A Billion-Color Display 206
The Future of Things covered the introduction last month of HP's DreamColor display, with 30 bits/pixel, developed in conjunction with DreamWorks Animation. The display is aimed at the video production, animation, and graphic arts industries. HP promises blacker blacks and whiter whites — though TFoT quotes one source who notes that if they deliver this, it will be due to the back-lighting and not to the number of bits/pixel. No word on the size of the displays that will actually be delivered, or on the price.
To what end? (Score:2, Insightful)
My point is that 24 bpp ought to be enough for anyone.
Re:To what end? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Great (Score:5, Insightful)
(On a similar note, in the center of our visual field, we can discriminate physical positions with much greater accuracy than the receptor density would lead one to believe, because our analog receptors are capable of discerning fine differences by working with their neighboring receptors. So anybody who says "X resolution is higher than humans can see" is talking out of his ass. You can tell when they know what they're talking about when they say something like "at this resolution, most humans will only be able to perceive a 1-pixel difference 60% of the time" or something which sounds a lot more like signal theory than somebody comparing one arbitrary number to another arbitrary number.)
Re:I'd like to see a double-blind test... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's just a shame that.. (Score:3, Insightful)
And of course, video codecs have been perfected now and will never, ever change or improve. You're right - we should all just pack up and go home, it's all been done.
Cheers,
Ian
Re:To what end? (Score:3, Insightful)
As it is, 10 bit displays are nothing new. Photographers have been swearing by them for years as they allow for the response curve of the display to be corrected without dipping below 256 displayable tones per channel. Of course the real solution is just to get someone to manufacture CRTs again. For this kind of market an analog display technology has a serious advantage in that there are no rounding errors.
Re:To what end? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Slashdot is a homo think-tank (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Great (Score:2, Insightful)
It's naÃve to treat the human vision system like a camera. The two things are very different.
Re:To what end? (Score:3, Insightful)
No amount of zooming will make your eyes capable of telling the difference between 30 and 24 bit/pixel color.
Re:To what end? (Score:4, Insightful)
On the contrary. Go create a single-color or grayscale smooth one-dimensional gradient on a large-ish image (1024x1024 or so). It will show clear evidence of banding at 8 bits per channel, since there are only 256 color levels available.
This will be substantially reduced if everything were properly dithered, but in normal software and normal displays it is not.
How worth it is I don't know, but there is absolutely an easily detectable difference. How about testing your hypothesis before claiming you know what you're talking about, hmm? It's not exactly a difficult experiment to carry out.