BMW Will Build a $1.7 Billion EV Battery Factory In South Carolina (theverge.com) 25
BMW says it will make batteries for its electric vehicles at a factory in South Carolina in the latest move by a major automaker to localize EV production in the United States. The Verge reports: The German company plans to invest $1.7 billion in the US, including $1 billion for EV production at BMW's Spartanburg plant and $700 million for a new battery-assembly facility in nearby Woodruff. By 2030, BMW says it will have at least six electric models in production in the US. Establishing a US-based EV plant will allow BMW's upcoming line of plug-in vehicles to qualify for the federal EV tax credit.
BMW said it is partnering with Envision AESC on its plans for a dedicated battery plant in South Carolina. The Japan-based energy company will produce round lithium-ion battery cells specifically designed for BMW's next-gen EV platform. When it's completed, the battery factory will have an annual capacity of 30 gigawatt-hours (GWh). BMW has also announced plans to build EV production facilities in Europe and China to meet demand. The company currently has several electric models for sale, including the i4 sedan and iX SUV.
BMW said it is partnering with Envision AESC on its plans for a dedicated battery plant in South Carolina. The Japan-based energy company will produce round lithium-ion battery cells specifically designed for BMW's next-gen EV platform. When it's completed, the battery factory will have an annual capacity of 30 gigawatt-hours (GWh). BMW has also announced plans to build EV production facilities in Europe and China to meet demand. The company currently has several electric models for sale, including the i4 sedan and iX SUV.
$1.7 Billion EV Battery Factory (Score:2)
But who will buy these $1.7 billion EV batteries?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: $1.7 Billion EV Battery Factory (Score:2)
South Carolina... please don't mix us up with our more southern neighbors. That's almost as bad as mixing up the Virginias
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot doesn't support the HTML code tag, so this looks horrible, but...
Electric Car Plants
Battery Plants - Planned as of 10/25/2021
Manufacturer Location Plan Open
GM & LG Chem Lordstown, OH 2022
GM & LG Chem Spring Hill, TN 2022
SK Innovation Commerce, GA 2022
SK Innovation Commerce, GA 2023
Toyota Greensboro, TN 2025
Ford & SK Innovation Stanton, TN 2025
Ford & SK Innovation Glendale, KY 2025
Honda & LG Chem Columbus, OH 2025
Piedmont (Lithium) Etowah, TN 2025
Ford & SK Innovation Glendale, KY 2026
Tritium (Charging) Lebanon, TN 2026
Re: (Score:2)
You can use ecode or tt but it still collapses spaces
Truly amazing what gov't handouts can do... (Score:2)
to grease the wheels of "free enterprise"
Re:Truly amazing what gov't handouts can do... (Score:5, Insightful)
Does it also bother you that car manufacturers make combustion engines? Given that the US subsidizes the oil and gas industry to the tune of at least $20B a year (https://generation180.org/the-absurd-truth-about-fossil-fuel-subsidies/), you must be really pissed that car manufacturers keep making gasoline engines just to take advantage of our addiction to cheap fuel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Truly amazing what gov't handouts can do... (Score:4, Insightful)
Normally I'm skeptical that government subsidies really do much to grow business, but this one seems to really be working. Almost every week another company is announcing plans to assemble EVs and/or batteries in the US so they can benefit from that credit. It may help that the money goes direct to the consumer, not the company, so it's harder for them to game the system. They can't just take the money and then not do what they said they would, like seems to happen with a lot of subsidies.
If the goal is to bring more car and battery manufacturing to the US, the EV credit is clearly working.
Re: (Score:3)
For real, is there a major worldwide automaker who hasn't announced an EV related factory plan in the US yet? There are 10 planned to come online in just the next 3 years.
If there's anything the EV skeptics should take to heart it's the fact that none of them have said "oh yeah, ICE is the king and future. we're sticking with that. Everyone else is wrong"
Re: (Score:2)
"If the goal is to bring more car and battery manufacturing to the US, the EV credit is clearly working
"
Well one of the promises was American jobs. How many Americans does it take to make an EV battery? Well, how many does it take to change a light bulb? None! Humans are redundant in the process. The light bulb is an LED and lasts nearly forever. The factory is automated and only needs a couple humans as window dressing.
This factory could be located anywhere in the world and operate on the same budget. But
Re: (Score:3)
Tesla's "Gigafactory" in Nevada has 7,000 employees. They make batteries for EVs. If "humans are redundant in the process", why did Tesla hire all those people?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I don't disagree. However, as a US taxpayer, I am somewhat chagrinned that so many of these subsidies are going to states [nytimes.com] that voted against the Inflation Reduction Act, and actively obstruct any effort to combat climate change.
To whit: "In Kentucky, which is represented in the Senate by Mitch McConnell, the minority leader who led opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act, battery
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
De-industrialization of Europe (Score:1)
BMW move factory to USA.
Once again... who benefits from the war in Ukraine?
Re: (Score:2)
What factory is being moved? EVs are a growth industry, this is an additional factory AFAICT.
Re: (Score:1)
A growing industry that US is making sure to be happening in their soil solely.
I mean, with its tax-credit for EVs and the sanctions on Gas and Oil, I don't see how BMW would have any other choice but to build in US.
BMW says it's planning to build more factories in Europe and China to keep up with demand. Seriously? Right now Europe can't cope with energy demand and China is in US' eyes.
EV disaster looming (Score:2)
The key to survival is diversification. (Not "diversity," haha.) This monomaniacal emphasis on battery-powered transport is going to lead to a disaster as its problems, mainly obtaining raw materials and recharging of the battery, come home to roost.
Hydrogen ICE or even fuel cell seems a lot more sustainable, if enough effort goes into making the cost reasonable; and to keep religious fanatics happy, if enough effort goes into making hydrogen not from oil or gas.
But, instead, we have this religious fervor