Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Intel Hardware

Intel To Outsource Some Key CPU Production for 2023 Chips to TSMC (tomshardware.com) 31

An anonymous reader shares a report: Intel made several big announcements about its 7nm tech at this week's Intel Unleashed: Engineering the Future event and divulged that it expects that the majority of its products in 2023 to still be produced in-house using its own manufacturing technology. But there's a caveat: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger said the company will also release "leadership CPU products" in 2023 with CPU cores that are fabricated with an unspecified process node from third-party foundry TSMC, and those CPUs will come to both the client and data center markets. This development comes on the heels of Intel's announcement last year that its 7nm process was delayed, possibly forcing it to do the unthinkable -- turn to external foundries to produce its core logic, like CPUs and GPUs, for the first time in the company's history.

The newest announcements mean that, in addition to the 7nm Meteor Lake desktop chips and Granite Rapids data center processors that Intel will produce with its own process technology in 2023, the company will also release other lines of CPUs in 2023 that will use CPU cores with an as-yet-unspecified process node from TSMC. Intel noted that the chips that utilize TSMC's third-party process tech will power Intel's "CPU leadership" products for both the client and data center markets, suggesting a split product stack. Intel says that the majority of its products in 2023 will come manufactured with its own process technology. Still, it's important to note that Intel hasn't specified that the majority of the newly-released 2023 products will come with its own 7nm process. Naturally, Intel will still have plenty of chip production volume centered on its 14nm and 10nm process tech in that timeframe, and even older nodes that still ship in large volumes.
Further reading: Intel To Spend $20 Billion To Build Two New Chip Fabs In Arizona.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Intel To Outsource Some Key CPU Production for 2023 Chips to TSMC

Comments Filter:
  • tells me something (Score:4, Interesting)

    by swschrad ( 312009 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @01:55PM (#61193558) Homepage Journal

    tells me that Intel has given up trying to upgrade existing fabs for 7 nm and below. could be because they expect them to be fully booked anyway. could be because they figure they can't make the change, and need new facilities to pull it off. could be because they figure to book a metric shipload of new parts and need more footage to manufacture them. I can believe it's synergy of all of them.

    • by SirSpanksALot ( 7630868 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @02:37PM (#61193706)
      I think some of it is a hedge, They have had trouble dropping their node size recently, but they are also building 2 new fabs for a $20billion outlay. Probably best to use both pipelines so they don't get caught with their pants down like they did when Ryzen launched.
    • "given up trying to upgrade existing fabs for 7 nm and below"
      Historically, they haven't re-used old fabs for new processes since there's still demand for the older processes. Everybody is supply constrained on almost any process they're still running so if you have the ability to grow capacity it is easy to justify.

      • An oversimplification:
        -new, top processors on the newest process (n)
        -old processors on the "current" process (n-1)
        -chipsets on the "past" process (n-2)
        And fabs running n-3 are being upgraded to the "future" process

  • by hirschma ( 187820 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @02:08PM (#61193618)

    Guessing that this is just another anti-competitive move by Intel - increase costs/decrease supply for their competitors.

    • Given that they're going to build a plant in Arizona to compete with TSMC, I wouldn't be surprised if TSMC backs out and makes Intel look stupid.

      • by guruevi ( 827432 )

        TSMC would rather make a profit in the short term rather than no profit at all. They won’t have any problem selling off capacity to nVIDIA, AMD and a host of others that want 7nm, 5nm and beyond. There are still foundries producing less critical chips at much larger nodes, if needed, they would move them to smaller nodes which saves them money.

        There are only a handful of foundries and we are well over a decade since the last major disaster wiped out a significant portion of them.

      • We can only hope so. I'm still waiting for a PS5.
  • Manufacturing (Score:2, Interesting)

    by coastwalker ( 307620 )

    Leading edge chip manufacturing left most countries around the world for the Far East starting more than 20 years ago. Still it is extraordinary to see it leave America too. I still find it hard to believe that Intel has given up.

  • by theshowmecanuck ( 703852 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @03:00PM (#61193804) Journal
    When China invades Taiwan. Time to diversify the supply chain.
  • by sethmeisterg ( 603174 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:56PM (#61194468)
    As screwed as they seem now, they were in a similar situation in the early '00s as well with AMD introducing the amd64 ISA; Intel came back from that big time, so I wouldn't make any predictions about intel's future based on this alone.
    • ^ this 100%. Yes, Intel has been complacent for a long time in part because of a lack of real competition. (Temporarily) losing the throne to AMD is absolutely going to wake up and galvanize Intel like many of you young 'uns currently crowing about their demise can't even comprehend. And don't be mad -- this is a Good Thing because the result for all of us will be a new golden age of CPU innovation which can't happen without a catalyst like necessity or competition.
    • Not even remotely similar. Intel never had a process node stuck for three to four process nodes. Intel never had ALL the Spectre/Meltdown/IME PR nightmares perfect storm *on top of that*. Intel never was at risk of actually going under. Intel never ever outsourced its production.

      Unless you mean Intel's dirty tricks, like literally threatening to bankrupt motherboard manufacturers if they dare to make a single Athlon board, by not giving them any chipsets for Intel CPUs.
      That, of course, has been, is, and wil

    • Not exactly the same situation. AMD did get an edge on Intel but the problem was more CPU design as Intel had to change the CPU architecture to compete. The current problem is that Intel cannot manufacture CPUs at 10nm or 7nm in sufficient quantities.
      • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

        AMD managed to get an edge on Intel despite having to use a worse fabrication process by having a superior design.

        Now AMD can get a clear lead on Intel by having both a superior design and being able to use a superior fabrication process.

        All Intel ever had going for them was x86 and superior fabrication process. The litany of failed replacement for x86 from Intel is long (iAPX 432, i860, i960 and Itanium) ARM and possibly RISC-V is gunning for them and they no longer have the best process by any stretch of

  • ... intel 7nm is still not going to be functional in 2023.

    got it...

    • Worse . . . It looks like their 10nm lines will not be fixed either. But Intel's plan to forge ahead with 7nm when they had not resolved their 10nm issues completely does not look like good planning.
  • Better start worrying about China taking over Taiwan.

Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no substitute for a good blaster at your side. - Han Solo

Working...