A New Battery Warns Parents if Their Child Has Swallowed It (nytimes.com) 244
A new battery from Energizer comes with "color alert technology" to alert parents if their child has swallowed one. When the coin lithium battery comes into contact with saliva, it activates a blue dye "so parents and caregivers know that medical attention could be required," reports the New York Times. The battery also features more secure packaging and a nontoxic bitter coating. From the report: The new coin lithium battery features more secure packaging, a nontoxic bitter coating to discourage swallowing and "color alert technology" that activates a blue dye when the battery comes into contact with moisture, like saliva, so parents and caregivers know that medical attention could be required. The new battery was announced in a video last week by Energizer and Trista Hamsmith, whose 18-month-old daughter died after swallowing a button battery from a remote control. Ms. Hamsmith founded a nonprofit organization focused on children's safety, successfully advocated for legislation, known as Reese's Law, that requires a secure compartment of the batteries in products that use them as well as stronger warning labels on all packaging, and is now working to make the batteries themselves safer.
Ingested coin or button batteries result in thousands of emergency hospital visits each year, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which notes that "the consequences of a child swallowing a battery can be immediate, devastating and deadly." "A button cell battery can burn through a child's throat or esophagus in as little as two hours if swallowed," according to the agency. Secure packaging and bitter coatings for batteries have long existed, but "the massive breakthrough here is the color alert technology, which helps give caretakers that indicator that something has happened," Jeff Roth, the global category leader for batteries at Energizer, said in an interview on Wednesday. "The most significant part about this is getting help early in the process," he said. "That's really what the color alert technology allows the family to do."
Ingested coin or button batteries result in thousands of emergency hospital visits each year, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which notes that "the consequences of a child swallowing a battery can be immediate, devastating and deadly." "A button cell battery can burn through a child's throat or esophagus in as little as two hours if swallowed," according to the agency. Secure packaging and bitter coatings for batteries have long existed, but "the massive breakthrough here is the color alert technology, which helps give caretakers that indicator that something has happened," Jeff Roth, the global category leader for batteries at Energizer, said in an interview on Wednesday. "The most significant part about this is getting help early in the process," he said. "That's really what the color alert technology allows the family to do."
Even better idea (Score:3)
Re:Even better idea (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Even better idea (Score:4, Interesting)
This has already been developed for button type batteries: TU Delft and RUG/UMCG join forces to develop child-friendly button cell [tudelft.nl]
Interesting.
That article also suggests giving a child who swallows a coin battery honey -- doesn't say why that is effective -- then taking the kid to a doctor. I'll note that babies under 1-year shouldn't eat honey because, "a type of bacteria (called Clostridium) that causes infant botulism can be found in honey." So there's that... coin battery vs. potential botulism.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, there is an antitoxin for botulism, and the amount needed is based on the amount ingested so if it is addressed promptly, you know the rest.
Re: (Score:2)
Honey would encapsulate the battery and prevent it from short-circuiting in the electrolyte-rich environment of the stomach, preventing a potential gastrointestinal perforation.
Re: (Score:2)
botulism in honey is *incredibly* rare in the first place and by the time the child is onto solids ~6 months they can handle it. A baby is far more likely to get botulism from formula milk than honey, but hey lets recommend babies under 12 months don't have it anyway.
If a baby under 6 months gets hold of a coin cell then that is an epic failure as a parent.
Re: (Score:3)
Damn, I won't be buying any more of those then.
Surely I can't be the only person who sucks on their batteries to see how much charge is left.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The issue is the cell bursts from contact with stomach acid and leaks nasty stuff into the intestines of the child. Stopping the voltage from the battery will not improve safety one iota.
Re:Even better idea (Score:4, Informative)
No, that is incorrect.
The hazard comes from electrical burns. To quote TFA:
Link to the Product Safety Commission's page [cpsc.gov] on coin cell safety.
Position statement and references [entnet.org] from the academy of ear nose and throat docs.
Re: (Score:2)
They aren't going to reduce the capacity of the battery just for the battery-eaters of the world.
Besides, you can't really "neutralize" toxic metals.
I don't know if they could be converted into safe compounds but once the battery contents get dispersed inside a stomach you'd need a lot of "neutralizing agent" to make sure you got all the metals - many, many times the entire capacity of the battery.
Legislation... (Score:2, Informative)
So woman fails to watch her baby. Baby swallows battery. Baby dies.
Instead of going "FML, I failed as a parent" woman decides to blame society and successfully lobbies to make batteries harder to change for everyone. I guess I know who I need to curse at every time my new chinesium "standard global markets" AC remote needs me to go find a small screwdriver to change batteries rather than just pop it open and change them.
However color coating on batteries to make people go "FML I failed as a parent" sooner s
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Noting that this happens way more than it should in many households, she worked to help make things safer. Babies (pets too) get into all sorts of things, no matter how good/attentive parents are -- both mothers *and* fathers.
Re:Legislation... (Score:5, Insightful)
>No matter how good/attentive parents are
No, this is something that is 100% preventable by being attentive.
Really? I’m quite certain that you have managed to harm yourself by not being “attentive” enough doing something at some point in your life. How exactly did that happen if you were a “good” person?
Perhaps dial back the 100% perfect expectation already for a fellow human who happens to be in charge of more than just their own safety. Shit Happens. That’s why we respect redundant solutions.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not claiming to be a very attentive person. But when I fuck up like that, I don't blame "society" and start demanding a legislative intervention.
And while that doesn't make me a "good" person, it certainly does make me a better one than a authoritarian who demands that society shoulders responsibility for her own personal failures.
Re:Legislation... (Score:4, Insightful)
Not everyone is fit to be a parent. Like how you seem easily excited, I would question your parenting ability.
Not everyone is capable of having a logical stance on something. Like how you seem overly assuming about human perfection, I would question your ability to judge other humans. Especially given the ironic fact you’re also a human who has proven yourself fallible, but expects perfection from everyone else at all times. Again, this is why humans design and respect redundant solutions.
No parent in the history of parenting has raised a child to be perfectly unbroken and untainted by error. We’re here discussing the redundant solution of a bitter blue battery. We’re doing that not because some parents are shitty, but because ALL humans are fallible. The mentally retarded 40-year old or the 80-year old suffering from dementia might be just as protected by such a product too.
Re: (Score:2)
>No matter how good/attentive parents are
No, this is something that is 100% preventable by being attentive.
I see you don't have children.
Re:Legislation... (Score:5, Interesting)
As an engineer, I look at something which can kill someone if the responsible adult's attention wonders for even a few seconds as a design flaw.
That said, I'm not sure this is the best solution. Nintendo coats their Switch cartridges with something that makes them taste absolutely disgusting. Reflex spit reaction, at any age. I suppose the issue is that batteries need to be conductive all around, because there is no telling where the contact is going to be with a coin cell, but there does have to be an insulating ring separating positive and negative.
Re: (Score:3)
As an engineer, I look at something which can kill someone if the responsible adult's attention wonders for even a few seconds as a design flaw.
Look around you. Right now. There are likely a dozen of things within 30 feet of you that can kill you. Not to mention the action of a human stepping into a modern car to drive at highway speeds mere feet from dozens of other cars that are barely maintained on public roads on a daily basis. An activity that kills thousands every day on this planet.
If you think “something which can kill someone” unless a 100% attention span is maintained is some kind of design flaw, then recognize we live in a
Re: (Score:2)
You missed the part about a responsible adult not paying attention for a moment. Batteries end up in all sorts of things, not all of them very well made to contain those batteries. They are small enough for babies to swallow.
Re: (Score:2)
So don't have those things. Anything which takes a coin cell should be removed from the household, or at least locked up in a box where it's inaccessible.
This is not rocket surgery.
Re: (Score:2)
This is not what happens here. What happens is that the responsible adult did not realize something was a danger. Or would you regard, say, needles, knives, detergents, matches, magnets, etc. as "flawed designs"?
Incidentally, that "reflex spit action" does not work at any age.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're the fucker who invented the blunt klnife, styrofoam hammer and so on.
Blunt knives are much more dangerous to the user than sharp ones. I like that hammer idea though.
Says someone who doesn't have kids (Score:5, Insightful)
You can't watch them 24/7/365. Unfortunately accidents sometimes happen.
Re: (Score:3)
Clearly, you haven't had children, or you'd know that children have this uncanny way of finding every little mistake you ever made.
Re:Legislation... (Score:4, Insightful)
However color coating on batteries to make people go "FML I failed as a parent" sooner so they can actually do something about it is a great idea. And that's not legislated.
If all it took was blue bitter batteries to make a good parent, parents would be battery-operated by now. Besides, no self-centered narcissist parent would acknowledge they failed. They’d be too busy self-identifying as a “victim”, because feelings.
Re:Legislation... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Or, you know, a little help can be extended to make potentially deadly products slightly safer.
I am not really sure why you are arguing, it's quite asinine.
I feel like you are one of those people who rails against seat belts in cars and thinks government agencies like the USDA and EPA are unnecessary.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Or man does the same crap. Too many "modern" human beings look for somebody else to blame when they screwed up.
For the case of "baby dies", there are basically two options 1) Misadventure. It happens. Sometimes things get overlooked even when careful. No punishment, the parent(s) are going to blame themselves enough. 2) Criminally negligent homicide. Make it clear to people that having a baby comes with responsibilities to be taken seriously.
In all cases: Give people real sex education and give peop
Re: (Score:3)
You need to look up "confirmation bias". Your argument essentially bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny how we had countless generations where neither sex education nor "real education what it means to raise a child" was a thing. And yet, every single human being alive is a product of parents being attentive enough to keep us alive.
Kids used to die young much more often in the past than they do now. Regulations, education, and better health care have all played a role in making kids safer. None of these are bad things.
Re: Legislation... (Score:3, Informative)
Did you know, that itâ(TM)s literally not possible for a human to watch another one for literally every waking moment. There are other things that need to happen, like going to the toilet, or cooking food for both you and the child youâ(TM)re caring for, or â¦.
Blaming parents for not looking at their children every literal second is insanity.
Re: (Score:2)
woman decides to blame society and successfully lobbies to make batteries harder to change for everyone
I mean they're literally asking websites to ask for your driver's license for porn because parents apparently can't monitor their children's web habits.
Parent's routinely hand a electronic brick to their kid, let them load up social media, get bullied online, and then blow their brains out, OMG it must be social media's fault. Not thinking for one second, who handed the brick to the child?
Just the world we are living in at the moment.
Re: (Score:2)
Except that isn't what is happening here.
Battery maker is attempting to make their product safer because they know that safety sells products...
Re: (Score:2)
Energizer putting a couple of coatings on their batteries seems like a straightforward thing to do, provided it doesn't add too much to the cost. But what Luckyo originally referred to are the new requirements in the US that all consumer products containing button cells adhere to a particular standard. Previously it was only toys, now it's everything.
Here's the standard:
https://www.intertek.com/batte... [intertek.com]
It will require lots of things to be redesigned, it will increase prices, and it will make replacing batte
Re: (Score:2)
No worse than that guy who couldn't be bothered to check his surroundings and ran over his kid [go.com]. Instead of going "FML, I failed as a parent" he decides to blame society and successfully lobbies to make backup cameras mandatory in every vehicle and now we have to contend with higher costs and higher repair bills when they fail.
Re: (Score:2)
The issue is quantity. There are more battery operated things in today's world.
The more battery operated devices there are, the more batteries there are to operate them. The more batteries there are, the greater the opportunity for mistakes to happen.
I don't judge anyone for making a mistake. Nobody is perfect. If batteries can be made more safe, why would you not do it?
Re: (Score:2)
So woman fails to watch her baby. Instead of going "FML, I failed as a parent" woman decides to blame society ...
Sexist much?
The person's name is Trista Hamsmith who prefers the pronouns "her" and "she" and claims to be a "woman". What's your problem with that?
Re: (Score:2)
So woman fails to watch her baby. Instead of going "FML, I failed as a parent" woman decides to blame society ...
Sexist much?
The person's name is Trista Hamsmith who prefers the pronouns "her" and "she" and claims to be a "woman". What's your problem with that?
Sorry, I meant to edit/add more, but got distracted -- by a baby eating a coin battery (kidding) -- and then clicked though. TFA notes that this happens thousands of times, for thousands of reasons -- including with pets -- presumably with mothers and fathers. She didn't blame society, just decided to do something about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Ya, sorry. As I noted in another post, I didn't edit/add enough before getting distracted and errantly clicking through. No way to then edit/delete... I'd like to blame my KVM (which does something weird whenever Windows polls it) but was most likely me not paying enough attention. I'll probably end up swallowing a battery later today. :-)
More technoligcal solutions (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
to social problems. Be a parent and keep harmful things away from children.
Babies and young children get into all sorts of things -- pets too. In addition, all kinds of babies (human, puppy, etc...) explore the world by putting things in their mouths. Shiny things, like coin batteries, are especially attractive.
Re: (Score:2)
If we give it a couple generations, evolution could take care of that.
Re: More technoligcal solutions (Score:2)
Weâ(TM)ve given it thousands of generations, evolution hasnâ(TM)t taken care of it, because thereâ(TM)s far too many random threats that donâ(TM)t occur often enough to exert evolutionary pressures.
Re: (Score:2)
I've read that young kids putting things in their mouthst is partly to increase their bacterial biome in their guts. No idea if its true but seems logical. Obviously it fails in the modern world where its not just mud and grass on the ground.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Kids can definitely be taught to not stick non-food-items in their mouths. If kids are being monitored when they are small and taught what is and is not safe, they carry that forward and you don't have to keep as tight a reign on them.
Source: I'm a dad.
Re: (Score:2)
Kids can definitely be taught to not stick non-food-items in their mouths. If kids are being monitored when they are small and taught what is and is not safe, they carry that forward and you don't have to keep as tight a reign on them.
Source: I'm a dad.
How many children have you raised? I'll bet, one. One who happened to be easy to dissuade from putting stuff in their mouth, so you have extrapolated from that sample of one to all kids everywhere.
The fact is that kids aren't all the same. Some are easy to train, some aren't.
Source: I'm a father (4X) and a grandfather. Based on my sample, I should perhaps assert that all babies and toddlers stick everything in their mouths and there's nothing you can do to teach them otherwise until they're at least tw
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Especially as the tech "solutions" cannot really fix the problem. Be a damn parent and take responsibility if you decided to have kids or were too stupid to find out how to not have them.
Re: More technoligcal solutions (Score:2)
I have four kids. Watching their every move unrealistic. Even keeping every possible hazard away from them is impossible. Putting blue dye on batteries is a brilliant idea and will save lives. It's cheap, simple, and in hindsight it's obvious. Kudos to the people who made this safety feature a reality.
If Mom Put The Batteries Immediately In The Dildo (Score:3)
This would not be a problem. The label clearly states to keep away from children so all the tech in the world isn't going to save your child because mom broke the first rule by leaving the batteries accessible.
Humans are pedantic.
Re: (Score:3)
What dildo takes a coin/button battery?
Re: (Score:3)
Your wifes'?
Sorry, couldn't help my self. At least it's not your mom.
Re: (Score:3)
A coin-cell powered dildo? Probably will last as long as her husband.
Young kids are smarter than you think (Score:2)
By the time mine was about 2 she could easily take stuff apart on her own and unfortunately you can hide stuff, you can watch them as much as you can , but occasionally they'll do things they shouldn't when you're not looking.
Re: (Score:3)
By the time mine was about 2 she could easily take stuff apart on her own and unfortunately you can hide stuff, you can watch them as much as you can , but occasionally they'll do things they shouldn't when you're not looking.
That was true with me; my parents said I routinely took apart all sorts of things, including my crib. I think a lot of the comments saying this is 100% preventable are by people who don't have kids or haven't had to watch them for any extended period. Same goes for pets -- like dogs eating chocolate and getting sick.
Re: (Score:3)
"are by people who don't have kids"
Absolutely this. Until someone has had kids or at least looked after some for a long period of time they really have no idea.
Re: (Score:2)
"are by people who don't have kids"
Absolutely this. Until someone has had kids or at least looked after some for a long period of time they really have no idea.
And not just one. KIds vary widely and it's not uncommon for parents who've only dealt with a single child to assume that all kids are like that one. Usually adding a second kid is enough to open their eyes when they realize that none of what worked on the first kid works with the second and vice versa. Occasionally parents get two that are very similar and don't learn this until they have a third, or until grandkids come along, or other close exposure.
Re: (Score:2)
Preventable with effort.
It might be a lot of effort, but that doesn't mean it's not possible.
What I actually think is that most parents severely underestimate the difficulty of parenting, so they half-ass it and then if everything works out OK anyway they tell themselves they did a good job. Outcomes are the easiest way to measure, but if they only succeeded by chance, then it really wasn't their doing.
If you're not willing to sanitize your household to make it child safe then you're not a good parent.
If yo
Re: (Score:3)
Oh please. Short of living in a padded cell thats simply not possible.
Then you can have your kid move in with you.
Grow old and die lonely then.
Did you teach your kids to be shitheads like you? Bet you did.
Obvious, but the headline is wrong (Score:2)
This technology accomplishes nothing if the baby has swallowed the battery. It only lets parents know if someone may have mouthed the battery.
Well, okay, if the baby swallows the battery it probably does change color... but unless the parents routinely use an endoscope on their kid, they aren't going to see it (and, if they do see it, they already have other incontrovertible evidence that their child swallowed a battery).
Re: Obvious, but the headline is wrong (Score:2)
Re: Obvious, but the headline is wrong (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I was also confused by this. The dye is there to color the mouth, not the battery. This is clear on the Energizer product page [energizer.com], but was not made clear in the article or summary.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, thank you - that makes much more sense!
Indelible Ink please (Score:2)
Yes, babies swallow weird stuff... but if bad parents didn't leave them on the table where young mouths could ingest them...
We've already all been inconvenienced by the cover screws - unwashable Blue mouth for a few weeks might teach the parents not to leave dangerous stuff
Re: (Score:2)
Blue mouth for a few weeks might teach the parents not to leave dangerous stuff lying around in their spawn's reach.
Please. You act as if Shame is still recognized and respected in society today.
I’m fully expecting to read headlines soon telling us all about the “victim” parent who is suing the shit out of the battery company for emotional distress and child PTSD after their child was “attacked” by a battery that left them temporarily stained but somehow permanently scarred.
That pays out far better in a society dumb enough to reward it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's hope the ink that will coat little Suzies mouth doesn't fade too fast. Then we can look for any kids with toilet-cleaner coloured mouths and know their parents are not keeping these things locked away in cupboards out of reach.
Harsh, bro. I know babies need kept close track of, but locking them in a cupboard?
Re: (Score:2)
Thank god, we'll know what killed them (Score:2)
Is that like the old Aussie saying "Try to catch the snake that bit you, we need it for our statistics to know which species killed you"?
I'd rather try to invent something that makes kid spit those things out instead of swallowing them.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather try to invent something that makes kid spit those things out instead of swallowing them.
TFS notes:
The battery also features more secure packaging and a nontoxic bitter coating.
Re: (Score:2)
On that note, emergency rooms in Australia want to stop people doing that because it would be an absolute catastrophe if one of these snakes gets loose in a hospital.
As to having kids spit the thing out, that only works after they have developed sufficient sense of taste. Hence this can help (if everybody does it, which is not realistic) but it cannot do that much.
So who is developing smarter children? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The kids don't need to get smarter, the parents do. Teach your kids to keep things that aren't edible out of their mouths. Also teach them that knives are sharp, falling down hurts, the stove is hot. Being a parent doesn't mean fucking and then just watching the child grow up, they have to be trained and taught. Being a parent carries with it the most responsibility that the average person will ever have.
My parents taught me this when I was like 8 years old, what the heck is with the current crop of people?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is actually bullshit in the given context. Kids of a certain age take everything they can in their mouths and sometimes swallow it. No connection to intelligence or insight, it is a natural development stage and there is nothing that can be done about it. The only thing that works is to keep dangerous objects away from the kids at that age. But asking parents to do that and take responsibility is apparently too much to ask these days.
Obviously, as soon as they are able to understand it, teach them to n
Good Grief (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean, or, you know, teach your kids to not eat everything they put their hands on?
I never "childproofed" anything in my house. None of those stupid little plugs in the outlets, no doors locked shut, no protective edge covers on every hard surface. We taught our kids that some things are dangerous and shouldn't be messed with. Don't run in the house or you'll crack your head, don't touch the stove because you'll burn yourself, etc etc. My parents (and my wife's parents) taught us the same way and we are fine in our 40s. My kids are teenagers now, still no problems.
I mean, hells bells, we kept loaded guns in the house, same as most of the people I know from where I lived then, kids never touched them unless they were allowed to. Both my kids had shot .22s by the time they were 5 years old, and today my daughter looks forward to her birthday for a couple new boxes of ammo to hit the range.
I do hand-tool woodworking as hobby, so I've got sharp implements everywhere, never had one of the kids hurt themselves on any of them, because I taught the kids that certain things have the capacity for harm and therefore must be respected.
That was a very long-winded way of just saying, parent your damn kids, teach them how to live in the world, wrapping them in bubble-wrap is stupid.
Re: Good Grief (Score:3)
You realise that thereâ(TM)s a natural human developmental stage where literally everything the kid gets its hands on gets stuffed in their mouth?
Thereâ(TM)s no teaching them not to do it at that age, itâ(TM)s just something that they do. And no, you canâ(TM)t watch them literally every second of the day, itâ(TM)s simply not possible.
Re: (Score:2)
And no, you canÃ(TM)t watch them literally every second of the day, itÃ(TM)s simply not possible.
It is possible if both parents don't have to go to work. People used to literally be with their children all day for the first few years of their lives. They didn't want them to wander off into the woods and get eaten by a wildcat or whatever.
Re: (Score:2)
And no, you canÃ(TM)t watch them literally every second of the day, itÃ(TM)s simply not possible.
It is possible if both parents don't have to go to work. People used to literally be with their children all day for the first few years of their lives. They didn't want them to wander off into the woods and get eaten by a wildcat or whatever.
This is what we did, my wife stopped working while the kids were young and stayed home with them. We had to make some material sacrifices during that time but we managed, and the kids were much better off for it. She went back to work but ended up coming back home anyway, because we had long-since already adjusted to just my income.
Re: (Score:2)
It is possible if both parents don't have to go to work.
It is not, not even then. You'd need at least three parents: One to go to work, one to stay with the kid, one to cover for the second when they have to do something other than watching the kid (clean the house, do the laundry, use the bathroom, etc.). Oh, sure, you can try to put the kid in a safe environment while you do stuff, but many young children are shockingly good at finding ways to get into stuff they're not supposed to get into, and do it far faster than you would expect.
A team of nannies can
Re: (Score:2)
You realise that thereâ(TM)s a natural human developmental stage where literally everything the kid gets its hands on gets stuffed in their mouth?
Thereâ(TM)s no teaching them not to do it at that age, itâ(TM)s just something that they do. And no, you canâ(TM)t watch them literally every second of the day, itâ(TM)s simply not possible.
My son never wanted to put non-food items in his mouth, it was just not something that ever really appealed to him. If it didn't smell like food, it didn't go in his mouth.
My daughter on the other hand wanted to put things in her mouth. I say wanted because when she would try to stick non-food stuff in my wife or I would stop her and chastise her. It did not take very long, even as a young baby, for her to learn what was and wasn't okay to try to eat.
This is obvious to anyone who thinks about it at all, if
Re: (Score:2)
Holy cow, I had completely forgotten about those until you brought it up, thank you for refreshing a memory for me!
The Easy Way (Score:5, Funny)
There's an easy way to tell if your baby has swallowed a battery: Take the baby's left hand and right foot and touch them to the end of your tongue.
Batteries, now an attractive nuisance (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Batteries, now an attractive nuisance (Score:2)
That wonâ(TM)t help if itâ(TM)s stuck in their throat. In fact itâ(TM)ll likely make the problem worse - instead of a hole in their throat, now you have a hole in their throat filled with acid, and bacteria.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course there is a technological solution... Battery shells that are too big for a human mouth.
That TV remote's going to get unwieldy, though.
Re: (Score:2)
It will only encourage older children to lick the batteries to turn their tongues blue.
I see a new TikTok challenge!
Wrong approach (Score:2)
It helps very little if some batteries (and no magnets) do this. What would be required is for all of them doing it, but that is in no way realistic. Instead, just like knives, needles, matches, cleaning fluids, detergents and other chemicals, etc. parents need to sanitize the environment for kids that do not yet have enough understanding to not do this.
Re: (Score:2)
It helps very little if some batteries (and no magnets) do this. What would be required is for all of them doing it, but that is in no way realistic. Instead, just like knives, needles, matches, cleaning fluids, detergents and other chemicals, etc. parents need to sanitize the environment for kids that do not yet have enough understanding to not do this.
This, also, is not a great approach. You have control over hazards in your own home, do you never take your child outside? To other people's homes?
Last I checked, rocks are still hard and will hurt you if you fall on them, water will still drown you even in small pools, cars can run over small children and indeed are more apt to since kids are erratic sometimes and harder to see.
You don't sanitize the environment, you prepare your children for the hazards that exist in it. Teach kids not to touch things tha
No.... (Score:2)
Just really getting out of hand with this nonsense....
Shit happens. Life can suck. (Score:2)
Child proof bottles? Sure. Tamper resistant outlets? well, oook, but it only took a decade for them to design them to almost work as well as normal outlets at triple the price. Meanwhile the rest of us didn't die from sticking things into an outlet, or eating batteries.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see a problem here.
One battery company is offering a product with a feature that some people will find attractive and purchase.
If you don't want to pay for the feature, don't buy it.... FFS...
Re: (Score:2)
We are the batteries (Score:2)
I saw it in a documentary.
lose (Score:2)
I've seen product review that says bitter coated batteries don't work in some devices. k.i.s.s.
Cool Idea (Score:2)
This is cool actually. I've noticed Duracell has already had the Bittrex coating for years now, which might discourage a kid from eating it. The blue dye is a nice touch though, because it helps with the question: "Did he really swallow that?"
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)