Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China Hardware

China's Chip Imports Fell By a Record 15% Due To US Sanctions, Globally Weaker Demand (tomshardware.com) 49

According to Bloomberg, China's chip import value dropped significantly by 15.4% in 2023, from $413 billion to $349 billion. "Chip sales were down across the board in 2023 thanks to a weakening global economy, but China's chip imports indicate that its economy might be in trouble," reports Tom's Hardware. "The country's inability to import cutting-edge silicon is also certainly a factor in its decreasing chip imports." From the report: In 2022, the value of chip imports to China stood at $413 billion, and in 2023 the country only imported chips worth a total of $349 billion, a 15.4% decrease in value. That a drop happened at all isn't surprising; even TSMC, usually considered to be one of the most advanced fabbing corporation in the world, saw its sales decline by 4.5%. However, a 15.4% decrease in shipments is much more significant, and indicates China has particular issues other than weaker demand across the world.

China's ongoing economic issues, such as its high deflation could play a part. Deflation is when currency increases in value, the polar opposite of inflation, when currency loses value. As inflation has been a significant problem for countries such as the U.S. and UK, deflation might sound much more appealing, but economically it can be problematic. A deflationary economy encourages consumers not to spend, since money is increasing in value, meaning buyers can purchase more if they wait. In other words, deflation decreases demand for products like semiconductors.

However, shipment volume only decreased by 10.8% compared to the 15.4% decline in value, meaning the chips that China didn't buy in 2023 were particularly valuable. This likely reflects U.S. sanctions on China, which prevents it from buying top-end graphics cards, especially from Nvidia. The H100, H200, GH200, and the RTX 4090 are illegal to ship to China, and they're some of Nvidia's best GPUs. The moving target for U.S. sanctions could also make exporters and importers more tepid, as it's hard to tell if more sanctions could suddenly upend plans and business deals.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China's Chip Imports Fell By a Record 15% Due To US Sanctions, Globally Weaker Demand

Comments Filter:
  • I’m not a cs/ee type. The RTX4090 is illegal to ship to China? Why? Please explain. Cause Chinese teenagers will get a leg up in their FPS matches?

    More seriously, are they THAT much better for AI computing? Cant someone string 10 last-gen cards together and get the same performance? Sure, at 5-10 times the energy cost. So what? We’re not talking about consumer grade computing where pennies matter.

    I don’t think that reverse engineering is the issue, right? China can look at current-n
    • Because AI is increasing rapidly and is a dual-use technology with military and cybersecurity applications.

      It's not currently a massive threat, but the writing is on the wall.

    • Because the 4090 is a tiny bit too fast. There's a computer bar above which chips are not allowed to be shipped there. The 4090 exceeds that by a few percentage points.

      Does that make sense? Are they that much better for AI? Maybe, maybe not. These are government policies; don't dig too deep for logic, you won't find it. There has to be a line, someone drew it, 4090 was over it.

    • by ffkom ( 3519199 )

      I’m not a cs/ee type. The RTX4090 is illegal to ship to China? Why? Please explain. Cause Chinese teenagers will get a leg up in their FPS matches?

      No, but because some western politicians are invested in the delusion that the next (real, not-video-game) wars will be won by those owning the fastest GPUs.

      More seriously, are they THAT much better for AI computing? Cant someone string 10 last-gen cards together and get the same performance?

      Yes, and China already runs some high-end supercomputers based on crazy high numbers of less-than-cutting-edge chips.

      Is there a legit reason here?

      Keeping the illusion of ever-lasting technology superiority of "the west" alive for a few more years, while not bothering to explain the public the financial and political costs that past decades of short-sighted, hell-bent outsourcing in

    • The RTX4090 is illegal to ship to China? Why? Please explain.

      The U.S. routinely restricts export of certain things for national security reasons. Simply Googling your question RTX4090 is illegal to ship to China [google.com] yields several pages discussing this in particular. The article, U.S. Govt Restricts Shipments of GeForce RTX 4090 to China, Other Countries [tomshardware.com] links to the specific U.S. document Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Updates and Corrections [cusersrpuc...ng20ifrpdf] that says:

      These revisions protect U.S. national security interests by further restricting China’s ability to obtain critical technologies to modernize its military capabilities in ways that threaten the national security interests of the United States and its allies.

      Another article notes Nvi [theverge.com]

      • That doesn’t really answer my question. What dangerous thing could China actually do with a bunch of 4090s that they can’t nowadays?

        I totally understand the restrictions on the most advanced chip fab systems. That’s serious tech with severe dual-use concerns.

        But the top-shelf GPUs themselves? They’re nice and all, but I’m pretty sure you can get the same computational power by ganging together a handful of last-gen chips.
        • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @08:29PM (#64165529)

          But the top-shelf GPUs themselves? They’re nice and all, but I’m pretty sure you can get the same computational power by ganging together a handful of last-gen chips.

          GPUs are more specialized and have a greater capacity for doing complex math closer to real-time than general-purpose CPUs -- even older GPUs vs newer CPUs, to a point. Google GPU vs CPU [google.com] for a bunch of articles. These two from 2021 talk a bit about military situations, though 'm sure there are others sources too.

          - CPU vs. GPU: The Paradigm Shift [systelusa.com]
          - Why the Armed Forces Must Prioritize Secure, Made-In-USA GPU Computers [trentonsystems.com]

          I'll note that the U.S.Government doesn't have to explain why it restricts the export of something and, in many cases, prefers not to, at least in any detail, as that itself might tip off why it wants to keep something to itself ...

          • Totally valid points but this isnt about CPU vs GPU either. Its all about five older GPUs being able to to the work of one cutting edge GPU. And if this is the case, is the US really denying the CCP any capability by restricting access? I totally acknowledge that Uncle Sam isnt required to justify every defense related decision it makes in public. But, sometimes, that secrecy is an excuse to support a knee-jerk response that ultimately is ineffective or counterproductive, and shut down conversation. This fe
            • once I asked my mom why we (USA) had classified so much in the way of nuclear technology such that China couldn't have it from us. It is all just basic physics after all, and Physics is taught everywhere, pretty much. My mom responded that if my father were alive he would answer, make them do the work themselves! This is probably in that ilk, sure, you can probably cluster a bunch of old GPU's together and get the same or better performance, but they have to do that work. It is just as much about slowing th
    • Cant someone string 10 last-gen cards together and get the same performance? Sure, at 5-10 times the energy cost. So what? We’re not talking about consumer grade computing where pennies matter.

      The reason that GPUs are so popular for AI training is not that they have a bunch of ALUs. Rather it's the memory subsystem plus the software support to take advantage of the memory. It's also this reason why one cannot simply pool together a bunch of ALUs and think that the resulting TOPS is equivalent to the equivalent TOPS GPU. This is also one of the challenges of ASICs and programmable processors like the TPU. GPUs have been developed over the last 15 years to provide a lot of memory bandwidth for

    • by NFN_NLN ( 633283 )

      > Someone please explain
      > I’m not a cs/ee type. The RTX4090 is illegal to ship to China? Why? Please explain.

      In the irony of all ironies I'll let American based AI ChatGPT explain why:

      You
      Why does the US have GPU export restrictions to China

      ChatGPT
      As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, the United States has imposed export restrictions on certain technologies, including GPUs (Graphics Processing Units), to China for several reasons. It's important to note that the geopolitical and trade l

    • Most ML is performed today using libraries of two types.
      1) Training
      2) Inference

      If you visit websites like GraphCore's who makes chips specifically for ML, you'll find they focus almost entirely on optimizing for the Python library pyTorch.
      If you visit Huawei's website and their Atlas machine learning compute systems, they focus on Pangu and PyTorch.

      Training tends to require some big iron to run. This is because Python libraries for training models are extremely inefficient in exchange for being very usable.
  • Probably have a case to sue the US government for lost revenue. The US should not be able to prohibit people from selling wares on the free market, if those wares were not created with tax-payer funds to begin with (I am talking of course about ASML and their customers, among others).
    • Of course they can. The government can legally prohibit exports of anything at all and they routinely do. In the case of ASML, they are legally free to export to China, but they would then come under US sanctions themselves.

      • They have a monopoly. If the US wants to enter chip manufacturing, they will forgive them.
      • Back when ASML was developing EUV technology, one of their corporate acquisitions was a US company called Cymer, specializing in lithography light sources.

        Supposedly, as a condition of being allowed to buy the company, ASML may have made some agreements with the US government. Also, the US has a intergovernmental agreement with the government of the Netherlands, regarding technology exports.

    • Re:Chip vendors (Score:4, Informative)

      by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @06:21PM (#64165245)

      The US should not be able to prohibit people from selling wares on the free market, if those wares were not created with tax-payer funds to begin with ...

      The U.S. routinely restricts export of certain things for national security reasons via its Export Controls [trade.gov]. Anyone who's ever had a security clearance knows all about this. Any U.S. company, like Nvidia, is bound by U.S. law and foreign companies may also be affected by U.S. Export Controls as noted in U.S. Export Control and Sanctions Laws [hklaw.com]

      The Economic Sanctions regulations affect not only U.S. companies in their potential relationships with Cuba, Iran, Syria and Sudan, but also may affect foreign companies as well, particularly foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies.

      You may not like this, but that's the way it is ...

    • Is it lost revenue though? The figures only measure imports, not use. If China has switched to domestically-produced stuff, which is exactly what the US sanctions were encouraging or at least acting as an accelerant for, then they would have lost the revenue anyway. The sanctions just moved the date up a bit.
      • Maybe, though China typically doesn't insist on making everything itself, and has been happy to pay a fair price for stuff made elsewhere.
        Placing sanctions on items does alter their motivations and focus, so makes the sanctions, ultimately, self defeating. Unless, you think that the Chinese actually aren't able to make them without the USA...but I should note that TSMC is evidence to the contrary, as are all the Chinese involved in developing such product elsewhere around the world.

        • My comment also wasn't directed so much at the flagship parts like GPUs that get all the attention but jellybean parts that China cranks out by the hundreds of millions or billions. I contribute to a forum that among other things does teardowns of Chinese-made consumer-grade electronics and over the last few years there's been a transition first from international-standard parts to Chinese knockoffs of said parts but with data sheets in Chinese and then to totally alien stuff with no identifiable manufactu
  • by MIPSPro ( 10156657 ) on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @05:59PM (#64165171)
    Take a look at this list of top fabs [wikipedia.org] and you'll notice that something like 8 of the top 10 largest fabs are in Taiwan (they are also mostly advanced ones with the best lithography). This is where Nvidia is producing most of these export-restricted chips. China knows if they take the island they may get a quantum leap in their capabilities. Now that AI is being used for warfare already, this could mean that they would have a distinct technological advantage over the West. I'm not too wild about fighting China for Taiwan (I'm anti-war), but I see why folks are excited about the prospects.
    • China will not get that tech if they take the island by force, and they know it. The Taiwanese will know weeks in advance if they’re gonna get invaded. Even if they can’t manage to dissassemble and ship the best litho machines out of the country, all it would take to wreck the key bits would be half a dozen engineers with full access, a few claw hammers, a couple cans of gasoline, and a few hours of work.
      • I think you might be right. I think the facts you cite are the main reason China has not done it already.
        • It could play into China’s reasoning, but the main reason they haven’t invaded Taiwan is because it would be absolutely brutal for all involved

          https://undispatch.com/what-wo... [undispatch.com]

          The CCP is really, really, REALLY hoping they can convince the Taiwanese population to voluntarily give up or the US to lose it’s nerve. Otherwise they’re looking at a Ukraine-style meatgrinder but with no way out for the elderly, women and children, an island with a badly reduced population and no sur
          • I completely agree on all your points. I'd be significantly worried about escalation and even a potential nuclear exchange, should one side get the clear upper hand. In the end, the island would be a wasteland anyway. My guess is that Taiwan will eventually come to some kind of deal with China which is sad, considering the history of Taiwan and Chiang Kai-shek. It'll be the true end of their civil war.

            As an American, I consider this a very dangerous game of brinkmanship and I honestly wouldn't be too disa
            • by HBI ( 10338492 )

              The invasion of Taiwan will be over virtually before it begins. Taiwan has no ability to last more than a few hours. This has been true for 10 years and it gets more unbalanced by the year. They know this, we know this. Formosa itself is a small island with a limited population concentrated in a few locations. Their ability to defend and/or maintain that defense against the relatively limitless resources of China is unlikely. Our ability to project power into that area is unlikely as well. Modern ASM

      • by ghoul ( 157158 )
        Really. How will the engineers be SURE that its a real invasion and not a PsyOP and if they have standing orders to do that if China is going to invade, whats to prevent China from staging troops , pretend to invade and watch Taiwan destroy a large part of its economy with not a single shot fired?
    • The PRC hasn't been motivated to recover Taiwan by chips. It's motivation was more sovereignty and territorial integrity, and keeping those who consider the PRC as an enemy off the island - yes, that's the USA mostly, though also it's allies, most notably Japan (see history).
      With the sanctions, though, chips have been added to the mix of motivations, but the PRC is not stupid and realise that recovering Taiwan by force will likely result in loss of those capabilities, so the motivation is replaced by the op

      • It's motivation was more sovereignty and territorial integrity,

        It is not, and that's PRC propaganda. The PRC has ever in it's entire history ruled over the territory in Taiwan. It's not "integrity" to gain a new piece of territory which someone else controls. It's pure expansionism and jingoism.

        Still, the Chinese on Taiwan aren't stupid either, and the recent election results show their support for the DPP has dropped significantly (~30%) so maybe it'd only take one more election to remove that delusional

      • Interesting perspective and informative post.
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      China interfered in Taiwan's recent election, but the anti-China candidate won anyway, so it looks like politically they won't be getting any closer.

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Except fabs are horrendously expensive and by all measures, very fragile. They must maintain an extremely clean environment, use extremely clean water and other things.

      All it would take to disable a fab would be to open a door to the outside world - leave a door open from the fab to the outside and you'll contaminate the air that will take weeks to clean out. Do it with the machines running and you'll probably have months worth of cleanup.

      AKM in Japan caught on fire in 2020. As far as I can see, it's still

  • ... and became less dependable on foreign technology? Sounds like a win for China. And given how few chips not made in China I find in everyday consumer products these days, I doubt they are in trouble with regards to their chip industry. Certainly not quite in the kind of trouble that the penny-squeezed and inventory stock starved supply lines to western companies are whenever shipments from China are delayed.
    I am all for changing that, but the "US sanctions" certainly do not.
  • They're just starting to hit the leading edge of shrinking working age population vs retired age due to one child policy.
    Their debt to gdp ratio for 2023 was officially at 299% but since 2008 their gdp numbers have been inflated so the real ratio is likely higher.
    Ghost cities: well known issue in the real estate market where people spend way too much money to buy apartments in places with no need which aren't getting finished because that money was spent by the construction company on the next set of apartm

    • by ffkom ( 3519199 )
      As much as we may enjoy seeing China's autocratic leaders in domestic trouble, at least decades of economic growth provided them with some good reasons to keep the peace. As soon as China's ruling party feels being in trouble enough at home, they will do the same that leaders, autocratic as much as democratically elected ones, have done in many countries around the world: Start some war to distract their people from domestic politics, triggering the knee-jerk reflex in most people to stop doubting their lea
      • Entirely true, however, given 2 choices: help push over a totalitarian regime that wants to take over the world and continue to trade with and thus help prop up and strengthen that regime which is the morally correct option?

        If we replaced "China" with "Nazi Germany in the mid 1930s" would you be concerned about what Hitler might do if we had isolated Germany and tried to collapse his government through economic sanctions?

        Bad people are going to do bad things either way. I suggest that helping them out is

  • by jenningsthecat ( 1525947 ) on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @06:33PM (#64165273)

    Given the extent to which household-name American corporations aided the Nazis in WWII, I'd be surprised if the latest Nvidia chips aren't making their way to China in defiance of mere economic sanctions. Also, what's the basis for the belief that we have accurate figures for Chinese imports? The Chinese certainly aren't going to provide accurate figures; and anybody selling to them via clandestine channels is going to make sure that the records of those transactions fly under the radar of financial analysts.

  • So China imported 15% less chips... the real question is, how much of this 15% was replaced with internal production and how much is a real decrease in chip supply.

  • Meanwhile domestic chip revenue up 40 percent year over year in last six months, China is weaning itself off imports, what a surprise.

    Sanctions of west are pointless, most the human race doesn't live there.

  • BS reporting no counting the big price drops of SSDs and Drams during the year.

Think of it! With VLSI we can pack 100 ENIACs in 1 sq. cm.!

Working...