More on the Russian E2K 99
volkris writes "Here's
an article about the Russian chip, the E2K. It's
the first I had ever heard about it, though later I went
back and checked the article earlier this week about the
Merced, the G4, and the E2K. This is just an overview of the chip. Looks interesting."
Yeah yeah (Score:1)
Makes me proud of my country (Score:1)
I hope they will get enough financing (it would not be bad even if money will come from the West. Knowing the falling apart Russian economy, there's no gov. money for such projects) and manufacture the chip.
can you say RUSKY VAPORWARE? - be glad it is a con (Score:1)
The say that it is a "paper design". Hey, that's like saying that because I hang out in a donut shop, I'm a cop.
It's a good thing though. If they were to move away from their vacuum tube technology there would be nobody that our FAA could buy vacuum tubes from. We need to keep our air traffic system up and keep our airplanes from droppng out of the sky.
HEAR THE RUSSIAN ROAR: (Score:1)
SANT PYETYERSBORG TEKNOLOGICHESKIY UNIVERSITY RULZ
Am I the only one who thinks this is a conn? (Score:1)
'Father of Soviet supercomputing' !? Everything I have heard and seen said that Soviet Supercomputing was a smuggling operation. Bring in the fastest workstations they could get from the west. I just find it very hard to believe. Over the past few days this unheard of group has taken credit for inventing pipelining, superscaler chips, EPIC, parallel processing, and some compiler technology. Just a little too good to be true.
Look at the efforts AMD, Cyrix, NexGen, etc. put in to cloning 486 and pentium chips, now some new group from a country that is practically third world is going to beat them to the punch with an IA64 design that is 2-3x faster?? There was a lot of top tallent, money and work put into just matching Intel's processor speed.
It just doesn't smell right to me, they might have a design but their performance claims are lies. Their claims to have invented a lot of that technology are also suspect in my mind. This kind of thing has happened before, even Exponential boasted of inflated performance numbers, they didn't exactly take their investors money and run but they didn't deliver anything. They may have a top chip team but not good enough to beat Intel by that much, Intel (regardless of what you think of their products) has some brilliant designers.
Re: Americans really are that stupid (Score:1)
Sure. Why not? ;-)
During WWII, Germany was the technologically leading nation in the world. Just think about the V2 (without Wernher von Braun there would be quite a lot less spacecraft, on either side! Also, the first American rockets were V2s, captured from the Germans. The Redstone was IIRC a direct descendant of the V2.)
Think about the Me262 (or was it the Me163?! I keep mixing them...), a jet fighter ready for deployment in 1944/45! If the Allied Forces Forces hadn't destroyed most of the manufacturing plants by then they'd been in deep trouble!
Radar was also developed by a German, but when he offered his invention to the German military, he was chased off. ("German fighter pilots need no stinking electric helpers!" or something along that lines...) So he went to the British...
Shall I now continue?!? Enough rant...
I may sound bitter, but I think it's quite good that Germany lost the war. But that's because of what the government did back then, not because of the tech. I just wanted to show that not everything came out of the US. (Wasn't Einstein born in Germany and chased off by the Nazis?! (I'm not sure...))
Like the original poster said... (Score:1)
s/Wired/Slashdot
Blegh (Score:1)
Do you honestly think the US has never told a lie? Do you think the US has never stolen technology or used foreign intelligence like you describe?
The process of giving your enemy misleading information about your abilities and arsenals is called "counter-intelligence". That's right, it has a name. Every major nation does it. It's not like we all stood up and gasped when it was discovered that Russia was actually MISLEADING us. My God! They told a lie!
Perhaps you should educate yourself about some of the stuff your own country does before you judge others.
Fuzzy-headed, x-files-type thinking (Score:1)
Daniel
cold fusion... got a reference? (Score:1)
US Education (Score:1)
One guy posted a lot more E2K info to slashdot! (Score:1)
In short words, E2K is very different from other CPUs on the market. The other part of the core technology is a heavily optimizing compiler, which Elbrus people were developing for something like 10 years.
Also what is interesting E2K will both interpretate & recompile IA32 programs (unlike Merced), putting them in E2K form back to the disk. Dont ask me how. Also UltraSparc CPU was developed with help of Babayan team, and in general his company has done a lot of work for Sun. Now they are maintaining SunOS, for example.
It's a PAPER design (Score:1)
This is the most vaporous of Vaporware.
I'm amazed anyone even noticed this stuff....
I have a plan for world peace, eliminating
hunger, ethnic conflict, overpopulation,
old age, obesity and lonely Friday nights.
Just waiting for funding and implementation.
HEAR THE RUSSIAN ROAR: (Score:1)
What I want to say with this is:
No country is "perfect", most countries does both bad and good things.
relatively... (Score:1)
More bad reporting (Score:1)
E2k chip -- fabricated in a
- would run at 1.2 GHz. By contrast, Diefendorff
estimated that the Merced processor, fabricated
in the same process, would run at 800 MHz, three times slower."
WHAT? 1.2 GHz is 50% more than 800MHz.
It's reporting like this that makes me doubt the rest of this article.
Cum grano salis, friends.
US Education (Score:1)
MIT, CMU, CalTech, Berkely, Stanford, all the Ivies, zillions more. 'Course CMU's the best
It's no surprise there are a lot of foreign nationals who come here for university. My friend Mathilde est d'origine francaise and she agrees, US universities are far better and more rigorous.
Early US space program (Score:1)
Apollo went to the moon on a slide rule as backup.
There were some amusing situations. I think it was Skylab, had 2 machines duplicating all calculations. The first one that cought the other one in a difference turned it off -- hehe, no guarantee whether the right or wrong computer wins.
Hell, the original incarnation of the shuttle had --you guessed it--IBM 360's. And ferrite core RAM. Wow.
Interesting... (Score:1)
But this will still be a chip competing against much later revision Merced's than the initial ones. This won't appear for 2-3 years at _best_.
Anyone else notice Intel's initial chips suck? The first (was it klamath?) PII's were 66MHz frontside, the first pIII's don't have the new cache, the first Merced's aren't so hot either. Ohwell. Mmmmm, alpha.
BTW I'm not that impressed by anything I've seen from AMD. Yeah, their K6's run applications ok. But I have yet to see a k6 w/a good FPU. I'm greedy. I want it all. I want nice caches AND a nice FPU. Give me a celeron450a
Sigh, I've started a flamewar :) (Score:1)
There are a hell of a lot of American state universities (at least 1 in each of 50 states), but most are at best mediocre, except perhaps in a few areas. There are still a couple of great state schools: UVA (go VA!, founded by TJ), UCBerkeley, UMichigan (aerospace), Georgia Tech. But the best ones are private.
BTW the best public school I have seen, and one of the best overall right up there with CMU, MIT, etc. is Technion, the Israel Institute of Technology. Where you should speak Russian to get anywhere.
Celeron (Score:1)
Unfortunately I understand the celeron went out of production a week ago last Thursday. There may be a few places w/one or two left, buy'em while you can.
From what I've seen and heard (discounting unrelieable reports) Celeron366 will run at 464 or something but that's over I think an 83MHz bus, so the PCI is at 42MHz and no peripherals will work. The Celeron366 will not even POST at 550, don't bother
Really a shame Intel had to kill that one, here we were getting something for nothing. My @$$ overclockers played no part in their decision to pull the chip. Grr.
3x faster on clock, no, but what about spec rating (Score:1)
and specfp were both significantly higher than the clockrating would indicate. Perhaps that's where that 3x comes in?
Either way, if the thing is real, some US company would make an enormous amount of money by buying up the rights to manufacture it. AMD, maybe?
GPL it (Score:1)
It would be a great way to expande the 'open source' idea into other field!
Folks, this is a HOAX! (Score:1)
- Darchmare
- Axis Mutatis, http://www.axismutatis.net
HEAR THE RUSSIAN ROAR: (Score:1)
"Saharof". We spell it "Sakharov" over
here.
Point well taken. The Russians should be
proud of their accomplishments, especially
the technical ones.
Then again, as an American, I may be a
minority -- I know what the Battle of Kursk
was, I've heard of Prof. Kolmogorov (chaos
theory dude), and I know who Sergei Federov
plays for. 8-)
(ooh, a smiley. How uncool here. Well, bite me.)
-----
TWAK!!! (Score:1)
Unlike most Americans, I know a thing or 2 about Russian history (liberal arts colleges with good technical departments *rule*).
I've heard all about Nicholas, Alexandra, Rasputin, Lenin, Trotsky, Frunze, Dzerzhinsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, Stalin, the kulaks,
the kolkhozes and the harvests of sorrow, Kandinsky, Malevich, the Reds and Whites, the Purges, the Yezhovshchina, the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact, Stalingrad, Leningrad, the defense of Moscow, the Berlin Airlift, the Thaw, the Master and Margarita,
Gagarin, the Doctors' Plot, Krushchev, etc. etc.
Russia has a fascinating history and has many many interesting people within its borders.
And they have many acheivements to their credit (not the least of which is
saving the world from unspeakable evil).
But I have to ask: Why is Russian history so.. well.. sad and awful?
By comparison, Irish history reads like a day at the amusement park..
-----
Have a little respect. The U.S. is a toddler. (Score:1)
that has produced some of the humankind's greatest
writers, musicians, mathematicians, and
scientists. Dostoevsky, Horowitz, Sakharov; just
to name a few.
They are more than capable of formulating such a
chip design. Fabricating it is another matter.
You ought to be careful to distinguish between
Soviets and Russians. They are not the same.
---------------------------------
"The Internet interprets censorship as damage,
Re: (Score:1)
Am I the only one who thinks this is a conn? (Score:1)
HEAR THE RUSSIAN ROAR: (Score:1)
I think my foreign friend had a point
your spelling stinks
your history is substandard
you ARE a moron
and you do suck
get a life
get a real education.
relatively... (Score:1)
Case in point: (Score:1)
My GOD man! The original Russian poster had better English skills than you do! When you stand up for your own country's educational system, make sure you do not embarrass it in the process.
As for the accomplishments of the US, no one will dispute what you've said. However, the Russians were the first in space. They were the first with a permanent station out there. Does the name Tesla ring a bell? How about Sikorsky?
Point being, every country has it's flashes of brilliance. The US has an incredible amount of resources, and this is why it attracts so many foreign students into it's graduate programs and it's think-tanks. It's a quality of life thing, nothing more, nothing less. This is the land of opportunity for people who are willing to work hard - and a land of welfare for those who are not.
Americans are not genetically superior - as is implied in many "we're better" postings. That kind of thinking is what got the Germans in trouble.
Slide rules. (Score:1)
Hell, my calculator has more processing power and RAM than the space shuttle, and my watch has more than the Apollo lunar lander!
Almost everything designed before 1975 was made using only a slide rule.
3x faster? (Score:1)
>While we all know Hz aren't directly related to processing power, 1.2 GHz is not 3x faster than 800 MHz.
A few thoughts... (Score:1)
2) It will get sufficient funding if its confirmed to be real. Not necessaritly from Russia or from US.
3) Ok, its fast, its real, there are 2 questions left, how much time will it take to make and how expensive will it be? If it's 3x faster than merced but 10x more expensive, everybody will just get dual or quad merceds. BUT there's something worth considering here: design cost is alot less in Russia than it is in US right now. This may result in E2k actually being cheaper than Merced.
This might be very cool in a few years..
woot.. Simpsons time
Am I the only one who thinks this is a conn? (Score:1)
Education is still a field where the USA is a leader. If you don't believe me, go to a major university and look around, you will see a great number of students who pay huge sums of money to attend US schools.
Dude, you speak in ignorance. The "50'th place" figure is very real; it was based on some international testing of school (not university) students, so it reflects knowledge and not education spendings. However, I think it is old -- I believe US is somewhere in the teens right now (which is still pretty pathetic).
Bottom line is, US public education sucks royally. As far as industrial countries go, it is very weak. US universities are good, but think -- people get to universities by acquiring a lot of knowledge in schools first.
I go to a graduate school in a major university. I would guess that at the very least, 1/3 of students here are foreigners (and they do not pay any money to attend UMass). This, if anything, speaks detrimentally about the quality of US education -- it implies that US, rather that raise their own brains, steals them from other countries.
As to Russians -- their academia IS one of the best, pity they don't have money to do what they can do so well. They have the knowledge and the ability, but not the money or the technology.
Sputnik, MIR (Score:1)
English does not have a word for 'sex' either, 'sex' is borrowed from Latin through French -- unless you count 'fuck'. However, if you allow English to have 'fuck', then Russian has 'yebat'. QED.
Did you know that in russian peasant is pronounced krestianin, very close to Christian. Why is that?
I don't know -- but I am not convinced that the two are etymologically related. I wish I had a good Russian dictionary here...
Feb 25 1999: E2K press conference, in English (Score:1)
And it's in English, so don't bother that
Russian guy in the next cubicle 8-)
Feb 25 1999: E2K press conference, (link) (Score:1)
http://www.elbrus.ru/press/press_faq-2502.html
Mips vs Clock Speed (Score:1)
Aside from that, hell, I've been trying to find an investor for these guys. If we can get them going, not only will the chip rock, but it would be a hell of a profit.
PDG--"I don't like the Prozac, the Prozac likes me"
Affect on export restrictions of technology. (Score:1)
wow. (Score:1)
Let's take up a collection to start manufacturing them.
d
More bad reporting (Score:1)
the clockrate does not measure the speed of a processor but (part of) its timing behaviour.
Am I the only one who thinks this is a conn? (Score:1)