Chinese Takeover of UK's Largest Chip Plant Blocked on National Security Grounds (cnbc.com) 45
Slashdot has been covering plans for the UK's largest chip plant to be acquired by Chinese-owned firm Nexperia.
But this week the U.K. government "has blocked the takeover of the country's largest microchip factory by a Chinese-owned firm," CNBC reported this week, "over concerns it may undermine national security." Grant Shapps, minister for business, energy and industrial strategy, on Wednesday ordered Dutch chipmaker Nexperia to sell its majority stake in Newport Wafer Fab, the Welsh semiconductor firm it acquired for £63 million ($75 million).
Nexperia is based in the Netherlands but owned by Wingtech, a partially Chinese state-backed company listed in Shanghai. Nexperia completed its acquisition of Newport Wafer Fab in 2021, and the firm subsequently changed its name to Nexperia Newport Limited, or NN.
"The order has the effect of requiring Nexperia BV to sell at least 86% of NNL within a specified period and by following a specified process," the United Kingdom's Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said in a statement. Nexperia had initially owned 14% of Newport Wafer Fab, but in July 2021 it upped its stake to 100%.
"We welcome foreign trade & investment that supports growth and jobs," Shapps tweeted Wednesday. "But where we identify a risk to national security we will act decisively."
Nexperia plans to appeal the decision.
But this week the U.K. government "has blocked the takeover of the country's largest microchip factory by a Chinese-owned firm," CNBC reported this week, "over concerns it may undermine national security." Grant Shapps, minister for business, energy and industrial strategy, on Wednesday ordered Dutch chipmaker Nexperia to sell its majority stake in Newport Wafer Fab, the Welsh semiconductor firm it acquired for £63 million ($75 million).
Nexperia is based in the Netherlands but owned by Wingtech, a partially Chinese state-backed company listed in Shanghai. Nexperia completed its acquisition of Newport Wafer Fab in 2021, and the firm subsequently changed its name to Nexperia Newport Limited, or NN.
"The order has the effect of requiring Nexperia BV to sell at least 86% of NNL within a specified period and by following a specified process," the United Kingdom's Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said in a statement. Nexperia had initially owned 14% of Newport Wafer Fab, but in July 2021 it upped its stake to 100%.
"We welcome foreign trade & investment that supports growth and jobs," Shapps tweeted Wednesday. "But where we identify a risk to national security we will act decisively."
Nexperia plans to appeal the decision.
180 nm node processes?! (Score:1)
Looking around on web I see this plant did 180 nm node process. My sides, China and plenty of other countries could do that with or without this plant.
Yes, it's an important and still "hot" ( for sales/money) and mature process node, but what in the world would it have to do with national security?
Re:180 nm node processes?! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:180 nm node processes?! (Score:5, Interesting)
You'd be surprised how much stuff runs on IC's made on old nodes, just think of milspec chips for example where reliability and robustness are more important.
Having the ability to manufacture your own IC's for those types of applications securely is a national security concern.
Re: (Score:1)
Secure manufacture for UK? UK has plenty of other fab plants though, bigger and smaller node.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Well in general, the west is losing it's shit over China rising up to first world status.
So... we may see moves like this which represent geopolitics rather than true security issues. Though, not knowing the behind the scenes details it's hard to speculate.
But in a world of 370(?) countries... being number 2 or 5 should bother anyone.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It's about them recreating Maoist China while building a 1st world army & pilfering all the tech they don't have & can't quickly create.
Chinese companies are entirely beholden to the CCP; they cannot refuse to do what Beijing demands.
If international law gets in the way, they'll work around it or flout it entirely.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Surely every company is "beholden" to do whatever their local jurisdiction demands? Or are you saying that Newport Wafer is somehow allowed to refuse to adhere to the government's direction and the government can't do anything about it?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:180 nm node processes?! (Score:5, Informative)
Yeah, the west has decided to block China’s attempts to become a dominant player. Almost the exact same playbook that was used with the USSR and the same outcome is likely. The only people who like emperors and czars are other emperors, other dictators and other czars.
Re: (Score:2)
Beat me to it.
China is not headed in the first world direction.
They're huge so it won't happen over night but their long term trajectory is downwards. It took a few decades to crawl part way out of the muck, it'll take many years to sink back in. Cause? In addition to turning away from capitalism, and being heavily top down from the government (aka Xi / "Pooh Bear"), they've been wrecking their environment, created an anti-intellectual / anti-creative educational system, and have levels of corruption app
Re: (Score:3)
Stupid one child policy by dictatorship. ...
That was the best thing China ever did
And the rest of your post makes no real sense. I suggest to visit the country once. Or at least watch YT videos about it ...
Re: 180 nm node processes?! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I have been there. And? What was your point?
I was in their biggest cities. I was in smaller completely non-westernized cities and I was in dirt floor poor shit hole villages. I talked to farmers and pottery makers. I talked to bar owners. I talked to cabbies and restaurant staff. I talked with the government guide who took us through the terra-cotta warriors site.
Did I miss something? Please enlighten me.
Re: (Score:3)
So why all the fear mongering?
China can do a lot of damage while thrashing around, duh. And feeding that beast is just that.
Re: (Score:2)
First world status? Don’t make me laugh. In terms of GDP per capita, they’re somewhere between Thailand and Serbia. They havent even caught up with Russia yet. And I’m doubtful they will. Their emperor is sending strong messages that he’s fed up with capitalism and that thought control is back in vogue. My bet is that they’re gonna tear down 25 years of progress in the next 10 years. Its way easier to wreck a society than to build one up.
To be precise, he wrote "first world army, not being a first world country
Per capita GDP is the wrong metric (Score:2)
If per capita GDP were an appropriate metric for a country's ability for military or economic antagonism, then we should be afraid of Luxembourg and Liechtenstein and not at all afraid of North Korea.
Rather the two main metrics should be (1) the absolute military or economic might and (2) friendliness toward other countries. Yes, China should most definitely be wary of the US and the West, and likewise, the US and the West should most definitely be wary of China.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And after Russia's Lebensraum (in the West) special military operation, with China mostly being silent while eying to do the same to Taiwan itself, we're likely going to see more of such moves in the near future as part of a push to keep the influence of authoritarian governments on the economies of democratic countries low.
These are developments in Germany for example https://www.reuters.com/busine... [reuters.com] only about two weeks after their chancello
Re: (Score:1)
At this node size it's utter nonsense and fear mongering though. 23 year old tech and the chips are made everywhere, even in Russia and other boo so scary bad countries like Belarus. Gaslighting by politicians, stuff is as common as dirt.
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the generally approved nationalism of the 21st century.
Re: (Score:1)
meanwhile most their stuff contains chinese semiconductors, same as in USA.
Re: (Score:2)
They made their economies largely dependent on Chinese products under some mutual trade dependence delusion keeping peace, while China itself doesn't follow such a mutual dependence approach itself. Instead China also tries to do everything domestically, even though they're perhaps decades behind on some stuff.
The plan is to change that in Europe with more market intervention like regulations and state funding, securing domestic industry.
Re: 180 nm node processes?! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You are the hilarious inept one. The chips at this node size are made the planet over, it's 1999 level stuff everyone has royalty system to make. We have literal tons of the chinese made stuff (and from other countries) already in cars and appliances and elators..
You're talking as if UK has this one plant that makes something rare. No, they have many fabs, at this node size and bigger and smaller, and the stuff made at this plant is common as dirt, old as in 1999 level, and made the world over.
Stop bein
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
China makes that stuff themselves in various fabs in their country, and we buy and use literal tons of it
Not seeing how this UK thing is going to be hub for eveeel chinese chips
Re: (Score:1)
Freedom Fries? (Score:2)
Uh oh (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With all the restrictions on chipmaking supplies and technology, China is going to find themselves make semiconductors with a microscope and a chisel.
if they can't buy, they'll steal
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
I agree with you but the schizo writing style is not the way to get that message to a receptive audience who are often far too young to have a personal idea of Chinese Communism and the Cold War which never ended despite greedy Western business Quislings wishing otherwise. Detente backfired severely.
"...snap" that writing style except on 4chan or it won't make for effective communication, and this advice is from someone who would volunteer for the firing squad (Vidkun Quisling was not executed by hanging).
Scrap it (Score:2)
Given the downturn in the chip market, Nexperia may as well just shut the company down, lay off the staff, and scrap the equipment. As a way of saying "fuck you" to the UK government.
whoever gets AGI first, wins (Score:2)
"Nexperia plans to appeal the decision." (Score:1)
God I wish they'd done this for ARM (Score:2)
Nevertheless, the ARM deal was terrible for the UK and let a serious asset out of the national sphere. I'm happy to see people belatedly waking up to the fact 'modern' industries need looking at too, but I would really have appreciated it at the correct time as well.
Re: (Score:2)
If it makes you feel any better, RISC-V is probably going to wind up punching ARM right in the dick because this is capitalism and licensing fees are relevant.
The solution being .. (Score:1)
State-Owned, not State-"backed" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Many companies in China are 40% owned by the state. They may also have government officials in the board room reviewing corporate activities. The distinction between state backed and state owned in China is blurry.
A song about the plant's location, Newport: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eijc2tGe-zM