


Vista Won't Play With Old DVD Drives 726
tlhIngan writes "From a developer's blog, Windows Vista will no longer support DVD-ROM drives that do not handle region coding in hardware (RPC1 drives) - thus preventing playback of DVDs that are region/CSS encoded with those drives. Not a big problem, as RPC1 drives haven't been officially manufactured since 2000 (and Microsoft claims their drives are all broken), but for those with hacked drives (RPC2 with RPC1 firmware), or move the RPC1 drive to new computers, well, no more DVD movies for you!"
This is a good thing. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:whooboy. (Score:5, Informative)
You don't get it, do you? The problem is that the drive you can buy at newegg is region-locked, and the region can only be changed 4 times. This means that if I want to watch my American, Japanese and European DVDs, I need to buy three players (and a case big enough to accommodate them).
--
*Art
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
don't buy 3 drives... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:whooboy. (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ [videolan.org]
I know because I am in Canada for christmas and we got a couple of european DVD's. Of course no DVD player in the house would play them and the only computers with a DVD-drive were running Windows and would also not play them.
But VLC were installed in a few minutes and worked with a charm.
And a few people realised why I was wearing my "no CSS" thinkgeek T-shirt
Re:whooboy. (Score:3, Informative)
Wow. Seriously. (Score:3, Informative)
Uhh, yes, that's the domain name. If you spend two minutes browsing the site, you'll see they have plenty of RPC2 firmwares. link [rpc1.org]
(A bunch of savages in this place, I swear. I'm not even supposed to be here today.)
Re:whooboy. (Score:3, Interesting)
Wanna watch a DVD? Dual boot into linux or use a linux live-cd.
Problem solved!
It will be interesting to see how as more commerically available OS's restrict their users, more users will move towards free and open alternatives.
Re:whooboy. (Score:3, Insightful)
Problem solved?
Re:whooboy. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:whooboy. (Score:4, Funny)
Why (Score:3, Interesting)
I have XP and I don't have any need for Vista.
Of couse at on point, support stops for XP. But then Linux for the desktop will hopefully be awesome.
Re:Why (Score:4, Insightful)
True, I could go out and buy a floppy drive, or pull a floppy drive from another system, but is that reasonable in this day and age? WTF happened to "it just works"? No it don't.
It seems like there's always some stupid fucking annoyance whenever I try to deal with Windows. People bitching about having to drop to a command line, shit. Get back to me when you have to rip apart two computers and swap ancient ass hardware you have no intention of using, just to get the operating system to install.
Yeah, I can't wait for vista. God only knows what the fuck weird problem I'm going to run into. If I was inclined to paranoia, I'd think the Windows team is able to look into the future and discern what hardware combination I'm going to buy, so they can engineer Windows to work for everyone else smoothly, but require some asinine step from me just to piss me off.
Re:Why (Score:3, Informative)
Of course you need to have a working computer to burn the CD in the first place. Not much good if you're building a computer from scratch!
Re:Why (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why (Score:3, Insightful)
I had to hang a floppy drive out of the side of my Shuttle system, it was highly annoying!
Although that said, my attempts to run Linux on the machine ended up in frustration when it turned out that it had no support for the SATA unit whatsoever...
Re:Why (Score:3, Insightful)
As a related gripe, why the hell can't you just use a USB jumpdrive to load the drivers for the h
Re:Why (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why (Score:5, Interesting)
I get to spend the day trying to get an ATI video card working in my mothers computer.
My dad calls me and asks if the card would be a good upgrade from the existing card and I suggested he try to see if there was an Nvidia card instead that might be a good deal. There wasn't. So I decide that my bias against ATI is several years old and they have probably fixed their drivers by now. (Which I have been assured by numerous people were all fixed and good since I bought my ATI all In Wonder years ago.).
So I tried installing it the other day and spent god knows how long getting an error message at the end of the install process telling me to install the standard VGA drivers. Of which there does not seem to be any for Windows XP. (No, booting in the VGA mode didn't solve that problem).
Since I had things to do last night for New Years I left before I could figure out the issue but now I have to travel back to my parents place and fix the problem.
As much as hardware for my Mac tends to be more expensive, I'll take the price hit over the GOD DAMN HASSLE of Windows hardware.
I am utterly sick of having to print out pages of information not provided by manufacturers just to install their products on the CURRENT VERSION of a Windows OS.
And ATI is back on my forbidden hardware list.
Re:Why (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why (Score:5, Interesting)
Furthermore, people who otherwise have no problem paying for content will feel increasingly comfortable doing things that are "technically" illegal, concepts of what is "reasonable" having been thoroughly sodomized.
So, let's blow by the angst and instead focus on promoting companies at every point in the chain who treat their customers like free, adult human beings.
Re:Why (Score:3, Interesting)
Strangely enough, pirates get more then the normal user. I steal my CD off the internet I get a non DRM encumbered CD. I go out and buy the CD via itunes or somthing of the source. It's all locked up. People are worried about DRM don't. The only time that DRM will be an issue is if you buy somthing.
My Solution ?
Don't buy anything. Want that CD download it here [piratebay.org]
Want that serial ?
irc.efnet.net #Serialz
Ive not once seen any DRM on my computer (that I know of) and I d
Re:Why (Score:3, Insightful)
Quite why Apple keep on getting touted as this bastion of consumer freedom when:
Re:Why (Score:3, Interesting)
Which leads me to my point: I wonder how Vista will handle VMWare. We've been hearing about al
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
MS has pulled the "Wait for us, we're the leader"-stunt many times and I for one refuse to get suckered in by it any more.
I'll belive in the features of Windows Vista when I see it running on a machine, not a minute sooner.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why? (Score:3, Informative)
Those splendid new stacks include DRM and Trusted Computing... I just think I keep my Linux...
We don't think Vista is Aqua... there was no DRM or Trusted Computing on Aqua...
--
I prefere to decide for myself what and whom I want to trust... and if I want or do not want to obey the law... that's a part of what I understand as FREEDOM !!
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't see anything there that doesn't already exist in both OS X and Linux. Care to contrast those features with their equivalent Linux and OS X features and explain where you think there is any innovative functionality in Vista?
first goatse! (Score:4, Funny)
Trolls, fire up your keyboards; only 12 months until
What about places like new zealand? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:5, Funny)
Somehow I doubt this keeps Bill Gates up at night.
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:4, Informative)
The story is a bit misleading - basically Windows Vista will only support drives that do something in hardware, rather than the old style drives that required it to be done in software. It's not a DRM issue, just dropping of support for older drives - and saves them a bunch of problems building a driver layer in for what are legacy devices.
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:5, Informative)
The DVD video data itself is encrypted. In order to decrypt it, a DVD player app is supposed to ask the drive for the decryption keys. On older drives, the drive will give the player app those decryption keys regardless of what region the disc is coded for. The drive doesn't know what region the player app thinks it's in, and doesn't care. It simply hands the keys over to the player, which then enforces region encoding. The encryption is separate from the region coding - it's possible to have a region coded disc without CSS encrpyion (although it won't be effective), and it's possible to have a CSS encrypted disc without region coding.
Newer drives refuse to hand over the decryption keys if the disc's region code doesn't match the drive's region code. That is the ONLY difference between older and newer drives. Official DVD player apps will not be able to read the decryption keys if the disc region code doesn't match the drive region code, because the drive won't give up the keys. This was added because some users started finding ways around the software-enforced region coding system (such as registry hacks, tricking the DVD player app into working in region-free mode, or whatever).
Of course, open-source DVD player apps (which are illegal in the US anyway) don't even attempt to grab the decryption key from the drive - they deduce the decryption key by examining the encrypted data, using a known-plaintext attack. They don't enforce region coding either, and are completely unaffected by hardware region coding. That's the only reason I've not bothered reflashing my DVD drive to make it region free - I don't need to.
The ONLY reason Microsoft are doing this is for DRM purposes. There is no other legitimate reason. Older drives do not need extra code (in fact, they need less code than newer drives), they don't need compatability layers, or any that stuff. All current (official) DVD player apps enforce region coding in software anyway, before they even ask the drive for the decryption key. This is only there to prevent people running patched firmware to make their drives region-free.
They'll probably add code to prevent DVD rippers and open-source DVD players from working as well.
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:4, Interesting)
Older drives do require extra code, because if Vista includes DVD playing software they would be legally (I think? Certainly mandated by DVD consortiums in any case) obliged to write software to enforce the region coding in software, since (as you mention) this is not handled in hardware. Just playing the disc is no more difficult, as you mention, but this is misleading since that's not all they have to do.
But yes, this is all about DRM. I'm not convinced that it's Microsoft's "bad" in this case, though.
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:3, Informative)
Think of it like this:
RPC-1 drive:
software : Please supply decryption keys for the DVD
RPC-1 drive : OK, here you go.
software: Ooh, this is a region 1 DVD, but I'm in region 2.
software : Please supply decryption keys for the DVD
RPC-1 dr
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:3, Informative)
From Microsoft: [microsoft.com]
Every CSS-licensed DVD-Video playback device must be set to a single region. There are two types of DVD-ROM drives:
RPC Phase 1 (hereafter referred to as RPC1). RPC1 drives do not have built-in hardware support for region management. For these drives, Windows maintains the region change count information, and the region can be set only once
Re:What about places like new zealand? (Score:3, Informative)
Who has to use Vista? (Score:5, Insightful)
Funny reasoning!
So why do you think you have to use Vista?
Or if you think you need to upgrade your OS, why don't you consider Linux which I'm sure offers a better DVD watching experience than Vista on that hardware?
Re:Who has to use Vista? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Who has to use Vista? (Score:4, Insightful)
'User friendly'...
Some people call a system user friendly when it is easy for an unexperienced user to access the functionality they want.
The problem is that this almost always gets in the way for those who are more experienced users. It does this in many ways, for example by hiding or simply lacking more complex functionality, addressing the user as if (s)he is stupid etc.
In most cases, you start out without experience, after some use you gain experience, and after some more time, you can be said to be a somewhat experienced user. This last phase lasts substantially longer then the 'unexperienced user' phase.
Hence, reasoning that a system that caters to unexperienced users is 'user friendly' is stupid.
Call such a system 'easy accessable' or something else that points at the fact that you need little experience for using it, but don't say it is friendly to the user because for most users it is the opposite.
Ah, but most people do not use their computers enough to ever become an experienced user? True if you talk about 'consumers', but then, thats true for most tech markets that happen to include normal consumers. THere is 'pro' and consumer grade audio equipment, video equipment etc etc. Professional video equipment has a lot more functionality and quality then consumer grade equipment, and usually combines it with a more powerfull interface, putting more power in the hands of the editor. It can only do that if that interface is also 'friendly' to that editor, else it will just be confusing and get in the way.
The same really applies to software on 'general purpose' computers, and it is your choice if you want to act as a 'low grade' consumer or as a (semi) professional. Stop thinking this has anythign to do with one being more 'user friendly' then the other however.
Re:Who has to use Vista? (Score:4, Interesting)
I use linux for all my daily work, but I still dual-boot into XP when I need to do DTP. I haven't seen a single piece of DTP software on linux that is useful. (Yes, I mention this from time to time hoping that somewhere, somone knows of a DTP application for Linux that's actually usable which I've missed. In that case, let me know so I can ditch XP altogether
Re:Who has to use Vista? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Who has to use Vista? (Score:3, Interesting)
OpenOffice: check.
X: check.
Netscape: check. Though I dread to think what would have happened had it not been open-sourced.
Jamie Zawinski has penned a beautiful essay [jwz.org] on how basically groupware, because it's not sex
...so what? (Score:4, Insightful)
Besides, the easy way to watch DVDs on crippled OS's like Windows is to rip it and re-record it without region codes, or no-skip flags. It makes a backup of your DVD and you can watch it anywhere.
Happy New Year!
Let's be suicidal, shall we? (Score:5, Interesting)
The money is in editorial branding. And that is because editorial choice is a way of dealing with information overload. It's so freaking obvious, yet none of the majors seem to get it. Even when some english nightclub goes on to form a top selling dance mix brand, just by picking good tunes. This is the way it is done.
Not by making your software even more anti-usable. FFS.
..and then they wonder why people pirate.. (Score:5, Insightful)
So now I guess everyone in the 'wrong region' will then have to get their movies from bittorrent instead.. yet another instance where big media and big software companies push their legimate customers to "piracy". That's brilliant...
1)shut out legitimate DVD purchases
2)push them to bitorrent
3)????
4)more profit?!?
Gotta wonder about some of these companies...
Re:..and then they wonder why people pirate.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Good point. I live in a country (Switzerland) where the MPAA has little to no influence and in which I regularly rent zone 1, 2 or 5 DVD at the local videoclub and have been doing so for the past 4 or 5 years and my DVD player (panasonic) was zone-free when I bought it (like all DVD players sold here).
DVD region coding is probably the stupidest ploy against consumers, especially at a time in which people can and do travel extensively around the world. Heck, you travel with your laptop and can't play a DVD you've rented once on the other side of the big pond? WTF? What's next, not being able to play media files if you're more than half a mile from home?
All these measures only lead to what's now uncorrectly called "piracy", because we want to be able to do whatever pleases us with the hardware and software WE PAID FOR, not just what we're allowed by some paranoid Hollywood coke-head lawyers. No matter what's said in their illegal EULAs (well, they're not legal here), once I've bought something it's my absolute right to do whatever I want with it as long as it remains a private matter, period.
Btw, downloading or copying stuff isn't piracy, it's not like we're robbing anyone, physically stealing property. The media industry hates us because of their so-called "loss of REVENUE", which IMHO may set a dangerous precedent. I mean, if they get their way, what's to stop them from litigating with anyone who simply doesn't buy their stuff?
"Hey, your shopping decisions harm our business! Stop buying from the competition right away, or else!"
Re:..and then they wonder why people pirate.. (Score:4, Insightful)
You are right. It's not outright theft, but it's copyright infringement. Making it sound like a-okay for all sides is not particularly good (or sympathetic for our side) in economies where what a reasonable portion of the population do for a living is producing the intangible - movies, cds, writing software, research......
A copyright is selfexplanatory in its name, because theoretically gives the owner sole the sole right to copy (and distribute). This is given by society so that, in theory, works would be shared. Of course, in exchange for this (society's) protection and recognizing that much of who we are is influenced by previous public domain (Disney - see Grimm Brothers) works, copyrights were to expire in a somewhat timely manner (that part got totally perverted) and those works go into public domain.
In America, at least, I would surmise you would be infringing under that right when you make a copy (downloaded or not - like borrowed from a friend) on your harddrive of something you don't legitimately have. Legitimate back-ups should be covered under Fair-Use (downloading songs from CDs you own would be legal too, thought the distributor is in a gray area......)
In any case, it's not that I agree with Mega-corps - they perverted the system far too much in their own greed so that much of their current woe I view as justified payback.
But then, I don't really sympathize with the downloaders - it's a type of complete selfishness in it's own way and the mega-corps only really lose if people lose interest in their wares completely and move onto other avenues of entertainment (perhaps going to a local band's concert). Even if their stuff is downloaded for free, the big corps gain (retain) the image of being the only game in town for musicians and other entertainers - ie mindshare. OTOH, if their wares were to become ignored, they would shrivel up and die....
Re:..and then they wonder why people pirate.. (Score:3, Insightful)
The band (i.e. the people who make the music) have decided that they would like to sell their music through the record label. Chances are, unless they expressly say otherwise, they'd rather people buy the CD than get it off TorrentSpy. This funds the people who worked on the CD, including producers, studio workers and yes, the record companies, who believe it or not do not eat babies and shit cancer as is sometimes assumed on Sla
Message to MS + studios: it's our hardware (Score:5, Insightful)
1) Our PC hardware is our private property, fully bought and paid for by us. Our PCs are not just a rented delivery platform which can rightly be controlled by you.
2) The operating system that we run on our PC hardware has the purpose of making our hardware do whatever *WE* want *OUR* hardware to do, and not merely what *YOU* would like *OUR* hardware to do.
If you want a fully controlled delivery platform doing whatever you desire and no more, then set up a subsidized leasing business and we'll rent the content delivery platform from you, at a cost far below the cost of private PC purchase.
In the meantime, our hardware is ours to do with as we please.
Re:Message to MS + studios: it's our hardware (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Message to MS + studios: it's our hardware (Score:3, Interesting)
So what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Won't stop VLC, presumably (Score:5, Informative)
There hasn't actually been any need to flash drives RPC-1 for some time; Linux DVD players ignore the hardware region code and read the data directly, VLC on any platform ignores the hardware region code and reads the data directly, and on Windows AnyDVD provides a nice, easy-to-use solution for those who want to use any Windows DVD player (albeit for cost). Anyone who has flashed their drive RPC-1 will find it very easy to get an official manufacturer flash that makes it RPC-2 again, or know just to use VLC instead, so the problem is pretty much moot.
Fine (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Fine (Score:4, Informative)
No thanks M$. I pass.
A solution! (Score:5, Funny)
2. Watch movie
3.
4. Profit! (but remember, this violates fair use policies if you do profit from this).
Re:A solution! (Score:3, Insightful)
But we shouldn't be needing to do this. If we happen to own a dvd rom thats region free why shouldn't we be able to play dvd movies on it without jumping through hoops?
This topic isn't important (Score:4, Insightful)
This just doesn't look important for the vast majority of Slashdot readers.
You missed the important part of the note. (Score:3, Informative)
Take it from me, a very large percentage of the popular drives have this firmware available, and a significant number of users use it. By locking them out, they've just pissed off the end user, and if the end user is a Joe Durr who doesn't know what RPC1 or RPC2 are, they'll start bitching at their nerdy associate for their drive being broken...and, more than likely, just shove it and bu
RPC 1 is an upgrade. (Score:5, Interesting)
Having to suffer from region restrictions is not acceptable (locally both region 1 and region 2 dvds were easily available and I also order stuff from both amazon.com and amazon.co.uk.
Of course, I usually play DVDs under linux, so this is not really a problem
Price Gouging - DRM (Score:5, Insightful)
Consumers should respond by simply not buying anything which is deliberately designed to support a cartel. They are only ripping themselves off (The Matrix: US $9.95... Aust $19.48)
Combined with DRM, how many months will we wait after the release of a fully DRM'ed Vista with hardware support before a company threatens its users with an OFF switch unless they pay their $2 per month DVD hardware "licencing" fee, or your CPU/RAM/HDD monthly "licencing" fee?
Refuse to pay? OFF.
what's the point ? (Score:3, Insightful)
Congratulations (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Congratulations (Score:3, Interesting)
Because people REALLY want to know... (Score:5, Insightful)
llegal drugs are at least a big of a problem as copyright violation in the world today. In fact many of the artists promoted by Hollywood and the American recording industry include many positive drug related references in their scripts and lyrics. So the question is : Would you endorse forced illicit drug testing for all artists, actors and executives involved in content production?
Over 11,000 people die in America each year at the hands of gun violence. The USA has the highest murder rate in the developed world. So the question is : Would you endorse taking away the legal capability of all Americans to bare arms?
In the USA there are over 12,000 speeding-related traffic deaths per year. The technological capability exists to install a "governor" in every new automobile which would deny the driver the ability to exceed the speed limit. So the question is : Would you endorse restricting access to roads and highways to only vehicles that have such a speed restriction system installed?
( If the questioned person says yes to any of the above then pass the quote along to the Hollywood/recording/NRA/automobile media, bloggers and lobby groups etc)
Spam advertising and spyware has become a major problem for computer users. The DRM capability that Intel is offering to content providers would also be available to those wanting to abuse those same user restrictions. Intel is effectively offering the ability to hide malicious content [blogspot.com] or deny access to content needed to gather evidence for the basis of a complaint [spamlegalaction.co.uk]. So the question becomes: Why are you offering up this ability to content providers when it denies the owners of the computer the ability to protect themselves?
Whether it is a war on drugs, gun, or road crime restrictive and technological solutions that lock the end users out of the ability to make personal decisions perform actions are effectively a fundamental violation of a person's civil rights, even if taking that action could violate the law of the land.
Even though illicit drug consumption is against the law, wholesale drug testing would be seen as a violation of a persons right to privacy. In fact most American courts would not accept evidence gathered though such an action.
Even though gun related crime is a major problem, taking away the right for any citizens to bare arms would leave them at risk from criminals who would ignore the law as a matter of course.
Even though speeding is a major problem, there are cases it is needed for safety. Overtaking vehicles may require the driver to exceed the speed limit to safely avoid oncoming traffic. Also there are rare cases, such as transporting someone requiring urgent medical treatment, where the even the courts have found that exceeding the speed limit was preferable to the affected person's demise.
While making a copy of copyrighted content may seem trivial in comparison to the examples in the above three paragraphs, remember that Intel along with Adobe and Microsoft is talking of offering this same DRM technology for business, legal and even governmental documents. The ability to blow the whistle on suspect dealings, and pass copies along to the press and even authorities, may be severely restricted in the future.
So the final question to everybody has become: Why should the consumers and citizens have to put up with DRM restrictions on their general purpose computers that they own?
Re:Because people REALLY want to know... (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you really feel safe carrying a gun around? What happens if you do get robbed? Would you give the criminal what they want to avoid bloodshed, or would you pull your gun out and either shoot them or end up being shot yourself?
If you don't get robbed, do you really want the temptation to be there to act on a whim and
Have you ever lived outside of the city? (Score:3, Insightful)
The ratio of gun ownership in New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the USA is roughly the same, but only the USA su [bowlingforcolumbine.com]
Actually New Zealand has greater racial diversity (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder... (Score:4, Interesting)
Vista may of course not support lots of obsolete hardware and there's nothing wrong with that. It's ancient, hardly anybody uses it anymore, developing drivers costs money and time, so cutting back on these costs is understandable. If someone wants to have their ISA gfx card or some obscure SCSI scanner supported, they'd have to write the driver themselves or pay someone to write them to work, cool. But if some hardware is blacklisted as in "This kind of hardware may be used for illegal purposes, we won't allow you to use it", it's a different matter.
Anyway, I strongly believe that in both cases the hacker community will be more efficient that Microsoft.
Different version for Australia? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Different version for Australia? (Score:3, Informative)
Will VLC work? Because it works everywhere else (Score:3, Interesting)
That aside, this is just more good news for Apple. If this bugs you, get a Mac. The new ones with Intel will be able to dual boot Windows, Apple has said, so your usual excuse about not being able to play games doesn't work anymore. Use OS X for work and switch over to Windows for the games, all on hardware that doesn't look like crap. Watch DVDs with any operating system, as long as you use VLC.
No problem... (Score:3, Funny)
Two DVD drives on PC (Score:5, Interesting)
I would like to meet the a-hole, probably a marketing executive, who thought of this Region coding BS.
On DVD Shrink, it is used for my own purpose of making dups of the DVD's i buy. The originals are kept at home and I play off the copies. I am about done with vacation and I recently bought some new Anime. I made copies and took the copies with me to watch when I have time. The originals are at home safe.
No more DVD movies for me? (Score:3, Insightful)
And if the day comes i cant watch what i bought on what i want too, *that* is the day of 'no more dvd movies'. Not that my 'media budget' will bankrupt anyone, but i refuse to participate.
Don't forget (Score:3, Interesting)
So it just means that to get real region freedom, the software will need to do more.
And as mentioned earlier, region protection works simply by getting the drive to refuse to give you the CSS decryption key in the key exchange. Movies that are not CSS-encrypted won't be affected. And software that brute-forces the CSS key won't be affected either.
What are the odds... (Score:3, Informative)
New monitors needed, now new DVDs, more memory, more disk space. The costs of upgrading are getting out of hand. OK, over a 3 to 5 year interval, hardware replacement may result in a significant change, but on day one who is going to upgrade?
So, Vista may not be the financial bump that MS will need. You have to wonder if it is time to abandon development until the necessary hardware is already in the field.
Big deal... (Score:3, Interesting)
All RPC-2 does is prevent the drive from passing through the decryption information from out-of-region discs. So having an RPC-1 drive means 1) faster ripping of out-of-region discs, and 2) the ability to easily play out-of-region discs. I was wondering what the hell Microsoft might be thiking, so I RTFA'd and found out that there were apparently just too many technical problems for them. Hey, they can't even keep their OS secure, so I'm not too surprised. Awwwwww, poor Microsoft.
I suspect all this will do is cause the firmware hackers to start making region-free firmware that speaks RPC-2. I mean, after all, they're already patching RPC-2 firmware.
Switch to Linux (Score:3, Interesting)
If Vista don't allow playing of encoded DVDs on old DVD drives, then it is the right time to give Linux a try. It will allow you to play encrypted DVDs and more. And the good thing is Linux is not at all fussy at all and is very user friendly.
Who is going to notice? (Score:4, Insightful)
Hardly anybody installs Windows. Yeah, I'm sure there are Slashdotters out there who are exceptions. "I have a kickass machine but sometimes I need to need to test my software under Windows, yadda yadda." But that's what you are: exceptions. "Normal" people who run Windows, run it on the hardware that it came with. They also call the "e" icon on their desktop "the internet" and they call their Dell PocketPC their "palm pilot." Yes, really.
Don't be an elitist prick (Score:3, Interesting)
You forget that the average person gets loads of spyware. Granted, they could just install anti-spyware software, but many just re-install Windows. BECAUSE THEY CAN. Don't be elitist prick.
Vista ships on New Machines (Score:3, Insightful)
Very very few copies of Vista will be installed on any machine older than a couple of years. What's the point? If an upgrade copy costs $200, only another $200-$400 will get a base Dell that will already have Vista Home installed and sorted out on it.
Slashdot users may do a new install, but let's face it, pre-installed on new hardware is really the only thing that most users can really cope with.
When will Linux get its ass in gear? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I don't care :-) (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I don't care :-) (Score:3, Informative)
Re:All hail the shrine of backwards compatibility! (Score:3, Insightful)
Sigh. This is nothing to do with 'pirated movies'. I live in Europe and have over three hundred region-1 DVDs: Microsoft is now telling me that I won't be allowed to play those DVDs _THAT I HAVE PAID FOR_ on my PC, with a drive that I've paid for, with an operating system that I've paid for.
Pirates, of course, don't need to worry since they'll rip the DVD to a DivX file or copy it to a disk with no region coding. THIS ONLY HURTS LEGITIMATE PURCHASERS OF D
Re:How does hardware protection work anyways? (Score:3, Informative)
It isn't even anything as complex as separate keys for each region.
Once decrypted, the stream just contains the equivalent of a bitfield indicating which regions are allowed to play the disc. The difference between RPC1 and RPC2 is that the RPC2 drive decodes and checks this bitfield itself.
The disk actually contains the (unique) key to decrypt each file, but encrypted with about 200 "player keys". The player asks the drive for its key, decrypts it, and uses that to decrypt the stream. An RPC2 drive si
Re:Let the MS bashing begin. (Score:4, Informative)
As I understand it, if you connect an RPC-1 drive to your system, the cdrom.sys driver will emulate the region control. If you look at the drive's properties, it'll say that you have two or fewer region changes left. The region setting is saved in a fairly well-known location in the registry (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\<random junk>). Vista will remove this emulation, and will probably refuse to pass key exchange messages to the drive. (As an aside, the cdrom.sys driver only checks the RPC level on startup. So, if you change an RPC-2 drive into an RPC-1 drive, Windows no longer shows the drive as being region controlled until the next reboot.)
On the other hand, Linux doesn't have any region control emulation. Since it's not encumbered by any DVD licensing contracts, it can simply pass the key exchange messages to the drive. So, it really wouldn't make sense for it to "be considered for Linux."
Re:Let the MS bashing begin. (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, the article is very Windows-dependent and has nothing to do with similar hardware/software in other OS's. For example:
"It was impossible for third-parties to compile their own CDROM.SYS from the source code in the DDK because the region code enforcement code was not included in the DDK."
This means that the source code was not present to include complete support. This is a decision that MS has made because they don't want people re-doing the region protection. That's not a "generic" issue, that's an OS issue. OS code to handle any type of DVD drive is available and (because of the GPL) always will be.
"The region code enforcement code would sometimes mistake a new drive for an old one, resulting in customers unable to play DVDs. Even worse, the driver test team could not reproduce the problem reliably, and the problem went away entirely once a debugger was attached to the system."
Strange how the new code would mistake the drives when the code in every operating system currently available that supports DVD's has no such problems (previous versions of Windows included!). Also, is it really the DVD's fault that their debugger was stopping the code from executing in the same way when it was activated or not? This definitely smells of bovine excrement.
"The code to support the older drives is complex, and the drives that the optical storage team purchased prior to January 1, 2000 are dead or dying. Consequently, testing the code that provides support for old drives has become increasingly difficult, and when the last old drive finally gives up the ghost, testing will become impossible altogether."
Strange, then, that they haven't noticed that almost every new DVD drive has firmware available that'll run it as a RPC-1 (or as they like to coin it, "old") drive. Also, I'm pretty sure that the "more complex" claim would not stand up to scrutiny (check out any OS code that deals with DVD drives, whether in the kernel, libdvd* or other places and see if they differ that much for RPC-1 or RPC-2).
"What does this mean for you? Almost certainly, the answer is "absolutely nothing"." Followed by the quote: "Only if you have an old drive will you notice anything different, namely that encrypted/regionalized DVD movies will no longer play."
That's not "absolutely nothing", especially for the budget-conscious who may well upgrade their PC a bit at a time.
"And since the average drive lifetime is only three years, the number of such old drives that are still working is vanishingly small. Not even the optical drive test team can manage to keep their old drives alive that long."
Strange... sitting here with DVD drives that are much older than that and still working. All of them "original" RPC-1, all of them the cheapest crap I could afford, all of them still reading the disks perfectly. None have died and, whoops, if they did you could always get a new RPC-2 drive and firmware it. This is just an excuse... for this paragraph read "We couldn't be arsed to support it and you're not allowed to use it anyway because you'll just use it to do naughty stuff you're not allowed to do cos the DVD forum said you can't and this sounds like a decent excuse to convince the idiots who are going to buy Vista anyway".
"It is that software enforcement that is going away"
There's your answer - they've made a conscious decision to remove this feature. Why? Because if you believe the above quotes, their dev team is incompetent, can't get already working code to play nicely in Vista and can't find a single RPC-1 drive to test i
Re:So I should throw away my laptop? (Score:3, Interesting)
So no, don't throw out your laptop.