Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Hardware Technology

Microsoft Enters the Wearables Market With 'Band' 135

Microsoft has announced the availability of "Microsoft Band," a wearable device that goes on the wrist. It's designed to do health- and fitness-related tasks, like monitoring heart rate and how well a wearer sleeps, and its on-board GPS lets users map their run/bike routes. The company says Band plays nicely with iOS and Android devices in addition to Windows phones. It also has full support for viewing phone notifications and calendar alerts, and a built-in microphone enables queries through the Cortana personal assistant software. The display is rectangular, 11mm x 33mm (0.43" x 1.3"), and has a resolution of 320x106. They claim a battery life of 48 hours, with a charge time of 1.5 hours or less. The device costs $200.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Enters the Wearables Market With 'Band'

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Why hasn't Nadella killed off all these "me too" wankers whose projects are just going to be discontinued after a few years anyway?

    • by Tx ( 96709 )

      To be fair, nobody has really hit a mass-market sweet spot with this class of device yet, so it's worth a shot for Microsoft, normally they are later to the party than that. Although personally I think they've gone too niche with the health focus and the $200 price tag, and I wouldn't bet against you on the Microsoft Band being discontinued in a couple of years. Maybe they just wan to dip their toes in the water of the wearables market for now, and this is a fairly low-key, unambitious start that will pave

      • The fact that Microsoft already has a "Me Too" product in a market that doesn't have much traction, proves that market is doomed.

        FYI, I shed my wrist clock years ago, and couldn't be happier. If I went back to wearing a watch, I'd go old school Waltham pocket watch [watchuseek.com]. Now there is Class.

        • I used to carry a pocket watch when I was a teen, but I found having to dig in my pocket to know what time it is too inconvenient.

          Ironic, considering.

          • There are clocks everywhere. Practically every electronic device has one. It cost about $.02 to put one in anything, so it goes into everything. Ubiquity is the one reason I stopped wearing a watch; there is no practical need to carry one. The additional fact that unless your clock is Atomic Clock Synced, it isn't accurate enough is another issue worth considering.

            Which is why i suggested that the best watch to carry, is a statement piece. A 150 year old time piece is just classy.

      • I was very close to getting the GPS fitbit and I'm glad I didn't because this was $50 cheaper and does more. I'll also add that the health niche is probably much larger than the group of people who want a watch that connects to their phone so they don't have to pull it out of their pocket. This product has a clear purpose and is clear about the customer it targets. Maybe that's not you but judging by the lines they generated with almost zero notice and the fact that the admittedly limited supply sold out in

    • Prediction: "Band" will soon need "aid"
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I wonder what people's health information are worth.

  • Finally (Score:1, Troll)

    Now I have a reliable way to compute an accurate Mean Jerk Time.

    Thanks Microsoft! What would I do without your amazing products?

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:01AM (#48277505)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • I'm curious which part of parent's post was "trolling". I checked and the Fitbit is exactly 7 years old [wikipedia.org]. Can we start having a mod-free Friday or something?
      • by dkman ( 863999 )
        I would say the

        [bringing this product] into the market when everyone from nike to apple already have a competing product with greater market share.

        That's the only thing troll-ish I could spot. But really every product that isn't first can have that said. So I don't blame a company for trying to enter a market. I don't see great things when you enter with the same features at the same price. If you want to shake up the sector you need something to distinguish yourself or a price to move your product to gain market share. Did they do that? It's not for me to say.

        What I really want is a watch band that doesn't scratch up my desk s

    • Yeah, but I don't have my smartphone on me when I'm exercising and few people use a smartband.

      The fact is, the market is wide-open for someone to make a killer-product. I don't think Microsoft has done that, but their take on the market is not any worse than anyone else's and it represents more choice for the consumer.

    • Technically that's not true. When the iPhone came out, Microsoft already had Windows Mobile out for the better part of a decade. Now I will say that MS failed to respond to the iPhone and Android as a fundamental shift in the smartphone market. Before then the vast majority of smartphone customers were enterprises who could and had to deal with the unfriendliness of the smart phone. With Android and iPhone the consumer smartphone was the main focus. Part of it may be that MS was reeling from the disaster th
    • when he iphone came out redmond took 4 years to consider the prospect of a competitive product. Once they released it, nobody cared because two smartphone manufacturers already existed in the market.

      To be more specific, when the iPhone came out, Redmond had a superior product (it could run apps, the iPhone couldn't). After four years of little improvement, they still managed to hold ~15% of the smartphone market.

      Then they decided to remake their phone in a backwards-incompatible way, and their percentage of the market dropped to ~2% overnight. It takes effort to perform worse in the smartphone market than Blackberry, but Microsoft did it.

      • To be sure, by the time they killed off WinMo, it was already being displaced by Android (and to a lesser extent Android). They could have focused on tweaking the UI and OS core while trying to maintain backward compatibility and avoiding losing features (WP7 lacked a lot of features WinMo 6.5 had, though it also had some features 6.5 lacked such as finer-grained permissions than "root" and "not root") and maybe they could have ridden the tail of WinMo into the modern smartphone era, but I'm skeptical.

        Meanw

        • maybe they could have ridden the tail of WinMo into the modern smartphone era, but I'm skeptical.

          It would have been better than what they tried.

  • I have one (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:05AM (#48277539)

    I picked it up yesterday. That means, to a certain extent, that yes, I'm a fanboy.

    That being said, so far I love it. The sensors work great, and the pedometer does an eerily good job of differentiating between me taking a step vs me waving my arms around like I'm taking a step.

    So yes, I'm sure the /. crowd will absolutely hate this device. But - as someone who has a windows phone and was wanting a fitness band - this is a first rate option.

    • Other than heart rate, which I only care about when working out so could be integrated into headphones, what does it provide that I don't get with my gps enabled phone?

      • I have a Jawbone UP, and it provides 1) sleep quality tracking, so that each morning I get a graph of my light and deep sleep patterns from the night before, and 2) the ability to track a treadmill. Maybe your phone provides that; my iPhone 5 (pre-pedometer) does not.

        I can't speak to the MS band, but there are useful sensors in other products in that class.

    • The main thing I want is a heart rate monitor and calorie tracking. Everything else is just a bonus. Does it actually track calories burned based on heart rate? If so, I'll definitely consider getting one.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      The features seem good. But it's about as neat as wearing a rubber band. It's boring and ugly. About what I can sum it up as is: Meh.

      I wear a watch partly as a fashion statement. The rest is on my phone. If I want a sports watch I would have bought that, but would not use it day-to-day. A sports watch is used when I am exercising which is not what I do most of the time. I wouldn't mind a "smarter" watch but it needs to look good. Otherwise I look like a granola touting hippie, like the people do in

    • Have fun with your Zuneband!

    • How well does it track other types of activity? For example, how well does it track bicycle riding or weight lifting?

    • Have you picked out a spot on the shelf with your Tamagotchi?

  • I liked the look and function of the recent Samsung model with the same rectangular screen and found that attractive but wouldn't get it since it didn't work with iOS and my iPhone. This one one looks like it takes care of that problem. Microsoft making something that works with iPhone out of the gate is a selling point and would seriously get me thinking to buy one. I run with my iPhone in my hand and keep track of my distance, speed and progress with the Nike+ on my iPhone and from what I've seen this unit. although it doesn't look like it has Nike+ working with it does look closer than anything else. Hey now, eventually there will be something that makes a fitness band/watch/smartwatch a must buy.
  • Kudos to MS (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sootman ( 158191 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:08AM (#48277575) Homepage Journal

    Try something new, play well with others, start small... I'm liking this. Go, Satya! Take that lumbering hulk of a company and do something with it besides coast.

  • Device (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Translation Error ( 1176675 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:14AM (#48277625)
    Now, this makes more sense than something that tries to cram everything you can do on your smart phone/tablet into a tiny screen strapped to your wrist. The wrist is a convenient space to mount a device. For most applications, it just isn't a convenient space to use said device.
    • by c ( 8461 )

      Now, this makes more sense than something that tries to cram everything you can do on your smart phone/tablet into a tiny screen strapped to your wrist.

      I think their problem will be that battery life sucks for a fitness band. 48 hours is only just a little more than the Wear smartwatches. Sleep tracking with a device the user is likely to plug in every night or two strikes me as a bit of a dodgy feature.

      Compare that to the just announced Fitbit Surge (which I'd put in the "not quite a smartwatch" category w

  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:18AM (#48277663) Journal
    Microsoft announced that starting from 2015, there will be a grand fusion of ALL User Interfaces. All devices, from wearable watch like device, to 4 or 5 inch phones, to 7 or 10 inch tablets to 15 or 18 inch laptops to 23 to 36 inch desktops will all use the Microsoft Band UI as the default UI.

    There will be a hidden hotspot at the lower left corner to bring up the phone UI, and it will have another hidden hot spot and the mid point of left edge of screen to bring up the tablet UI, and that will have a hidden hot spot at top right to bring up the laptop UI and there will be a hot spot on the top left to bring up the desktop UI.

    So, in one fluid motion, you can hit all the four corners and move up and down the UI. National Association of Chiropracters and Carpel Tunnel Healers of America welcomed the new UI and gave 10$ off coupons to all Microsoft users.

  • by Bugler412 ( 2610815 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:20AM (#48277681)
    Go ahead and accuse me of being a fanboy, but this is the first smartwatch in my view to hit the right balance of functionality and design that I would be willing to wear regularly. It's function because MS didn't overreach and try to duplicate the smartphone in a tiny wrist device, it's an adjunct. It's also the first wearable not hideously designed like some sort of oversized geek bling. So go ahead and hate away MS haters, this is a good device and MS squarely hit the mark for me at least.
    • by halivar ( 535827 )

      It's still early. They can still find a way to stuff Metro onto it.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • well, it's lighter and thinner than the Citizen chronometer I had been wearing, and the 18 hours or so I've worn it so far (including while sleeping), the flat screen hasn't been an issue. It lies very comfortably and unobtrusively on my wrist. Yeah, a curved screen would have been somewhat better, I'll agree. And yes, a VERY limited version of metro is there, it works for this purpose.
  • by archmcd ( 1789532 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:43AM (#48277957)

    I picked one up yesterday. I like the form factor. It's not as bulky as my MOTOACTV, but it still seems to have a lot of usefulness. Some of the things missing out of the gate include the ability to do voice input if you're on anything but Windows Phone 8.1, the ability to load music on it and use it without your phone for a run (with bluetooth headphones - something my MOTOACTV can do), and I really wish it had NFC so I can use it for mobile payments.

    As for the first two gripes, those may get fixed with a future software update. The last one I guess I'll have to get over. I can use my phone.

    All in all, it seems Microsoft may finally be thinking outside the box. Not everyone wants a microtablet on their wrist, and with the right software updates, this thing could be just as capable.

  • by WolfgangPG ( 827468 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:44AM (#48277975)
    I was considering a fitness band and went with this one. It is $199 and has more sensors than the iWatch or Fitbit charge. Seemed like a good deal to try out and it works with all the smartphones. http://www.neowin.net/news/spe... [neowin.net]

    It is pretty cool -- it has GPS, Heart beat monitor, sweat monitor, etc... hopefully it works well.
    • by Dr. Evil ( 3501 )

      This looks like it might actually be a good product. I clicked "buy" and it actually has a caution about the sizing... and recommends I go to a "Microsoft Store", whatever that is. I guess I should look for one.

      Could Ballmer have been so bad for MS that we forgot they could produce good products?

      I'm going to check it out, but I simply can't believe it will be acceptable until version 3.

      • Not to sound like a fanboy (because I'm not even close), but they have made a few compelling products and interesting decisions since Nadella took over.
  • by pushing-robot ( 1037830 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:48AM (#48278023)

    ...we can call it the one-man band.

  • by Chris Mattern ( 191822 ) on Friday October 31, 2014 @08:52AM (#48278079)

    ...will the ad theme song be "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down"?

    • by dwpro ( 520418 )
      They should use "the shape I'm in", but knowing MS they'll probably use "the weight" instead.
  • For the time, i use this: http://www.casio.co.uk/product... [casio.co.uk]
    For my heartrate, i let the nurses hook me upto a monitor when its required
    For sleeping well, i use earplugs.
    For GPS, i use a Map and compass.
    For everything else, i have a PC.

    Jokes aside, this is just the 1st wave of possible replacements for phones and tablets.
    Give it 2-5 years and the "smartwatch" might just be the only device you need. At the moment, its just an extra peice of tech that is already being replicated by existing tech (phones/tablets

    • Give it 2-5 years and the "smartwatch" might just be the only device you need.

      I keep seeing this and I'm not convinced.

      Some of it is the whole "digital hub" thing. I don't really want to try to read web pages or watch movies on my watch. The screen is just too damned small. Look at "small" screened smart phones as an example. The original iPhone's 3.5" screen was huge when it first came out. But people wanted bigger screens.

      I like the idea of a bunch of devices that work with my phone. For example, I could see my "smartphone" receiving data from my "smartwatch" and presenting i

  • And objectively speaking, beyond their core product, which Bar has been a success? Arguably the X-box.

    Windows phone? Nope.

    Zune? Nope.

    Surface? Nope.

    Azure? Please, be serious.

    WebTv? Nope.

    Mice? Maybe, a long time ago, but not today.

    Kin Studio? Nope.

    Courier? Do you even know what this is?

    Keyboards? Some people like them for some unfathomable reason. They are not unlike a myriad other keyboards out there.

    Headsets? Nope.

    Microsoft knows how to fail. That's good. Microsoft has a real issue with acknowledging they have failed. That's bad.

    • by dkman ( 863999 )
      The Surface Pro 3 I would really disagree on. It's pretty good (though not perfect). It is pricey however.

      I never liked the MS mice.

      I have no idea what Courier was (I assume past tense is correct)
    • *Which* "core product" are you talking about? Productivity software? Desktop OSes? Server OSes? Web servers? Database servers? Content management software (SharePoint)? Email and "groupware" servers? Software development tools? Encarta, until the Internet made it obsolete? Strategy games? Flight simulators? Any of the other games they've produced?

      Or are you just classing all of those under "software"? Maybe "x86 software" so you can exclude Windows RT and Windows Phone? How about Windows Mobile, which was p

  • Looks like a GPS tracking device criminals are required to wear.

    That and some mean tattoos and you'll look like a real bad-ass!
  • It knows when you're sleeping and where you're sleeping, it knows when you're awake and where you go. It provides enough extremely personal data so that, when coupled with your online data trail and banking records, can provide a very accurate picture of every move you make, all you activities, your beliefs, proclivities, and any potentially illegal activities you engage in. How long until they have an implantable, body-powered version, and it's mandated by the government that every citizen has one? For the
    • It knows when you're sleeping and where you're sleeping, it knows when you're awake and where you go. It provides enough extremely personal data so that, when coupled with your online data trail and banking records, can provide a very accurate picture of every move you make, all you activities, your beliefs, proclivities, and any potentially illegal activities you engage in.

      Um - You've just described Santa Claus.

      • Yeah, I knew it sounded like that.. but more like an evil Santa Claus. Closer to Black Peter, really.
  • Does it come in brown?

  • I am hardly a MS fan but this is actually a unique entry into the 'wearables' market. A fitness band with 24 hour HRM and smartphone notifications for any platform is already a pretty good deal. Throw in the GPS for whenever you run or bike at $200 makes it the best value in years for such a device. It's a great balance between cheap fitness bands like the Fitbit and super expensive fitness watches by Timex, Garmin and Polar. I think the only shortcomings in this band are a lack of being waterproof (swimmin
  • Microsoft cock-ring.

    You can gather metrics about your, um, performance.

    And, as an added bonus, you can set it to give you an electrical jolt at random intervals ... heighten your pleasure, and let you last longer since the jolt will distract you enough to bring you back from the brink.

    And, of course, there will be an app so you can share your coital prowess with your friends. Unfortunately, it'll use whatever social media offering Microsoft has these days, so nobody will ever know.

    Slightly more on topic ..

  • Look at every photo. The screen sticks out far beyond the man's wrist - extremely uncomfortable.

  • No gold, less space than an Apple Watch. Lame.

  • 320x106 is SUPER widescreen. 3:1! This thing will be AWESOME for movies.

  • My first thought when I saw this was "Wow, this may actually be one of the first fitness wearables that I'm interested in, and it's cross-platform to boot!"

    My second thought was "I wonder how Slashdot's going to shit all over this."

  • I have been waiting for a device like the Band ever since reading Total Recall, a book by Gordon Bell, a few years ago. The book described his experience with a total life logging system called MyLifeBits inside Microsoft Research. About once every six months since 2012 I've investigated what options are available in the smartphone personal assistant and wearables markets, and tested lots of half-baked apps like ReQall Rover, that just weren't there in terms of features or integration. Wearables on the m

  • http://www.windowscentral.com/... [windowscentral.com]

    Hello Microsoft, why is your watch showing the time at a 90 degree angle from the way we're used to reading our watches?

    Man, how did they fuck that up?

  • Where's the API? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Lumpy ( 12016 )

    Let me guess, any apps for this will require the Craptastic Microsoft development suite. Epic fail.

  • I can always rely on Slashdot to crap on anything Microsoft does, even when it's actually a good product. Not that it's unique to this site, but at least others have the decency to just not bother mentioning it at all. Early reports already indicate that the Band is a hit; it's sold out online and apparently people have seen lines in the stores. That one is a first as every Microsoft store I've ever seen has been a ghost town.

    Anyway, as a fitness band Microsoft's implementation seems to get the essentials r

  • You know it's finally dead.

  • As if people weren't vanishing into their phones enough already, now you don't even have to take the phone out of your pocket to get distracted, ignore your surroundings, and generally be a rude cunt.

Some people claim that the UNIX learning curve is steep, but at least you only have to climb it once.

Working...