Wireless Wearable Linux Media Computer 47
Number Five writes "Art+Com announces UrbanJunglePack, a wearable Linux computer designed for jounalists that uses a camcorder and microphone to record photos, sound, text, and video, which can then be transmitted back to a base station using a built-in wireless phone. " It's ready for testing-I'm willing to test.
Re:And you think Cell Phones are bad... (Score:1)
cellular + digital cam. (Score:1)
A cellular phone embeded in a digital camera or
any wireless system to upload your pictures
to a server no need for memory cards.
another interesting linux-based wearable (Score:1)
SIGGRAPH this year. It will do location-based context awareness,
real-time video processing, and hardware-accelerated 3D graphics. Cooler still,
it fits into a nicely tailored vest/jacket combo, and will use an
embroidered fabric keypad (conductive thread/capacitive coupling)
for input.
Unlike the wearable in this story, it isn't currently set up to
broadcast video back to a base station. Instead, the video input is
used in conjunction with a small head-mounted camera to do object
recognition for annotation (assuming we get the vision code ported in
time). Since the demo will run in-doors, we are using IR beacons
rather than GPS for the location data, since the chance of getting a
clean GPS signal inside the LA convention center is zero.
As the user wanders around the exhibition floor, the wearable will
annotate the environment with 3D and 2D content, and relay information
back to a base-station using 10Mbit wireless networking. Annotation
will include web pages, which the user will be able to brows and
navigate using the fabric keyboard. The system weighs slightly more
than a laptop, but the weight is distributed throughout the
ergonomically design vest; the only obvious sign that the user is
wearing a computer is the HMD, which in this case is full-color VGA
resolution.
Attribution time:
The demo application is "City of News" by Flavia Sparacino, much of
the hardware hacking is being done by Steve Schwartz, and I'm working
on the localization system so that the wearable knows where it is (and
hopefully what it's looking at). Sandy Pentland heads up the Vision
and Modeling Group at the MIT Media Lab where this work is being done,
and we are also getting help from Thad Starner who was one of the early wearable pioneers at the lab before becoming a professor at Georgia
Tech. Numerous other MIT students are also contributing to this
project.
More information on wearables at MIT can be found at The MIT Wearable [mit.edu]
Computing Web Page, although this project does not yet have a
link.
Quantity vs. quality (Score:1)
It does (Re:Good old Neal) (Score:1)
>video goggles we've been hearing so
>much about, turn
The device uses the Sony video goggles. See their FAQ [artcom.de].
Re:It does (Re:Good old Neal) (Score:1)
Do we do technical things because they are aesthetically pleasing or do these guys (Stephenson, Gibson, Sterling) have a certain way of percieveing things about society?
Product name (Score:1)
I want to know who came up with the name Swiffer [swiffer.com]. Ugh.
~afniv
"Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
old news (Score:1)
Hm, if memory serves it worked fine in the test the day before and failed when they actually wanted to use it, because the mobile phone it used to connect couldn't connect. There were too many others who tried to use their phones.
Sign me up (Score:1)
Yay Stephenson! (Score:1)
Re:another interesting linux-based wearable (Score:1)
So how long until we can get one for less than the $6.5k xybernaut (http://www.xybernaut.com/F00005.htm). As has been mentioned by others if you plug a series of currently available items together this becomes MUCH cheaper.
Then its "just" a question of getting the inter-operability between the items to work.
invade your company's information space. (Score:2)
With the proliferation of monitoring technology being deployed throughout the corporate world, it only makes sense that the individual have a method of leveling the playing field. Imagine sitting in a project meeting when some inept program manager starts blamestorming you for something s/he screwed up. You say "Hold on a minute. Let's listen to what you told me 6 weeks ago at lunch about something else being a higher priority..." And just imagine the instant reduction or justified rise in sexual harassment claims -- load the mpeg file for that day, hit playback and watch the actual events.
Paranoid, yes. But I can think of half a dozen instances last year off the top of my head when I would have loved to be able to correct someone else's rather liberal interpretation of reality. In some cases, it might be the only thing that would save someone's job. My employer watches and records me (email, phone, video of the premises, etc); why can't I watch and record them?
Oh, fancy that. Corporate security's knocking on the window.
Re:invade your company's information space. (Score:1)
They make "lipstick" size cameras that are cheap, and also audio/video transmitters. Clip one of those to your glasses (or make a headband mount if you don't wear glasses) and an omnidirectional mike on your lapel, add the transmitter in your shirt pocket. Put the receiver in your car with the computer digitizing and storing everything.
I know I have simplified this greatly (one question that comes up is how to get the transmission to your car if you are far away, or in a concrete style building - would 900 GHz work?), but you get the idea.
I think something like this could be built for around $500.00 (US). I think you could even do a similar full version of the UJP for around $1000.00 - just don't use the latest/greatest tech.
1. Use a pair of i/o glasses for the display ($300 on eBay).
2. B/W lipstick camera taped to side of display (around $100, various distributors).
3. Old Pentium laptop in a backpack - around $500 on eBay.
4. Large HD for laptop - $300 on eBay.
5. Linux - free.
Notice that eBay supplies a lot of this, but you could also shop around at various used/surplus dealers for the stuff as well (one was offering the VictorMaxx StuntMaster for $60.00 - could be used as well). Also, you will need a way to get video in/out of the laptop for the HMD/camera - and the laptop will need multimedia capabilities. But the fact is, this can all be done CHEAPLY. It doesn't have to cost $30,000.
Re:The REAL Value of Linux/Open Source (Score:1)
Regards,
Dirk
Re:The REAL Value of Linux/Open Source (Score:2)
But you have to admit. It CAN be an issue and will be an issue in the future for other people for very interesting niche projects. (The 'matchbox' web server comes to mind)..
Re:invade your company's information space. (Score:1)
Old news... Sounds like APRS (Score:1)
Re:Can you say, "Gargoyle"? (Score:1)
The concept of mediated reality is starting to become trendy. See a military application at:
http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG19990712S0054
Another Real-Life Star Trek gadget (Score:1)
This sounds like a pretty neat idea. The price tag, however, is a little ridiculous. It will be interesting to see if these things take off. But, the advantages of such a compact system are enormous. What a great way to gather data.
Maxheadroom (Score:1)
Can you say, "Gargoyle"? (Score:1)
On the other hand, if this thing ever got to a reasonable price (it's currently listed at around $30K), there'd be a whole lot of geeks wearing these things to cons. I can just see it now....
"Ok, this girl in the chainmail bra is just plain yummy! I hope all you geeks at home are getting a good look at this!"
Of course, that's what *I'd* do, since I'm a lech.
Sign me up (Score:1)
s
Star Trek: Generations (7) had the Enterprise-B... (Score:1)
Re:Hm, I wonder... (Score:3)
You know, I'm suprised at the number of people who equate Bourne shell==Unix! (or X==Unix for that matter). In systems like this, the OS is just there to handle the dog work of memory management, buffering, provide an environment for the UI, and communications.
jf
) (Score:1)
Network XXIII (Score:1)
Re:Maxheadroom (Score:1)
Now it's found it way into /., and it still takes a comment from _sprocket_ to point the similarity out.
Are we just the only ones old enough to remeber this show?
Snowcrash (Score:1)
At least I think that's what they were called.
Internet wired, video enabled data hounds.
And you think Cell Phones are bad... (Score:2)
I can see it now, surgeon generals warning: discontinue use when your head starts to feel warm.
Spyky
Re:Can you say, "Gargoyle"? (Score:1)
One of their goals for this is to have you be able to stand on the street and look at a building, and have the UJP use your GPS and compass to identify the building and start mining (and displaying) information for you.
The difference being, of course, that the glasses in Virtual Light weren't so much a computer that had this function. Their job was to provide an overlay on reality for the user with this mined information. That was the only purpose. And of course, that they were just glasses with nothing else attached
-Todd
---
Good old Neal (Score:1)
If you hooked this puppy up to the Sony video goggles we've been hearing so much about, turned them to "transparent", and wrote some custom code, you could get a HUD for your daily activites. Imagine: [[AUTOMOBILE APPROACHING - SPEED : 75 KPH - LICENSE NO. K7L 3N8 REGISTERED TO WILLIAM GATES - RETINAL SCAN IDENTITY CONFIRMED - RANGE : 76 METERS AND CLOSING]]
Re:Can you say, "Gargoyle"? (Score:1)
Though, like you other folks, that was the first thing I thought of.
Sam Jooky
Hm, I wonder... (Score:2)
screw the computer, that name is TIGHT!!! (Score:1)
oldest ref to this concept? (Score:1)
1. Edison Carter's SatCam in Max Headroom (my all-time favorite sci-fi show, but a bit too close to reality for the network folks, I suppose...)
2. the Gargoyles from Neil Stephenson's Snowcrash (maybe I'll have to read that someday...)
3. The vid-capture things that were shown in the Star Trek movie where Admiral Kirk returns to the bridge of the Enterprise.
I'd like to add fourth, which certainly predates all three: the "newstapers" as described in Larry Niven's Future History Series (I don't recall which book, but possibly one or more of the Ringworld series.)
Are there any that predate Niven's work?
The REAL Value of Linux/Open Source (Score:3)
Here you have an advanced system developed by a reletively underfunded organization. They apparently have hardware experience, and some development experience, but needed an OS for their system. Licensing a commerical OS for this would be very expensive for development and the limited number of systems they want to build. The cost per unit would probably have to be almost half again what they are currently asking just to pay for the the embedded OS and break even. Using an embedded version of Linux, however, severely reduces the development and manufacturing costs, and makes this possible.
Linux, Open Source, and free software allow people and companies to do this. It makes the OS a very inexpensive commodity and enables development for things that would not be economicly possible otherwise.
Ain't world domination grand?
jf
Bring on the Gargoyles (Score:1)
The test failed due to communication outage... (Score:1)
The test failed because it relied on cell phone communications to transfer data.
With so many youngsters sporting cell phones (the "Loveparade" was visited by 1.5 million people), the wireless communications network in the event's area went down...
Sources: Report at Heise Newsticker [heise.de], more info and pictures at Telepolis [heise.de].
A reporter's POV (Score:3)
This could be pretty cool, but they could stand to do a little miniaturization on it. If I walked up to someone wearing that behemoth and started asking questions, they'd probably call a cop.
Seriously, though, getting data to and from a person in the field is damn tough, especially audio and video. These folks could be on to something. If they could just build off of Via or Xybernaut's tech, though, they might save some space. Gotta keep the Linux, though...Windows boot up time is a drag when you've got breaking news.
Re:Can you say, "Gargoyle"? (Score:1)
-Ted
The police in Oz (?) have the same thing (Score:1)
As near as I could tell, all the gear, including a little camera, was built into the hat--it looked like a cross between a blueberry imac and an old-fashioned policeman's helmet.
Pictures and Story for Urban Jungle Pack (Score:1)
Andre
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/co/5069/1