Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Google's Head of Research — We Don't Do Hardware

Posted by Zonk on Fri Sep 14, 2007 01:02 PM
from the to-the-gmobile dept.
mr_sifter writes "In a recent, wide-ranging interview Google's Head of Research, Dr Peter Norvig, revealed the firm has no interest in developing its own hardware. (Except a phone, apparently.) Said Norvig, 'We want to work everywhere and be neutral. That neutrality is important.' Interestingly, Norvig is tough on where the company's priorities are at the moment, saying: 'I think there could be much better tools, we're [Google] still kind of isolated in what we do. You give us a question and we give you an answer ... We're really focused on either the five second-type question ... We don't really support the five month or the five year queries, the project or life-long goal.' He also talks about the importance of adding a narrative to search, mobile technology, and how Google's strong financials mean the company can run research in an unusual way."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Technology: Google Shows Off Ad-Supported Cell Phone 290 comments
taoman1 writes "Today Google showed off a ad-supported cellphone that the company plans to offer for free to interested parties. The product could reach the marketplace within a year, and will offer Google search, email, and a web browser. 'The move would echo another recent product launched by a phone industry outsider, Apple Inc.'s iPhone. But Google's product would draw its revenue from a sharply different source, relying on commercial advertising dollars instead of the sticker price of at least US$499 for an iPhone and $60 per month for the AT&T Inc. service plan. Negotiating the fairest way to split those advertising revenues with service providers could be a big hurdle for Google, one analyst said. Another problem is the potential that consumers could be scared off by the prospect of listening to advertisements before being able to make phone calls, said Jeff Kagan, a wireless and telecommunications industry analyst in Atlanta.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Oh no!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by wandazulu (265281) on Friday September 14 2007, @01:04PM (#20605205)
    My Google Search Appliance just disappeared in a poof of smoke and logic!
      • "I have a masters and I do not do hardware"

        I'm curious what the hell that was even supposed to imply. Was he saying that hardware is relegated to BS and below, or PhD? And does he think that anyone's impressed by a masters' these days? They're usually no harder to get than a BS (or indicate that someone bailed on their PhD program).

  • by eno2001 (527078) on Friday September 14 2007, @01:07PM (#20605263) Homepage Journal
    ...or "do" as in "copulate with". Because if it's the later, I'm glad to hear they aren't going the route of Microsoft developers. ;P
  • by downix (84795) on Friday September 14 2007, @01:08PM (#20605267) Homepage
    I remember when Microsoft was all "We don't do hardware"...

    **looks at his co-workers X-box, microsoft mouse and microsoft joystick**
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The funny thing is, MS arguably has better hardware than they have software.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Really? [wikipedia.org]
      • The funny thing is, MS arguably has better hardware than they have software.

        <troll>Well, it could hardly be worse.</troll>
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          Running it on Vista?

          Seriously, I have a MS-keyb+mouse set, and it's awesome. Probably one of the best keyboards I've had - only, as soon as I installed Vista, half the cool functions weren't available. Kind of embarassing, that.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Microsoft WIRED Mice and Keyboards are pretty good. My first mouse was a Microsoft mouse and it lasted for a LONG time. Their wireless gear on the other hand sucks monkey ass. I have yet to touch a wireless microsoft mouse that didn't suffer from interference problems or render my system completely unusable (including locking up the wired keyboard) when the batteries got the slightest bit low. The one I bought for myself sits in a box even though it has the best resolution of all my mice. The conferenc
          • Microsoft WIRED Mice and Keyboards are pretty good.

            Too true. I have a first gen MS optical intellimouse that has seen 6+ hours of use per day for about 11 years now without failure. Hell the thing is so old that I didn't even dislike Microsoft when I bought it! Fortunately the logo rubbed off around 1999 and these days no one can recognise it.

            In fact when it was new my top-end machine was a blistering 400mhz PII with 64mb of ram running Win95. Who the hell knew that that Microsoft could make anything
    • That must have been a long time ago...I'm still using the MS keyboard that came with a CTX computer I picked up about 10 years ago. One of the only MS products that's withstood the test of time.
    • You've got a good memory, then. I had a Microsoft mouse for my IBM XT 20 years ago. I hear they eventually made a GUI that used it, too, that's become somewhat popular. Unfortunately, they didn't document it nearly as well as their mice, so it isn't nearly as nice to work with.
  • Of course! (Score:4, Informative)

    by biocute (936687) on Friday September 14 2007, @01:14PM (#20605357) Homepage
    Define hardware [google.com] : major items of military weaponry (as tanks or missile)
  • "can i have your job?"

    seriously, do i not speak for the slashdot community when, considering this guy's resources and job description and everything else, i find my mind consumed with one concept?:

    E-N-V-Y

    does this guy not have the perfect slashdotter's job or what?
  • Responding to issues of accessibility Dr. Norvig analogizes his answer: "If you cut out the curbs it helps wheelchair users - and it also help bicyclists and skateboarders and so on."


    The Dr forgot to mention it's easier for cars to run over pedestrians and for wheelchairs to get stuck in transport grills like this guy [dhadm.com].

  • "People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware."

    --Alan Kay
  • by DrDitto (962751) on Friday September 14 2007, @01:24PM (#20605501)
    Just look at the job postings:

    http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/egr/408676278.html [craigslist.org]
    • Just because Google needs hardware to run its operations, and thus, hardware testing engineers to test new hardware and infrastructures, doesn't mean that they 'do hardware.'

      Or were you trying to be funny?
  • From TFA:
     

    We don't really support the five month or the five year queries, the project or life-long goal.

     
    This quote explains much about Google's consistently unfocused progress with many applications remaining incompletely integrated with the others and often incomplete or in endless 'beta'. If I were an investor in GOOG, I'd be even more nervous now than before.
  • Don't believe this (Score:4, Insightful)

    by suv4x4 (956391) on Friday September 14 2007, @02:24PM (#20606299)
    They said they won't do email, chat, financial information, spreadsheets or horoscopes (making fun of Yahoo and Microsoft).

    And short of horoscopes, they now do all of this.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      They don't make hardware, and if I read the article correctly they don't plan to get into the that market.

      At the moment (iirc) their using off the shelf components bought in bulk to power their server farms. If you're buying anything close to the amount of hardware Google is using you need people who are well versed in the stuff in order to make the right architecture decisions. Otherwise you just get a huge 20+ geek argument about which Intel or AMD processor to use.

      Hiring hardware testers is not the same
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Google doesn't assemble the hardware for that device...they contract that out to a company in San Jose that does it for them.