A Solar Firm's Plan to Build Off-Grid Neighborhoods in California (yahoo.com) 158
Sunnova is one of America's largest rooftop solar companies, according to the New York Times. But they've now applied to California's Public Utilities Commission for permission to become the state's first solar (and storage) micro-utility, initiating formal steps to qualify and "request a certificate to construct and operate microgrids," targetting new home developments that aren't yet connected to the grid.
"We see a future where communities, neighborhoods, and businesses can operate independently from the legacy grid with sustainable energy sources that provide uninterrupted power," says the company's founder and CEO. "We believe microgrids address a strong need in the market for more robust energy solutions and better connectivity...." But he's also offering touting another possible benefit: "relief that the existing transmission and distribution system will experience given that most of the power that will be consumed by these communities will be generated locally from renewable resources."
The company likes to point out that America's recently-passed climate bill included tax incentives to encourage microgrids. But the New York Times describes it as "a business model that is illegal in much of the United States." Sunnova said it would offer those residents electricity that was up to 20 percent cheaper than the rates charged by investor-owned utilities like Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison. If approved by regulators, the micro-utility model, also known as a microgrid, could undermine the growth of those larger utilities by depriving them access to new homes or forcing them to lower their rates to keep that business. Sunnova executives argue that the approach they are seeking approval for was authorized under a California law passed almost two decades ago for a resort just south of Lake Tahoe. In addition, the company says advances in solar and battery technology mean that neighborhoods can be designed to generate more than enough electricity to meet their own needs at a lower cost than relying on the grid.
"If they don't want to choose me, that should be their right; if they don't want to choose you, that should be their right, too," said John Berger, the chief executive of Sunnova.
A small number of homeowners have gone off the grid as the cost of solar panels and batteries has fallen. But doing so can be hard or impossible. Some local governments have rejected permits for off-grid homes on health and safety grounds, arguing that a connection to the grid is essential. But connecting a single home to the grid can cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, which means an off-grid system may actually be cheaper — especially for properties in remote areas, or in places where the local grid is at its capacity and would require significant upgrades to serve more homes. Off-grid setups can also be appealing because once a system is paid off, the cost of operating and maintaining it is often modest and predictable, whereas utility rates can move up sharply.... The nationwide average retail electricity rate increased 11 percent in June from a year earlier, according to the Energy Information Administration.
But the kind of micro-utilities that Sunnova hopes to create have also had problems. The utopian visions of generating electricity where it is used have often run into maintenance and other problems. Many tiny utilities created under such models in the United States and Canada were later swallowed up by larger power companies.... Sunnova's microgrid approach could suffer a similar fate. But the costs of solar panels and batteries have tumbled over the last decade, making the energy that off-grid systems generate much more affordable....
Utilities have been pressing regulators to reduce the compensation homeowners receive for the excess solar energy their rooftop systems send to the grid. The companies have argued that customers with solar panels are being offered generous credits for power that they are not contributing adequately toward the cost of maintaining power lines and other grid equipment....
Building and operating microgrids could provide a steady source of income to companies like Sunnova. That could essentially transform the rooftop solar companies into the kinds of utilities that they have long fought against.
Sunnova bills itself as an "Energy as a Service" company, and they expect their microgrids to experience 30 minutes or less of outages each year, the Times points out, "compared with an average of two hours a year at California's large investor-owned utilities."
In the article, the chief executive of home-building company Lennar says they've already formed a partnership with Sunnova. "We value the current electric grid and we're intrigued by new microgrid solutions that can supplement and support the traditional utility grid and help solve reliability during extreme weather and peak demand."
"We see a future where communities, neighborhoods, and businesses can operate independently from the legacy grid with sustainable energy sources that provide uninterrupted power," says the company's founder and CEO. "We believe microgrids address a strong need in the market for more robust energy solutions and better connectivity...." But he's also offering touting another possible benefit: "relief that the existing transmission and distribution system will experience given that most of the power that will be consumed by these communities will be generated locally from renewable resources."
The company likes to point out that America's recently-passed climate bill included tax incentives to encourage microgrids. But the New York Times describes it as "a business model that is illegal in much of the United States." Sunnova said it would offer those residents electricity that was up to 20 percent cheaper than the rates charged by investor-owned utilities like Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison. If approved by regulators, the micro-utility model, also known as a microgrid, could undermine the growth of those larger utilities by depriving them access to new homes or forcing them to lower their rates to keep that business. Sunnova executives argue that the approach they are seeking approval for was authorized under a California law passed almost two decades ago for a resort just south of Lake Tahoe. In addition, the company says advances in solar and battery technology mean that neighborhoods can be designed to generate more than enough electricity to meet their own needs at a lower cost than relying on the grid.
"If they don't want to choose me, that should be their right; if they don't want to choose you, that should be their right, too," said John Berger, the chief executive of Sunnova.
A small number of homeowners have gone off the grid as the cost of solar panels and batteries has fallen. But doing so can be hard or impossible. Some local governments have rejected permits for off-grid homes on health and safety grounds, arguing that a connection to the grid is essential. But connecting a single home to the grid can cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, which means an off-grid system may actually be cheaper — especially for properties in remote areas, or in places where the local grid is at its capacity and would require significant upgrades to serve more homes. Off-grid setups can also be appealing because once a system is paid off, the cost of operating and maintaining it is often modest and predictable, whereas utility rates can move up sharply.... The nationwide average retail electricity rate increased 11 percent in June from a year earlier, according to the Energy Information Administration.
But the kind of micro-utilities that Sunnova hopes to create have also had problems. The utopian visions of generating electricity where it is used have often run into maintenance and other problems. Many tiny utilities created under such models in the United States and Canada were later swallowed up by larger power companies.... Sunnova's microgrid approach could suffer a similar fate. But the costs of solar panels and batteries have tumbled over the last decade, making the energy that off-grid systems generate much more affordable....
Utilities have been pressing regulators to reduce the compensation homeowners receive for the excess solar energy their rooftop systems send to the grid. The companies have argued that customers with solar panels are being offered generous credits for power that they are not contributing adequately toward the cost of maintaining power lines and other grid equipment....
Building and operating microgrids could provide a steady source of income to companies like Sunnova. That could essentially transform the rooftop solar companies into the kinds of utilities that they have long fought against.
Sunnova bills itself as an "Energy as a Service" company, and they expect their microgrids to experience 30 minutes or less of outages each year, the Times points out, "compared with an average of two hours a year at California's large investor-owned utilities."
In the article, the chief executive of home-building company Lennar says they've already formed a partnership with Sunnova. "We value the current electric grid and we're intrigued by new microgrid solutions that can supplement and support the traditional utility grid and help solve reliability during extreme weather and peak demand."
This is the one thing that worries me about solar (Score:5, Insightful)
That's a terrible idea for all sorts of reasons. Ignoring the fact that we lose the benefits of a large and well educated population (you never know where the next Albert Einstein will come from) it's only a matter of time before a demagogue notices that a substantial portion of the population is being left out of civilization and uses them against the rest of us.
You can't have a modern civilization that abandons a significant portion of its population to poverty and despair. It's far too easy to give those people firearms and other weapons and send them off to be the next Taliban.
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:2)
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:4, Insightful)
The solution is to decouple generation from distribution. The same corporation should not be invested in both. Ideally, the state should maintain the distribution network. Let the market compete on generation. Toll roads are a bad idea, so are toll mains.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
We've been subsidizing utility, phone and internet companies for generations now, trying to make them extend service to EVERYONE, not just the most profitable. And we still have large swaths of the country that are underserved by at least one of the above basic services. If a government utility connector existed, there'd be no argument about the cost of running services to everywhere, and we'd not be forced to
Re: (Score:2)
How could that possibly work? Just because I drag my trailer home 40 miles into the Arizona desert and take the wheels off, suddenly the taxpayer is on the hook to pay $20M or whatever it costs to run power lines there?
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about s (Score:2)
That said, if Someone owns the land, they pay taxes on the land. Those taxes entitle people to services. We donâ(TM)t say, âoesucks to be youâ if you call 911 from rural areas. We send the police or sherif, it just takes more time for them to get there. It may take longer to get upgrades, and we can put li
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about (Score:2)
Just because one pays taxes does not mean you get all services for no additional charge. For example, in many areas, you can get charged for an EMS response.
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:5, Insightful)
Capitalism isn't good at keeping costs down. Look at what is happening in the UK right now.
Capitalists decided that it wasn't worth keeping the UK's last big gas storage facility open, so there was no way to store gas in the summer when it was cheap.
On top of that, although the price of extracting gas has not increased, the market rate has due to supplies from Russia dwindling. They could sell it to consumer at the old price and still be profitable, but of course they are going to charge market rate.
Some countries have stepped in to protect citizens and businesses from extreme prices. Windfall taxes, or in France's case they just nationalized the biggest energy company and capped the increase at 4%.
The market only drives down price when the resource is abundant. Once it becomes scarce the market uses price to control demand, which is a politically correct way of saying it lets people freeze to death in the dark because that's more profitable.
Re: (Score:3)
That's got it's points, but I'm not sure you should really trust it. Or at least if you do that, don't make the distribution network required to buy from anyone who wants to sell to them.
The distribution network is sensitive to the site and timing of sources of power. Demand isn't constant, and power available needs to meet demand. So you've got to have a large enough ballast, of one sort or another, to handle the swings of demand. One way to do that is the have generators that you can ramp up quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
False [planetizen.com].
Wrong. [archive.org]
Incorrect. [archive.org]
Debunked. [sfgate.com]
I have more proof. Before I spend my time to post it, what proof do you have that tolls are a bad idea?
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about s (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It really ends up more as an urban vs suburban/rural debate rather than socio-economic. Sure, there is overlap, but that is almost secondary. The core need is to have distributed energy solutions, co-located with consumption wherever possible. When you look at cities that cannot self-generate or generate on their immediate periphery then obviously solar doesn't make sense.
But, for cities things like district heating/cooling with co-generation might make sense. Let them import during the day and export
Re: (Score:2)
The grid is valuable, but there are places it doesn't go. The more people move there, the more valuable a grid interconnection becomes, so the more likely it is to happen. Flip side, if not that many people are moving there, a grid interconnection isn't going to happen anyway.
QED, this isn't going to change much. Everybody wants the stability you get from a grid connection. Worries about sun not shining and wind not blowing are exaggerated, but there are times when these things are true locally.
Re: (Score:2)
Let's face it, essentially 100 percent of USA has electricity.
If you measure by where the population is, sure. But people live where services are, and services are brought to where people live.
There's a whole bunch of the USA where not many people live, where there's no grid. Some of those people don't respond to things like the census.
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:2)
Don't we refer to those people literally as "living off the grid?"
Re: (Score:2)
You're making up something you hope was true, but it isn't.
You don't know what you're talking about, at all. Period. Not even a little. There are absolutely lots of people in the US who have no power connections. They are dispersed across vast areas, but many of them are within sight of power lines, just not near enough that they can afford interconnection. If you're ignorant of their existence, that's perfect, it's exactly what they want.
Re: (Score:2)
Power redundancy is a great idea. Power independence creates the Texas power outages, but writ smaller. Either within the self isolated community, or in the community outside of it, as investment in the community assets are cut back by libertarian fucktards who think they've found a "Better Way", but who'll still expect the rest of us to bail them out if
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What's wrong is that someone else will have to pay to maintain that backup grid capacity just in case the microgrid shits itself.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Exactly. Letting people have their own solar is bad.
People should not be allowed to:
generate their own solar power - the poor can't afford solar
own a car - the poor can't afford EV
own a bike - the poor can't afford a bike and safety gear
own roller skates - the poor can't afford safety gear
own a home - the poor can't afford a home
own a dog or other animal - the poor can't afford an animal
own a computer - the poor can't afford a computer
have internet or WiFi - the poo can't afford monthly bills
cook their own
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly nowadays, I can't tell if comments like yours are sarcasm or genuinely idiotic. I'll bet at least a double-digit percent of people will say "right on!" to what you're saying.
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the world of Poe's Law [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
The thing is, he's got a point. It's not a strong point, but it's a valid one. Each "way of being independent in my choices" is a thing that weakens to social connection. This really *is* a true statement. That the ideal of "being independent" is an idiotic idea fostered by Hollywood than never existed and has never been able to exist (except for really short periods of time) is not normally considered.
But it's also true that the opposite extreme isn't very desirable.
Where the ideal middle ground is dep
Re: (Score:2)
That the ideal of "being independent" is an idiotic idea fostered by Hollywood than never existed and has never been able to exist (except for really short periods of time) is not normally considered.
Um what? So Pioneers were the collectivist type? You don't get to just deny facts you wish weren't true. The US was very isolationist for most of its history. And during the robber baron era (late 19th century) the US was extremely independent. This idea has been core to the US culture since before its founding. Did you not get taught any of this in school? If so, ask for your money back because you were ripped off.
Re: (Score:2)
YES. The pioneers were collectivist. The wagons traveled in trains. The explorers or mountain men went out for 6 months or so at a time, and then returned. Read the history of Daniel Boone. Look up the history of barn raising.
Re: (Score:2)
By letting people have their own stuff we are just highlighting that poor people don't have that stuff and make them feel bad. This bad feeling stuff must stop at all costs! Everyone should have exactly the same stuff. Issued by the government of course.
I know you're joking but there's a legitimate threat here in a way that isn't comparable to EVs or roller skates.
If all the rich people get their own, completely offgrid solar power, they'll be less and less interested in maintaining any sort of public infrastructure. Why should my tax dollars go to support the electricity grid? I don't even use it! Let's cut investment by 10% every year from now on.
You can see the disaster that is the US public transport and other services that work properly in other count
Re: (Score:2)
It already isn't a "public service". You get charged money for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Just because something costs money it doesn't stop being a public service. Public service doesn't mean that it's free but that it's offered to everyone, publicly, and (usually, I know it ain't always the case) at the same conditions.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, this is a PR stunt.
It becomes obvious when you understand how difficult it is to build in California between the NIMBYs, community extortionists/activists (just another kind of NIMBY really) and environmental groups
Actually, California would be a good target (Score:2)
Yes, it can be very difficult to build anything in California. Now figure on the "micro" part, say a single gated community. The people there are relatively rich, and they already pay relatively large amounts to keep the gated community exclusive. A service mows all the lawns there, keeps the sidewalks clean, the streets clear, etc...
They've been plagued with power outages recently. They're a newer community, so aren't piped for natural gas. So no natural gas generators.
So somebody sells them the conce
Re: (Score:2)
Get them all to whistle the same song... Yeah. That will happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry about it. It's never going to be enough to power your home and charge your EV.
Re: (Score:2)
It becomes very tempting to take away electricity from the poor. If we all have our own personal electricity instead of it being a public service then we can leave the bottom half (or more) in the dark.
This isn't about forcing every home to have their own generation/storage solution and those that can't afford it go without. This is about a purpose built, independent, isolated electrical grid. Think of it as an electrical HOA.
Living in an existing community that has an HOA doesn't deny services to low income homeowners, even though most HOAs are for new communities and therefore are probably in the higher priced market. In the past, communities used to have all sorts of shared services: swimming pools
Re: (Score:2)
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:2)
Abandon... these potential homeowners will be going in knowing the power deal, it will be more like an HOA but with its own power generation, there will be rules about usage ie. No bitcoin farming or industrial style equipment running, and no chance to sell the power generation facilities off. And let's not forget it's California... there's plenty of people with money to spend there.
If everyone behaved themselves, it could most definitely work.
Re: (Score:2)
The summary says that they expect their grids to have 30 minutes or less of outages per year.
To me as a European that sounds really bad. But I see that for California it's not terrible.
I think the problems with electricity supply go much deeper in the US.
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To me as a European that sounds really bad. But I see that for California it's not terrible.
Um, I was in Spain for the summer. We had far more than 30mins of power outage in the 3 months I was there. On another note, do you not know how fixed point math works or something? I have never understood your sig.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the name.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
One
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>"It becomes very tempting to take away electricity from the poor. If we all have our own personal electricity instead of it being a public service then we can leave the bottom half (or more) in the dark."
It doesn't have to be a zero-sum game.
Even in areas where one is REQUIRED to be connected to the public grid, I assume that doesn't exclude connection also to another grid. Sure, it does mean you will still get a zero KW/h bill that has some dollars on it for maintenance, but that shouldn't bother most
Re: (Score:2)
"it's only a matter of time before a demagogue notices that a substantial portion of the population is being left out of civilization and uses them against the rest of us."
You have it backwards of course, but the basic idea is correct. It's thinly dispersed rural populations that get run over by urban based armies. See Australian Aborigines, American Indians, Zulus, Gauls vs Rome.
The process of demonizing rural people is already underway. See https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch... [snopes.com]
And of course there was Hillary'
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about so (Score:2)
Re: This is the one thing that worries me about s (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LA is seizing tiny homes from the homeless [latimes.com]
Looks to be less about solar power and more about the continued war LA and the LAPD wages against homeless camps.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, when you mischaracterize the other side they sure do seem evil! You should mention that they're all satanic pedophiles too.
Re: (Score:2)
It sucks. Because we already have gated communities in the education department. Anyone who can afford it already sends their kids to private schools. The poor are left with the underfunded dregs.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, our schools were the pinnacle of education until the dreaded democraps closed them for their fake pandemic...
Re: (Score:2)
What are you retarded or something? Don't answer that, we know the answer. Anyway, you don't seem to know how solar works. If everyone has solar, solar panels will extremely dirt cheap .. cheap to the point where discard solar panels would be a problem like plastic bags are..
Solar panels are already dirt cheap. What costs all the money is everything else.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, this isn't North Korea, where people are too cowardly to fight their oppressors.
If you think it has something to do with "cowardly", you are an idiot and insulting moron.
Re: (Score:2)
Because if the rich go away and do their own thing, the rest of us is stuck with mediocre service that we can't effectively complain about. We're not lawyers and we can't afford them, and this is the US. You get something from government and corporations only if you somehow manage to navigate the byzantine labyrinth that is the legal system.
If a lawyer is stuck with crappy service, he has the means to not only complain about it but actually use the law to spank the service provider left and right, or at lea
Re: (Score:2)
Remember, it might be bespoke, but those arguing for it are actually saying that, at least in some cases, it might actually be cheaper than grid power.
You put a smartly obtained solar energy system up against a for profit electricity company who is mired in debt from bad management and practices...
Re: (Score:2)
Remember, it might be bespoke, but those arguing for it are actually saying that, at least in some cases, it might actually be cheaper than grid power.
You put a smartly obtained solar energy system up against a for profit electricity company who is mired in debt from bad management and practices...
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, no that won't happen. Scale matters in power generation...a lot. To put it in perspective, those 1GW fossil fuel plants make 3x the power per unit of fuel burned (also 1/3 the CO2 per watt produced) than a small diesel backup generator and those to things use the exact same fuel and work using the same laws of physics. So no, a bespoke micro-grid won't be more efficient. In terms of cost it will be much more expensive (2-4x). What it will be is able to hide its CO2 r
Re: (Score:3)
The poor don't need handouts but they need to have an equal chance to get somewhere. If you create a two-tiered power grid with the rich having access to perfect power and the poor dealing with rolling blackouts, you abandon the idea that they can even possibly have the same chance to get anywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
The rich and the poor get the same grid. Yes. Only that the rich also have access to alternatives.
This in turn means that if (ok, when) the "general" grid deteriorates to the point where it becomes unusable, the rich won't give a fuck anymore. Now, they sure do. And since they know the law and the relevant people, they get a working power grid. Once they have their own independent power grid, they will no longer give a fuck about the general one and won't care if it deteriorates. They have disconnected them
Re: (Score:2)
The devil is in the deployment. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: The devil is in the deployment. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As long as they disclose this fact to their buyers, why not? Why should it be illegal to live off-grid [primalsurvivor.net]?
I'll believe it when I see it. (Score:5, Insightful)
First, a press release is "news for nerds"?
Second, I'll believe solar power with storage is a viable business plan when I see it making a profit. So many have tried this and failed that it is difficult to believe it is going to work this time. In the fine summary it is pointed out this is possible in part because of government subsidies. Rarely does a government subsidized business make a profit. If this was such a great idea with a high probability of success then private investors would be standing in line to give them money.
Third, why make a big deal about the difficulties of selling electricity from residential rooftop solar onto the grid? If the solar power system is properly engineered then it should not need to be able to sell electricity to the grid to be viable. Being low in cost and meeting a majority of the electrical needs for the residence should mean it is a win without needing to feed electricity to the grid.
Fourth, I can see why a city government would be reluctant to allow homes inside the city to go without a connection to the grid. If there is a failure in the solar power system to meet the electrical needs of the family inside then it would be a burden on the city to keep them safe. If the family leaves the home because of the solar power problems then the city is left with a house that might be difficult to sell because it has no reliable electrical service.
Rooftop solar PV and batteries may have made big improvements on cost and reliability lately but it is still a long way from something that can be relied upon for low cost electricity when and where it is needed. Solar PV on the grid is proving to be a bad idea over and over. Yet people keep trying it over and over. I'm reminded of a joke about the definition of insanity.
I'm all good with people trying to prove solar PV with storage a viable alternative to electricity from fossil fuels. I have a problem when I'm seeing my tax money spent on this insanity. You want to prove this works? Fine, bet your own money on that horse, just don't bet mine.
It would be nice to see the government get out of the energy business but I know that's not going to happen. Best we can do is minimize it. Large civil projects are going to need government involvement since it involves things like interstate electrical grids. Even small projects like a "micro-grid" is going to need government involvement because we can't have a section of a city in the dark because someone missed some important detail in the engineering. What we can certainly do without is government money being gambled on someone's Utopian "green" energy idea.
Re: (Score:3)
First, a press release is "news for nerds"?
Hey it gives us something to complain about or pick apart.
Slashdot would have a lot fewer stories if it weren't for press releases. All those whiz-bang new battery tech posts? They're all press releases (mostly from university PR groups). Most of Intel / Apple / Microsoft / Google / Tesla stories? They're based on thinly-disguised press releases.
Re: (Score:2)
If there is a failure in the solar power system to meet the electrical needs of the family inside then it would be a burden on the city to keep them safe.
And yet our city says nothing when the investor-owned utility drops entire neighborhoods for a week following a windstorm.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I live in a very sunny place. My rooftop solar + enough batteries to be effectively off grid is frightfully expansive and even with the 26% tax credit still has a pay off of over 13 years. That assumes it doesn't break or need repairs and the panels don't degrade too fast and rates stay the same or go up and blah blah blah. Without the tax credit, uhm no, I don't see myself doing it at all. The credit made it barely worth doing. And that 13 years is straight payoff and does not include the opportunity
Re: (Score:2)
Plus the investment in solar should increase the value of your property so the 13 years might be a red herring
Re: (Score:2)
In other words it's definitely worth doing, it's just the initial capital outlay that is a problem for you.
Luckily there is a solution. Governments can borrow money cheaply and lend it to you, so you can buy a solar+storage system, and pay the loan back while still saving money on your energy bill.
Then after 13 years you would only have maintenance costs. Your energy would be free. Depending on your energy bill, it might be worth taking out a loan if you can borrow cheaply.
The only real problem is that so m
Re: I'll believe it when I see it. (Score:2)
Batteries don't last forever. At 13 years many would need replacement.
Re: (Score:2)
No by the 13 year mark the panels are already measurably degraded and the batteries likely in worse condition.
And I should take a government loan? So on top of a financially questionable investment I should add interest to my costs? I'm jaw dropped. That would only make it worse. I'm not going to say something typically Slashdot quality mean. I think you honestly believe what you're saying and meant well. I'll just say, no, the math is bad, and leave it at that.
I did -lots- of math and got quotes from
Re: (Score:2)
You don't have to be completely independent. Buy two panels with two microinvertors and plug them into a power socket - no battery. That way you will save 200 to 300 dollars a year in daytime lecce.
Do this and in many areas of the US it would take about a day before you got a knock on the door by authorities.
Re: (Score:3)
Rarely does a government subsidized business make a profit.
Well that's just not true. Maybe consider the entire oil industry and most of the agricultural industries in this country for a start.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll emphasize my point on where it is needed. You didn't mention where on Earth you found solar power working for you is but I suspect it must be someplace that gets little rain and even less snow. The world is a big place and people live in places that get cold and cloudy, even places that get snow once in a while. Just California is a big place, with enough variation in climate that we could see solar power system work in the south but fail in the north.
I'm seeing solar power projects getting governme
Re: (Score:2)
Every aspect of solar is currently being drowned in regulation and unjustifiable technical requirements.
Unjustifiable? I have my doubts.
Because of the popularity of rooftop solar to the grid we are seeing utilities threaten to shut down the grid if they don't have some kind of veto authority on accepting this power to their system. This is a burden on the utility and with new solar capacity added so quickly in some places they can't keep up with the changes to the load on the grid. There's now power coming on to the grid from homes while people are away at work and school so power is flowing in on places w
always with the "Big"! (Score:2)
Ahhhh... we lose "Big Oil" only to gain "Big Photon". Of course. Follow the money.
Re: (Score:2)
So, if we go down this route, we will be beholden to the Sun?
Re: always with the "Big"! (Score:2)
his agent
Should do well in Texas (Score:2)
Second, By the same argument large parts of Texans would like freedom from regulations from Austin and strike out on their own, disconnecting their homes from the grid.
Third, ... mm third,... oops I forgot.
How to Avoid Grid Upgrade Costs (Score:2)
think hard about this - (Score:2)
"offer those residents electricity that was up to 20 percent cheaper"
Let's take a quick look at that statement. Does it mean 20% savings? No. It simply promises no more than that. You might get 0% savings or anything in between. You could even pay more than those on the grid. The only promise is that you will never get more than 20% savings. It's all up to Sunnova and their attorneys who write the contract you will sign.
And then you have panels on your roof and batteries in your garage, but, who do they bel
Public/Private Balance (Score:2)
As a Canadian, I see public utilities as a way to buy things in bulk that the individual consumer can't get a good deal on. Roads, water, garbage collection and medical care usually fall into this category. As the costs of small solar and wind installations drop, it's becoming possible for small installations to compete with the grid.
Public utilities are like any other large organization of humans. After an initial period of tight focus on the purpose for which the organization was formed (in this case g
A lot of things wrong with this concept (Score:2)
2) The grid is designed to provide power to as many people as possible, with sufficient generators and capacity to deal with generation issues. This effectively puts neighborhoods entirely on their own; if there's a problem, you're out with no backups. Brown outs on t
This is a truly excellent idea (Score:2)
This is a most excellent idea and should be supported by everyone. If it works, it will be a demonstration for the skeptical that a real community can generate all the power it needs from the wind and the sun.
Its exactly what should have been done already, before marching whole countries off into the Net Zero swamp. Before trying to do it to the whole country, do it on a small scale and make sure it works.
One hopes that the entire green agenda will be implemented. That is, no connections to the electrici
Not off grid ... (Score:2)
"During a grid outage, the microgrid would island from the grid and the community would rely on its on-site power. The design allows the microgrid to operate independently for a minimum of 300 hours.
About 82% of the community’s power would come from the microgrid with the remainder coming from the grid. The microgrid would cost about $16,000 to $20,000 per home, Sunnova said in the Sept. 1 filing before the California Public Utilities Commission."
I can tell exactly how this works ... they use massive
Re: (Score:2)
PS. I should say a big solar farm and a big grid energy storage site. Nearly all the power generated will be sold, nearly all the income for the battery will be created by providing peaking for the normal grid.
In the rare California winter storm they will slurping off the grid pipe same as everyone else, so the microgrid solves nothing ... the grid and generation has to be scaled for worst case and they do fuck all for worst case.
Re: (Score:2)
Very interesting point.
Isn't it curious that the alleged goal of the green/renewable movement, net zero, does not have, anywhere, a single working demonstration site.
And that when one that purports to be that is proposed, an examination of the fine print shows that its no such thing. The way you describe this one working isn't a community living on renewable energy at all.
And yet people in positions of power over policy are seriously proposing to spend billions or even trillions on taking whole countries t
Half Measure (Score:2)
If local generation is desirable, it seems like it would be better to go all the way down to the individual residence.
If scaling up is good, then a state sized grid seems like it would be better.
What advantage does being neighborhood sized give over the existing grid or existing rooftop solar?
Big bureaucracy or small bureaucracy (Score:2)
Who exactly will maintain these systems? Are you really sure you'd rather rely on your HOA to do it, rather than a large diversified faceless regulated company?
Re: Anyone but Tesla (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I really don't care who builds them, but they should be owned as a cooperative and not by a for-profit entity. It's the only way to actually make it a solution to a problem rather than just a different problem.
Re: (Score:2)
A cooperative is just one kind of for-profit corporation. If this can't be profitable then it can't be sustainable. Well, maybe it can be sustainable without making a profit but that's a very fine line. If it costs money then it's likely to cost more than just buying electricity from some utility that has economy of scale on it's side, and if it makes money then everyone else would likely be doing it in short order with economy of scale to make small time cooperatives look bad.
How is a for-profit entity
Re: (Score:2)
A cooperative is just one kind of for-profit corporation.
Not in this context.
Question: Who is the Owner that must be pleased? (Score:2)
I've lived in a number of areas in the USA, and have generally found that the cooperative utilities have the best customer customer service and very reasonable rates.
While they do "make a profit" in most cases, what happens is that after a set period, they pay back the excess to the customer/owners. This is generally a negligible amount.
Re: (Score:3)
Not really, at least for the US and other more developed countries.
The average carbon footprint of households living in the center of large, population-dense urban cities is about 50 percent below average, while households in distant suburbs are up to twice the average.
Suburban sprawl cancels carbon-footprint savings of dense urban cores [berkeley.edu]
Suburban living really is the absolute worst for carbon emissions [fastcompany.com]
The Suburban Wasteland: How the 'Burbs Eviscerate the Environment [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Who told you that? Because NYC is the Greenest City in America [archive.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Dirty Electricity. (Score:2)
Can you provide one of those numerous studies pertaining to RFI negatively affecting people's physical health?
Re: (Score:2)
1. Dr. Magda Havas, a proponent of 5G causation of COVID [worldcounc...health.org]
2. Richard Lear, the seller of the "Greenwave Dirty Electricity Filter" [www.ali.fitness]
3. A website where five of its eleven references consist of the above two authors, along with other fringe academics such as Olle Johansson and Sam Milham, possessed of a gross misunderstanding of the concepts of correlation and causation.
Well, I'm convinced, I'm tossing my electronics out the window after I finish typing this. I'm twelve floors up, so I