Amazon Plans To Make Its Own Hydrogen To Power Vehicles (theverge.com) 77
Amazon is making plans to produce hydrogen fuel at its fulfillment centers. The retail behemoth partnered with hydrogen company Plug Power to install the first electrolyzer -- equipment that can split water molecules to produce hydrogen -- at a fulfillment center in Aurora, Colorado. From a report: The electrolyzer will make fuel for around 225 fork lift trucks at the site, although Plug says it has the capacity to fuel up to 400 hydrogen fuel cell-powered forklifts. This is the first time Amazon has tried to make its own hydrogen on site, and it's not likely to be the last. "On-site production will make the use of hydrogen even more energy efficient for certain locations and types of facilities," Asad Jafry, Amazon's director of global hydrogen economy, said in a press release announcing the installation of the first electrolyzer yesterday. "Hydrogen is an important tool in our efforts to decarbonize our operations by 2040."
[...] Hydrogen produces water vapor instead of greenhouse gas emissions during combustion, a trait that's made it more attractive to companies and governments working to meet climate goals. The big problem they need to tackle is cleaning up the process of making hydrogen in the first place. Today, most of it is made using fossil fuels, primarily through a reaction between steam and methane. The process releases planet-heating carbon dioxide. Methane leaks are another problem since methane -- also called natural gas -- is an even more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Plug tries to solve those problems by using electrolyzers to produce hydrogen. Instead of using methane, it uses electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. If that electricity is generated by renewable sources of energy like wind or solar, it's called green hydrogen.
[...] Hydrogen produces water vapor instead of greenhouse gas emissions during combustion, a trait that's made it more attractive to companies and governments working to meet climate goals. The big problem they need to tackle is cleaning up the process of making hydrogen in the first place. Today, most of it is made using fossil fuels, primarily through a reaction between steam and methane. The process releases planet-heating carbon dioxide. Methane leaks are another problem since methane -- also called natural gas -- is an even more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Plug tries to solve those problems by using electrolyzers to produce hydrogen. Instead of using methane, it uses electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. If that electricity is generated by renewable sources of energy like wind or solar, it's called green hydrogen.
great idea (Score:3)
What we need for a reliable, sustainable vehicle:
Green energy BUT make it less efficient by losing HUGE percentages in electrolysis and even higher in burning it. We gotta get those 100 watt panels down to 10 watts or less, guys!
Make it more dangerous - more explosive
Use tech that nearly nobody uses so we have the highest development and engineering R&D costs
Crappier energy density than petroleum or lithium batteries
Shorter range before needing refueling because Amazon is definitely not known for not driving long distances on a daily basis.
Solid idea, let's do it!
Re: (Score:2)
The big problem they need to tackle is cleaning up the process of making hydrogen in the first place. Today, most of it is made using fossil fuels, primarily through a reaction between steam and methane. The process releases planet-heating carbon dioxide. Methane leaks are another problem since methane — also called natural gas — is an even more potent greenhouse gas than CO2.
Re: (Score:3)
The electrolyzer is plugged into the power grid, and fossil fuels still make up about 60 percent of the US electricity mix.
But yeah, the first quote tells you why current hydrogen production is bullshit. The 2nd one tells you why Amazon's new idea is bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I can't help but get the feeling that this is simply an exercise in virtue-signalling rather than any serious attempt to reduce carbon emissions.
In fact, given the inefficiencies, it would be *much* more effective to simply buy electric forklifts and charge them from the power grid. At least you'd get about 90 percent of the energy going into doing the work you want. Once you figure electrolysis losses into the equation, the proposed "solution" is just a waste of time and money.
Re: (Score:3)
And let's not forget that you've not only got to use energy to split the water -- but then you'll have to use even more energy to compress the collected H2 into the cylinders you'll be using on your forklifts. Compressors to that level (200 bar or so) will use a *lot* of energy that is *never* recovered.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right... Compressing gas why in dive shops it's SOO expensive to fill SCUBA low tanks at 2200PSI (about 151 BAR). SCUBA high is 3000PSI is a bit over 300 BAR, again done SO expensively in the back room of the dive shop.
Re: great idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
... Except we don't care about volume. Weight/mass is the key.
At 300 BAR 2L is sufficient to drive a small car at 60MPH for about 300 miles.
This is a REAL, existing vehicle. The Riversimple Rasa out of Wales.
Go re-do your figures
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine how much fossil fuels are used to produce fissionable uranium. Between the mining, the hauling, the processing, the gassification, the centrifuges, creation of th
Re: (Score:2)
Plus, burning Hydrogen leaves slippery, wet floors so more employees skid their forklifts into each other and into products and workers slip and fall more often. I actually have no idea if this is true but it'd hilarious.
Re: (Score:2)
For the forklifts in and of themselves hydrogen seems to be competing with Lithium Ion for the virtue of getting richer. It's a giant market which has appeared organically. The energy is more expensive, but it makes better use of floorspace, the indentured servants and has less chance of damage (battery swaps are a bitch).
For the rest, if at net zero, all hydrogen comes from renewables and electrolyzers, Amazon is big enough to DIY that. Might as well experiment with it now.
Re: (Score:1)
From amazon's press release the mention these fuelcells replacing batteries, not other fossil fuels powered forklifts. "To date, Plug has collaborated with Amazon to deploy more than 17,000 fuel cells to replace batteries in forklifts in more than 80 fulfillment
Re: great idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But much like data centers that use water once, we need heavy regulation on companies to not do that and to recapture water as much as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
The latter auto greens every consumption that's electrified. This is a decent part of the consumption side. As the grid then greens this becomes even greener.
No one size solution. Hydrogen has a place and smaller, localized use 'indoor' vehicles might be a decent one of those. Unlike batteries these don't lose range over time either.
Perfect arguing with good situation me thinks.
Re: (Score:2)
So explain to me exactly how you know where the energy for your tesla comes from?
Shall we discuss the the Tesla megacharge station powered by a diesel plant? Hmmm... Shall we?
Re: (Score:2)
So yes, EVs today are probably majority charged with non-green sources.
but literally with NO EFFORT for the consumption EV, can be make 100% green as the grid becomes green.
Two step process that has to be done in parallel.
Re: great idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You've just illustrated that you ignore all that disagrees
Re: (Score:2)
An elephant in the room is the efficiency, Solar electricity through electrolyser and fuel cell to power for the forklift (including electronics such as max-power-point trackers for solar panels) vs. equivalent devices (inverters, charge controllers, etc.) for alternatives such as battery-electric.
LFP and several other lithium battery systems are now 93-97% efficient round trip from solar or line input to line-equivalent AC. Going to motor control should be at least that good. Last I heard, electrolyzer/f
Re: (Score:2)
Missing bulletpoint from the presentation:
- Whatever you do, don't use any components sold on Amazon to make the eletrolyzer!
RTFS! Is FORKLIFTS, not "vehicles" (Score:5, Informative)
Bulletpoints from that meeting (I assume)
What we need for a reliable, sustainable vehicle:
Green energy BUT make it less efficient by losing HUGE percentages in electrolysis and even higher in burning it. We gotta get those 100 watt panels down to 10 watts or less, guys!
Make it more dangerous - more explosive
Use tech that nearly nobody uses so we have the highest development and engineering R&D costs
Crappier energy density than petroleum or lithium batteries
Shorter range before needing refueling because Amazon is definitely not known for not driving long distances on a daily basis.
Solid idea, let's do it!
Amazon seems pretty happy with those Rivian delivery Vans. The thing with forklifts is that, when you use them in enclosed spaces (like say, a fullfillment center), ICEs are a big no-no, because the CO2 and CO can kill people.
So, your only options are either Electric forklifts or Hydrogen Forklifts. And guess what? Unlike the delivery vans, which can be carged overnight (because night deliveries are significantly fewer than daytime ones), Forklifts in a fullfillment center are used 24/7, so recharging time counts.
Hydrogen forklifts can be recharged in less than 5 min, Vs the hour or so of downtime for electric forklifts...
Even at reduced efficiency, If they can make the Hydrogen with clean energy (solar+Wind), is still clean.
Re: (Score:3)
Amazon seems pretty happy with those Rivian delivery Vans. The thing with forklifts is that, when you use them in enclosed spaces (like say, a fullfillment center), ICEs are a big no-no, because the CO2 and CO can kill people.
So, your only options are either Electric forklifts or Hydrogen Forklifts. And guess what? Unlike the delivery vans, which can be carged overnight (because night deliveries are significantly fewer than daytime ones), Forklifts in a fullfillment center are used 24/7, so recharging time counts.
Hydrogen forklifts can be recharged in less than 5 min, Vs the hour or so of downtime for electric forklifts...
Even at reduced efficiency, If they can make the Hydrogen with clean energy (solar+Wind), is still clean.
A well known solution to the charging time problem is battery swapping. There are solvable but real issues with battery swapping "in the wild" but these don't really apply in this application.
Re: (Score:2)
Just buy a few more of them so you can have some on charge while others are in use.
Re: (Score:2)
Just buy a few more of them so you can have some on charge while others are in use.
Yeah I was thinking of that too...
These discussions always remind me of this one:
https://thedailywtf.com/articl... [thedailywtf.com]
Re: RTFS! Is FORKLIFTS, not "vehicles" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon seems pretty happy with those Rivian delivery Vans. The thing with forklifts is that, when you use them in enclosed spaces (like say, a fullfillment center), ICEs are a big no-no, because the CO2 and CO can kill people.
Erm... Warehouses have used LPG forklifts for decades. Emissions are lower than petrol or diesel on standard LPG and you can get specialised LPG with even lower carbon emissions, also as there are fewer emissions it's far easier to contain or scrub them.
They're still favoured over electric as they don't need daily downtime for recharging. So unless you've a brand new warehouse with electrified rails everywhere (which are a hazard too) electric fork lifts aren't really that viable.
Re: (Score:2)
In fact, both Walmart and Amazon own significant portions of PLUG for the same reason... OK, maybe not Amazon. Walmart freaked when Amazon got involved a several years ago,
Walmart use the H2 forklift systems in their warehouses and have for years because propane driven units really don't work well in the closed environment of a warehouse (carbon monoxide anyone?), battery power units are "down for charging over 40% of the time" (the fleet needs to be almost 50% larger due to down time $$$$$)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How about extract?
Although you could 'mine' hydrogen from a gas giant like Jupiter.
Well Bezos is full of shit (Score:2)
Might as well put it in a digester to create biogass.
Re: (Score:2)
Bezos stepped down as CEO back in 2021. The operations are being run by other people.
Not that Bezos still doesn't have a say, but he's not in control.
Re: (Score:3)
I think whoever is behind this is already producing quite a bit of biogas.
The Japanese model of unnecessary, redundant tech (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, EV forklifts would also "complicate the jobs of firefighters".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Their job would be much easier. If they went to Lithium battery powered forklifts, the fire could be burning for hours where firefighters would have to hose them down to slow down the reaction.
Meanwhile, Hydrogen just makes a giant boom and explodes into a fireball. The fire is over much more quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
More likely a woosh. Getting an explosive mix will be hard and can only realistically happen at the roof, some ventilation in the right spots and it won't happen there either.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually hydrogen has an amazingly wide stoichiometric range (anywhere between 30:1 to 200:1) so it's very easy to get a mix with air that becomes highly explosive (unlike most other gasses).
Re: (Score:2)
You need >18% for detonation, if it can't pool at the roof you are rarely going to get a significant cloud at 18%.
is it a company ... (Score:1)
... or a corporanation?
Re:is it a company ... (Score:5, Informative)
Indeed. The world is ruled by gigantic, far-reaching, unaccountable oligopolies that are essentially above the law. There's a name for that: it's called Corporatocracy [wikipedia.org].
And when they and the state work hand-in-hand and rely one one another, like it's mostly the case today in the US, it's called fascism.
Hydrogen is a great.. (Score:2)
..research project, but many serious challenges remain
Current electrolyzers/compressors are VERY inefficient
We need direct solar production and solid state storage, NOT wasted "investment" in today's crappy tech
Re: (Score:2)
Direct solar production is almost certainly not a good idea. With thin film you can cover a large area with minimal expensive material ... now fill that entire area with water and hydrogen transport, it's suddenly fucking expensive. Cheap PV with relatively compact electrolyzers is almost certainly superior.
There is no point in transforming the hydrogen into something else for them either, then they have to extract hydrogen again to feed the fuel cell. Needless complexity. Couple hundred bar hydrogen is wor
I wonder (Score:2)
Easier work for my friend (Score:2)
of course it comes pre-mixed with oxygen (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A 316 stainless steel exhaust will solve that problem.
It does not solve the problem of "The minimum ignition energy (MIE) of a hydrogen–air mixture is only 0.019 mJ, whereas that of other flammable gases such as petrol, methane, ethane, propane, butane, and benzene is usually on the order of 0.1 mJ according to Lewis and von Elbe"
Hopefully they put the generator outdoors.
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't ignition- the article is not accurate when it mentions "combustion" - these are fuel cell forklifts. Hydrogen and oxygen from the air in, water + electricity (and some heat) out.
To the point of flammability, Hydrogen is way less dense than those other flammable gasses, and dissipates (goes up) far faster. It is easy to ignite, but it does not sink and pool.
In for a penny... (Score:2)
What I found interesting is the fact that Amazon apparently already operates hundreds of fuel-cell forklifts so this makes sense as a natural next step since one way or another they're buying hydrogen.
It'd be interesting to see the economics of this in what they are already paying for production and transport versus making it on site. I gotta imagine it's close to break even or better, the PR from this cannot be worth a big operating loss, but then again this is Amazon and running some things at a loss is
RTFS! Is to be used in FORKLIFTS, not "vehicles" (Score:2)
Amazon seems pretty happy with those Rivian delivery Vans. The thing with forklifts is that, when you use them in enclosed spaces (like say, a fullfillment center), ICEs are a big no-no, because the CO2 and CO can kill people.
So, your only options are either Electric forklifts or Hydrogen Forklifts. And guess what? Unlike the delivery vans, which can be carged overnight (because night deliveries are significantly fewer than daytime ones), Forklifts in a fullfillment center are used 24/7, so recharging time
Re: (Score:1)
a big no-no? seen and smelled propane forklifts in dozens of warehouses over the years, lolz
Re: (Score:2)
Very hard to use an ICE forklift in an air conditioned area. Guidelines I've read suggest an air exchange of 5,000 cubic feet per minute per propane forklift, 8,000 per gasoline forklift. Considering the carp that Amazon has gone through with reports of high temperatures in their facilities, It would be pretty hard to have "climate controlled" facilities (their words) and combustion forklifts (and these forklifts are fuel cell).
Re: (Score:1)
Most warehouses aren't for multi-billion dollar corporations.
You think Joe's Big Bait and Tackle or Bubba's Booze Emporium cares about those guidelines? hahahaha
Re: (Score:2)
Or just get some extra forklifts. Even a cursory googling round indicates modern li-ion electric forklifts can run for quite a few hours (8) off a 1 hour charge. For continuous operation, 24/7 you'd need 1.125 times the number of fork lifts (not 3x like with the old lead acid sort).
That seems simpler and easier and almost certainly cheaper than building a whole electricity to H2 system, H2 charging infrastructure and bunch of handling kit and so on.
Then "charging" is even quicker: park the forklift and plug
Also (Score:2)
not just cows (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"It was after the public found out what drivers had to do to collect the methane powering their vehicles, that support for unionization at Amazon really took off."
Battery swap forklifts (Score:2)
Given all the disadvantages of hydrogen, I have to wonder whether a battery swapping solution might not be better.
Battery swapping has problems as a general solution for transportation, but for forklifts in a warehouse it should work pretty well.
I read the article and what jumps out at me is that Amazon is buying hydrogen forklifts from a company. So at least they are going with an off-the-shelf solution that they have already tried and is known to work. The only real news is that they are getting their o
Re: (Score:2)
Batteries are heavy though. How are you going to lift them? /sarcasm.
Re: (Score:2)
Jokes aside, some kind of pack-swapping machine is probably the way to go.
Forklifts have counterweights so they can lift heavy things without tipping. I think the battery pack could double as a counterweight, getting a benefit from the weight. And then there's the energy efficiency and less danger of fiery death.
Re: (Score:2)
Or a forklift swapping machine, otherwise known as having a few more fork lifts. Li-ion batteries charge pretty fast, so the number of extra fork lifts you need is pretty small.
Hydrogen is a greenhouse gas ... (Score:2)
People don't realise that hydrogen is a greenhouse gas: It prevents atmospheric methane from degrading. Not only that, but about 10% of hydrogen inevitably leaks off during production and storage due to its remarkable ability to penetrate the most cleverly engineered seals.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not the definition of a greenhouse gas. But the rest of your point stands.
Re: (Score:2)
TIL hydrogen prevents (slows) methane from degrading. Still, hydrogen doesn't stick around in the atmosphere long- about 2 years (typ) before it eventually gets stripped from the atmosphere by the sun's radiation. Methane sticks around until broken down- which takes (typ) 12 years.
Not combustion. These are fuel cells. (Score:2)
The article is not accurate when it mentions "combustion" - these are fuel cell forklifts. Hydrogen and Oxygen from the air in, water + electricity (and some heat) out.
Fuel cells are a pretty decent option (when you're not generating the Hydrogen from fossil fuels), since the working temperatures are far lower than combustion. When you burn a fuel in air, the high temperatures lead to reactions with the Nitrogen, producing NOX gasses.
Re: (Score:1)
Do fuel cells use expensive, rare earth catalysts? Do they come from slave labor mines in the Congo??
Re: (Score:2)
Expensive, yes (Platinum, mostly). Rare earth, No. From the Congo? No (AFAICT).
electrolyzer (Score:2)
The electrolyzer will be powered by clean electricity, made by burning the hydrogen that is produced.