesswork as to how much emissions in new cars will improve over time. But "SUV" and "economical" in the same paragraph feels like an oxymoron.
Big families need big vehicles like SUV's and minivans. Maybe minivans lack style but they have tremendous utility.
Of course when I'm driving alone I still have to bring all that metal with me.
Don't forget aging people too (Score:2)
It isn't just big families that need the SUV/minivan anymore though.
I figure that you have a lot of "stealth" disabled people out there as well. Due to mileage requirements, cars have gotten lower over the years.
My mom isn't considered disabled enough to get a permanent parking pass, but she has a condition where she can't lift herself up out of a low seat if she's been in it ~15 minutes or more. IE most drives.
In a low car, IE most modern ones, she'd actually need to essentially fall onto the ground, the
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't just big families that need the SUV/minivan anymore though.
I figure that you have a lot of "stealth" disabled people out there as well. Due to mileage requirements, cars have gotten lower over the years.
That's a good point. Put me in that category too, getting in and out of econoboxes is not easy. And the visibility, especially at night, is reduced a lot in a lower vehicle.
Re: (Score:2)
At this point I pull out my "no true Scotsman" and argue that an SUV isn't big enough for a proper big family. My parents drove a converted Renault Trafic and then a converted VW Transporter until enough of us had left home that they could downsize.
More to the point, it didn't come through to me that you were comparing old SUV with new SUV on the assumption that SUV was a sine qua non.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What do you man with a "fucking sedan" ?
Must be some kind of bondage thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Or I can buy a good car not an ev faggot car.
Sure when your old enough to drive and get a job first.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention the CO2 emitted to produce all the electricity needed to charge the batteries. EV owners are doing more harm to the environment than owners of regular cars.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep - here in Texas the emissions equivalency [ucsusa.org]* for charging my Model 3 from the grid is equivalent to an 89 MPG gas car.
When I bought my 3 in 2018 that made it 3.7 times cleaner than the average gas car which used 24.7 MPG [reuters.com].
In 2019 I installed solar panels, which supply 90% of the power for my home and car charging. That improved my emissions equivalency to a theoretical 890 MPG gas car.
Key thing is as our grid continues to get cleaner [eia.gov] so do electric cars. Those gas cars from 2018 still pollute at the ave
Re: (Score:2)
The state I'm in gets more than half its' electricity from nukes, almost 10% from renewables, and the rest pretty evenly split between natural gas and coal. So, less CO2 from electricity than from gasoline or diesel, not even counting the better efficiency of using electricity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you had a look at the factories in china making those batteries ?
The Gigafactory is in Nevada [tesla.com], not China. So kind of impossible.
In addition, note how the factory is roofed in solar panels. I'm not going to pretend that that meets 100% of energy demands for the factory, but it helps.
Yes, 99% of rare earths come from China, but I think you're missing that a LiIon battery doesn't actually use rare earths. Biggest lithium producer is Chile, not China. It certainly isn't perfect, but at least lithium is recyclable.
And the batteries WILL be recycled, because it is cost pos
US will be left behind again (Score:4, Interesting)
I find it a little ironic that, even though it was a US company who managed to prove the viability of electric cars, the US will be left in the dust by both China and Europe when it comes to EV adoption.
Re: (Score:2)
I find it a little ironic that, even though it was a US company who managed to prove the viability of electric cars, the US will be left in the dust by both China and Europe when it comes to EV adoption.
It is unfortunate... but the current administration is unusually backward in it's thinking, and (one hopes) there's a good chance that'll change soon, in which case, the US should be well positioned to lead with now proven technology.
Re: (Score:2)
I find it a little ironic that, even though it was a US company who managed to prove the viability of electric cars, the US will be left in the dust by both China and Europe when it comes to EV adoption.
It is unfortunate... but the current administration is unusually backward in it's thinking, and (one hopes) there's a good chance that'll change soon, in which case, the US should be well positioned to lead with now proven technology.
Why is "adoption" in a free market the responsibility of the government? Let the consumers decide what they want and need. Some consumers are already choosing EV's. Others may choose them when the prices drop and the support infrastructure is in place.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is "adoption" in a free market the responsibility of the government? Let the consumers decide what they want and need. Some consumers are already choosing EV's. Others may choose them when the prices drop and the support infrastructure is in place.
Because a free market will go for the cheapest option at any given time, but long-term that'll be bad for everyone due to the environmental impact.
The current administration seem to indicate* that they would prefer to remove any regulations and allow local manufacturers to build inefficient vehicles, all with the idea that that will encourage more local production and less imports.
* Starred because quite honestly, what this administration says and what they do, often do not agree. They say one thing to a
Re: (Score:2)
Why is "adoption" in a free market the responsibility of the government? Let the consumers decide what they want and need. Some consumers are already choosing EV's. Others may choose them when the prices drop and the support infrastructure is in place.
Because a free market will go for the cheapest option at any given time, but long-term that'll be bad for everyone due to the environmental impact.
The current administration seem to indicate* that they would prefer to remove any regulations and allow local manufacturers to build inefficient vehicles, all with the idea that that will encourage more local production and less imports.
* Starred because quite honestly, what this administration says and what they do, often do not agree. They say one thing to appeal to voters but do something entirely different.
Personally, I think once a good proportion of cars being sold are full-EVs, more people will at least ride in them, and they'll be less inclined to go back to ICE cars.
I don't think "local production" is incompatible with "building EV's". But costs and infrastructure affect the demand greatly. There are many people who can't afford the high cost of new EV's and, even if they could , they have no place to park and charge them. This is not limited to poorer people but it certainly includes a lot of them. Whether they like these cars is irrelevant under these circumstances.
The government is providing tax credits for EV purchases though: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/fe... [fueleconomy.gov]'
Re: (Score:2)
Tesla made EVs desirable perhaps, but it was Nissan and Renault who proved they were viable. Teslas are still very expensive, for half what the cheapest Tesla costs you can get a Leaf and it's a decent car that will meet most people's needs.
Nissan started building a charger network a couple of years before Tesla did too.
Hybrids? (Score:2)
My (ex) bosses wife has a diesel/electric hybrid. I think it is a Volvo. My boss borrowed it, and gave me a lift into work. Electric all the way. The ICE will only cut in if you put your foot down, or run the battery down. This strikes me as a very reasonable interim measure, while there is still some "range anxiety" among car users. Commuting is particularly inefficient using an ICE, and contributes to serious pollution in cities. If the ICE only comes into effect on occasional longer motorway journeys, th
Let's rephrase that headline, shall we? (Score:2, Insightful)
"Europeans force to buy new cars in order to comply with government regulations." AKA, Potemkin economics.
But the charging infrastructure's not there yet (Score:2)
Unless you're lucky enough to have your own house, and the money to install the charging infrastructure, and/or a charging slot at work *for every employee EV* (Hint: these don't exist) then in most places in the EU you're SOL.
Don't believe me? 76% of all EV charging points in the EU are located in just four countries, with 26% in one of the smallest, the Netherlands.
So, what happens when everyone starts swapping to EVs? Remember, it's not just a case of installing a few power sockets in the street, the e
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that the logistics of installing chargers is daunting, but since most EV charging can be done off peak, I don't think that most grids will need to be upgraded for quite some time.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see what you are referring to.
Re: (Score:2)
You must live in a particularly depressed part of the world in Europe EV sales will be tripled the amount last year, RTFA.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Very bad example.
Instant generation is not representative at all.
Today is bad weather but low wind in Germany, low renewables. Tomorrow is different.
Annual average data is much more useful.
And on this, germany is now down to less than 30% coal.
https://strom-report.de/medien... [strom-report.de]
Re: (Score:2)
Boah, just saw that in the first half of 2020, Germany generated 56% renewable electricity
https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/... [fraunhofer.de]
Crazy :)
Re: (Score:2)
This.