Reports of the PC's Death Are Greatly Exaggerated, Says IDC (theregister.com) 70
The PC market is expected to return to growth in 2024, according to estimates from IDC analysts. From a report: Still, industry players might want to taper their enthusiasm. PC shipments are forecast to grow 3.7 percent year-on-year to hit 261.4 million units in 2024, putting them above 2018 levels, but not quite on par with 2019 demand. Meanwhile, 2023 is predicted to sink by 13.7 percent to 252 million units. Research manager Jitesh Ubrani called demand "tepid at best" and said 2023 will be the year with the "greatest annual decline in consumer PC shipments since the category's inception."
IDC recognizes the market still faces challenges including "concerns around the consumer market refresh cycle, businesses pushing device purchases forward, and education budgets that are not rebounding in many markets." Market hesitancy, as always, boils down to uncertainty. For one, processors are seeing what IDC called "some of the biggest shifts in commercial PC history" as AMD market share hit 11 percent in 2022 and Apple pulled in just over 5 percent that year. Apple device sales have been on a decline for multiple quarters now. Q1 2023 saw new Macs plummet more than 40 percent year-on-year, compared to an overall 25-30 percent among PC vendors. The quarter before that saw Apple shipments outperform the PC market as a whole, declining a mere 2.1 percent while other manufacturers experienced 37 percent reductions.
IDC recognizes the market still faces challenges including "concerns around the consumer market refresh cycle, businesses pushing device purchases forward, and education budgets that are not rebounding in many markets." Market hesitancy, as always, boils down to uncertainty. For one, processors are seeing what IDC called "some of the biggest shifts in commercial PC history" as AMD market share hit 11 percent in 2022 and Apple pulled in just over 5 percent that year. Apple device sales have been on a decline for multiple quarters now. Q1 2023 saw new Macs plummet more than 40 percent year-on-year, compared to an overall 25-30 percent among PC vendors. The quarter before that saw Apple shipments outperform the PC market as a whole, declining a mere 2.1 percent while other manufacturers experienced 37 percent reductions.
Re:Endless growth (Score:5, Interesting)
Would you rather live in one of the centuries where people die with the same technologies they were born with?
Man does not live by bread alone. The hope and energy of change is a kind of psychological oxygen for society.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
We are dying with the same technology we were born with. Or rather, the progress is no longer arriving with the consumer. We just add some stupid gadgets and gimmicks to it. TVs have higher resolution now, but that only displays much better that the program is worse than before. Computers are faster than ever, and that additional speed benefits its maker, not the user.
We have actually arrived at a point where "newer" is no longer "better" but more and more it actually gets worse.
Re: (Score:3)
In rare cases where a true advance is made, the growth model strongly rewards it. In a stability model, they would be penalized for endangering the status quo.
Long-term, it's more dangerous to stand still than to move by habit.
Re: (Score:2)
The solution would be real, genuine competition. There hasn't been something like that in years. Everyone is, basically, dancing around the status quo. We're adding gimmicks and gadgets, flashy irrelevancies that add nothing to the usefulness of the product. In the eternal words of Homer Simpson, you should have added a clock to something, that would sell.
All our "competing" companies have essentially agreed on doing the same. Everyone's peering at the "competition" and doing essentially the same. There is
Re: (Score:2)
I be happy with some antitrust radicalism and some social programs like universal trust funds so everyone has a chance at input.
Re: (Score:2)
Quite bluntly, if I had the solution, I wouldn't post it here but run for an office and make millions with the idea.
The first thing we'd need is to put a stop to the market consolidation along with the ever raising bar to enter the game. What we get with consolidation is fewer and fewer competing companies, and by making it prohibitively expensive and a legal minefield to do so, we ensure that only the existing global players can even try to participate.
How to solve this, I don't know.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Endless growth (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you seriously trying to tell me that things havent fundamentally changed for the better in the last century? Stuff that’s better- Medicines, vaccines, computers, the internet, cars, satellites, education, young people’s iq’s. Stuff we have less of - world wars, lead in everything, cars that last 75,000 miles and kill you quick if you hit something over 25 mph, societies that think it’s ok to beat your children and women, etc. etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Ouch. You’re letting your curmudegon show, old man.
Are you seriously trying to tell me that things havent fundamentally changed for the better in the last century? Stuff that’s better- Medicines, vaccines, computers, the internet, cars, satellites, education, young people’s iq’s. Stuff we have less of - world wars, lead in everything, cars that last 75,000 miles and kill you quick if you hit something over 25 mph, societies that think it’s ok to beat your children and women, etc. etc.
Things have definitely improved. However, medicine and vaccinesare quite commonly priced out of anyone's but insurancer's pockets. So what use is medicine, if barely anyone can afford it?
Computer hardware improved by a lot, you are speaking truth there. But if Windows 11 is an indicator, that hardware will be seriously hobbled by Microsoft's greed. Having bought a brand new laptop with decent hardware in it together with Windows 11...A year in, I can tell you that I am not particularly impressed with how we
Re: (Score:2)
Last century? Most definitely!
Last decade? Well, no. Name one thing made in the last year that is genuinely better for you as the consumer than something you got 10 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't disagree with you that lately it feels like we're regressing, products are getting worse, companies are getting greedier, and genuine co
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, make it 20 years. Make it 30. Aside of computer graphics getting better, I fail to see a bunch of advances that warrant the drawbacks we got in the same amount of time. Products are less repairable, more invasive in your privacy, more demanding of your data and less convenient to use.
Re: (Score:2)
In a century yes. In the last couple of decades? Not so much really, despite the immense hype that everything is new and batter when mostly everything is old and just a new reskin with less benefit. Mostly what we have are old technology that is scaled up. Also after being scaled up the tech is used to push advertisements on everyone.
Now there are some new things recently, not all is rampant consumerism. mRNA vaccines for example.
Re: (Score:2)
You should be so lucky as to see his curmudgeon or mine.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you serious? Anyone roughly fifty years old was born before the internet, cell phones, smart phones, commercial rockets, electric cars, self-driving cars, home computers, videogames (mostly), flat panel TVs, AI chatbots (well, good ones). 4K or 8K resolution is now standard. VR and augmented reality glasses are here. These days many people never have to step foot in most any store unless they want to. Working remotely from home with video conferencing is a thing. Cable TV is dying, and on-demand i
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that wasn't all around fifty years ago.
The thing is, though, all of that stuff was around fifteen years ago.
Progress has halted. Yes, we had some vast progress with the advent of the transistor, and another leap with the microchip, but those leaps are in our past. Developments in the past 10-15 years are mostly to the detriment of the end user rather than to better the experience.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think about it, since 2010, what real game-changing technologies have been introduced? The only real disruptive technologies of recent seem to be rental scooters that are used for running around a metro area without worry. Everything else is being monetized to death or filled up with ads that it is pointless to bother with, or one winds up having to play the arms race versus Admiral anti-ad blockers, or allow ads, and then be vulnerable to malvertising.
This is one of the first times in history wher
Re: (Score:2)
"Progress" is only measured in drawbacks for the customer these days. You see it worst in consumer electronics, where the average TV today offers the same value to you but tries a lot harder to siphon a lot more information from you for its master. But it's everywhere. Cars and that ridiculous push towards touchscreens instead of knobs where touch would inform you what you're about to do rather than having to take your eyes from the road to adjust the AC. Cellphones with more and more crap pushed into them
Re: (Score:2)
The only thing that comes to mind that has been a change, have been scooter rentals, which were definitely a disruptive technology... and added to the ER load in many cities. Other than that, the main things that have come our way are higher prices, more ads, more intrusive ads (browsing a phone with a postage stamp area of text with everything around it animated crap gets old), more effective malware, more clickbait, and having to buy faster CPUs to run the same software due to code bloat.
Re: (Score:2)
I would purpose after ubiquitous connectivity, cheap energy and cheap flight to orbit there might not be much to do before Nuclear or Fusion Power usher in a world with a much different balance of trade.
Some would think the labor savings of Steam Engines were the revolutionary part of the 1840s, but the machining skills, metallurgy, product transportation and measur
Re: (Score:1)
Sustainable growth is logical,
Sustainable growth in "real stuff" is an oxymoron on a finite planet with finite resources.
As long as practically all are stuck on this planet there can only be sustainable growth in virtual stuff but not real stuff.
Last but not least the Circuses can be virtual but the Bread has to be real.
Re: Endless growth (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Endless growth (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the alternatives are equally bad or worse. Sustainable growth is logical, but it's easy to mistake conservatism for diligence, and stagnation for stability.
It's not just that the alternatives to a computer (PC or Laptop) are worse, but computers have gotten better. People aren't rushing out to buy a new laptop because their existing one is working fine. A 5 yr old processor will still handle everything most users will throw at it. Companies have realised this and have extended their refresh periods to compensate. I'm a gamer, however I now expect a desktop or laptop to have a service life of 5 years with minimal upgrades (as in new storage, maybe some RAM). Th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. I replace mine and my wife's macbooks about once every 5-7 years. The last cycle was shortened because my work got me a m1pro and I fell in love with the performance so I replaced "out of cycle" with a m1max. I fully expect to use this computer for 5-6 more years without issue and honestly I bet the battery will die before the useful life.
My last gaming PC was built in 2015 (skylake processor) and served me well with a mid-range video card upgrade a few years back. It's dead now (I'm fairly sure I coul
Re: (Score:1)
Research manager Jitesh Ubrani called demand "tepid at best"
Selling 252 million computers in a year is not tepid. That's 690,400 every day. That's pretty good. It may not be as much as the greedy assholes want, but fuck them.
Re: (Score:2)
What were they thinking? I curse them all for developing the technology that allows a person to make a living posting photos of their ass on Instagram.
I don't know about you but I have seething hatred for everyone older than me that didn't dedicate their entire lives to having a zero carbon footprint, even before we started blaming everything from dandruff to herpes on climate ch
Re: (Score:2)
minimize long term stability in favor of making money *right* *now*
Not true. Investors poured billions into Amazon, Google, Facebook, and other tech companies that lost money for many years before they became profitable.
The entire VC industry exists to make long-term investments.
The are trillions invested in "growth funds" that focus on companies increasing value over immediate profit.
I thought... (Score:3)
that the biggest year for PC sales in recent times would be 2020-2021 as people bought PC's to work from home during the pandemic.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
that the biggest year for PC sales in recent times would be 2020-2021 as people bought PC's to work from home during the pandemic.
Perhaps we should first find out of the ones slinging PC statistics have redefined what a "PC" is, in order to figure out how much hype and bullshit is behind this potential clickbait of an article.
Ain't life grand when Narcissism becomes a legitimate career choice...
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. Is Microsoft Surface a PC, while Apple iPad (with keyboard) Not a PC? I think that's how they count.
"While AI-capable PCs are not ready today, they are coming and have shifted some of the discussion around device purchasing within businesses," said IDC. The M2 contains dedicated neural network hardware in a 16-core Neural Engine capable of executing 15.8 trillion operations per second. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] I guess these don't count in IDC's view. The GPU cores in the M-series ch
The person controls the computing (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah. Is Microsoft Surface a PC, while Apple iPad (with keyboard) Not a PC? I think that's how they count.
Surface Pro is (in theory) end-user programmable, whereas iPad is not. The key difference between the two is that the person who owns a Surface Pro, not the app store gatekeeper, controls what computing is done (at least in userspace). Person, computing. Personal computer. PC.
(The less that can be said about Surface RT, the better.)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. Is Microsoft Surface a PC, while Apple iPad (with keyboard) Not a PC? I think that's how they count.
Surface Pro is (in theory) end-user programmable, whereas iPad is not. The key difference between the two is that the person who owns a Surface Pro, not the app store gatekeeper, controls what computing is done (at least in userspace). Person, computing. Personal computer. PC.
While this sounds like a completely logical stance, I'm still waiting for the "official" definition of PC that media has been sold in order to brainwash the targeted consumer masses. Needless to say marketing like this doesn't help the computer revival no matter how personal you make it.
https://youtu.be/3S5BLs51yDQ?t... [youtu.be]
Get off my lawn (Score:3)
Good news for sustainability (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Things like iPADs, Phones, or gaming consoles
Re: (Score:2)
When PCs start slumping off, expect stagnation in the mobile / gaming spaces for a few years.
I can live with that!
Three year cycle (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most companies in the current trend can only allow a tiny handful of employees to have such privileges. Most are managed by IT, who have a very limited budget for new laptops.
Re:Three year cycle (Score:4, Informative)
Most companies in the current trend can only allow a tiny handful of employees to have such privileges. Most are managed by IT, who have a very limited budget for new laptops.
Most employees don't need a computer that is computationally powerful. A 3 year old machine is probably still overpowered relative to their needs.
Re: (Score:2)
For most office workers, even 10 year old machine works just fine. 2500k/2600k grade machine is still perfectly fine in terms of office software performance.
There's a tiny sliver of people in the office who actually need compute. People who work in IT and compile code as well as people who edit video come to mind. Word and excel jockeys of whom there's probably a 100 for every one of aforementioned people if not more?
They probably won't even notice the difference.
Re: (Score:2)
The point is, large companies have this odd computer refresh cycle. You get a new laptop after warranty period is over.
Upgrade RAM when buying, periodically upgrade GPU (Score:3)
That is what the guarantee period is, after which my company allows you to order a new laptop. Independent from the status of the old laptop. There is no incentive not to honor this three year cycle.
I'd say there is a disincentive to honor it. A three year old PC works just fine.
Once upon a time you get a new PC after three years and you can see the performance improvement, no stop watch necessary, it was visibly faster.
This is no longer the case. Getting 7 years out of a PC is usually not a problem. Get a RAM upgrade when you buy a PC and 7+ years later you may have a hard finding a significant performance gap. Into gaming, updgrade the GPU ever two or three years.
I got a 10 year old PC with
Re: (Score:2)
I used a 1982 Apple IIe , that was mostly a 1977 design well into 1992. That system had been the primary FIFO inventory value system for a family bossiness for 8+ years, and I wrote all school work on it since about 1980 The impact
Pluton / TPS2 / Intel ME (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Linux on desktop is honestly close to being on par with windows XP in terms of user friendliness on desktop. Not quite there yet, but close. If you're into really old systems, may want to consider switching to that.
It gives you control over most of those things, minus the management engine aspect, which is unlikely to ever go away as it's getting more and more entrenched due to increasing complexity of processors and processes needed to start them.
Re: (Score:2)
If you build your own and run Linux, none of that is really a big deal. I just built a system for $950 and am very happy with it. The motherboard has room for future expansion and upgrades whenever I get to that point of needing them. Not sure I'll need more then 32gb of ram but I could see upgrading my RTX 4060 in the eventual future though that card should easily last 5 years.
I could also see maybe buying an additional storage drive, as I only have 1TB NVME but even that seems highly unlikely since even m
Re: (Score:2)
It's the lack of good laptop options that is making me reconsider getting another desktop. I wanted a single machine I could use as a travel laptop and desktop replacement, but the only one that meets all the requirements is the Framework 16, and they aren't shipping yet.
So instead I might get an old, cheap Thinkpad for travelling, and a compact ITX or mATX desktop. Or maybe just stop travelling with a laptop entirely. I think I can get by with just a smartphone.
Reports of PC death? (Score:4, Informative)
I think I stopped listening 20 years ago or so. They were always ridiculous nonsense. Essentially, some "journalist" desperately looking for something to write.
Re: (Score:2)
I equate "The death of the PC" to "The year of the Linux desktop" or "Flying cars right around the corner."
Re: (Score:2)
Joke is on you, I have Linux on the desktop since 1995. As to flying cars, that was always a stupid idea and a stunt.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think that is nonsense, have a look at this absolute achievement of modern journalism:
https://inews.co.uk/inews-life... [inews.co.uk]
Technical Obsolence (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why, just to run Windows 10 or 11? A 2nd to 6th gen i7 with plenty of RAM and an SSD is more than enough to run any flavor of Linux effortlessly. I don't upgrade simply because I no longer follow the Windows trail. When PC manufacturers (and programmers, games especially) finally figure out that truly supporting Linux is in their best interest you'll see new PC sales start to pick up again.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe MacBooks age faster than Windows PCs. I have a 7th gen i7 Windows PC (2017), it works just fine with the latest version of Windows 11. It cost me only $1,100 new. I've never had to replace anything on it or repair it in any way, and it's probably got years of life left. That's been my typical experience with Windows PCs, especially in more recent years.
just like TV did not kill radio (Score:2)
"We're all going to die!" Wait. NOW we are! WAIT! (Score:2)
The "death of the PC" has been getting forcast for nearly 20 years.
Yet it keeps NOT happening.
The only people less dependable in their predictions are Climate Change doomsayers.
Re: (Score:2)
The only people less dependable in their predictions are Climate Change doomsayers.
You're one of those global cooling dingdongs, aren't you?
Re: (Score:2)
And you're one of those "Global Boiling" dipshits?
PCs are not going to die... (Score:2)
The desktop role is not going to die. Of course, device makers would love it if everyone moved to a locked down device like an iPad or a modern smartphone, but realistically, if one is putting in a lot of input, editing code, or having workflows more complicated than clicking on a web browser, PCs are still king of the hill.
Even though the physical form can be different, the role of a desktop isn't going anywhere, as tablets and smartphones are great for media consumption, but not media generation. The ph
Just bad journalism (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
On the shop floors, in the dirt and gram the 1U 19" computer
Re: (Score:2)