Almost a Third of New Cars Sold In Norway Last Year Were Pure Electric (reuters.com) 213
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Almost a third of new cars sold in Norway last year were pure electric, a new world record as the country strives to end sales of fossil-fueled vehicles by 2025. In a bid to cut carbon emissions and air pollution, Norway exempts battery-driven cars from most taxes and offers benefits such as free parking and charging points to hasten a shift from diesel and petrol engines. The independent Norwegian Road Federation (NRF) said on Wednesday that electric cars rose to 31.2 percent of all sales last year, from 20.8 percent in 2017 and just 5.5 percent in 2013, while sales of petrol and diesel cars plunged. The sales figures consolidate Norway's global lead in electric car sales per capita, part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas to transform to a greener economy. For comparison, electric cars had a 2.2 percent share in China in 2017 and 1.2 percent in the United States, according to IEA data.
The best pushers are not users (Score:3)
part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas
The best drug dealers know never to use the stuff they sell. :-)
That said, the fact that so many people in Norway can go electric shows the cars are pretty much viable anywhere in large numbers.
Re:The best pushers are not users (Score:5, Insightful)
Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro [slashdot.org].
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.
People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... (Score:2, Informative)
Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro.
Irrelevant as people people generally do not think (or care) about where power comes from.
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice
That's a really limited view of how people in Europe live. Sure they country they live in may be tiny, but that just means you can drive to a lot more countries. Don't you think that a lot of people in Norway drive to at least Sweden and Denmark?
Also, Norway is a lot bigger than you think [bit.ly].
you have th
Re: (Score:2)
Norway may be bigger than you think, but that does not translate to commute distance. Checking with timeanddate.com shows that with the exception of Tromso and Svalbard every city in Norway listed is within 150 miles of Oslo.
For me the question isn't how much do I commute every day, but how many times a month/year do I want to travel beyond that distance. More, how many times a week/month/year do I want to travel beyond the typical EV range? If its once or twice a year, sure rent a vehicle those one or two
You are way behind the times with range info (Score:2)
For example a student who goes home on weekends and at every semester break probably can't get by with an EV if they go to school >300 miles from home. Someone who spends a good deal of their leisure time hiking far from the city probably can't get by with a EV. Someone who spends their weekends visiting other towns, cities and the countryside can't get by with an EV.
What decade d you live in? A Tesla model D can go 335 miles on a charge, and the long range Model 3 can go 310 miles. There also also sup
Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... (Score:5, Interesting)
It actually is relevant because if you live in a backwards shithole like West Virginia or Utah that gets a lot of coal power, it makes less sense because it is way more expensive and dirtier then the worst car.
Actually, coal-powered EVs are cheaper to power and cleaner than the best ICEVs, even hybrids. Coal is generally dirtier than gasoline or diesel, but the dramatically higher efficiencies available in a large, high-temperature power plant vs a small, low-temperature engine more than make up the difference.
I live in Utah, BTW. And drive an EV. Last month I drove 2024 miles, and spent $24.09 on charging (I have a meter on my home EV charger, which is the only place I charge). If I were driving a gasoline car that gets 35 mpg, at $2.50 per gallon that would cost me $142.50 in fuel. Tell me again which is more expensive?
Re: (Score:2)
And even if it wasn't cleaner the coal power station's tailpipe isn't in the middle of a giant population centre. Even if climate change were not a thing I'd be a huge advocate of EV just so every city did not smell like diesel and wouldn't be full of soot.
Re: (Score:2)
Creating electric cars is more carbon heavy stuff than creting old fashioned car. All thos rare earth minerals that need to be digged etc.
Cite?
Re: (Score:3)
Your numbers are bullshit swillden.
Electric cars get about 30 kWh/100miles. 2024 miles takes about 600 kWh. $24.09 for 600 kWh = $0.04 kWh, when the average price for electricity in America is ~$0.10/kWh You're paying at least $50/month charging your electric car.
I pay $0.034/kWh to charge my cars. I'm on a time-of-use plan which charges $0.034/kWh off-peak and $0.34/kWh on-peak. My chargers (I have two, for two cars) are configured to charge only during off-peak times.
As an aside, switching to the time-of-use plan has saved me a lot on AC, too. I configure my smart thermostat to cool the house to 68F an hour before peak starts (3 PM) and then change the set point to 78F. The AC rarely runs again before 8PM when peak ends. This has reduced my cooling bills by
Re: (Score:2)
On top of that, you’re paying interest on the loan need to buy the over priced golf cart in the first place.
Actually, I bought my cars with cash; the only thing I finance is my home. But I have run the numbers with a reasonable discount rate which would cover inflation loss and/or loan servicing in another post, and I also included those considerations in my calculations before buying.
In addition the charger uses up electricity even when it’s not charging.
Which is included in the metering I mentioned. Also, the consumption is trivial; pennies per month at most.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I bought my cars with cash; the only thing I finance is my home.
Actually, this isn't quite accurate, because I did lease for several years. I leased a 2011 Leaf in 2012, and then turned it in and leased a 2013 Leaf in 2014. I leased rather than buying because I knew that technology was changing and prices dropping rapidly. In 2017 when the (extended) lease ended, I paid $6000 cash to buy the car off lease (Nissan had estimated the end-of-lease value at $21K. Oops for them.), so my total cost was about $15K including all lease payments and the buyout.
I suppose I also
Re: (Score:2)
Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro [slashdot.org].
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.
That, and a trillion dollars of oil profits in the sovereign wealth funds, meaning you can afford big subsidies to help make the guilt go away.
Re: (Score:2)
The US produces way more oil than Norway. Where is our sovereign wealth fund enabling us to pay for societally nice things?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but it's bloody cold in Norway. If they had an American attitude, they would be burning fossil fuels like nobodies business to make their country more habitable and of course making Texas more uninhabitable, from flooded coast to burning lands. I don't think Norwegians know how rabid dog eat rabid dog capitalism works.
Re: (Score:2)
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.
Norway is less densely populated than Texas, most of its cities are along the coast (and bit inland, with the Oslo area being the only big "intrusion" of relatively high-density population farther inland), and it's elongated shape and inhospitable terrain probably means (though I haven't checked) that it takes quite a bit longer to drive from one end of Norway to another then from one end of Texas to another.
In other words, Norway is not Denmark. Also, the climate in Texas is far more favourable for EVs tha
Re: (Score:2)
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.
Yes and no. It's also a country where getting from A to B is often 4 times further thanks to wonderfully windy roads around the amazing scenery.
Now for powering up a hill as you're driving through the fjords, THAT is perfect for electic cars.
EV requirements (Score:2)
Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro [slashdot.org].
Yup. So do a couple of other countries (e.g.: Switzerland) and in the grand scheme of things, with a few key exceptions (of the top of my head: India, China and Australia - you can google to find actual studies on the subject) most countries have power generation mixes that make EV slightly less polluting than ICE over their lifetime.
(Yup, even countries like the US that burn coal : turns out that big central optimized power plants are more efficient than an engine miniaturized enough to fit in a car)
That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.
Now, h
Re: (Score:3)
Since you're apparently connecting to the internet from the 1990s: Short Pets.com. Buy Amazon.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you are rich and can afford seven digits for a flat in town, you are likely living on the outskirts, and commuting, 25-30 miles each way.
These numbers looked quite suspect to me, so I did some googling, and found [itstillruns.com] that the average American commute (driven, so I guess but I'm not sure that this excludes people walking, cycling, and taking public transport) is 16 miles one way, about two-thirds to half of what you state. Yes that's an average, so I'm sure there are lots of people driving 25-30 miles, I'm sure there are people driving more than 50 miles, but to say that one is "likely" to be driving 25-30 miles unless they are rich doesn't sound
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not all commutes are so short.
Indeed but most are.
Is there an electric half-ton pickup truck that could replace my truck?
Why do you drive a half ton truck as opposed to a much smaller, cheaper and cheaper to run compact or alternatively a semi tractor? People have different use cases which is why you have a truck.
Not everyone's needs are served by electric, especially if they're road warriors. Most people aren't and most people's day to day range is well served by an electric car.
Re: (Score:2)
The Nissan Leaf, for one. Almost all the rest, for another.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... [wikipedia.org]
So really you have no idea what you're talking about, but you call someone else an idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
The top 5 best selling BEVs in the US this year are, in order:
* Tesla Model 3 (primarily the LR version, 310 miles, but also some MRs, 265mi).
* Tesla Model X (237-295mi)
* Tesla Model S (259-335mi)
* Chevy Bolt (238mi)
* Nissan Leaf (150mi, but next year's version ("E-Plus") is expected to be about 225mi; it was supposed to have already been unveiled but got delayed due to the Ghosn debacle)
Other well anticipated EVs coming early next year are the Hyundai Kona (258mi) an
Re: (Score:2)
ED: ** this year's version. I forgot, it's 2019 now! :)
Re:The best pushers are not users (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
The more impressive thing to me is not so much the sheer numbers numbers, but the percentages in an environment that is one of the worst for electric cars (cold temperatures affecting batteries, lots of need for running a heater for the interior).
That meany people (yes 44k is still fair numbers of people) tells you a lot about wider acceptance.
Re:The best pushers are not users (Score:5, Informative)
The most popular car sold in Norway last year was the Leaf, not the iPace.
Correcting your trolling is tedious, but someone has to do it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If you are trying to say that the fastest EV you can buy is the iPace, that would also be a false claim.
Jaguar put out some BS numbers earlier in the year, but when the models actually went into production, they were slower than the top of the line Model S. Actually, the are slower than an AWD Model 3 (not even the performance model).
Re: (Score:2)
The best selling EV 2018 in Norway is the Leaf. That year. Not cumulative.
You're a troll because you're trolling.
Re: (Score:2)
No it wasn't, moron. The best selling EV in Norway cumulative is the Leaf. The FASTEST selling EV LAST YEAR was the iPace
I'm not sure what magic facts you're trying to use here. The iPace didn't do the most sales in the year, it didn't do the most in any month, and didn't do the most in any single day. What about it makes it the fastest selling EV? It's top speed? How long it takes to put down cash and drive out the door? Or some completely other irrelevant and moronic metric that you're trying to use to defend your absurd claim that EVs are for the rich?
They call me a "troll" because they don't know any facts.
Actually they call you a troll because the facts are the fact, but you c
Re: (Score:2)
Mercedes S-Class (practically any model)
Mercedes E-Class (almost every model)
Mercedes GL-Class (practically any model)
BMW 7-Series (practically any model)
BMW 5, 6 Series (almost every model)
Audi 6,7,8 Series (almost every model)
Range Rover (almost every model)
Jaguar (almost every model)
Porsche (every model)
There's probably 30 other mode
Re: (Score:2)
I am a BMW i3 driver in Norway. And I'm an American by birth and I've traveled to about 80 countries in my life.
Electric cars work extremely well here in Norway because of trust.
Yesterday, when I tried to transport stuff from my office to my house and it wouldn't fit in my car, I went to Ikea and for about $40, rented a massive van for 3 hours which I used to pick up my stuff, move it and then returned the vehicle.
Norway, Sweden, Denmark and to a more limited extent Finland are the most trusting
Re: (Score:2)
We actually can't afford to drive anything other than brand new electric cars in Oslo. Consider that a 5 year loan for an electric car is paid for completely by the money saved by getting rid of a diesel. In fact, when you add in the cost of EU control, the cost of gas, etc... buying a brand new BMW i3 is actually substantially cheaper than continuing to drive a gas vehicle. But it won't work in someplace like the UK or the US. These are protectionist societies. We assume everyone is guilty until proven innocent.... actually... we assume everyone is guilty and if they're proven innocent we congratulate their lawyers for being so damn good. Unless you live in a society of trust, you can't make a change this big. You have to actually be willing to work together towards something better.
Norway's approach is to tax the hell out of ICE cars and then not tax the electric cars, thus making the electrics, as you explain, quite a bit cheaper (but still expensive in absolute terms). This approach makes sense in Norway as it is a small yet rich country that imports basically all of its cars. Since Norway does not have large scale auto manufacturers, it cannot make large enough investments/subsidies to make EVs cheaper than ICVs without resorting to taxation.
The US, the UK, France, Germany, China,
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Many Canadians have two vehicles. An electric is an excellent 2nd vehicle, wish I could get the wife one. It would get a lot of use and we'd still have the truck for longer trips, including going into the bush and even getting into town when there's been a dump of snow.
Re: For certain values of "anywhere". (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting statistic. Probably depends on what that second vehicle is used for with more spent when a job depends on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was talking about commuting vehicle and the need to get to work reliably
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Many Canadians drive well into the wilderness to go to the cottage or go camping. A lot of times that is in the winter. There are a lot of road trips to national parks, etc.
You would have to define what you mean by "many", since as a Canadian I would dispute that "many drive well into the wilderness" (it's certainly very far from "most"). By my experience, most people in the GTA drive less than 2-3 hrs (around 300 km) when they go camping, to the cottage or wherever (Muskoka does not fit the description of "well into the wilderness", I'm sorry).
Norwegians are also very outdoorsy people, my impression is that the average Norwegian is actually outdoorsier than the average Canadi
Re: (Score:2)
Even Muskoka has a su
Re: For certain values of "anywhere". (Score:2)
Re: For certain values of "anywhere". (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You should have sourced your figures properly as POOMA.
12 years. Pah.
Target of 100% may be impossible (Score:2)
So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of apartments around here that have EV charging points. Most people don't mind the $500-$1000 a month premium they have to pay to get them;(. Still at least you won't find any section 8 renters or kids there. They are pet friendly
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Got a private track? Drive a non electric car around that and then transport it back on an electric truck.
Pay the car tax? Soon the car tax will be replaced with a car ban.
100% of the cars allowed on roads by the government will be electric.
Thats the power of a government to shape transport to get that needed 100%.
Then start to "inspect" private roads and ensure all cars used are "safe", registered and paying a
Electric does not have to mean chargers (Score:2)
So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.
I agree that is a huge hurdle, however that is one reason hydrogen fuel cells will make for a sizable component of electric cars. Otherwise I agree, apartment dwellers would have a rough time with electric cars even if they all cycled out of a nearby charging station once a week or so.
Re: (Score:2)
So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.
I think it'll be harder than you think. I live in a HOA townhome community. I have an assigned parking space and am not allowed to install a charging point.
At least one of my siblings lives in a house in a city which has neither a garage nor a driveway. They park on the streets. Where do you think they're going to charge their potential EV?
Re: (Score:2)
That's why I mention fuel cells - with hydrogen you would just fill up at a gas station converted to deliver hydrogen.
I agree there are a LOT of places you will not be able to install or realistically use chargers. I already see some vandalized.
A heavy tax (Score:2)
The gov is making people have to consider electric by making other transport more expensive.
Making people change their car buying habits by imposing a new tax rate.
Electric becomes the only way to buy a new car for a large number of working people.
I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really ... (Score:2)
I'm a Tesla owner AND I have PV solar on my roof. But I think it's pretty clear, once you really look at the facts, that all the subsidies aren't too practical.
We're still early enough in the technology curve for EVs so they cost a premium price to purchase, and have more "hidden costs" that are less often talked about. (EG. You probably need to upgrade the electrical power in your garage so you can charge one of these cars without it taking 2 days to charge back up.) If you compromise on the costs, buyin
Re: (Score:2)
We're still early enough in the technology curve for EVs so they cost a premium price to purchase, and have more "hidden costs" that are less often talked about.
Yes, we need you early adopters to pay for figuring that stuff out. Thanks!
Re: (Score:2)
Electric cars can never be "hand-me-downs" to the poor.
Why on earth not? You don't need to replace a well conditioned battery every few years; researchers estimated the useful life of a Tesla battery at 500k miles at least, and numbers from the field are starting to back up those claims. There's this TV show here they MOT old cars, and they had a Tesla in with 300k km on it, and it had lost a little less than 10% of its battery capacity. By the way, at 300k it was still using the original brake discs, and was only on its second set of brake pads. Some parts
Re: (Score:2)
One good reason for EVs in countries with cold win (Score:2)
You can get the car nice and toasty to a schedule or remote.
Also if extreme cold don't need to keep the ICE ticking overnight.
Re: (Score:3)
The reason for this is that Norway has all kinds of taxes, fees, etc. related to cars, almost all of which have been waved or heavily reduced for electric vehicles. It isn't that it's rich people who can affo
Re: (Score:3)
The regular folks don't see any of that money and until recently, the government wasn't even spending any of it. The vast majority of what they take in for any given year ends up getting banked away into an investment fund (earning even more money) and as a result they've got a considerable nest egg.
That's very much not true, up until recently the oil income was greater than the deficit meaning we were both saving compound interest and adding fresh money but without any oil income we'd have a big deficit. Last year we had 183 bNOK in net oil income, 214 bNOK in return on our oil fund and had a 255 bNOK deficit without the oil. So the result is our fund grew by 140 bNOK, but almost 20% of our 1253 bNOK budget came from oil. If the oil industry completely shut down today we'd already be losing money desp
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
B. The use of fossil is not good for humans.
You are incredibly short sighted (or willfully ignorant) if you don't understand this.
Re:Reasons (Score:5, Informative)
The fastest selling EV in Norway is the Leaf.
Re: (Score:2)
You can have your own opinions, you can't have your own facts.
Greenwashing. (Score:3)
Yep, huge government subsidies is the reason.
All in the name of greenwashing of course.
After all, they are the 3rd largest exporter of natural gas in the world - or perhaps they think that is being used to make magical pixie rainbows?
Re: (Score:3)
Even without the huge subsidies, the cost savings are significant over the life of the vehicle, in part because gasoline is taxed so heavily. That's why places with a higher-than-average median income — places where a majority of people can afford new cars (the used EV market is basically nonexistent) — also have much higher EV sales than places with lower median income. Compare that EV sales in the U.S. as a whole (1.2%) to EV sales in San Jose (13%).
With Europe's exorbitant gas taxes, it is
Re: (Score:2)
The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons. The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace. Clearly it is rich people taking advantage of a government program to make their lives easier while commuting.
I'm not sure what point you're making.
Also a question... what is the reason behind the various regulations/breaks you listed? My guess is they were put there by legislators in order to save the environment. And the legislators aimed for this goal because they thought their electors would like all the end results (easier lives while commuting, and saving the environment). And that people did indeed vote with both things in mind.
That would be an entirely typical case of the reasonable and rational attitude "I
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How are you going to "save the environment" by providing tax breaks for metal boxes so rich people have easier time commuting to work? It doesn't make a dent in anything. If you want to "save the environment" you shouldn't be driving around in ANY CAR.
It'd make a huge dent to switch over a country to electric vehicles 100%. And the only question is: what is the most cost-effective way for a society to achieve this transition?
I think the current model used in Norway and US seems like a really good way for society to leverage the free market - provide small targeted incentives which yes do benefit rich people because their real goal is to encourage innovation and this is the best place for leverage. In this case, we've seen that the benefits really do tric
Re: (Score:2)
Have you really never heard of the concept of not letting the best be the enemy of the good? There is a scale of environmental damage for transport that runs the gamut from walking to Ferraris (and beyond -- this is just an illustrative example, in case you're prone to being literal). EVs are further towards walking than are ICEs.
Re: (Score:3)
What cant be mandated with tax will be regulated with gov approval on what can drive on the gov roads.
Nordic central planning at its best.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait for the gov to go full East Germany
You're always banging on about this. So far the only thig that actually happened is East Germany colappsed and became like West Germany.
Nordic central planning at its best.
I hate the way those guys are so rich and happy. Must be the government's fault. Fuck the government I don't want to be rich or happy.
Re: (Score:2)
People can enjoy old and new cars. Electric, SUV, trucks.
The freedom to buy any regular car they want.
Not having to consider the tax rate and getting priced by the gov into selecting from a few new approved electric cars.
Who wants a bureaucrat to list a few approved electric cars?
Re: (Score:2)
In normal rich and happy nations people can enjoy the freedom to find a car they want.
Stop simply making shit up to support your point. In Norway you're not restricted from buying fossil fuel vehicles.
Not what the gov suggests with a new tax rate.
That's the opposite of true.
People can enjoy old and new cars. Electric, SUV, trucks.
Nice use of "weasel words", "enjoy". In Norway you can still buy and run old cars as well as new ones. Claims to the contrary are lies.
The freedom to buy any regular car they want.
Re: (Score:2)
The new tax rate will make that electric car the only option for most people looking to buy a new car.
Re "That's the opposite of true."
The tax exists to change the way people buy a new car, forcing them to buy electric.
Like you can in Norway.
From a selection of new electric cars. Unless a person can afford to pay the full tax rate.
Re:Reasons (Score:5, Informative)
The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons.
Saving the environment is the reason for the tax breaks, etc.
The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace.
Trump, is that you?
From TFA:
I can't find whole-year figures that include December, but up through November [wattev2buy.com] the Jaguar iPace was #20. The top three were the Leaf, the VW e-Golf and the BMW i3.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The FASTEST selling EV was the iPace. The idea that $60k+ cars are "saving the environment" borders on the insane, but is just simply basic stupidity. EVs aren't saving anything.
Okay, you're definitely either Donald J. Trump or his biggest fanboy. I quoted the article and gave you another link, both of which showed you were wrong, and you just repeated the error. Or lie.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps he meant that the "FASTEST* EV you can buy is the iPace, which would also be a false claim.
Just ignore him. He always trolls articles on EVs, renewable energy, etc..
Re: (Score:2)
No, he can perform simple math, buying an electric vehicle at a premium price is like purchasing your fuel up front with interest.
Umm, first, either your reading comprehension or your basic logic skills are lousy. His claim was that the Jaguar i-Pace was the hottest-selling EV in Norway. It's not. The "simple math" required is being able to correctly orient the greater-than symbol, and he got it wrong.
However, addressing your comment, I did the math, and bought the EV, and am reaping the financial rewards. Actually, it has worked out so well that I've purchased three EVs.
Here are the high points of the math: My EV costs me $0.01
Re: (Score:2)
Here are the high points of the math: My EV costs me $0.01 per mile in electricity.
Here are the higher points of the math: Your EV costs you $0.03 per mile in "fuel" one month ago. [slashdot.org] Amazing how were you able to chop your electricity costs by 67% in one month swillden...what's your secret?
Hmm. Looks like I made a mistake in that previous post. Adjust my numbers in that post downward accordingly.
Re: (Score:2)
The FASTEST selling EV was the iPace.
Repeating stupidities doesn't make them any more factual or any less stupid.
Re:Reasons (Score:4, Interesting)
The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace.
It's still only preorders. Top selling cars in Norway 2018:
1. Nissan Leaf 8.3%
2. Volkswagen Golf 6.7%
3. BMW i3 3.8%
4. Tesla Model X 3.4%
5. Mitsubishi Outlander 2.9%
6. Toyota Yaris 2.6%
7. Volvo XC60 2.5%
8. Tesla Model S 2.5%
9. Toyota Rav4 2.5%
10. Renault Zoe 2.1%
They don't break the Golf down between the regular one and e-Golf, but that and the Leaf are the big commuter cars. The Leaf starts at $32k, the iPace will start at $68k so for a very different market. Other than that I fully agree it's only because of government sponsorship. But hey, we're voting in "green" politicians (it's either blue-green or red-green, at the moment blue-green) so we get what we vote for. Though it should also be said we have lots of hydro and wind power - not so much solar - so it makes sense to use electricity at home and export the oil and gas. That way we can pretend to be environmentally friendly, as long as the emissions happen somewhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Who's said anything of the sort? I think people have said that Norway is an excellent example of how a government can use its powers of taxation to change citizen behaviour. Norwegians (and many other Europeans) are by and large pretty comfortable with the notion of regulated markets with taxation used to incentivise particular behaviours, and are pretty uncomfortable with the notion of free markets unfettered by regulation.