GPS Rollover Tonight 71
A reader wrote to us with the reminder about the GPS rollover tonight. It will occur at midnight, UTC time. Most machines should be compliant, but check out
The Coast Guard for more information. Essentiallly, they are rolling over the GPS time, and machines that aren't repaired/replaced will claim that it is 6 Jan 1980, and August 23 will be Jan 7, and so on.
Planes don't rely on GPS (Score:1)
Re:Hmmm... I thought this was in the specs... (Score:1)
"Oh, we know it exists, but by the time it really happens,
somebody else will have replaced all this old equipment."
GPS/NDS (Score:1)
"golf ball" & r2d2 antennas - hp1000
daily briefings with tight ass generals (lol) - working 11pm-7am - 1lt apodoca
tracking lightning strikes for NOAA
the look on some cpt/col's face when a lowly a1c tells them their bird is wobbling - priceless
the good ole days...
as i was
thor
Re:We just spent 100K to upgrade our antique GPSs (Score:1)
off to the sporting goods store (Score:1)
I'm really tempted to be at a sporting goods/hardware store that sells GPS receivers, and be "looking at buying" a couple at 6 PM MDT tomorrow night (MDT = GMT -0600).
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
On the other hand, other posters in this thread and elsewhere have pointed out that essentially no commercial airliners are relying on GPS.
So, if you must worry about flying on a commercial airliner, worry about some bozo with a haywire GPS blundering in front of your plane, not about your plane's own navigation. (And even that probably should be regarded as paranoia...)
i wanna see this,, (Score:1)
Malto
*Tomorrow* night (Score:1)
Y2K hysteria a good thing in some ways... (Score:1)
-----
Worst Case Scenario (Score:1)
I don't think it would matter if it was a technicality (really bad weather, etc). The millenial panic level (which seems a bit subdued to me so far) would take a big jump, regardless of the fact that GPS and Y2K are completely seperate problems.
I also don't see too many people stocking up on compasses and sextants...
Re:No, it's tomorrow. (Score:1)
Not just a cosmetic problem (Score:1)
"Accuracy of navigation may also be severely affected" is an understatement. There will be no accuracy at all.
Should I be worried? (Score:1)
Not to be paranoid, but do I have anything to worry about? It's a transcontinental flight, so they can't use Loran. Obviously, this is not a surprise to those in the aviation business, but I still worry a teeny bit flying on a cut-price carrier...
Bravery, Kindness, Clarity, Honesty, Compassion, Generosity
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
No, it's tomorrow. (Score:1)
Subject says it. The GPS EOW rollover happens midnight UTC, tomorrow - not tonight. More info here. [uscg.mil]
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
W2**10 bug (Score:2)
A while ago I attempted a humourous web page, part of which enumerated [irelands-web.ie] some of the ways that tech was going wrong; I was surprised that my research research dug up so many ways that technology we relied on is fundamentally flawed. It seems that there isn't a technology out there that doesn't feature a fatal flaw that'll kill us all a few years hence.
It's got to the stage where I'm thinking of heading for the hills not because of Y2K, but because sooner or later something electronic is going to kill us all.
panic!!! (Score:1)
Groundhog's Day... (Score:1)
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
by the time it happens, old equip will be replaced (Score:1)
(nice tag line btw)
Hmmm... I thought this was in the specs... (Score:1)
I also read a while back that the biggest problem with this rollover would maybe cause problems in international banking due to the fact that some international banks use the GPS timestamp to coordinate electronic transfers. Sorry I don't have the references to these...
A
Re:How do you determine longitude with pre-elec te (Score:1)
Well, you could do some complicated constructions with an astrolabe, a compass, and a really big chart of magnetic declinations. It'd probably be easier to reinvent electricity, though.
--
We appreciate the news but... (Score:1)
We appreciate the news but...
you could have kept the message shorter, still got your message across, and not crossed the annoyance threshold.
Take it easy, news of this type will circulate very quickly.
-matt
Wrong, Wrong, Wrongitty Wrong (Score:1)
The FAA *has* approved GPS as primary navigation for enroute and non-precision approach. However, the testing for that FAA approval included proving that the unit could handle GPS_Week rollover.
But most planes don't use GPS or Loran for IFR navigation - they use ground based VOR navigation aids. So you don't have to know the latitude and longitude (as another person in this thread asked), you just follow the beam.
Re:How do you determine longitude with pre-elec te (Score:1)
That's what had naval navigation messed up for so long. It took the invention of a really good watch, a small pocketwatch, actually, to finally get accurate longitude.
This first watch used for such a purpose managed to make a transatlatic crossing while only loosing two seconds of time. Try taking a pendulum watch on a boat while the boat is rocking back and forth enough to make even the hardiest sailors ill...
Those first pocketwatches must have been the cell phones of the day. They were years ahead of their time, packed so much technology into such a little bundle, looked really cool and everyone had to have one.
Garmin (Score:1)
Did it happen already? (Score:1)
GPS roll-over & Y2k (Score:1)
It will be interesting to see if the effect of the roll over is less than or greater than what is expected. If most newer GPS units are compliant as is claimed, and the negative effects are minimal, maybe the y2K compliance/impact predictions will also be accurate. We shall see.
Good thing I'm not playing Golf (Score:1)
yeah OK -1 me allready
Re:Groundhog's Day... (Score:1)
The GPS rollover is more likely to be the Y2K disaster scenario that your local newspaper is freaking out about. Navigation systems, electrical devices going nuts, etc.
I think Y2K will be more of an economic problem than an "elevators will get stuck". Programmed in a thousand different ways by a million programmers, the effects will be far more random and unknown. Probably enough to shake the JIT shipping philosophy up a bit.
OK, enough Y2K rant. All the people who've heard enough already can just go on being happy and keep their money in mutual funds before the Great Crash...
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
Believe it or not, airlines actually flew without falling out of the sky before GPS.
ARGGHHH! (Score:1)
--
Kyle R. Rose, MIT LCS
NSA got all the Math Majors (no pun intended) (Score:1)
Ok, by my reasoning:
1980
+ 19.625
---------
1999.625
Where does 1999.638 come from?
Mycroft
Re: Yes, you can fly an aircraft without GPS! (Score:1)
If you want to know more about this, stop by your nearest General Aviation airport and ask a flight instructor. Depending on the airport, they can probably arrange to take you on an inexpensive introductory flight or flying lesson, just so you can see what it's like to fly an airplane. Some people get hooked after one time taking the controls...
(Yes, I'm a Private Pilot.)
Re:W2**10 bug (Score:1)
You enumerated a few, the ones I've heard most about; but these and many, many (, many, many) more are listed on J.R. Stockton's ``Critical Dates [demon.co.uk]'' site... all sorts of critical dates, mostly relating to rollover dates of various sorts, and mostly clustering around this era (of course). He appears to have updated it just this week, too.
Re:The only thing affected is the almanac (Score:1)
Re: Yes, you can fly an aircraft without GPS! (Score:1)
Radio interview (Score:1)
Rollover timing (Score:1)
good information (Score:1)
Two good links about this:
http://joe.mehaffey.com/y2000dat.htm [mehaffey.com]
http://joe.mehaffey.com/y2k-sv.txt [mehaffey.com]
The only thing affected is the almanac (Score:2)
Instead, they'll have to scan the entire sky for GPS signals and I'll reacquire my position after 20 minutes or so. I then need to leave the GPS running for a while so (pieces of) the new almanac can be downloaded; IIRC it's included in a low-bandwidth data channel. Or I can simply download the new almanac via a free program and a non-free PC/GPS cable. (I've ordered the cable, but with my luck they may be out of stock.
Aviation and marine units, unlike hiking units, usually have far better antennas and they should be able to perform a "where in the heck am I?!" search much faster. Aviation units, in particular, will already be updated since they must periodically load new aviation databases containing the location of airports, VORs, etc.
Re:Should I be worried? (Score:1)
Re:Hmmm... I thought this was in the specs... (Score:1)
Re:NSA got all the Math Majors (no pun intended) (Score:1)
1980.013
+19.625
--------
1999.638
Re:NSA got all the Math Majors (no pun intended) (Score:1)
Umm... No. GPS Week 0 started 7 January 1980, not 1 January 1980. That's where the extra comes from.
Re:W2**10 bug (Score:1)