Mercury Capsule recovered after 38 years 81
38 years after it's sinking the Mercury capsule that Gus Grissom flew into space. Officially called the Liberty Bell 7, it was recovered from a depth of 15,000 feet (about 3 miles). They were unable to recover the hatch, meaning that the mystery of whether the hatch bolts blew prematurely, or Grissom activated them too early while remain a mystery. It's going to be cleaned and put on exhibiton-the Discovery Channel footed the bill. Hats off to them.
Hatch = conspiracy (Score:1)
and kicked another in the 'nads. this totally pissed off the egyptian-aliens so they
performed numerous tests including miscellaneous probes of Grissom's orifices. they then put a message scarab in one of those *ahem* more sensitive orifices with orders that the was to *again ahem* eject it out for his superiors inorder to demonstrate their opinion of the US so called space program. he was drugged with a hallucinogenic sedative and inserted back in his capsule. Since the hatch was unable to be reattached, the aliens covered the opening with a material they use that is analgous to our aluminum foil but much stronger and sealed it with a substance that while extremely resistant to heat and pressure differences, could not withstand regular salt water and would break down instantly upon exposure. so when the capsule hit the water the substance started to dissolve and water came in and Grissom, still under the influence was startled awake and with the scarab inside and the hallucinations still happening he freaked out and smashed out the replacement "hatch" thus flooding the capsule.
"if most Star Wars fans had their way, Part II would be mostly Darth Maul and Boba Fett mowing down Ewoks and Gungans"
Another Gus Grissom story. (Score:1)
This one, he named the "Molly Brown".
After that, NASA didn't let them name ships until Apollo.
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:2)
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:1)
Still, a particularly nasty way to go, and a shameful statement on the hubris in the space program at the time.. Doing the plugs-out test while the spacecraft was superpressurized (basically doing both tests at the same time) was reckless, but nobody really cared until people died. I think the term is 'Go Fever'..
Re:Pima ASM, Tuscon, AZ (Score:1)
3000 Pounds? What a nonsense! (Score:1)
Your little sister could lift 2000 pounds of water, in water. Everyone whos ever been cooling a barrel of beer in a lake will know what Im talking about.
Well, this is how the press tells us facts.
-martin
Re:Mission Impossible (Score:1)
Actually, that bit about the spacesuit inflating on Leonov has been known for a long while. I saw an interview with him once where he talked about the whole situation in depth.
Part of the problem, you see, was that they were using an inflatable airlock...
Phil Fraering "Humans. Go Fig." - Rita
Re:Damn (Score:1)
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:1)
btw: A huge part of the problem was also that the hatch opened _inwards_, so the pressure from the burning oxygen pressed the hatch shut and prevented anyone from opening it from the outside. Didn't the hatch eventually blow off its hinges because of the pressure?
Re:Explosive Bolts on Hatch (Score:1)
Actually, I think the current thinking is that static electricity from the helecopter overhead was what set the charges off. (The other one I heard was that the "pull to blow hatch" line was caught on something, and accidentally pulled.)
LB7 was in the water for quite a bit before the hatch blew, so it wasn't from the direct impact.
I'm uneducated on this... (Score:1)
Re:Mission Impossible (Score:1)
Hmm if the American astronauts have trouble fitting through a hatch that is 10 square feet in area I think they need to change their diet a bit.
A bit less of the fatty foods and a little more exercise. I guess the Russians got into space up a little earlier as their rockets would need a lower power rocket to reach orbit.
Re: Problems translating geek english (Score:1)
nitpicking left out
Couldn't find anything in the article to post about eh? Haven't read enough Huck Finn or E.E. Cummings?
Personally I think that this was just NASA doing some really early airbag testing. I mean, think about it, things that explode in your face and nearly kill you on impact? Heck, maybe this is where they got the idea :)
What about the camera? (Score:1)
That is awfully convenient...I wonder what would have caused the camera to break like that...
doesn't nasa still have one saturn V? (Score:1)
Re:doesn't nasa still have one saturn V? (Score:1)
It's about time... (Score:1)
An awesome discovery in any time, but especially in light of the 30th anniversary of the first lunar landing.
Poor Betty... (Score:1)
Good. (Score:2)
I guess Discovery Channel is going to take this thing on tour or something. I cant wait to see it.
-Rich
Look for the Hatch!! (Score:1)
RTFA (Score:2)
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:1)
Why feel bad for her, this means that we're just one step closer to (possibly) clearing Gus' name.
LK
Re:It's about time... (Score:1)
Doug
And it's in Kansas! Yee Haw! (Score:3)
The capsule is being delivered to the Cosmosphere in Hutchision, KS for cleanup and restoration, which may take up to a year. The restoration process, I've heard, will be on full display in a glassed workroom.
After the restoration, it will be taken on tour and then it will be permanently housed at the Cosmosphere. If you are ever going through central Kansas, the Cosmophere is worth checking out. I'm only about an hour away, so I guess I'll go check it out when I can..
More information is here [cosmo.org].
jf
Explosive...? (Score:1)
I was trying to think of explanations for it and the only thing I could come up with was that they wanted the capsule destroyed in case the Soviet's attempted to recover it? But I don't really know how much real 'secret' technology was on the thing at the time. Was their anything to protect? Not a lot of electronics. Maybe the metal alloys of the pod, but I don't think these would be too secret?
Anyway, if anyone knows the answer, I'm curious to hear it.
Re:Look for the Hatch!! (Score:2)
Mission Impossible (Score:2)
The time required to conduct the search, the cost of the equipment involved, the specialists on the task have to get paid.. Or at least must eat.
While knowing the whole thruth may (arguably in this case) be the best way to go, I think this one will die based on economics. (Most things die this way anyway)
Mercury Capsule World Tour (Score:3)
My 2 cents... (Score:1)
Kansas Cosmosphere (Score:3)
Their page is marginal, but it can help you find the place. http://www.cosmo.org You'll understand when you walk in the main door and notice a complete SR-71 Blackbird hanging over you.
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:1)
Re:And it's in Kansas! Yee Haw! (Score:1)
Re:Explosive...? (Score:1)
Re:My 2 cents... (Score:1)
I read that too. In the article!
Newport located the spacecraft on May 1, about 300 miles southeast of Cape Canaveral. But he had to leave it there when the cable to the expedition's robot vessel snapped in rough seas.
Re:I'm uneducated on this... (Score:2)
The bottom of the hatch sat very near the water line and in moderatey rough seas the capsule could take on water. Even a small amount of water would cause the capsule to become unbalanced and list over. If that happened (as it did) the capsule would flood and sink. The $$ loss was only overshadowed by the total loss of onboard telemetry. Basically the sinking totally negated the usefullness of the launch since they lost the capsule and all the data that was supposed to be gathered during the trip.
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:1)
Astronauts' families are generally far more emotionally and psychologically robust than the average American.
Re:Mission Impossible (Score:2)
* * * * *
Interestingly (and off-topically) - the Voice of Russia shortwave recently revealed (in a sort of 'cosmoglasnost') that their first space walker had a bit of a panic when his suit inflated so much in the vacuum of space that he couldn't get back in! He actually had to release enough pressure to deflate and get in quick. Brave dude.
Chuck
Don't Panic!!!!
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:2)
There was a scene where Borman was talking to an engineer about how to open the hatch, it took 20 seconds to perform the steps. They mentioned a re-design involving some kind of explosive releasing mechanism.
Scary shit. Good thing there were brave, dedicated professionals that were willing to put their lives on the line in the name of science and 'patriotism'. We owe a great debt to these men, this series really brings home the courage and dedication these astronauts brought to bear on this amazing endeavor.
Re:Mission Impossible (Score:1)
George
Re:What about the camera? (Score:2)
>>Liberty Bell 7 splashed down. But the camera was found broken open and the film was ruined.
> That is awfully convenient...I wonder what would have caused the camera to break like that...
I rember seeing an interview with one of the astronauts (Apollo, I think) describing his splashdown. The last thing on his checklist was to remove a camera from a mount and secure it. He didn't do it, and on splashdown it came loose and hit him very hard on the head, nearly knocking him unconcious. He said he was lucky he was not killed by it. It could be something similar happened when Grissom hit, and the camera hit the button for the explosive bolts.
Cheers
Eric
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:2)
Imagine that! A hull designed to withstand spaceflight, re-entry and spashdown, busted from the internal pressure of a fire. With three human beings inside. Jeezus!
Re:Three cheers for Discovery Channel (Score:1)
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:1)
Re:Mission Impossible (Score:2)
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:3)
Re:It's about time... (Score:1)
Found the wrong thing? (Score:2)
kmj
The only reason I keep my ms-dos partition is so I can mount it like the b*tch it is.
Discovery Channel Site Has more info (Score:3)
http://www.discovery.com/exp/libertybell7/99072
It has a nice discussion of the explosives on the inside of the capsule, and some more pictures.
Ignorance is not bliss (Score:1)
Engineers study each others failures as much as their successes, in order to not repeat design mistakes. Pilots study accident reports in order to (hopefully) not repeat the piloting mistakes of others (JFK Jr. could have undoubtably benefited from doing this, as the decisions he made were truly unforgivable, and have previously, for many other unfortunate pilots, had the same deadly results). This has nothing to do with disrespect for the dead, but rather an ernest and very responsible effort to prevent trajedies from being repeated.
Three cheers for NASA (Score:1)
That's my 1/50 of $1.00 US
JM
Big Brother is watching, vote Libertarian!!
Re:Pima ASM, Tuscon, AZ (Score:1)
Travis
Apollo 1 fire (Score:3)
The hatch had been redesigned just before the incident so that it would take at least 15 seconds (or something like that) to open, thus preventing the possibility of the hatch being opened accidentally, or by a panicked crew member before they could be restrained.
The tragic irony was that Grissom had insisted on the redesign himself. He was a great man and a sad loss.
From the Hutchinson News (Score:1)
The Liberty Bell will be in Hutchinson at the Cosmosphere in about a week and will be displayed for the following six months as it's restored. A division of the Cosmosphere, the recently-defunct Space Works, was responsible for several replicas of spacecraft used in movies including Apollo 13 and the HBO series Earth to Moon. Some of the same workers will be restoring the Liberty Bell.
The Cosmosphere recently acquired status as an official branch of the Smithsonian, and remains one of the best aerospace museums in the world. The foyer was built around an authentic SR-17 Blackbird, perched on its nose at an angle.
More info about the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center is here. [cosmo.org] Friday and Saturday, Apollo 17 astronaut Eugene Cernan will be on hand to sign copies of his book, "Last Man on the Moon."
J.
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:1)
I never understood why they couldn't have done testing with compressed air, or why the astronauts needed to be in the capsule at all. It was a terrible tragedy, but a lot was learned from it.
Re:What about the camera? (Score:2)
More Trivia: The "Gusmobile" (Score:1)
For who's sake though (Score:1)
NASM to improve shortly (Score:1)
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:1)
Gemini had a hatch that could be opened and closed in flight to allow for spacewalks. I don't know if the Apollo hatch allowed for this (probably not because then I bet they would have spacewalked to survey damage on Apollo 13 and see if the service module engine would run without blowing up.)
Re:Explosive...? (Score:2)
It's called a Sofar bomb. The purpose was to deploy when the chutes did, and to detonate when it reached a certain depth. This would be easily visible (audible?) on sonar, and allow for the position of a lost capsule to be computed. It's not really all that dangerous vs all the other things that could go boom on a Mercury capsule. (Ranging from manuvering fuel to retrofire rockets to an explosive hatch that could trigger itself.) IIRC, the sofar bomb was armed and triggered by passing a certain depth.
Obviously, it didn't work.
Explosive Bolts on Hatch (Score:1)
You see, we were concerned about our astronauts coming back alive. All of these are safety features. In fact, we didn't send up people in unsafe rockets just to be first. The Soviet Union however, sent men up without spacesuits/pressure suits at times to save weight, sent three men in a ship built for two, had few if any controls in the ship, and had them land on the tundra. Can you say "Oy, my achin' back!"? Squeezing men into a metal capsule led to the term Spam in a Can among pilots. Let's just say that USSR is lucky they didn't lose more men than we know about.
Re:Apollo 1 fire (Score:1)
It's worth watching for this one episode... and there are several more really good ones too.
Re:Poor Betty... (Score:1)
http://cnn.com/TECH/space/9905/03/liberty.bell.
His widow, Betty Grissom, feels certain the hatch malfunctioned. In any case, she wishes the capsule was never found.
Re:Explosive...? (Score:1)