Kosovo Bans Cryptocurrency Mining To Save Electricity (reuters.com) 52
Kosovo's government on Tuesday introduced a ban on cryptocurrency mining in an attempt to curb electricity consumption as the country faces the worst energy crisis in a decade due to production outages. Reuters reports: "All law enforcement agencies will stop the production of this activity in cooperation with other relevant institutions that will identify the locations where there is cryptocurrency production," Economy and Energy Minister Artane Rizvanolli said in a statement. Faced with coal-fired power plant outages and high import prices authorities were forced last month to introduce power cuts.
European gas prices soared more than 30% on Tuesday after low supplies from Russia reignited concerns about an energy crunch as colder weather approaches. In December, Kosovo declared a state of emergency for 60 days which will allow the government to allocate more money to energy imports, introduce more power cuts and harsher measures. The country of 1.8 million people is now importing more than 40% of its consumed energy with high demand during the winter when people use electricity mainly for heating. Around 90% percent of energy production in Kosovo is from lignite, a soft coal that produces toxic pollution when burnt.
European gas prices soared more than 30% on Tuesday after low supplies from Russia reignited concerns about an energy crunch as colder weather approaches. In December, Kosovo declared a state of emergency for 60 days which will allow the government to allocate more money to energy imports, introduce more power cuts and harsher measures. The country of 1.8 million people is now importing more than 40% of its consumed energy with high demand during the winter when people use electricity mainly for heating. Around 90% percent of energy production in Kosovo is from lignite, a soft coal that produces toxic pollution when burnt.
flippit (Score:1, Funny)
Here we save electricity by buying extra from Kosovo using our crypto profits.
You make a good point (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
How many of those are there?
Re:How about off-grid wind/solar? (Score:5, Interesting)
Always? Seems to me, an off-grid solar powered crypto miner would do nothing to "increase the cost of electricity for everyone."
If the people using off grid solar power are buying up so many solar PV panels that it creates a shortage then that will have an impact on solar energy prices. Because utilities don't much care where it gets electricity so long as the price is low then people that were buying up solar PV panels to produce electricity for the grid will see their costs go up as they try to buy more panels to expand output and replace worn, broken, and stolen panels.
What if they don't use PV for producing electricity? Maybe they build some kind of concentrated solar power array, a system to boil water and run a turbine. Well then they are buying the same kinds of turbines needed for concentrated solar power for on the grid. These happen to be also the same kinds of turbines used for coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants. That's making electricity more expensive for everyone because they are buying up parts needed for on the grid use.
Maybe everyone off the grid isn't building massive solar thermal systems that use the same kind of turbines as big power plants. Maybe they use small air motors and salvaged automotive alternators. These air motors are the same kinds used in machine shops to build and repair automotive engines. A shortage of alternators means a greater demand for them, raising prices. Higher priced parts for automotive engines means more people buying electric cars. More people buying electric cars means more people buying electricity. More people buying electricity means higher electricity costs.
I know I'm making some very tenuous relationships between off grid electricity use and the prices of electricity on the grid. As absurd and comical the relationships appear they are very real. The relationship is there and it remains absurd and comical until it reaches a scale in which is it not so absurd and comical. The idea that crypto-currency could impact electricity supplies was absurd and comical until it wasn't. If regulators are successful in driving these crypto miners off the grid then the miners will start to buy up the bits and pieces to produce electricity off the grid to a point it impacts electricity production some other way
If these people shift to running natural gas generators to power their computers then we will see the consumption of natural gas, and the shortage of spare parts for generators, impact electricity prices. If they buy windmills to power their computers then the price of windmills go up, and with wind power producing something like 5% of the electricity in the world that could impact global electricity prices. These miners can't be removed from the global energy market because whatever they use to produce the electricity will impact the market in some way.
The more it costs in electricity to produce this currency the more valuable it becomes. It's a feedback loop that can't really be broken. We can minimize this relationship by making the electricity market proportionately larger. We can make electricity less valuable through various means, potentially making the currency effectively worthless. What we can't do is make a hard break of the link between electricity prices and the value of this currency. The entire value of the currency is in how much energy is consumed to produce each unit or token.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If the people using off grid solar power are buying up so many solar PV panels that it creates a shortage then that will have an impact on solar energy prices.
Or more likely they will push costs down by increasing demand, the way Elon Musk does when he things something is too expensive. More people buying solar PV means more mass production, more competition in the market.
We are nowhere near there being supply constraints on solar PV yet. Even the pandemic only made prices level off, and they will be back to falling soon.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Problem: There isn't enough for everybody, hence the words "energy crisis" in the headline.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The problem is getting it (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In a single hour, the amount of power from the sun that strikes the Earth is more than the entire world consumes in an year.
Sunlight may be effectively free and infinite but the mechanisms we need to converts sunlight into useful energy require materials and labor that is far from free and infinite. One crude but still useful metric to compare energy sources is by energy return on energy invested. When it comes down to it all raw materials we use come from an effectively infinite source we call Earth. In order to turn bits of Earth into something useful requires energy. Some materials take less energy to get than others to p
Re: (Score:1)
Except "effectively infinite source" isn't true for the Earth and hasn't been for a long time.
Just the effects of infinite waste heat alone would render the planet uninhabitable in under 500 years at current growth rates per person (that we have sustained since the 1600s).
That's ignoring global warming from fossil fuels. That's even if it was all solar. Even if 100% of the suns energy turned to infrared instead of being reflected, it would be bad.
Re:You make a good point (Score:4, Interesting)
> In a single hour, the amount of power from the sun that strikes the Earth is more than the entire world consumes in an year.
A cubic inch of human bone can bear the weight of five standard pickup trucks.
https://bestlifeonline.com/use... [bestlifeonline.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Until it can all be collect that is pointless trivia when discussing bitcoin mining.
But somehow it always immediately becomes very relevant when discussing nuclear power.
Re: (Score:2)
Since electricity is finite and in many places is bought and sold privately
Not in Kosovo.
In Kosovo, the government sets the price of electricity. Low prices are popular, so power is heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Kosovo has, by far, the lowest electricity prices in Europe.
So here is how it works in Kosovo:
1. Pay people to waste power.
2. Become outraged that, lo and behold, power is being wasted
3. Pass laws to micromanage how power is being wasted.
4. Win the election.
It should continue to work unless the IQ of the average Kosovar voter magically increases.
I hope other nations follow suit (Score:5, Interesting)
Especially in europe, where electricity is approaching 80c/kwh in some areas.
Re: I hope other nations follow suit (Score:1)
Re: I hope other nations follow suit (Score:4, Insightful)
No, but miners take away electricity from people who do useful things instead of creating something with no inherent value. (I guess it does create greenhouse gasses and destroys the environment, all to create something that can move money around, banks do this with much less wasted energy).
Re: (Score:2)
6 cents/kwh in Kosovo, since electricity is heavily subsidized there.
Re: (Score:1)
Depends on who you listen [britannica.com] to ...
Re:It's Serbia (Score:5, Insightful)
Though you're right, the argument you cite is actually unnecessary. The GP said "Kosovo does not exist" which is obviously wrong. Kosovo exists. Kosovo exists as a place, either recognized as a sovereign nation or as a part of Serbia, and for what it's worth their current government officials (aka "Kosovo") decided to take make a statement regarding cryptocurrency mining in their area.
Good Luck (Score:3, Interesting)
If you can actually make 2,400 Euros using only 170 Euros worth of electricity then Kosovo is going to have a hard time shutting down crypto miners. This is especially true in a country where apparently many people use electricity to heat their houses. If you are a public utility how do you tell the difference between customers using space heaters to warm their houses and customers using crypto mining rigs to heat their houses?
Heck, depending on the price of crypto rigs it might make more economic sense to ban electric space heaters. If you are going to use lignite coal generated electricity to heat your house, you might as well use the space heater that pays you back in bitcoin.
Re: Good Luck (Score:2)
Heck, depending on the price of crypto rigs it might make more economic sense to ban electric space heaters
And incentivize upgrading to more efficient heat pump systems.
If they were going to sanction any crypto mining, it should be at the utility level, and to fund efficiency initiatives to reduce electricity demand and pay for new generation. Not at the individual level, driving demand up, efficiency down, and not paying for better infrastructure. Not that I'm actually advocating betting your country's power infrastructure on crypto, but it's probably easy to find some sucker right now to agree to favorable
Re: (Score:3)
And incentivize upgrading to more efficient heat pump systems.
Heat pumps still use copious amounts of energy for the amount of heat they produce. If I want 20 kW of heat into my home an electric resistance furnace would consume 20 kW of electricity, that's by definition. The heat pump on my home can produce something like 8 or 9 kW of heat but it will consume about 2 kW to do it. My natural gas furnace, on the other hand, can produce something like 15 to 20 kW and consume something like 10 watts of electricity.
Where I live natural gas is quite popular for heating i
Re: (Score:2)
The great thing about heat pumps is that many people already have a thermal battery. That makes them ideal for using cheap electricity when demand is low.
Decently insulated houses are thermal batteries. Running the AC overnight in the summer, or the heating overnight in the winter, can keep the temperature inside pleasant all day without much, if any, energy consumption at peak times. Many people have insulated water storage tanks too, which are used with some kinds of gas boilers.
I'd be happy to give the e
Re: (Score:2)
If you can actually make 2,400 Euros using only 170 Euros worth of electricity then Kosovo is going to have a hard time shutting down crypto miners. This is especially true in a country where apparently many people use electricity to heat their houses. If you are a public utility how do you tell the difference between customers using space heaters to warm their houses and customers using crypto mining rigs to heat their houses?
Considering Kosovo's current electricity price equates those 170EUR to be 2.8GWh you'll be able to identify the houses using a typical year worth of electricity consumption every month just to heat a few rooms by the charred remains.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for doing the math. That's helpful. It sounds like perhaps what the crypto miners really do need to do is spread the crypto rigs around so that they really could heat houses. You probably noticed that I am a little fuzzy about how much electric heat 170 EUR buys in Kosovo. Let's just say that in my neck of the woods spending that much money to heat the house would not stick out.
Which means that it still might make sense to use crypto mining kits to heat apartment complexes. Or to spread them o
No luck needed if done right. (Score:2)
As you alluded to, the entropy created is just as useful to heat your house.
Nevertheless, making it illegal should alllow them to go after and shut down more problematic actors.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
As someone else noted in this thread even without smart meters it is pretty easy to notice people that have 12 times the typical electricity usage. Which just means that crypto miners should be spreading the love. Instead of heating one house to the point where you need active cooling you could simply size your rigs so that they are about right to heat one house. I wouldn't mind someone else's crypto rig in my house if it cut down on my heating costs. That's a win-win situation.
The Dutch give electricity for free to Facebook (Score:2)
so at least your daily dose of narcism and cat pictures won't be threatened.
Re:The Dutch give electricity for free to Facebook (Score:4, Interesting)
No they didn't. They simply connected them with a higher priority than other companies. Not only is the electricity not free, but the stipulation that it be 100% green energy means they will pay more for it than the normal wholesale rate charged to bulk consumers.
who writes this shit? (Score:2)
Around 90% percent of energy production in Kosovo is from lignite, a soft coal that produces toxic pollution when burnt.
As opposed to burning anything which usually gives off gasses and byproducts that are toxic as well. Seriously, what microbrains write this shit anyway?
Thanks for closing those nuclear reactors Germany! (Score:2)
Try to not screw up the European grid this time... (Score:2)
Try not to screw up the European Electricity Grid and our clocks again [reuters.com] like you did in 2018, Kosovo...
Crypto miner is just a heater (Score:1)
The article states that electricity is used for heat. If heat is produced with an electric heater, then a crypto miner would produce the same amount of heat as the heater, and any crypto that is mined is a bonus.
This does not apply if they use heat pumps for heating.
Re: Crypto miner is just a heater (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The Law of conservation of energy guarantees that every watt of electricity put into the miner is converted in to heat. Miners don't produce any other kind of energy from electricity. Even if the miner produces light, as long as that light does not escape the room it will end up as heat.
So yes, a crypto mine is the same as a space heater.
Re: Crypto miner is just a heater (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I agree that if your the miner generates and RF energy then that will escape a room. But a visible light will not escape a room (without windows) and will just bounce of the wall shifting wavelength till it becomes infra red, and that is heat.
As far as your comparison of a ceramic heater, it produces the same amount of heat as a resistive wire heater (as long as the light waves don't escape through a window).
Transistors don't consume work, work is force over distance, a gate flipping inside a transistor is
Re: Crypto miner is just a heater (Score:2)
Meanwhile in Kazakhstan... (Score:2)
This will concentrate the miners in miner friendly countries like Kazakhstan. With the consequences like right now, as they turn off the internet due to civil revolts the hash rates dropping by 12%.
Source: https://coingape.com/kazakhsta... [coingape.com]
to save energy or to PRINT MONEY ? (Score:2)