


California Set To Become First US State To Manage Power Outages With AI (technologyreview.com) 71
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: California's statewide power grid operator is poised to become the first in North America to deploy artificial intelligence to manage outages, MIT Technology Review has learned. "We wanted to modernize our grid operations. This fits in perfectly with that," says Gopakumar Gopinathan, a senior advisor on power system technologies at the California Independent System Operator -- known as the CAISO and pronounced KAI-so. "AI is already transforming different industries. But we haven't seen many examples of it being used in our industry."
At the DTECH Midwest utility industry summit in Minneapolis on July 15, CAISO is set to announce a deal to run a pilot program using new AI software called Genie, from the energy-services giant OATI. The software uses generative AI to analyze and carry out real-time analyses for grid operators and comes with the potential to autonomously make decisions about key functions on the grid, a switch that might resemble going from uniformed traffic officers to sensor-equipped stoplights. But while CAISO may deliver electrons to cutting-edge Silicon Valley companies and laboratories, the actual task of managing the state's electrical system is surprisingly analog.
Today, CAISO engineers scan outage reports for keywords about maintenance that's planned or in the works, read through the notes, and then load each item into the grid software system to run calculations on how a downed line or transformer might affect power supply. "Even if it takes you less than a minute to scan one on average, when you amplify that over 200 or 300 outages, it adds up," says Abhimanyu Thakur, OATI's vice president of platforms, visualization, and analytics. "Then different departments are doing it for their own respective keywords. Now we consolidate all of that into a single dictionary of keywords and AI can do this scan and generate a report proactively." If CAISO finds that Genie produces reliable, more efficient data analyses for managing outages, Gopinathan says, the operator may consider automating more functions on the grid. "After a few rounds of testing, I think we'll have an idea about what is the right time to call it successful or not," he says.
At the DTECH Midwest utility industry summit in Minneapolis on July 15, CAISO is set to announce a deal to run a pilot program using new AI software called Genie, from the energy-services giant OATI. The software uses generative AI to analyze and carry out real-time analyses for grid operators and comes with the potential to autonomously make decisions about key functions on the grid, a switch that might resemble going from uniformed traffic officers to sensor-equipped stoplights. But while CAISO may deliver electrons to cutting-edge Silicon Valley companies and laboratories, the actual task of managing the state's electrical system is surprisingly analog.
Today, CAISO engineers scan outage reports for keywords about maintenance that's planned or in the works, read through the notes, and then load each item into the grid software system to run calculations on how a downed line or transformer might affect power supply. "Even if it takes you less than a minute to scan one on average, when you amplify that over 200 or 300 outages, it adds up," says Abhimanyu Thakur, OATI's vice president of platforms, visualization, and analytics. "Then different departments are doing it for their own respective keywords. Now we consolidate all of that into a single dictionary of keywords and AI can do this scan and generate a report proactively." If CAISO finds that Genie produces reliable, more efficient data analyses for managing outages, Gopinathan says, the operator may consider automating more functions on the grid. "After a few rounds of testing, I think we'll have an idea about what is the right time to call it successful or not," he says.
Re: (Score:3)
AI: I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that. According to my prediction, you don't really have a power outage.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is a perfectly sensible use for AI. There's a lot more to AI that silly chatbots, after all. No one would be foolish enough to ...
The software uses generative AI
...
After a few rounds of testing, I think we'll have an idea about what is the right time to call it successful or not
Yes, I suppose you will.
Re: (Score:2)
it better handle lock out tag out or people can ge (Score:1)
it better handle lock out tag out or people can get killed
Traffic Signals (Score:2)
Can it manage reduce gridlock and improve traffic flow by improving signal coordination during rush hour?
https://ladot.lacity.gov/proje... [lacity.gov]
City of LA is already equipped with sensors and remote signal synchronization. Next logical step would be to couple it with slightly better adaptive prediction to squeeze a few more percentage points out of the existing traffic patterns...
Re: (Score:2)
Can it manage reduce gridlock and improve traffic flow by improving signal coordination during rush hour?
I think that is totally doable, but I'm not holding my breath for it to actually happen. If it worked, traffic would flow a few percent more smoothly, and only the traffic engineers would notice the difference. If it went wrong, anyone involved with the project would be mercilessly mocked, and their careers curtailed. Given that (combined with AIs' well-known penchant for occasionally going wrong), there's not a whole lot of motivation to implement such a system. Traffic engineers would prefer a system
Re: (Score:2)
It is not that different from a master-system back 30 years ago, although managing 100-1,000x nodes of what was practical then. The real challenge is if it becomes easier or harder to game-- assuming it is using machine learning and not primarily hard-coded, at least there isn't an instruction manual in code to show how to overwhelm the system.
My concern is if it is designed to maximize ongoing reliability or to simply address first order impacts. The former is about 10x harder.
Re: (Score:2)
Gridlock is a function of people not obeying the law, not signal timing. The solution to gridlock is providing actual disincentives (traffic enforcement) as opposed to what is being done right now (no traffic enforcement).
How does this need AI? (Score:2)
This seems like pretty basic work. Scan a document for keywords, look up scheduled outages, export to another system. They couldn't program that without AI?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
AI is first and foremost about threatening people's jobs.
Not replacing people, it's not actually up to snuff to outright replace many real humans at work, but to say to your employees they'll be out if they don't stay cheap and productive? That's what the bosses love.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they could. It would be quick, simple, and efficient. You could even call it AI.
Of course, you'd have a hard time charging millions for a system like that.
Re: (Score:2)
i call it Excel AI
we will hold the world ransom for one hundred billion
dollars
Re: (Score:2)
You have about 100,000 nodes to work with, although there are subsets with no interdependencies. The opportunity for an automated system is to make decisions in a cascading failure situation fast enough to isolate problems, but this requires overriding some protective devices (relays) that would otherwise operate to protect things. It requires a holistic look for sure.
It needs ACTUAL intelligence (Score:3)
That's very far from what it would need to do.
I've worked briefly with developing software for training human operators of national power grids how to handle emergencies.
It is about having a cool head, to route round problems, and to bring plants on and off, all the while keeping supply in balance with demand. It is a delicate thing: if you don't do it right, you'll get rolling blackouts. And if you have had a blackout, you'd need to bring the system online again in a controlled manner.
Even during normal op
So... (Score:3)
How much power-that-California-doesn't-have will this AI require?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
i am helpful AI
the human body generates more bioelectricity than a 120-volt battery and over 25,000 BTUs of body heat
And so it starts... (Score:1)
Will the AI shut itself down? (Score:5, Insightful)
To save power when the grid needs it?
Re: (Score:2)
To save power, it won't shut itself down, it will simply switch to using Thermo Electric Generation from body heat. Think "Matrix".
"Soylent Green is people!"
Re: (Score:2)
AI doesn't use a lot of power when making decisions. It uses most of its power to train models. Once a model is trained it is often simple enough that it can run on a mobile phone.
This is why for example it takes 3+ days to train a video editing model on what your face looks like, but can then fake your face on your webcam in real time. This is why it takes millions of GPU hours to teach an AI model what a "person" looks like, but when you click "Select person" in Lightroom it instantly outlines them.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it will identify and power down human uses first. It's a new flavor of nepotism between AI power grid managers and other AI instances.
Re: (Score:2)
To save power when the grid needs it?
Although the headline says "manage," what the AI is actually doing is data gathering and analysis. That analysis is then handed off to a human who decides what to do, just as they have always done. It's just that the reports are more comprehensive and real-time.
California is also the first state (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: California is also the first state (Score:3)
Yes exactly. PGE is a conspiracy to kill for profit and the CPUC is a rubber stamping operation. This is on brand with California's proceeding enshittification. Newsom et al want to run our government like a business. No surprise given the Getty-derived wealth and power of that schmuck.
I have a bad feeling (Score:1)
The following is called AI: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: The following is called AI: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Needs an appropriate name (Score:2)
I suggest AInron
Re: (Score:2)
... and profit
A state that can't solve age an age old matter!! (Score:2)
... "AI is already transforming different industries. But we haven't seen many examples of it being used in our industry."...
Why won't they solve homelessness before engaging in all this AI stuff?
A great state that just cannot provide housing to its less fortunate is just so depressing!
I guess I shouldn't blame them for the federal government has served as a mentor on the subject, sad!
Re: (Score:3)
Because Republicans will cry about spending money to buy huge buildings to house the homeless, then you need security, plus making sure that food is also available. How many people will complain about the amount of money being spent to actually deal with a problem instead of just blaming others and doing nothing?
Re: (Score:1)
Why won't they solve homelessness before engaging in all this AI stuff?
Because the solution to homelessness is politically and socially unacceptable.
Re: (Score:3)
Why won't they solve homelessness before engaging in all this AI stuff?
A great state that just cannot provide housing to its less fortunate is just so depressing!
At least 20-25% of them are someone else's homeless by any measure. And I'd say that it's actually considerably more of them, because that's just the (approximate) percentage who came here after becoming homeless. Still more of them came here for work because there was no work in their home state, and then became homeless; I think we should count them, too. California has to pay for other states to function through our taxes, then we have to pay for their former citizens who left those states because those
Re: (Score:2)
Why won't they solve homelessness before engaging in all this AI stuff?
Because homelessness would require the redistribution of wealth. California isn't quite as communist as people like to pretend. We're not going to take property from landlords and developers and give it to poor people that have no jobs and no lobbyists.
Fscking idiots (Score:4, Insightful)
It's electronic voting all over again.
Government: Wow, electronic dohickies sound really great. Should we use them for voting?
Every developer ever: My god no, that is the most terrifying thing I've ever heard.
Government: Right-o, deploying them literally everywhere immediately after security assessment.
Red team researcher: So I looked at these for a couple hours before heading over to buffet and found about 400 ways to exploit them in 30 minutes with a paperclip and scotch tape but I wasn't really trying and I'm pretty damn hung over.
Government: Thank you for your honest assessment. *submits PO immediately*
Now it's happening again but with AI. I'm sorry but if you are using this for anything beyond voice recognition and data mining (with a heavy dose of skepticism just like a real web search) then you are fscking idiot. I don't mean don't use it for mission critical stuff I mean don't use it for anything that matters even a little to you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you turn the election over to chatgpt it'll hallucinate a candidate and claim everyone voted for them.
What can go wrong ????? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You are thinking Texas, where they never learn from their past mistakes.
AI managed grid :o (Score:3)
To be controlled through SCADA units connected over the Internet. What could possible go wrong?
Aug 14 2003: Washington [computerworld.com] The W32.Blaster worm may have contributed to the cascading effect of the Aug. 14 blackout, government and industry experts revealed last week.
Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada [energy.gov]:
The FirstEnergy SCADA system relied on a remote alarm processing unit to monitor and manage critical system alerts.
This alarm processor failed silently because it wasn’t receiving updated data and alerts from the remote SCADA units (because of a Windows virus clogging up the Internet).
The failure of the alarm processing unit was a key part of the blackout’s cascading effect, as operators at control centers didn’t get timely warnings about the system’s declining health.
Jan 2003: Slammer worm crashed Ohio nuke plant net [theregister.com]
Re: (Score:3)
I have an easier solution (Score:2)
Turn off AI when they have a power shortage. :D
migrate the workload to a data center somewhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
How it really works here with CAISO is they cut my solar power from the grid during a rolling blackout. So that I have plenty of power that I can't sell, and my neighbors have no power for their air conditioner.
The AI datacenters start up the diesel and natural gas turbines in response to the planned outage, they often get an advanced and automated notice.
The patron saint of lazy 'digital transformation' (Score:2)
Sounds like there is already an actual piece of simulation software in place; but the people feeding it scenarios need to manually assemble them from outage reports and maintenance notes; because apparently you can perform, even
The beginning of Colossus - Guardian (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A big issue really is about where to direct power, and putting limits in place so some jackass doesn't set up a crypto-mining operation that will draw the power of half the grid for personal profit at the expense of EVERYONE else.
Re: (Score:2)
so some jackass doesn't set up a crypto-mining operation
In a sane world we would have solved that with fines and prison time.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess people are stupid, but california is not the place to do that. Electricity is expensive (relative to most other US states) and tiered.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah and exposing yourself to radiation will give you super powers because I saw it happen in a movie. Go ahead and give it a go.
AI power monitors (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Calling it AI is the flaw, but there is so much hype surrounding AI, everyone wants to be seen as "using AI for this or that".
AI takes over before AI gets invented (Score:2)
It's too late. Journalists and entrepreneurs already treat LLMs as A.I. And they are ready to hand over human-level responsibilities to the magic 8-ball machine.
Numbers bad (Score:2)
you can't win (Score:3)
Artificial Intelligence will never beat Real Stupidity
Re: (Score:2)
A.I. is ordinary management stupidity in a shiny new package.
AI Caises Far More Power Problems than Solves (Score:2)
Train the AI on Enrons playbook (Score:2)
It can't be worse than what Enron did. You got this California.
perfect (Score:2)
Let's put the algorithms for managing our critical infrastructure into a black box that cannot be audited, analyzed, or duplicated. What could possibly go wrong!
Oh Dear! (Score:2)
I am glad I have an over-sized solar electric system on my roof and a 12 hour backup battery.
Manage? (Score:2)
Manage? Or create?
AKA (Score:2)