Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media Hardware

Review of Dell's Digital Jukebox 382

bu115hit writes "Tom's Hardware has a review of Dell's Digital Jukebox. The quick summary is that Dell has provided their own version of an iPod in size and shape, and they gave it better battery life. However, it seems the iPod is still a superior product overall, for ease of use if nothing else."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Review of Dell's Digital Jukebox

Comments Filter:
  • Behind the game (Score:2, Interesting)

    by cybermint ( 255744 ) *
    I think Dell is still a bit behind Apple in this arena. The IPod Mini looks bad ass and I'm hearing nothing but good reviews. I think I'll have to pick on up one of these days. My only wish is that the IPod Mini came in white. Silver is close, but it's not white.
    • No, Dell and Creative Labs are ahead in price/performance (Creative has a 60GByte MP3 player for $399). Granted, the iPod is a slicker device if money is no object.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:54PM (#8141470)

      "My only wish is that the IPod Mini came in white."

      Don't you know why iPod mini colors were chosen?

      • Silver - Low risk of looking like a dork
      • Blue - Guarded risk of looking like a dork
      • Green - Elevated risk of looking like a dork
      • Gold - High risk of looking like a dork
      • Pink - Severe risk of looking like a dork
    • Re:Behind the game (Score:2, Insightful)

      by cybermint ( 255744 ) *
      I currently have a NEX II, which I am happy with. It works quite well and has excellent battery life. My only problem with it is the firmware is HORRIBLE. And still horrible even after all the firmware upgrades. Apple has award winning software on their player, and in the long run I think this makes a big difference.

      There are a few things about the IPod Mini I don't like. The price is not attractive, but there is that old saying, "You get what you pay for.", and I think that's true. I also mentioned before
      • Re:Behind the game (Score:2, Informative)

        by phatcat625 ( 668966 )
        I jog with a second generation ipod in an arm band all the time. Occationally, if I'm running and hitting fast forward it will hang. As long as it can keep the buffer full, you should be fine. Since the ipod mini is a smaller device, it should be more secure than a full size ipod.
    • I myself don't understand what the big deal with the iPod Mini is? I have a 20gig second generation Ipod that I think is perfectly fine. I don't complain about the size at all (my sister has a 3rd generation Ipod which is even smaller!). Granted, having something that small that could play loads of music is nice, but for $249 [apple.com], it seems somewhat steep. Especially so, considering that for a mere $50 more, you can have 15 times the storage space!!!

      Do the new pretty colors justify that much of a rip off? I don
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Polo ( 30659 ) * on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:46PM (#8141411) Homepage

    Straight from Steve Jobs's own weblog [justonemorething.com] comes a more succinct review [justonemorething.com] ;)
  • by bc90021 ( 43730 ) * <bc90021&bc90021,net> on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:46PM (#8141412) Homepage
    CONS
    - slightly wider (not that much)
    - slightly thicker (not that much)
    - slightly heavier (not that much)
    - not as many songs (after 2500, does it make a difference?)
    PROS
    - cheaper
    - twice the battery life

    For a commuter on a budget, this looks like it stands to gain some market share.
    • by iJed ( 594606 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:52PM (#8141446) Homepage
      Its also twice as ugly though.

      That Dell thing looks just like any of the other generic MP3 players out there. It has nothing like the scroll wheel and excellent UI to distinguish itself like the iPod has.
      • I don't know about you, but when I'm listening to music on the move (on my zen nx - ipod has terrible battery life) I don't tend to look inside my pocket that much, on on the passenger seat if i'm driving. Sometimes people seem to forget that loads of us were listening to mp3s on the move way before Apple came out with the iPod. It's a nice looking device, of that there's no doubt, but it's just a piece of electronics that allows me to listen to music - nothing more nothing less. That fact seems to have
        • That is your mistake. You put it on you arm or waist belt. That way you look more sexy.

          What we really need in the review is some objective data on whether an Apple or Dell is better at helping you pick up the evening's companion at the gym.

        • It's a nice looking device, of that there's no doubt, but it's just a piece of electronics that allows me to listen to music - nothing more nothing less. That fact seems to have been lost recently.

          The point of buying an iPod isn't that it is necessarily a good mp3 player (it sort of is), but the fact that you will look incredibly hip using one. A iPod is just the thing a modern metrosexual man would use while walking his poodle or checking his .Mac mail on his 17" iMac.

      • Its also twice as ugly though.

        I have to agree. Aesthetics isn't the *only* thing that matters to me, but there's no way I'd buy that thing (or the Neuros [neurosaudio.com]) just because I couldn't stand to look at it. That white band around it looks like those old white wall Chevy tires [petepaulsen.com] from the 1950's.
    • by awhite ( 179035 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:09PM (#8141548)
      CONS
      - slightly wider (not that much)
      - slightly thicker (not that much)
      - slightly heavier (not that much)


      While each dimension might seem only "slightly" bigger/heavier, the results are surprising if you do the math.

      The Dell is 56% larger by volume and 36% heavier than the iPod. Figures below.

      Volume:
      Dell: 4.1 * 2.7 * .86 = 9.52
      iPod: 4.1 * 2.4 * .62 = 6.1
      (9.52 - 6.1) / 6.1 = .56

      Weight:
      Dell: 7.61
      iPod: 5.6
      (7.61 - 5.6) / 5.6 = .36
    • Make a difference!? I've got 4700 songs on my "like 'em enough to bring to work" list.
    • "CONS
      - slightly wider (not that much)
      - slightly thicker (not that much)
      - slightly heavier (not that much)
      - not as many songs (after 2500, does it make a difference?)
      PROS
      - cheaper
      - twice the battery life"

      And then there's:
      - installation process so bad that a "mom" would have returned it
      - unfinished product (doesn't work with many USB hubs, etc.) " buy the device now before Dell spends the development money to get it right" vs. "something that works out of the box without any trouble and does what you expect"
    • The price difference between the 15Gig ipod and dell is $50.
      for this you get:
      -it feels nicer in your hands and slips into your pants pocket better and is less of a pocket weight in you jacket or shirt.
      -Best quality earphones magnets you can buy, with low-tangle coated wires
      -Firewire charging. Did you see the brick the Dell comes with?/ this is not really a portable device.
      -you can charge the apple anywhere with a tiny plug for the fire wire.
      -you can plug the apple into most computers with or without softw
    • by ljaguar ( 245365 ) on Saturday January 31, 2004 @01:57AM (#8142388) Homepage Journal
      Dell licensed the software from Creative Zen series.

      I feel that I won't get modded up because i'm so late to the thread. (and i live for karma)

      But I am very surprised that nobody has mentioned the very important facts about Dell Jukebox. In fact, I am close to believing that everybody is talking out of their ass when it comes to hdd mp3 players.

      My brother has a Creative Jen Xtra. It cost 270 bucks for 30gb model. It's the cheapest hdd player ever when it comes to gb/dollar. I found a guy who had a Dell Jukebox. Both of them had the exact same interface. I didn't see enough of the dell to see if it's got all the creative's EAX stuff, but the user interface is exactly the same.

      Now, you don't know how bad the interface is. And frankly, if you've never really used iPod, I suppose you'd think it's pretty nifty. You just don't really know how good life can be.

      First of all, dell/creative doesn't work as usb mass storage device. Even iPod works as firewire mass storage device!! The device driver and the provided software sucks. Again, perhaps you don't know how good things can be unless you are used to iTunes/iPod combo. All I know is that the drivers for dell/creative cause crashes on windows xp sometimes and half of the times it doesn't crash, it doesn't work. It's like crapshoot.

      On the dell/creative interface, it is the most convoluted thing. No designers in the world has ever come up with how you can comfortably present all the complexity of hdd mp3 device. No one. For example, in iPod, there is no way to delete songs or find bps of songs or edit existing playlists. Apple made a decision when they decided to hide all that for simplicity of use.

      On dell/creative, you can do all of the above. The tradeoff? You can't just play a song by clicking on it! When you click on a song, it brings up a menu and you scroll to "play this song" and it enters the "currently selected" section where it will be played. Most operations make you hunt through menus and godawful number of clicks.

      Sizes. dell/creative is big. I can use my iPod comfortably with three fingers. My index finger supports iPod, my middle finger balances, my thumb clicks buttons. I have to use the whole hand to hold the dell/creative. Especially creative zen is awkward because there are buttons to operate on the side of the players. You have to coordinate all five fingers which all has buttons assigned to it.

      I bet you, if I had gotten dell/creative about an year ago, i would have thought it was pretty sweet. But alas, I got an iPod. I know how good things can be. I tell you, no reviewers have spent enough time with any number of mp3 players to really know how good iPod is compared to the others. Trust me, we wouldn't be hearing about no iPod killers.

      For the records, I am an ex-linux user of about 3-4 years. Then I became freebsd user. Then I got a used crt imac g3 600mhz (fastest computer i own). My freebsd server still serves files over samba and acts as the gateway.
  • The Battery (Score:2, Insightful)

    by wan-fu ( 746576 )
    As long as the battery is replaceable [ipodsdirtysecret.com] and doesn't blow up [theregister.com], I think I'd be content.
    • by prockcore ( 543967 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:54PM (#8141469)
      You know, overreacting aside, I find Apple's choice in regards to the iPods battery very odd.

      I look at my Sony Clie and my GBA-SP. Both have a tiny little screw that holds the battery cover on. Both my Clie and the GBA-SP are smaller than the iPod, and yet they still managed to provide user-access to the battery.

      I haven't seen the miPod up close yet, but I imagine they don't have a battery cover either.

      I think Apple just doesn't like screws.. they're definately anti-screw. Maybe it's because Apple hasn't discovered a way to make them glow yet.
      • Re:The Battery (Score:2, Insightful)

        by wan-fu ( 746576 )
        If they're anti-screw, does that make them pro-nut? But joking aside, I definitely agree with you. How is it that Apple, one of the big innovators in hardware designs and interfaces, was unable to provide easy battery access for its iPods? Of course, like you said, it's most overreaction and not that much of a problem [ipodbattery.com], but you'd think that they'd make it easy on the consumer. The miPod I think will really show how much of an impact iPods have had on the market for portable music players.
      • Neither the GBASP nor the Clie has to fit a both a logic board and hard drive inside a tiny case. Look at an actual iPod sometime. The entire thing is barely thicker than a AA battery. No way could you fit two of them (which is what you'd need, at the very least) inside an iPod without substantially enlarging it.

        If you're proposing to replace the actual li-ion polymer battery, that might open Apple up to liability issues, because those batteries aren't exactly the most stable things in the world. Also, the

        • If you're proposing to replace the actual li-ion polymer battery, that might open Apple up to liability issues, because those batteries aren't exactly the most stable things in the world.

          I heard lithium polymer batteries were *safer* than Lithium-Ion batteries, which is what is in the GBA-SP.

          If Nintendo thinks replacing the battery yourself is safe, it's good enough for me. Nintendo actually sells replacement SP batteries for $10.

          As far as space is concerned, take a look at a GBA-SP.. I don't see how
    • by daveschroeder ( 516195 ) * on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:18PM (#8141614)
      I called Dell sales and Dell technical support, and Dell has no method for replacing the battery (outside of warranty), and the battery is not user replaceable [ipodbatteryfaq.com].

      (Also, iPod's battery is replaceable, via several different methods [ipodbatteryfaq.com].)
      • by dbIII ( 701233 ) on Saturday January 31, 2004 @12:46AM (#8142081)
        I called Dell sales and Dell technical support, and Dell has no method for replacing the battery
        I suspect, from previous experience, that Dell just has no method for providing technical support.

        I must admit I am biased - it took Dell months to give me a refund for a cancelled order. After trying a variety of mediums of communication and talking to people on three continents, the way I got results was a simple letter in an envelope posted with a stamp. So much for it being a technology company.

        The best thing about Dell computers is that there is a whole ecosystem of other companies that fill the niche of supplying Dell parts within a reasonable time frame. They cost more, but you know that your order is actually going to get processed and that you will get the part. Last time I ordered a part directly from Dell I allowed five weeks, and it wasn't enough.

    • Re:The Battery (Score:2, Interesting)

      by awhite ( 179035 )
      Actually the Dell battery is not meant to be replaceable either (or at least I consider gluing the battery to the unit [pdainternalbattery.com] a sign that it is not meant to be replaced by the user... I could be wrong :)

      Unlike Apple, Dell doesn't seem to have an official replacement program in place. I'm sure they'll institute one once the first wave of customers start finding that their Jukeboxes can't hold a charge, just as Apple did. Also, you can purchase replacement batteries and do the install yourself for about $50, just [ipodbattery.com]
  • Both good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by t'mbert ( 301531 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:49PM (#8141429)
    I own an iPod and a coworker of mine has the Dell. So I've seen and used both.

    They are the only two units for sale right now worth having. The others are bulky, ugly, more expensive...why bother.

    In the end I went with the lock-in. I bought the iPod becuase I bought alot of iTunes music, and I love my iTrip FM transmitter.
    • Re:Both good (Score:3, Insightful)

      by blixel ( 158224 )
      and I love my iTrip FM transmitter

      Really? I hate mine. I don't even consider it usable.
      • Re:Both good (Score:3, Insightful)

        by ericdano ( 113424 )
        Yeah, it doesn't work in my car either (89 Mustang 5.0). I ended up replacing the car stereo with a $99 Awia deck that has Aux inputs on the front. Things work great now!
  • Battery life (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:50PM (#8141437)
    So Dell's mp3 player has life of "Up to 16 hours", and iPod's battery life is "Over 8 hours". What does this mean?

    8h+ == 16h?
    • Re:Battery life (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Rob Riggs ( 6418 )
      8h+ == 16h?

      No. Replace "up to" and "over" with "about". That may help you parse the sentences in a way that may make sense to you. The rest of us get it.

      ~16h = 2 * ~8h

      Whoever modded this question "interesting" should be flogged. The parent post is vacuous.

    • Up to 16 hours mean it can and should play right up to 16 hours, or a bit under (obviously). Over 8 hours means that you can expect 8 hours, minimum. But if the unit did 9 hours, you'd bet your ass that it was listed in the specs. Based on this, I'd expect 8 hours to be a brand new battery with a full charge, and it'd go down from there. Obviously the dell has the upper hand here.
    • Up to meaning near, say 15.8 hours.

      Over x hours meaning just more than, say 8.2 hours.
  • What is the point of these types of reviews? Everyone knows the Dell DJ is a piece of shit. It's like comparing... ah fuck it I wouldn't know.
  • by Delf ( 1807 ) * on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:52PM (#8141453)
    This is an awfully sloppy review.

    The price comparison links for the iPod say they're for the 20Gb model when in fact they're for the 15Gb model, thus eliminating a major point in favor of the Dell model: no USD$50 Apple premium.

    The conclusion makes it sound like there were many problems with the unit, but reading the rest of the pages I found that outside of the reviewer botching the software installation, his only criticism was that the unit isn't a very featureful voice recorder. (And how he expected things to work properly after he canceled the software installation in the middle, I don't understand. Maybe it could have been smoother, but panning it in the review when he did such an unusual thing in the setup just doesn't seem fair.)

    There's almost no discussion of playback capabilities. Those of us who've used these devices know that there are issues to watch for: some devices have problems at certain bitrates, or with handling variable bit rate recordings, etc. No apparent effort was made by the reviewer to address those issues. I'd also have appreciated some discussion of the quality of the audio stage, how much power it has, how it performs with quality headphones, etc.

    This "review" reads more like a poorly executed "first look" than the product of a reasonable-length, in-depth evaluation.
  • by metlin ( 258108 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @10:57PM (#8141476) Journal
    Like I've said earlier, the real risk to the Record Labels and the music industry is not Peer-to-Peer networks or piracy, although both may affect them to an extent.

    The real hit is going to come in the form of people downloading songs that they like - I do not have to buy an entire album of crap just to listen to one song, and neither do I have to pay $12 for a CD full of crap.

    This is the market's way of getting back and eliminating bad music. Sure, there will always be some cross section that will listen to stuff like Britney and the Boybands, but they will largely diminish purely because popular demand for better material will kill them.

    Apple, HP, Microsoft and now Dell. Yay! Way to go.
    • Thats your loss (Score:3, Insightful)

      by bluGill ( 862 )

      It is at your loss when you only get the songs you like. I have several CDs that I got for one song, but after listening for several months I suddenly realized that a different song that I didn't care about is now the one I like the most. Not all songs have reached that point, but some have, enough that I'm unwilling to get just one song for fear of missing the better ones that you need to learn to like. Most real artists don't include a bad song on their album.

      I however do not listen to (much) RIAA

      • Agreed, but these days that seems to be happening to seldom that it really makes you wonder about the quality of music thats coming out.

        In fact, some of the bands I really like are ones which are unaffliated and which you probably have not even heard of.

        My point is that good music will get heard, no matter what. Hell, I hated G3 when I first heard them, and after listening to them for a while, I do not know how I ever got by without listening to them.

        Quality seldom goes unnoticed, especially in an area l
      • bluGill, that's the first sensible post that I've seen about this whole "I have to buy the whole album to get one song and all the other songs suck" complaint which you always hear in these threads. Anybody who hates 90% of an album by an artist they like needs to seriously question their taste in music.

        They used to be called "album tracks" and that's where you find the artist's true sound and personality; what their music is really like when they're not trying to make a no.1 single. Bands like U2 and Qu
  • User Interface (Score:2, Insightful)

    by patdabiker ( 710704 )
    What made the iPod a hit was its simple user interface. The scroll wheel. Apple patented it, and now everybody is having trouble making a competing product.
  • Meanwhile... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by OwP_Fabricated ( 717195 ) <fabricated&gmail,com> on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:01PM (#8141489)
    ...I just use my $40 MP3 CD player with burned CDs.
  • by JoeShmoe ( 90109 ) <askjoeshmoe@hotmail.com> on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:01PM (#8141496)
    The iPod was purchased as my primary entertainment device, and I later purchased a Dell DJ for use with a project that I am working on for a school.

    The iPod was purchased based on winning design, features, available accessories (iTrip, CF reader, etc). The Dell DJ was purchased because it was $219 no tax no shipping for the 15MB version, making it by far the cheapest portable device that can store several GB of data.

    However the interface on the DJ is horrid. The display does this "windowing" thing where clicking the main button never performs an action but only leads you to a menu of actions. To do the most simple thing in the world, resume playback where you left off, you have to click three times.

    The primary clicker is also a joke. The combo scroll wheel is tacky and too loose. Often I will go to click only to have my thumb spin the wheel down instead. The recording button is a nice idea, but you have to hold it down to register, and there is no way to name your recordings so you know what they are. (By the way, this might be good because the way you enter names in other sections is to wheel tediously through letters A-Z, then choose the options to shift to letters a-z, then wheel to the actual letter you want.)

    Also, no dock for the DJ. It uses a USB2 connector on the top...bad design. The connection is so tight I was afraid to plug it in for fear of breaking it. Pulling it out makes me just as fearful.

    And finally...worst of all...the Dell DJ does not detect as a standard USB2 device! WTF was Dell smoking? Am I supposed to carry the Dell DJ driver CD around at all times? Why not just carry my data on CD instead? The whole point of portable storage is to load it up, and take it anywhere you need the data to access it. The iPod is detected as a standard firewire/USB device on every version of Windows 98SE or higher.

    Overall, it will serve its purpose for a prototype, but Dell needs to spend some serious money to come out with a 2nd generation version that addresses these issues. I understand they can't use a wheel like Apple does, but there has GOT to be a better analog input than what they came up with.

    Oh, one last nail in the coffin...the include software is from MusicMatch and is without a doubt the worst piece of software I've ever used. There is no automatic sync. The option to sync your player and computer is buried three levels down in the software. The ID3 tags you make in music match don't translate to the player (will sort 1 10 11 12...19 2 20 21 22 on the player, ignores track number). The only saving grace is that as a standard Windows Media device, you can use pretty much any other program to sync the device, but I think Dell was really stupid to sign up with MusicMatch instead of just writing their own (given that Windows does all the work, all they need is a pretty interface with a big "Sync" button).

    That's about all that comes to mind. I wouldn't recommdn the Dell unless you were someone who planned to load their entire collection once and then never ever ever touch the player again. If you had to sync/update the Dell DJ on even a weekly basis it would drive you up the wall. Spend the extra $100 and get the 10GB iPod or the extra $40 and get the 4GB iPod mini.

    -JoeShmoe
    .
    • by Bagels ( 676159 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:24PM (#8141651)
      The likely reason for needing to install the drivers to use it is that this discourages you from casually going to a friend's house, plugging in the Dell device, and copying over your friend's 3GBs of MP3s onto it. If you have to remember to bring the CD with you, it's that much more likely that you won't bother.
      • No offense, but this seems like a rather lousy reason. If my intent was to copy over my friend's 3GB of MP3's, it is trivial for me to bring the CD...or...just download it from Dell's website. Although I don't know why I would copy my friend's MP3's to it since I can't play them until I get home, copy them back, and load them via MusicMatch. Having to use a CD doesn't raise any hurdle from rampant copying of the "easily burned to CD/DVD" content.

        Where this hurts you most is when you go to a school, or K
  • by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:03PM (#8141511)
    I know it's supposed to be the future of music players and all, but I keep wondering : apparently that new Dell mp3 player (similarly to its iPod rival I believe), use a special high capacity battery to power its 15G hard disk for 15 hours and costs $250.

    In contrast, my old Rio CD mp3 player uses a pair of AA batteries that don't require a special charger (if I'm on the road, I'm glad to be able to "recharge" my mp3 player anywhere AA batts can be found), the batteries last several hours too, and I probably carry more than 15G worth of data on my CDs (and more importantly, I can burn as many more as I want). Finally, there's no risk to trash the hard disk heads with shocks. All of that for the $110 I paid for it new 3 or 4 years ago.

    So I'm wondering : sure CD mp3 players don't have a particularly exciting form factor, and I have to swap CDs, which isn't sexy, but they're cheaper, they (seem to) fare better with shocks, consume less power, don't use special batteries and have virtually unlimited "storage" capacity. It seems to me those are much better no-nonsense devices compared to those hdd mp3 players. Hip tech fashion victims aside, do these iPod things really make sense for the average Joe Blow like me who just wants music on the go without headaches and wallet-aches?
    • I owned 2 CD based MP3 players before I bought my NEX II Compactflash player. I like the NEX II much much more, even though I only have 256MB of space. I can also jog with my NEX II, which is something I could never do with my CD based player. Even with 40 seconds of antiskip the CD player still managed to skip on occasion while I was walking, let alone jogging. I think it was Compaq that came out with an MP3 player that took mini CDs. If that has decent battery life and can be jogged with, that might be a
    • I recently purchased a CD based mp3 player for my car and found that dealing with getting a good selection of music from my hard drive onto a 700 MB disk is a real pain in the ass. How are other people dealing with this?
    • they (seem to) fare better with shocks

      Not true - CD players skip. MP3 players don't. I think the whole "shocks trash your hard drive" deal is a myth - I've never once heard of anyway's iPod having shock-related problems. I take mine jogging, and it has no issues whatsoever. If there was any kind of significant risk from everyday shocks, Apple would warn you about it.

      don't use special batteries

      You can recharge the iPod from any AC outlet, and car adapters are available. Also, you can buy an add-on AA ba

  • No audible.com (Score:3, Interesting)

    by tdrury ( 49462 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:06PM (#8141538) Homepage
    I got the Dell Jukebox for Christmas and I really liked it. I'm also a huge fan of audible.com [audible.com]. I knew that the Dell didn't support audible.com but I figured support would be right around the corner. I emailed audible.com support and asked when they suspected they would support the Dell. "Never," came the reply. Apparently there were licensing issues and Dell wasn't dealing in a manner that audible could live with.

    So I returned the Dell and bought the Gateway DMP-X20. For the same cost, I got all the same features, plus an FM tuner, voice recorder, and audible.com support. So far I've been happy with the Gateway.

    -tim

    • oops - I sit corrected. The Dell does have a voice recorder.

      One other thing - the Dell's scroll wheel and buttons are nicer than the Gateway. The Gateway's scroll wheel is slick (in the slippery way) and if your hands are very cold it's very hard to spin without depressing it and activating the button. The forward/back/menu buttons around the scroll wheel are also hard to find by feel and nearly impossible to depress with heavy gloves on.

      Still - audible.com baby!

      -tim
    • I use a standard MP3 CD player in my car - and as a result have a very simple way to convert audible content to pure MP3.

      Just download the older version of Audible's software - I think version 3 or below will work, and use the codec that comes with it. Grab Goldwave [goldwave.com], a very impressive digital audio editing program, for less than $50. It'll be happy to open audible files using the codec mentioned, put in splits at silences (cue points), and save the individual blocks into MP3 files. Overall, conversion of
  • by daveschroeder ( 516195 ) * on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:23PM (#8141647)
    From Fortune's review [fortune.com]:

    Dell Unveils Its iPod Kryptonite

    Bizarro was an imperfect clone of Superman yet still pulled off the occasional superhero feat. So it is with the Dell DJ.

    By Peter Lewis

    The evil scientist Lex Luthor used his duplicator ray to try to clone Superman, but something went terribly wrong. The result was Bizarro, a good-natured but ugly and backward version of the Man of Steel. Bizarro was the antithesis of cool; his home planet, Htrae, was square.

    When Bizarro had good news to announce, he would say, "This am terrible!"

    Which leads us into a discussion of Dell's new Bizarro version of Apple's iPod, called the Dell Digital Jukebox Music Player, or Dell DJ for short. Coming from the square world of Dell instead of the hip world of Apple, it's bigger, heavier, and clunkier than Apple's sleek, suave, elegant iPod, which arrived on the scene two years ago and quickly became the most popular portable digital music player on our home planet, Earth. Even worse, the Musicmatch-backed Dell Music Store is the clumsy, Bizarro counterpart to Apple's brilliant iTunes Music Store.

    [...]

    Bizarro, the pathetic wretch, was driven mad by constant comparisons with the handsome, smart, and sexy Superman he was meant to emulate. So too must the DJ suffer from inevitable comparisons with the iPod, with its two-year headstart. If the iPod did not exist, the DJ might even lay claim to the title of Best Portable Music Player Since the Sony Walkman.

    But the iPod does exist, and so do Apple iTunes and the Apple iTunes Music Store, and thus the Dell DJ is doomed to be merely the second-best player on the market.
  • by dpbsmith ( 263124 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:27PM (#8141659) Homepage
    It seems these days as if virtually every USB device comes with a warning saying you should not plug it into a hub. Everything wants to be plugged directly into the CPU. Too bad if you have more than two of these devices.

    WTF???

    It is not just a matter of needing a powered hub, either. The Tom's Hardware review notes that it was a powered hub with which the Dell digital jukebox failed to work.

    I don't know enough about the USB spec to know who's wrong, but it seems to me that if USB devices don't work on a hub, either

    a) the hub is defective, or
    b) the device is defective, or
    c) the USB spec itself is defective.

    What's the deal? Are hubs supposed to work, or not?
    • virtually every USB device comes with a warning saying you should not plug it into a hub. Everything wants to be plugged directly into the CPU.
      Tried that, but the pins on the CPU were too small to fit, and the damned heatsink kept getting in the way. At least on Slashdot I would expect people to know what a computer is.
  • A big improvement (Score:3, Informative)

    by ektor ( 113899 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:29PM (#8141671)


    MusicMatch, the software that comes with the DJ is by far the worse part of the product. However you can pay $20 for Dudebox, a much better product by Red Chair [redchairsoftware.com]. Highly recommended.

  • But how could he not have tested an iPod for comparison by now?

    The last remaining link to the caveman people?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:31PM (#8141686)
    I recently owned both a Rio Karma and an iPod after I bought the Karma (20gb) for myself then received an iPod (10gb) as a corporate gift a week later.

    Just thought I'd point out a couple of things which I haven't seen on /. before:

    -The iPod is easier to use, and looks cooler, but it will only synch to one PC, so it's significantly harder to pirate your friends' songs. (Since everyone in my office got one, they were a little disappointed when I explained they had to copy mp3s onto a local computer, then copy them onto the iPod in a separate directory using it as an external hard drive, THEN load from there into their iTunes back at home before they could take each others' songs).

    -The Karma uses a proprietary filesystem, so if you want to use it as an external hard drive as well, you'll have to install the Rio software on the PC to which you want to transfer files.

    -The Karma has a little scroll wheel on the side, which you have to have functional to navigate the OS. However, the design is such that it is most likely to fall on the wheel if you drop it (take a look at a picture of the Karma and you'll see why). After dropping it once, and breaking the wheel, I had to crack the thing open and krazy glue the wheel back into place (nerve racking since it's designed so that dropping glue 5 mm's off will glue the wheel so that it won't turn). My other option was paying $200, or 66% of the price new, to have it fixed by Rio itself. THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM.

    -Finally, a nitpick: Rio charges extra to permit mp3 encoding in its software. It's not a big deal to use a third-party encoder, but seriously, WTF?

    So I'd say get the Rio Karma for better pricing and pirating capabilities, but keep it encased in bubble wrap or avoid all pavement or something.
  • The article complains that there is no mention that the DJ will not work with some hubs, and goes on to complain how this is so different from Apple.

    I find this unfair in that my iPod can only charge when plug it into the firewire port on my external drive. Apparently daisy chaining doesn't work so well with the iPod.

    Find that in the iPod docs. And I am a shameless consumer of Apple products. Don't assume that Apple stuff always "just works".
  • Instead of getting a geek to test out all these products. Why not get an average joe off the street to use them. Which ever one he can transfer music files to, play and enjoy the whole process, should be the one that comes out on top.
  • by euxneks ( 516538 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:52PM (#8141789)
    When am I ever going to listen to 15GB worth of music on my player? That's like my _whole_ friggun music library! I don't even listen to half those songs anymore... I would rather have something like a 1.5 GB mp3 player.. Hey, it could be smaller and probably easier on the batteries.. ? The only thing I could find that had those specs was the Muvo2, and no store around here (lower B.C.) sells it.
  • by fordgj ( 522469 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:54PM (#8141799)
    I don't get it, why in this world of standards does Dell not make it act like a USB mass storage device? These are exactly the design decisions that make for flawed products. Moreover, these are the very same decisions that differentiate Apple products from the rest of the world. Macs can boot from the iPod, that's right, boot, let alone need some special driver (especially a driver that requires installation of gads of other software at the same time).

    As someone who does a lot of travelling and moves around a bit, I see these things as digital wallets. Why else would you want 40 Gb? Dell's device might be more usefull if you could go to any computer with a reasonably modern OS and plug it in, without needing administrative access to install drivers.

    There is another problem, USB. The iPod has firewire which doesn't need a host, I can only speculate that this is one of the reasons why Belkin chose firewire for their card reader. USB is good, it's good to have both, but when you want flexibility, USB has it's issues.

    Sometimes it's just the little things that count, that make a good design great. When I go to work and work on pc hardware and Windows, I miss the details, nuance and elegance that makes working with my Mac at home a joy to use.

    • Yep.

      Quite honestly, there's nothing more useful than reserving 2GB on your iPod for an OS X Server install so you can boot your Xserve in an emergency. Xserve even comes with a front-mounted Firewire port specifically for this purpose.

      I pretty much have my server emergency kit on me at all times.
  • by Flavius Stilicho ( 220508 ) on Friday January 30, 2004 @11:58PM (#8141816)
    Sorry.... mod this down if like.... but you get what you pay for and when you buy Dell you're not paying a lot. I don't own an iPod nor am I a fan of Apple but I have extensive experience with Dell products and wouldn't spend a dime of my hard-earned cash on anything they sell.
  • Battery life (Score:4, Interesting)

    by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Saturday January 31, 2004 @12:06AM (#8141860)
    I imagine that the Dell probably does have better battery life than the iPod. But having owned both a Dell Inspiron and now a Powerbook, I know that - at least when it comes to laptop computers - Apple gives a much closer-to-the-truth estimate of expected battery life than Dell does. Brand new, my Inspiron would get maybe half the battery life that Dell said it should (slightly over two hours in real life; Dell was saying a bit over four).
  • Good player (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mephisto_kur ( 300898 ) on Saturday January 31, 2004 @12:44AM (#8142065) Homepage
    I've had mine since before the holidays (actually meant to do a review and never got around to it). Worked perfectly out of the box. My wife and I used it for a cross country trip over the Christmas break, and never had an issue with it. I would put 16 hours as minimum for battery life. It survived on one charge the entire distance from Northern Virginia to Omaha (about 1200 miles, and 18 hours) and still had two bars on the meter left. Obviously - batteries are always a YMMV.

    Altho not as small as the iPod, it has a more rugged feel to it. More solid, and less fragile. Plus it doesn't look so friggin' girlie.

    Sound is great, but those earbuds *are* crap. The thing puts out enough power to push studio headphones - cheap ones, yes, but still. On good phones it sounds great.

    The version of MusicMatch included with it sucks. For those (like myself) that hate reading manuals, it is absolutely horrible. But the Windows Media Player access is logical, so I normally use that.

    If you do not have USB 2.0, get it. My initial transfer of about 11GB of songs took overnight. I bought a 2.0 card the next day. Transfers are exponentially faster now. Oh, and I run it through an *unpowered* hub when I use the USB1.x connection, and never had any problems with it being detected.

    Over all, I like it. Plus it's well padded with the C note I saved by avoiding Apple.
  • by meowsqueak ( 599208 ) on Saturday January 31, 2004 @05:17AM (#8142907)
    Check out the iRiver iHP-120 (and the new 140 model) . Purely in my opinion, the iHP-120 sounds a lot better than the iPod. It also has a longer battery life (I get about 12 hours out of it) and it can play WMA, MP3, WAV and yes, Ogg Vorbis. It can also record direct to WAV or MP3, has a pretty decent FM tuner, and 20 gig of HDD space (or 40 gig on the iHP-140). It's a good solid all-metal construction and it's about the same size as the iPod. If you're considering buying an iPod, you really owe it to yourself to read up on this beauty first.

"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.

Working...