American Airlines To Offer Wi-Fi In Planes 303
Firmafest writes "In USA Today there's a scoop that American Airlines will offer Wi-Fi on domestic flights. Price is approx. $10 to get connected. Being a frequent international flyer I hope this will catch on. The LA Times reports that the cost is about $100,000 to equip a plane. While that number seems high, it will probably be worth it. If I had a choice between two flights both equally good, I'd pick the Wi-Fi enabled one." The article also says that JetBlue and Southwest Airlines are at least experimenting with Wi-Fi access aboard, while Delta already offers it.
Please turn on your electronics? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:5, Insightful)
If it pays for itself within a few months, then good. Profitable airlines == more competition, and less nickel and diming for snacks and hydration.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait...that might mean a lot of 'solo' flyers making it into the mile high club?!?!?
Ewwwwww....
Re: (Score:2)
Wait...that might mean a lot of 'solo' flyers making it into the mile high club?
Who says they haven't always been?
Ewww...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Ewwwww....
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If it pays for itself within a few months, then good. Profitable airlines == more competition, and less nickel and diming for snacks and hydration.
Secretly funded by the NSA actually. A capture will be built into the system.
So then I work off of my laptop with restrictive iptables running and SSH to my server which I log into using port knocking and watch videos on Youtube via tunnel. Or I let the NSA know that I enjoy watching the cat flushing the toilet video ten times in a row.
Between the TSA frisking a grandmother and airlines denying people access for wearing T-Shirts with Arabic lettering I have stopped expecting a high amount of privacy on a plane.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:5, Insightful)
I've just stopped going to America.
Good solution, because we're the only [slashdot.org] country [slashdot.org] to spy [slashdot.org] on their [slashdot.org] own citizens [slashdot.org] or internet users.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Good solution, because we're the only country to spy on their own citizens or internet users.
We are?!? Sweet, I'm moving away ASAP! On an unrelated note, why were several words of your post underlined and interspersed with [slashdot.org]???
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Funny)
You've been taken in by obvious sarcasm troll! Oh no, now I have too!
Oh, UID, why have you failed me so?!
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Funny)
For extra credit, answer the following: who should the woosh go to?
A. L4t3r4lu5 (GGGGP)
B. Spazztastic (GGGP)
C. interkin3tic (GGP)
D. Anonymous Coward (GP)
E. rwa2 (P)
F. interkin3tic (current post)
G. the next guy to respond
H. All of the above except for C and F, because interkin3tic never misses the joke
I. None of the above
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:5, Funny)
I've just stopped going to America.
Our plan is working.
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Frankly I don't believe for a second that it'll cost 10$. They'll find a way to squeeze more money out of you, look how the airlines do it with everything else.
I would expect at least 10$ and then a very steep bandwidth charge on top.
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:5, Insightful)
I was estimating around 3-4 flights per plane, per day (domestic), which, with your figures, would make it between 50-66 days to start being profitable given ideal circumstances.
Even assuming less than ideal circumstances it's still a very short time to get a 100% ROI.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You can bet just about any and every business traveler will use it. And while I can't exactly claim to be an air traffic controller, I can't see it taking years to rack up 200 flights.
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Informative)
Most long-haul flights are available overnight, these planes tend to spend 20+ hours a day in the air so even on the longest routes they'll have 2 flights every 3 days. Anything in the 8-10 hours range is almost definitely doing two flights a day.
Commuter planes tend to be in service from 6-7am through 10-11pm, and so 5-9 flights per day seems to be about typical, although some routes will be higher.
Re:Please turn on your electronics? (Score:4, Funny)
You know, I had a conversation with my wife just this morning:
Her: Shall we go to Texas? Oh let's, please!
Me: No.
Her: Why?
Me: I hate flying, and all the security theatre. Plus money's tight.
Her: They got onboard wi-fi.
Me: Why didn't you tell me earlier? Tell you what, we'll go twice!
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed!
Will I now be able to keep reading my ebook during lift off? Or will the stewardess still complain of possible magical waves interfering with the airplane in some magical way.
It would be funny to then be offered a wifi connection.
I wonder if it'll be protected by password or by geas.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Turning off electronics has never been about interfereance with the plane, if that were the case you wouldn't be allowed to bring items onboard at all.
Consider this: Your electronics are just as electromagnetically dangerous left switched on in your pocket as they are in your hand and all the airlines verify is that you're not holding any electronics, not that they're turned off.
Virgin America as well... (Score:5, Informative)
Virgin america also has WiFi on at least some of their flights.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Boeing tried this with Connexion. And failed. (Score:2, Interesting)
Interestingly enough, Connexion was a partnership between Boeing, American, United and Delta airlines. I wonder what has changed...
Re:Boeing tried this with Connexion. And failed. (Score:5, Informative)
Interestingly enough, Connexion was a partnership between Boeing, American, United and Delta airlines. I wonder what has changed...
Connexion was primarily on international flights, and used satellites. It was a lot more expensive to install ($500,000 per plane) and significantly more expensive to use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connexion_by_Boeing [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Connexion was primarily on international flights, and used satellites. It was a lot more expensive to install ($500,000 per plane) and significantly more expensive to use.
I once payed $29.95 for Connexion for a 12 hour flight. Seems about the same as $10 for a domestic flight... maybe even cheaper
Re:Fuel burn (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Boeing tried this with Connexion. And failed. (Score:4, Funny)
Filtering will be in place (Score:5, Insightful)
Backelin said the Internet access will be filtered to block pornographic sites -- the airline at first said it wouldn't do that, but relented after hearing complaints from customers and flight attendants. And American won't allow voice-over-Internet phone service, to keep chattering to a minimum.
Re:Filtering will be in place (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah and thankfully they can't just store porn on their hard drives and look at it on the plane anyways without the internet. ...oh wait.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't expect vaseline.
Re:Filtering will be in place (Score:4, Funny)
You're a far more brave man than me if you attempt to get through US customs with your laptop.
There, fixed that for you.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Filtering will be in place (Score:5, Funny)
because all the porn they sell at the airport news stand is so tastefully done...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Because there's a difference between you bringing porn on the plane and the airline making it available to you. In both you might be prosecuted, but only in one can they be sued for sexual harassment or contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's a good thing that the guy in 4a has absolutely no chance of having any porn on his laptop already, or one of the Playboy's they sell at the airport newsstand.
Oh it doesn't stop there. Clearly you haven't taken a moment to browse the great selection they have.
Re: (Score:2)
DANGER DANGER (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I think there is a ban for other reasons. Another legitimate reason I heard is about cell-phone jumping around the cell-tower because all cell grid looks similarity poor, almost the same SNR from 30000 feet, and the cell phone and network will go crazy in switching.
When did your computer crash last time when your cell phone rings right next to it? None for me.
I know airplane has a lot more analog device, but with Wifi, which its active transmission power is like hundreds time smaller than the cell, and bein
Re: (Score:2)
When did your computer crash last time when your cell phone rings right next to it?
If I put my cellphone near my PC, all of the USB devices lose power when I receive a call or text message.
I guess USB cabling isn't shielded as well as others.
Re:DANGER DANGER (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't recall the FAA ever saying that electronic devices WILL cause a crash, only that the planes have not been certified with the devices. So, if you have not done the certification testing (expensive), the prudent thing to do is say don't use the devices. Since, as you pointed out, they can make money on it now, it makes sense to spend the money on the certifications and allow some devices.
Also, while the FAA is concerned about cell phones for the same reason as above, the FCC is more concerned. Having thousands of cell phones hop from tower to tower at 500 MPH is not something the system was designed to do.
Not everything is some conspiracy to infringe on your rights.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The ban on electronics in flight preexsits cell phones (late 1980's). So, while cell hopping is a real problem for the phone company, it's not the cause of the ban. The ban is simpley because they have know idea what you might be bringing aboard, so they blanket forbid everything.
We have found that if you go to the pilot and discover (s)he is a ham, you can usually get permission to operate a 2m rig.
Re:DANGER DANGER (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
You are aware that radio devices use different frequencies, yes?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:DANGER DANGER (Score:5, Informative)
no cell phones on planes is an FCC mandate, not an FAA mandate:
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/cellonplanes.html [fcc.gov]
"Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules prohibit the use of cellular phones using the 800 MHz frequency and other wireless devices on airborne aircraft. This ban was put in place because of potential interference to wireless networks on the ground. "
Re:I fly airplanes (Score:2)
People are not that close to the cabin in commercial jets so the problem is less severe than what I was getting.
Re:DANGER DANGER (Score:5, Informative)
They tested an old busted up plane (IIRC they installed the instruments themselves even) and by turning the cellphone output up way high they were able to have some effect.
Then they tested a real plane and even ramping up the signal to max they were able to have no effect. At all.
The conclusion at the end had more to do with not getting in trouble with the FAA than the actual results.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That is not the claim. Were it so, it would be trivial to disprove for a specific case.
The claim is that it CAN cause interference, and yes, it can. Not every time. Not with every electronic device. I'm a pilot and I've seen it happen. But trying to figure out why there is interference and where it is coming from is enough o
Re:DANGER DANGER (Score:5, Insightful)
That was a VOR they used. Mythbuster's test was completely invalid. All pilots/engineers who watched that test were banging their head on their remotes with frustration. Also, at the end of the show even the Mythbusters mention their errors were brought to their attention and point out their test may not have been accurate because their VOR WAS BROKEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.
The simple fact is, hundreds, if not thousands of planes fly every day with cell phones turned on. The truth of the matter is, cell phones in flight place a higher demand on a carrier's network. This has always been a political issue and has never been a safety issue.
Lastly, AFAIK, there has never been been a substantiated claim a cell phone interfered with the safe operation of a plane in flight. Furthermore, all of the reports which received significant news coverage were later determined to have absolutely nothing to do with passenger electronic devices.
No international flights (Score:4, Informative)
You are going to be disappointed as an international flyer as internet access will only be deployed on domestic MD80s and 737s.
For flights over water, a satellite based system would be required and American Airlines is not using a satellite based system.
Re: (Score:2)
Even if it's available on Asia-North America flight...only do it if you don't mind the Soviet Russia listening to your traffic.
Re: (Score:2)
only do it if you don't mind the Soviet Russia listening to your traffic.
So, that's what they call The Land of the Free nowadays. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And neither of those planes have enough room in them to easily use a laptop other than in first class, of which there are about 16 seats.
I travel "those planes" on a regular basis. When I walk back to the restroom in coach, I find that 1/3rd to 1/2 of the passengers are either working or watching a DVD on their laptop.
Not to mention no power adapters so half way through your flight you're done anyway.
AA has power at selected seats. I almost always sit in the exit row, which does have power. In the rest of the "prime seats" (used by business travelers), I find that approximately every other row has power. If it isn't your row, it isn't difficult to negotiate with the row in front of you to let you use their power out
I wonder... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Funny)
if they'll call it "Wi-Fli"?
More like Wy-Fly
So, suddenly it seems... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget Alaska Airlines (Score:2)
They've got a website - http://www.alaskaair.com/as/www2/help/faqs/inflight-broadband.asp [alaskaair.com] - answering questions on their inflight wi-fi and their @alaskaair Twitter account - http://twitter.com/alaskaair [twitter.com] - provides daily updates what flight #'s will have wifi.
Not particularly useful (Score:4, Interesting)
And if I'm going to use my latop with WiFi on, that would only drain by battery slightly quicker than without it.
Re: (Score:2)
My personal requirements are to not own a laptop that cannot last at least 5 hours on a battery during normal operation.
Unfortunately, with only a single battery, there just aren't any laptops that can last 5 hours with "normal operation", unless "normal operation" is just some light typing.
If you watch videos, play games, or do anything else that keeps the hard drive moving and the video card running higher than idle, you can generally get about 3-4 hours out of most laptops.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Avoid American Airlines (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You got it easy.
I flew US Airways. I got charged $15 for my checked bag. I also have a laptop bag which can go under the seat, and a backpack which takes up very little room in the overhead.
Several people each flight brought two large bags that each took up over half of an overhead bin, and then argued with the flight attendants for 5-10 minutes about how they should be allowed to bring as much as they want on the plane. This held up my flights for several minutes each, that WOULD have left a few minutes
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I understand that historically bundled services are replaced with fees that it is upsetting, however I really have enjoyed knowing that when you load up to 100lbs (50lbs weight limit per bag) that it is paid for while I carry on my only luggage (which I have done for up to 7 day trips easily).
Since I have yet to see an airline that weighs carry-on luggage, I can see why you would like this policy. The only real criteria for the carry-on is that you must be able to fit it in an overhead bin and be able to lift it there.
Flying now, it is quite obvious there is a lot more carry-on luggage, and much of it is often at the very limit of size to fit in the overhead bins (with no hope of fitting under a seat). Basically, people have just stopped checking luggage because it costs more, but the airplane
Re:Avoid American Airlines (Score:4, Interesting)
Exactly. I flew yesterday, and only due to the potential charge did I carry on my bag. My laptop bag was packed to the gills also. So many people did this exact same thing that 9 or 10 of them had to check their carry on because there was no more room anywhere on the plane. The lack of space was verified by the flight attendants stalking the aisles for about 45 minutes re-arranging bags in the overhead bins.
I spent 1.5 hours boarding a flight that was in the air for 1.5 hours.
The policy may not seem self defeating to the execs, but I will not be a return customer on airlines that force this type of behavior.
Implications (Score:2, Interesting)
The possibilities are endless.
Re: (Score:2)
Second is also most likely forbidden in the agreement.
Third one is probably going to happen at some point but it could also be used to twitter or IM "flight 717 has been hijacked somebody save us!!" albeit the same could happen and it be a prank.
Re: (Score:2)
2. No (Serious answer; VoIP is blocked)
3. The use of electronic equipment during an emergency is strictly prohibited by existing regulations. "Seat backs upright, trays in their upright locked position, bent at waist with head between knees and hands behind head" is hardly the ideal typing position.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How is AA going to prevent me from setting up my Meraki repeater once I'm aboard and start re-selling their service for a lower price?
The fact that if you start hocking your nerdly wares up and down the aisle, someone is going to alert a flight attendant. It's the same reason you don't have people selling you non-internet goods on the airplane.
If you just repeat it to your 2 co-workers no one is going to care, it will just make you look cheap.
Societal pressure will do wonders for stopping shitty behavior in the real world. It works double plus good when everyone has spent at several hundred dollars to enter a confined space. This is why y
Already happening (Score:4, Informative)
AA has been offering wireless on several SFO <-> JFK flights for quite a while. And as another poster pointed out, Virgin is also offering this on many flights.
I hit speedtest.net [speedtest.net] from both a recent American Airlines [samgreenfield.com] flight and a Virgin America [samgreenfield.com] flight (Bonus: Verizon Fios and TWC stats, too!).
The connections from the flights were good enough to watch Battlestar Galactica on hulu.com. (I am a big geek.)
In both cases, Internet service was provided by Gogo [gogoinflight.com].
Gogo in-flight Wifi already in service (Score:4, Informative)
Other than the fact that they are expanding the routes on which this is offered, I'm not sure how this is new news. Gogo has been offering service on trans-con American Airlines flights from LA to the east coast for at least 6 months now.
I've used it a few times, and it works OK. Speeds were reasonable (100-150KB download speeds, ping times comparable to mobile broadband, 150-200ms) and I think there was only 1 dead spot for a few minutes during the times that I was logged in. They did not block VPN access so you could conceivably use VoIP once you VPN, but I did not try this.
A link to the actual service (rather than USA today or a blog) would help too:
http://www.gogoinflight.com/ [gogoinflight.com]
Southwest's test program speeds (Score:5, Interesting)
Misplaced worry (Score:2)
While I certainly welcome connectivity on the plane, once you offer it, unless you explicitly block Skype, YIM, and others, cellphones are no longer relevant as anyone can use VoIP. Th
Hey, I can't get to the Internet! (Score:2)
Re:Torrent (Score:5, Funny)
International waters/airspace, here I come!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Not exactly. Generally, all of the airspace over a territory is within the jurisdiction of that terrority. However, at least in the United States, the federal government has sole jurisdiction over the navigable airways; state jurisdiction does not apply. There's a very interesting blog article about airspace jurisdiction [kentlaw.edu], written about 1 year and half ago on a college legal blog.
I believe the airspace over international waters, is treated exactly like the international waters themselves.
IANAL, TINLA, etc
Re: (Score:2)
it looks like they're going to block audio and video conferencing, I bet they block bittorrent and anything else that can eat traffic too. 3mbps won't get them very far though if any significant chunk of the plane books time on the net. They're talking about passengers streaming video to watch... can you just imagine 25 passengers trying to stream video at 3mbps?
Better investment by far in that arena is a larger hard drive and load it up with media to watch while you fly. I've got overkill here, the medi
Re: (Score:2)
probably not. many public wifi services (like on buses) block all ports but 80 and 443, so you can even use pop/imap/smtp or ftp on them. unless you get your torrent over 80, probably not.
SSH tunnel via port knocking to 443 to a server. Sure, you can't use HTTPS on that box but it gets around most filters.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Are you that addicted to the internet? (Score:5, Insightful)
That you can't be without it for a few hours?
Never been on a plane, huh? Let me enlighten you:
People on a plane will do anything to distract themselves from the cramped space, uncomfortable seats, stale air, stale body odor, and bad food. Including paying out the nose for booze, headphones to listen to a movie, or internet access.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Read a magazine? Oh, that's right, printed words cause a severe allergic reaction in most people nowadays. I forgot, sorry.
Re: (Score:2)
Well that's about 10 minutes.
There's another 4 hours to kill.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or picking up a paperback book.
Re: (Score:2)
That you can't be without it for a few hours?
Yes
Re: (Score:2)
Psssst. Hey. You...yeah...you. Buddy. You DO realize you just asked that question on Slashdot. Right? You know? The place where a lot of people go who really like technology and the internet and all that?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wifi routers have to be plugged into something.
Re:laptops? on planes? (Score:5, Insightful)
Lose a few pounds.