US President Invokes Emergency Authority Prioritizing Pursuit of EV Battery Minerals (cnbc.com) 199
U.S. president Joe Biden "will invoke the Defense Production Act to encourage domestic production of minerals required to make batteries for electric vehicles and long-term energy storage," reports CNBC.
"It will also help the U.S. minimize dependence on foreign supply chains." The president's order could help companies receive government funding for feasibility studies on projects that extract materials, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and manganese, for EV production.
The Defense Production Act, established by President Harry Truman during the Cold War, allows the president to use emergency authority to prioritize the development of specific materials for national production.... The administration also said it's reviewing further uses of the law to "secure safer, cleaner, and more resilient energy for America."
The transportation sector is one of the largest contributors to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, representing about one-third of emissions every year. The transition away from gas vehicles to EVs is considered critical to combating human-caused climate change....
The administration in February unveiled a plan to allocate $5 billion to states to fund EV chargers over five years as part of the bipartisan infrastructure package.
The White House said in a statement the move would reduce America's reliance on China and other countries "for the minerals and materials that will power our clean energy future."
"It will also help the U.S. minimize dependence on foreign supply chains." The president's order could help companies receive government funding for feasibility studies on projects that extract materials, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and manganese, for EV production.
The Defense Production Act, established by President Harry Truman during the Cold War, allows the president to use emergency authority to prioritize the development of specific materials for national production.... The administration also said it's reviewing further uses of the law to "secure safer, cleaner, and more resilient energy for America."
The transportation sector is one of the largest contributors to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, representing about one-third of emissions every year. The transition away from gas vehicles to EVs is considered critical to combating human-caused climate change....
The administration in February unveiled a plan to allocate $5 billion to states to fund EV chargers over five years as part of the bipartisan infrastructure package.
The White House said in a statement the move would reduce America's reliance on China and other countries "for the minerals and materials that will power our clean energy future."
Mining is Cool again (Score:3, Insightful)
After decades of mining being super un-popular, looks like mining is cool again.
Maybe even cool enough that mining permits will no longer be slow-walked as they have over the past few decades...
The thing is, it takes a long, long time to ramp up mines and it will not be enough really to meet battery metals needs for some time to come. Not even close to meeting needs for expressed desires to have all cars be electric in a short timeframe.
Tesla was super wise to lock in all the contracts they did early on for various minerals, other companies are going to struggle.
Re: (Score:2)
Are there any big American battery tech companies? I know Tesla makes Panasonic cells in its factory, I mean a company that has its own technology.
I heard that GM is developing battery tech. Is it their own and are the producing it at scale?
Re: (Score:3)
Are there any big American battery tech companies? I know Tesla makes Panasonic cells in its factory, I mean a company that has its own technology.
Actually, now Tesla makes it's own batteries. Tesla had bought a battery company [electrek.co] invested in it's own R&D and now owns the patent on tabless batteries [medium.com] as well as other improvements. [electrek.co]
So now Panasonic will be manufacturing Tesla batteries [electrek.co] in it's own factories.
Re: (Score:2)
Tesla has its own technology for the new 4680 cells, currently being produced in their Kato Rd facility and in a few months in Austin.
Beyond that, no domestic companies are at industrial production levels with their own technology. Quantum Scape and a few others claim to be about 2 years out from industrial production, but I am guessing that it will be more like 5 years.
Not Sure (Score:2)
Are there any big American battery tech companies?
I'm not sure, I've been more focused on the raw material angle, so rare earth miners and the like (like Energy Fuels [energyfuels.com], disclaimer I am a shareholder but I think the company is awesome and they had a push to produce rare earth materials before it was popular).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
We'll see if he is willing to tell the environmentalists to go away.
I was a victim of Clinton, Gore, and Babbitt's war on mining. I had to change industries when the mineral extraction jobs went away. Several universities closed down their mining and extractive metallurgy programs. And just a couple years ago Washington's two senators were very proud a a bill that banned not just mining, but even prospecting for mineral deposits in a large part of the Cascades because the Seattle Elite might want to take a
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention that a half-ton battery requires the refining of 250 tons of ore.
Per car. All diesel.
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly hope he's not. But there needs to be some way to handle that kind of situation. Ideally it would involve creating a "new safe space" for the endangered species, and then making sure that it could survive there.
That said, mining is not "cool". It's necessary, which is a very different thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe some people value pristine wilderness over mineral rights?
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe some people value pristine wilderness over mineral rights?
Then they are welcome to live there, as Nature intended. Not drive a Tesla to a coffee place, and write anti-corporate shitposts on their newest Macbook.
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of US mines were idled, but they are still there, so getting them started up will take a lot less time than building an entirely new mine. It is unfortunate that politicians have only recently discovered the necessity of not relying on other nations for mineral production. Hopefully this new-found awareness will extend to manufacturing as well.
Say hello to the perpetual emergency (Score:3, Insightful)
and rule by decree.
While I am all in favor of federal policies that streamline and encourage the development of domestic mineral extraction and heavy industry, I am not in at all in favor of using emergency powers to accomplish a goal that rightly needs to be done with legislation.
Covid vaccines one could reasonably argue justified use of DPA because it was an actual emegency in the sense that it was killing people.
Climate change...not so much. To the extent it actually threatens any American lives in an unambiguously attributable fashion (hint: not really), it is both slow-moving rather than an emergent situation, and its acute effects can be mitigated by other means that don't involve presidential decrees (more accurate flood maps that don't undervalue risk of insuring coastal properties, tax incentives for resilient roads and power lines, etc).
Loosening the definition of "emegency" to mean "$political_agenda is stalled because I'm a bad negotiator/communicator/lobbyist" is not at all a good way to govern.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump did declare an emergency for CV19 ... in March 2020 [archives.gov] before he was downplaying shit and saying it would go away on its own. [factcheck.org]
there are a lot of executive orders from all sides. [federalregister.gov]
But, only one has done shit like this. [apnews.com]
WASHINGTON (AP) â" The day he declared the COVID-19 pandemic a national emergency, President Donald Trump made a cryptic offhand remark.
âoeI have the right to do a lot of things that people donâ(TM)t even know about,â he said at the White House.
Trump wasnâ(TM)t just crowing. Dozens of statutory authorities become available to any president when national emergencies are declared. They are rarely used, but Trump last month stunned legal experts and others when he claimed â" mistakenly â" that he has âoetotalâ authority over governors in easing COVID-19 guidelines.
That prompted 10 senators to look into how sweeping Trump believes his emergency powers are.
They have asked to see this administrationâ(TM)s Presidential Emergency Action Documents, or PEADs. The little-known, classified documents are essentially planning papers.
The documents donâ(TM)t give a president authority beyond whatâ(TM)s in the Constitution. But they outline what powers a president believes that the Constitution gives him to deal with national emergencies. The senators think the documents would provide them a window into how this White House interprets presidential emergency powers.
âoeWhen somebodyâ(TM)s the president of the United States, the authority is total,â Trump said, causing a backlash from some governors and legal experts. Trump later tweeted that while some people say itâ(TM)s the governors, not the presidentâ(TM)s decision, âoeLet it be fully understood that this is incorrect.â
Trump later backtracked on his claim of âoetotalâ authority and agreed that states have the upper hand in deciding when to end their lockdowns. But it was just the latest from a president who has been stretching existing statutory authorities âoeto, if not beyond, their breaking point,â said Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas.
Re: (Score:2)
Gotta profit off dying Americans somehow.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Climate change...not so much.
Climate change is an emergency unlike any we have faced before. It might as well be a giant meteor and you are saying no effort should be taken to push it off course because it hasn't killed anyone. As more time passes, it becomes more and more difficult to push that giant meteor off course.
Now, we've pasted the point where we can stop the giant meteor from hitting the planet but are still trying to avoid a direct strike. Despite all this, you idiots are still saying, "it's no big deal" as if billions of
Re: (Score:2)
Are you a troll? You're saying we should keep polluting until we know more about the effects. A responsible person would say we should stop polluting until we know more.
Re: Say hello to the perpetual emergency (Score:2)
But we're not *just* "polluting."
We're manufacturing and transporting goods, food, medicine, and people; heating and cooling homes and businesses; generating electricity when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining; etc etc etc.
Waving away all use of petrochemicals and fossil fuels as *only* pollution is disingenuous to the point of being an outright lie. One could similarly wave away agriculture as an imposition of an unnatural order on otherwise virgin land and deam it immoral on those grounds. A
Re: (Score:2)
That's a good example of the fallacy of composition [wikipedia.org]. Because if it's good in some ways, it's good in all ways, right?
Maybe you're not a troll. Maybe you're just plain stupid. Or do you have any arguments that aren't logical fallacies?
Re: (Score:2)
So, the troll is the one who whitewashes pollution by enclosing it in quotes [slashdot.org] while glorifying the virtues of the actions that create it. That makes you the extremist here. Next time, you should try to take a more balanced view.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, to people who felt slaves were "necessary for a commonly-accepted standard of living," the abolitionists were extremists.
Keep digging yourself deeper, troll!
Re: (Score:2)
Arecibo was faster at gathering data, but it took three years to build. There isn't any data on an approaching meteorite that we can't gather in less than three years with existing instruments.
All your plan does is waste three years and divert resources that could be used to develop a mitigation effort.
Re: (Score:2)
The first thing to do would be to, for example, order that the Arecibo radar be rebuilt. Or that a radar transmitter be installed on Green Bank or another similar antenna.
So a significant increase in detection capabilities, right? So now you understand why there has been a massive build-out of global sensor networks and deployment of observational satellites.
Re: (Score:2)
That's why it's called and analogy, jackass.
Re: (Score:2)
Analogies whose specifics
If you are digging into the specifics of analogy then you have completely missed the point of an analogy.
There are plenty of good analogies for global warming and ridiculous hyperbole about a giant meteor isn't one of them.
By all means, make one and then I'll dig into the specifics and point out you are a failure and propagandist, jackass.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for proving my point.
Re: Say hello to the perpetual emergency (Score:2)
Every other nation can argue that thier own portion is also "negligible" and also wait for everyone else to do something first. It's a bit of a dilemma. If only there were a nation that was rich and powerful and central to most of the world's trade. They could lead the rest of the world and avoid the coming crisis.
P.S. I consider negligible to be 5% or less. At least when working with statistics, engineering, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
"Environmentally friendly" (Score:2, Insightful)
So first we'll need to strip mine to acquire the insane volume of material we'll need to produce the batteries in the first place. Then we'll need new electric generation solutions which don't use carbon. And still, everyone hates nuclear.
Ya. This is gonna go great. But hey! We're "saving the planet!".
Re: (Score:2)
Nuclear. Yep, nuclear. People will accept it when the other option is to freeze in the dark.
And electric trains ... you can power an EV from an overhead wire for basically an unlimited distance without batteries. Then use cars and trucks with much smaller batteries for the last 50-100 miles.
The Russians and Ukrainians fundamentally have the right model -- build dense cities and towns, leave rural areas rural, use electrified rail for longer distances between them.
Re: (Score:2)
And electric trains ... you can power an EV from an overhead wire for basically an unlimited distance without batteries.
Uh huh. Someone get this poster a detailed map of the US. Showing the impracticality of his "wire".
Re: (Score:2)
It's not really that impractical, but it would be very expensive and require lots of on-going maintenance. It might also need to be DC rather than AC, unless you're going to hang it high enough to minimize interaction with the ground.
OTOH, if the goal is to charge batteries, you could do that with solar plants in the middle of various deserts. (If you insist that it work at night, look into thermal storage. I think there's one in the Mojave that would be a good model with a bit of fine tuning.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem, though, isn't the Northeastern US, but rather the stretch between the Mississippi and the Sierra Nevadas. That's a long enough distance that losses become more important. Of course an alternative is to put generators at various points. My geography isn't good enough to pick points in there beyond Kansas City. Or you could go the Southern route, where there are several cities. I'm not sure about the Northern route. It used to work, but I'm not sure that the population hasn't decreased. I
Re: (Score:2)
Geothermal (Score:3)
I guess they didn't hear that you can get all you need from geothermal... https://hardware.slashdot.org/... [slashdot.org] (I'm still skeptical about this)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. I saw that article earlier but didn't look at the numbers. They say a single geothermal plant could produce almost enough lithium to meet current US lithium demand. If that turns out true, then it's amazing.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well that's pretty cool. It's about potash though, not lithium.
Biden Administration makes good decisions. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also they tend to be sloppy about actually implementing those decision.
I do admire the current president in his steadfastness in keeping us from war.
Re: Biden Administration makes good decisions. (Score:2)
I do admire the current president in his steadfastness in keeping us from war.
Just like his predecessor (you know, the administration that actually negotiated the Afghan Withdrawl that Biden was - according to his own statements - legally and morally obligated to do)...
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, his reticence to start war is something I appreciated about Trump, as well. All things considered, he wasn't the worst president of the century.
Re: (Score:2)
green energy mining (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but that was already happening. What this does is incentivize the moving of the process into the US. This will be more expensive, but will probably actually be a lot more environmentally friendly.
OTOH, environmentally friendly is not the same as "low carbon". They're related, but sure not identical. If mining wastes aren't properly handled they can be immensely environmentally destructive at a local level. (Even if they are properly handled they aren't exactly benign. So far. What we really ne
Apparently (Score:2, Insightful)
Apparently sinking poll numbers and rising gas prices constitute a "National Emergency"... Good to know.
Twin Metals copper-nickel Mine In Minnesota. (Score:3)
https://www.kvrr.com/2022/01/2... [kvrr.com]
Net-zero Mining? Non-ICE Mining? (Score:2)
So of course, all this emergency mining will be net zero carbon and done without fossil fuels right?
Re: Net-zero Mining? Non-ICE Mining? (Score:2)
You should be able to build thousands or millions of EVs from running a few hundred ICE vehiclea at a mine.
Besides, it is a chicken and egg problem. You will need to transport the materials to make EVs to transport the materials in a non-ICE way.
Huh (Score:2)
"It will also help the U.S. minimize dependence on foreign supply chains."
If only there had been some sort of US president and accompanying political movement that was interested in minimizing dependence on foreign supply chains.
These days we're more into killing domestic production of things and then begging dictators to sell us more.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Has there ever not been a state of emergency? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think the emergency powers are being invoked not because of an obvious emergency but because of an unstated, embarrassing one: namely that we haven't had a fully functional legislature since the Clinton administration, and it's only becoming steadily more dysfunctional.
I think it's more than a coincidence that Fox News started in 1995, during the Clinton administration.
Re: (Score:2)
How do we get it fixed? We are now at the point where an entire generation of adults has never had a functional legislature in their lifetimes.
Re: (Score:2)
You could start by reading about the fall of the Roman Republic. A lot of the same themes are on display. (Hopefully the lead poisoning sub-theme is on diminuendo.)
P.S.: Don't idolize the Roman Republic. It was not a great thing for any except a very few. But it does display many themes that are making an uncomfortable reappearance.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But abuse of emergency powers has to end.
Sorry but the ecosystem being destroyed by greedy companies isn't going to go away until it's not being destroyed. We could have done all of this at a gentle pace in the past but people just like you insisted on preventing that from happening. As a result, we are now in a dire situation.
Re: (Score:2)
Two ways to look at it, both with the same outcome. 1. The legislature's inaction and inability to pass meaningful legislation due to political gridlock forces executive action; or 2. By its nature and pressing immediacy, the action is necessarily an executive function. That executive action is necessarily an "emergency" based on law.
Duh... (Score:2)
CLIMATE CHANGE.
CLIMATE CHANGE is not fixed by ... (Score:2)
CLIMATE CHANGE.
... is not fixed by reducing US oil/gas production and importing oil/gas from Russia, Saudi Arabia, etc.
... is not fixed by reducing US oil/gas production and asking Saudi Arabia, etc to increase oil production.
LOL! (Score:2)
You do know that petrol is 1% of the power grid, right?
So tell me, little troll, just how many accounts have you had to make to keep posting on Slashdot?
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't a lot of it the price war that the Saudi's and Russia ran so Trump could boast about cheap gas? Shale oil can't compete with dumping.
Re: (Score:2)
Not that I'm aware of. Anyway, natural gas is much cheaper which is why ~40% of the grid runs on natural gas and less than 1% of the electrical grid is run on petrol. [eia.gov] Petrol fuel is really only for cars, trucks, and old power generators.
Re: (Score:2)
OK, you meant natural gas rather then gasoline when you said gas, gotta love English, especially American English.
Re: (Score:2)
I like the term "petrol" because it can used to describe gasoline and diesel fuel. Anyway, I drive an EV, so I'm fine with the price of petrol rising. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, didn't realize that petrol could also mean diesel. As for an EV, even if I could afford it, there are close to none available here as the C$2.00 (paid C$1.85 today and was sorta happy) a litre gasoline translates into the highest EV uptake in N. America. I guess I should be happy that the oil company executives can buy better and more yachts with their gouging. Live just outside a jurisdiction with 18.5 cents transit tax plus GST on the tax, means a nickel savings and no transit.
Re: (Score:2)
I hate the pricing games that companies play so I was more than happy to completely opt-out and do my part to help slow climate change. I saved up my pennies and bought an EV a few years back for just under $11KUSD ($12.5K adjusted for interest) but the same make/model/year (2016 Nissan Leaf) shot up to $20K but has since settled back down to $13K.
The part people don't talk about is that he radically reduced mechanical complexity of EVs means it rarely need any maintenance. I have only had to refill the w
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing Biden has done has even impeded oil/gas production in the US.
Other than create an environment hostile to domestic production, hostile to investing in domestic production while encouraging overseas production. The latter also effectively moves jobs overseas.
Basically when a shortage exists their solution is to go overseas because they want to greenwash things at home. I was about to say climate change is not improved by using Russian gas and oil rather than US gas and oil, but that is not true. US nat gas actually burns cleaner.
Re: (Score:2)
If there is a hostile environment then energy companies only have themselves to blame for creating it. They have been aware of the problem for decades, denied it, chose to not migrate away from oil and gas. The fact that people don't want to invest in expanding oil production is their own doing.
You might as well complain about someone preventing you from stabbing them in the heart.
Re: (Score:2)
If there is a hostile environment then energy companies only have themselves to blame for creating it.
As I mentioned, renewable projects are increasingly receiving the same treatment. Again, 20 year delay on Nantucket wind project. It largely politics and NIMBY.
They have been aware of the problem for decades, denied it, chose to not migrate away from oil and gas.
Seriously ill-informed. Who do you think the big energy companies selling renewable energy will be? It will be the same big energy companies. They sell fossil fuels because that is where the demand and profit it, if the demand and profit were in renewables they would sell that. And, they are preparing to do so.
Who do you think does those offshore w
Re: (Score:2)
You do realize that oil and gas production only declined due to COVID-19 ...
The problem is insufficient capacity to produce and insufficient capacity to deliver production. If you can't get a permit for a pipeline you can't produce even if you have a well.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can't get a permit for a pipeline you can't produce even if you have a well.
Pipelines aren't the only means of mass transport and they take about a decade to complete. This is not the issue.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can't get a permit for a pipeline you can't produce even if you have a well.
Pipelines aren't the only means of mass transport and they take about a decade to complete. This is not the issue.
Its usually the safest and least expensive option, therefore it certainly is an issue.
Re: (Score:2)
See above. 1032 leases going begging. No more are needed until the Oil Corps use these.
Its not that simple. Leases are acquired for exploration, sometimes exploration finds nothing. And if something is found you may need a pipeline to the lease. That's a whole new thing the admin can block or slow walk.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can provide one easy one: fossil fuel infrastructure. Left leaning politicians have been stalling, delaying, and killing every pipeline project proposed, both at the state and federal level. The Permian literally can't extract any more oil right now because there's no way to get the associated natural gas production out of the state (other than flaring it). Similarly, the Marcellus is infras
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You and every middle and lower class American was better off under Trump than Biden and you know it.
First of all, that's absolutely not true in my case, and even if it were true, it wouldn't be because of Trump or Biden. The president has only a minor influence on the economy.
The president has a MAJOR influence on what wars get started (by design of the constitution), and I expect the president to avoid starting or becoming involved in unnecessary wars. So far Biden has done a good job keeping us out of wars, and I appreciate him for that.
Re: (Score:3)
You and every middle and lower class American was better off under Trump than Biden and you know it.
First of all, that's absolutely not true in my case, and even if it were true, it wouldn't be because of Trump or Biden. The president has only a minor influence on the economy.
The president has a MAJOR influence on what wars get started (by design of the constitution), and I expect the president to avoid starting or becoming involved in unnecessary wars. So far Biden has done a good job keeping us out of wars, and I appreciate him for that.
And it's "only" costing Ukrainian and Afghan lives.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what you are saying. I have not heard anyone express that sentiment, except you.
Re: Today's joke: (Score:5, Informative)
The president typically does have limited influence on the economy, but I would suggest this one is different. Biden enacted more executive orders in his first year than any presidency in recent history, and all ones that very do much stretch into (and arguably) beyond the original intended scope that executive orders were intended to have. Some of those orders directly harmed our ability to produce oil in this country which is a major part of the inflation index. He has appointed 6 new people into the Department of Commerce (Gina Raimondo, etc), 8 into the Department of Energy (Jennifer Granholm, etc), 8 into the Department of Health and Human Services (Rachel Levine, etc), 6 into the Department of Labor, and 7 into the Department of the Treasury (including Janet Yellen). Yes, those appointments have a significant impact on our economic policies.
Jan 20, 2021: "Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis", Section 4(b) made it illegal to drill for oil in Artic waters and the Bering Sea. Section 4(c) did similar to 1.5 million acres in northern Alaska. Section 6 killed the Keystone XL pipeline. Section 7 revoked (like EO 13783) or re-enabled a lot of the red tape that makes finding, getting authorization, and implementing new oil sites much longer and much more expensive.
Feb 17, 2021: "Executive Order on the Revocation of Executive Order 13801", effectively killing apprenticeships which allowed many Americans to get high paying jobs without incurring large education loans.
Feb 24, 2021: "Executive Order on the Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions", revoked EO 13772 which set the US financial system priorities, revoked EO 13828 which was about prioritizing getting people off welfare and into self-sufficiency (I guess prioritizing keeping people on welfare and dependent on government handouts was important to him). Revoked EO 13924, which radically changed the federal government's stance on COVID-19, and no longer prioritized economic recovery.
April 26, 2021: "Executive Order on Worker Organizing and Empowerment", encourages and promotes Unions, and dissolves the American Workforce Policy Advisory Board. This emboldened the unions at our docks, which lead to strikes, the inability to bring more people in to work the dock loader/unloaders, which eventually led to the backlog and supply chain issues that we now face, including the inability for building supplies so that new homes can be built, which led us into the current housing crisis.
I could go on. There are 12 more months of executive orders just like this that has had harmful repercussions on our economy, energy sector, inflation, housing and the stock market. Feel free to get informed. Then vote for honest change.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Putins' Russia has a history of sneaking puppet leaders into countries Russia would like control of; how is it that people don't see that Trump was just another of these incipient 'puppet' leaders under the control of Russia, and his wife is just his 'handler' (with benefits, ostensibly)? His kids are born-and-raised as sleeper agents (or perhaps Russian agents outright from birth, something else Russia has a history of practicing).
Knowing puppet, or just an easily manipulated target? The effect is the same, so I suppose it doesn't really matter...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: It won't work (Score:2)
The average car lasts 12-15 years, if we stopped selling ICE vehicles right now, it would take 12-15 years to get most of them off the road. Average 12-15 years means there are a large number of cars that last even longer, extending this date even longer.
Re: It won't work (Score:2)
charge ICE vehicles a toll to enter major cities and double thier registration cost and you'll see EV sales increase. You don't need to wait for the manufacturer's design limits to expire.
Re: (Score:2)
And *THIS* is what I see as the real problem. There are several ways of solving it, and more than one of them is decent. My favorite involves massive build-out of solar plants. It's relatively quick, and has had most of the problems solved.
The next problem that that more than half the population has no place to charge an EV. I don't see so many answers to that one. The obvious answer is "battery exchange at filling stations", but that would require a standardized battery module that could be quickly sw
Re: (Score:2)
The obvious first answer is power points at streetlamps for overnight charging... for a start. But the start is where we are now, so that's appropriate.
Re: (Score:2)
IIUC, there are places using that approach. But it's limited. How many streetlights are adjacent to each apartment building? Compare that to how many residents drive. Of course, if parking garages had mandatory charging for their parking spaces that would address the problem, but that's a different answer, and again only addresses a part of the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be another good start, though. Ultimately we do need a lot more public high speed chargers. If people can spend a few minutes getting enough charge for the next couple of days in a pinch, it will mitigate the problems while we build out charging networks. The best way to enable EVs, however, is definitely to build out charging infrastructure.
Re: (Score:2)
If it isn't applicable, then certainly somebody will fund a lawsuit against it. It's isn't as if this isn't going to affect various corporate bottom lines.
Re: (Score:2)
FWIW, there are lots of sites I just won't register at. Either their registration process is too intrusive or they require too much Javascript. So I don't register at them.
One weird one that I tried to register at was a site (https://auth.geeksforgeeks.org) appeared to only want an email, so I tried to register. For some reason the registration email they sent me never reached me. Fortunately, it was possible to ignore the registration without problem, but why they collect the email address and don't ve
Re: government needs less emergency authorities. (Score:4, Insightful)
You must have missed the memo - sagging poll numbers are now classified as a "National Emergency"