Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Graphics Software HP Input Devices Technology

HP Restores Creased Photos With Flatbed Scanners 125

An anonymous reader writes "Scientists at HP have developed a technique to detect creases in photographs using standard, unmodified flatbed scanners. Once correctly scanned into a computer, software can determine where the photograph's defect is, and artificially correct it to remove any trace of a crease or fold. The result is a spotless JPEG scan from a creased photo, with absolutely no modified hardware and no technical know-how required on the part of the user." They're using multiple light sources to do this, in a way that reminds me of last year's description of 3D image creation using an ordinary digital camera.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HP Restores Creased Photos With Flatbed Scanners

Comments Filter:
  • !unmodified (Score:3, Interesting)

    by muyla ( 1429487 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:09PM (#29041471)

    In the article it says that they use an unmodified scanner, but later on they claim to control the lights of the scanner individually... how is this not modifing the hardware?

  • Re:Not really (Score:3, Interesting)

    by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:22PM (#29041665) Journal
    Could still save some people a lot of money. I did some consulting a while back for a company that, among other things, digitises archives. Libraries send them books and they scan them then manually open each file, draw a line along the curve of the page, and then let the machine deform the image to remove the curve along the line of the text. This step takes several times longer than the scanning phase to do well. If a machine can recognise the creases then they can get rid of the humans in this process and increase their throughput considerably.
  • Quite so... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by denzacar ( 181829 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:27PM (#29041741) Journal

    From the examples shown in the .PDF [hp.com] it seems that it is once again a case of a quick fix that only works on low-res and low detail photos, preferably in single color.

    And for it to work at all, you would need a 2-lamp scanner.
    Which are standard, but in high-quality print studios and other places that would do this kind of retouching by hand anyway in order to preserve or achieve better quality of the final product.

  • Re:Nice (Score:3, Interesting)

    by needs2bfree ( 1256494 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:31PM (#29041801)
    My memory has just been sold.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:31PM (#29041805)

    Xerox did this already a few years back. And Google does it for their book scanning by projecting a laser grid and determining the 3d surface curvature of the book.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @02:46PM (#29042009)

    Atiz makes consumer (simple, cheap) and professional (more options, expensive) software to do this, and they also sell the hardware (though you can just use a scanner or camera+tripod).

    It actually works pretty well. The only caveat is that you must frame the photos to meet their specifications (e.g. need a solid background border around the book being photographed). It is also pretty slow to process several hundred pages...

    http://snapter.atiz.com
    http://www.atiz.com/

  • by Spy Hunter ( 317220 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @04:06PM (#29043193) Journal

    There will soon be much less need for 3D from 2D hacks, because there's a new technology coming that produces 3D pictures directly: Time-of-flight cameras [wikipedia.org]. Today they are really expensive but they're going to become much cheaper very soon. This is what XBox's Project Natal is based on.

  • by dangitman ( 862676 ) on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @08:50PM (#29046305)

    As a practitioner of traditional photography, I'm annoyed to no end by people who talk as if the concepts of "photograph" and "image" were one and the same. Photographs are unique physical objects that have mass. Speaking as if photographs are digital images is like speaking as if symphonies are .mp3 files.

    That's stupid. A traditional print is made from a negative or slide, so by your purist philosophy, restoring the print isn't actually restoring "the photograph." Digital images are photographs and vice versa. What matters is the image, not the medium it is presented on.

    Your idea of the photograph would be considered silly and outdated by the photographers of 50 years ago.

"A child is a person who can't understand why someone would give away a perfectly good kitten." -- Doug Larson

Working...