Microsoft and Warner Bros. Archived the Original 'Superman' Movie on a Futuristic Glass Disc (variety.com) 93
Microsoft has teamed up with Warner Bros. to text. The collaboration, which was unveiled at Microsoft's Ignite 2019 conference in Orlando, Florida Monday, is a first test case for a new storage technology that could eventually help safeguard Hollywood's movies and TV shows, as well as many other forms of data, for centuries to come. From a report: "Glass has a very, very long lifetime," said Microsoft Research principal researcher Ant Rowstron in a recent conversation with Variety. "Thousands of years." The piece of silica glass storing the 1978 "Superman" movie, measures 7.5 cm x 7.5 cm x 2 mm. The glass contains 75.6 GB of data plus error redundancy codes. Microsoft began to investigate glass as a storage medium in 2016 in partnership with the University of Southampton Optoelectonics Research Centre. The goal of these efforts, dubbed "Project Silica," is to find a new storage medium optimized for what industry insiders like to call cold data -- the type of data you likely won't need to access for months, years, or even decades. It's data that doesn't need to sit on a server, ready to be used 24/7, but that is kept in a vault, away from anything that could corrupt it.
Turns out that Warner Bros. has quite a bit of this kind of cold data. Founded in the 1920s, the studio has been safekeeping original celluloid film reels, audio from 1940s radio shows and much more, for decades. Think classics like "Casablanca," "The Wizard of Oz" or "Looney Tunes" cartoons. "Our mission is to preserve those original assets in perpetuity," said Brad Collar, who is leading these efforts at Warner Bros. as the studio's senior vice president of global archives and media engineering. And while the studio is deeply invested in these classics, it also keeps adding an ever-increasing number of modern assets to its archives, ranging from digitally-shot films and television episodes to newer forms of entertainment, including video games. To date, the Warner Bros. archive contains some 20 million assets, with tens of thousands of new items being added every year. Each of them is being stored in multiple locations, explained Collar. "We want to have more than one copy."
Turns out that Warner Bros. has quite a bit of this kind of cold data. Founded in the 1920s, the studio has been safekeeping original celluloid film reels, audio from 1940s radio shows and much more, for decades. Think classics like "Casablanca," "The Wizard of Oz" or "Looney Tunes" cartoons. "Our mission is to preserve those original assets in perpetuity," said Brad Collar, who is leading these efforts at Warner Bros. as the studio's senior vice president of global archives and media engineering. And while the studio is deeply invested in these classics, it also keeps adding an ever-increasing number of modern assets to its archives, ranging from digitally-shot films and television episodes to newer forms of entertainment, including video games. To date, the Warner Bros. archive contains some 20 million assets, with tens of thousands of new items being added every year. Each of them is being stored in multiple locations, explained Collar. "We want to have more than one copy."
Don't Drop it (Score:1)
Don't find out the hard way like this guy did [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Don't drop it...
No worries, they can just download a pristine copy from The Pirate Bay.
Re: (Score:1)
You jest, but if the movie studio uploaded a near-perfect copy onto The Pirate Bay, it would probably stay seeded for a very very long time. Especially if they promised not to sue the people who were seeding .....
Re: (Score:2)
Ah yes, I believe they call that the Linus Torvalds Method.
Re: (Score:2)
what about the readers and the decoders? (Score:2)
what about the readers and the decoders?
Re: (Score:2)
You just need a suitably-powerful optical magnifier and a digital reader, and if a future civilization can't make those, then they probably won't need to read those files, will they?
Re: (Score:2)
Future generations will find the vault and assume it's some weird rich guy's really large coaster collection.
Re:what about the readers and the decoders? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
"Gosh, those AOL guys got around. They must have been *really* important to have made so many of these!"
Re: (Score:2)
I admit I didn't RTFA, but I wasn't aware they used AOL cd-roms for archiving the movies.
Re:what about the readers and the decoders? (Score:5, Interesting)
The real problem is knowing how to interpret the data once you read it. Take for example trying to read disk packs from a 1980s Cray https://www.chrisfenton.com/cr... [chrisfenton.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The solution for that is including a number of "HOW TO READ THESE ARCHIVES" notes around, starting with easy-to-read text, and then working your way down. Build the archive structure so they have to see the "README" tablets first.
"If you can read this, the next tablet can only be readable with a basic magnifying device. The one after that needs a microscope (instructions on how to build are included). The next tablet includes instructions on how to read the actual archives."
You also need to make sure to inc
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, this all assumes that civilization will completely collapse, and all tech above zero is lost. History shows that this doesn't happen in real life
Citation needed.
Seems to me there is strong evidence of being reset to zero, that is only now being uncovered in places like Turkey (Göbekli Tepe). Advanced stone work from 12000 years ago, predates what we once considered to be the birth of writing, which apparently was merely the most recent birth of writing (5200 years ago.)
Re: (Score:2)
Digital Data has some interesting aspects primarily It can be copied exactly
So unlike traditional analog data on Paper, Stones etc... The more the data is read and copied the more reliable the data is. As Paper, Stone etc... will degrade over time. Glass storage is the digital equivalent of etching it in stone. For the case if the data will not be copied and shared, then it can be held for a long time. But if the media stays popular and it is shared and copied then it will outlast
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In ancient times scrolls and stone tablets mostly hold information that the culture deems as important. At best we may get some graffiti. But most of it is religious texts, tracking of the weather and stars and sun, tracking of warfare and succession.
Re: (Score:2)
People just don't store data for fun, either. In ancient times scrolls and stone tablets mostly hold information that the culture deems as important.
Depends on what you mean by "the culture deems important". The oldest writing we know is accounting.
You have it backwards: when we find ancient writing, we conclude "this must be something that they found important".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Do like the Long-Now's Rosetta project did - start off with eye-readable info that get progressively smaller - thereby focusing attention to the magnification needed to 'read' the data.
As a component to the archive's metadata you also place decode info on each disc. If you're encoding 3-color separated images, the algorithm to read the grayscale image data, along with the device independent color space info (e.g. CIE L*a*b). Similar info for the audio tracks.
I mean, if you have (eventually) 1-TB+ per opti
Which is "original" (Score:2)
What do they mean by the "original" Superman movie? The 1948?
https://www.imdb.com/find?q=Su... [imdb.com]
Superman? Really?? That's the best you can do? (Score:2)
And since when is a square called a disc? Doesn't "disc" imply circular?
Re:Superman? Really?? That's the best you can do? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Superman? Really?? That's the best you can do? (Score:5, Funny)
I really would have thought they'd pick something else. Granted it's a nice movie but jeez. Citizen Kane? Casablanca? It's a Wonderful Life? Battleship Potemkin? And since when is a square called a disc? Doesn't "disc" imply circular?
Shouldn't it be on a crystal shard?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Surely you mean an Isolinear chip [fandom.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, a green one.
Re: Superman? Really?? That's the best you can do? (Score:1)
Alas, the rumors are true, Slashdot is no more. The Slashdot of old, I mean. That comment would have been at +5 insightful.
Re:Superman? Really?? That's the best you can do? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
RTFA for the answer:
Re: (Score:2)
The obvious choice would have been The Glass Menagerie.
Re:Archiving with Piratebay? (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem with relying on this method is that you need people with an interest in the movie/TV show/book/music/whatever. As soon as nobody is interested in Akira Kurosawa - Seven Samurai (1954) anymore, access to this work would be lost.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm browsing through some old torrents dating back to 2004. One of the first torrents - Akira Kurosawa - Seven Samurai (1954) - has 24 seeders.
Over the years, it's likely that the original seeders are long gone, and have been replaced by new seeders several times. The location of the data has changed many times over the years, and many different hard drives and network connections have been used to store and transmit the information. And yet this 1.35GB file contains exactly the same binary data as it did when it was first uploaded 14 years ago.
Wow. "Old," meaning "dating back to 2004." Storage that works for fourteen years is being touted as wonderful.
Check back in another hundred years and tell me if that data is still there, readable, and uncorrupted.
Re:Something missing (Score:5, Informative)
Glass moves like a very viscous liquid. It flows over time so that in old windows the bottoms are noticeably thicker than the tops.
No [thefoa.org] it [gizmodo.com] doesn't [glassnotes.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was taught by my art history teacher in the 1990s that glass is a liquid and used the thickness and distortion of cathedral windows as an example. This is the first I've seen to debunk that assertion. Thank you.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Consider the source! :) I also "learned" bad history from my high-school physics teacher, so they all try to teach things outside their actual qualified area.
Re:Something missing (Score:4, Informative)
Glass moves like a very viscous liquid. It flows over time so that in old windows the bottoms are noticeably thicker than the tops.
No [thefoa.org] it [gizmodo.com] doesn't [glassnotes.com].
Thank you for making me spend the past hour or 2 reading about sagging glass and how glass is made rather than working.
Re: (Score:2)
Heh, I'm here to help! I mean, which would you rather be doing?
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, which would you rather be doing?
I'd rather be avoiding work by playing RDR2 on my pc but can't do that until tomorrow.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Glass is an amorphous solid. It is not considered a liquid even in geologic timescales. In deep-time scales? Everything is a liquid.
The thickness variant you speak of has to do with how glass sheets were created 100's of years ago.
As for the creation of high-purity glass for this purposes such as this on an industrial scale? Owens-Corning, among other manufacturers in this space, have been doing this for better part of 100 years. The recipe for the original Gorilla Glass is almost 100 years old.
Re: (Score:3)
Glass moves like a very viscous liquid. It flows over time so that in old windows the bottoms are noticeably thicker than the tops.
That's an urban legend. It has been debunked for decades now.
Re: (Score:2)
Our legacy (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Followed by "Friends", "Seinfeld", "Sex in the City" and "Wheel of Fortune".
Re: (Score:2)
And then they'll build rockets to go to the moon. Or at the very least, a fist-powered launcher of some kind.
Reminds me of (Score:2)
Expedition to Earth by Arthur C Clarke
M-Disc? (Score:3, Informative)
What's wrong with the M-Disc format?
It is available in DVD and BD formats, in several capacities, and from several manufacturers. M-Disc Burners (which also burn conventional Organic-dye optical media) are also available from several OEMs.
M-Disc media looks like it will last over a thousand years (hence the "M"), when stored in office-environment-like conditions, and is readable in bog-standard CD/BD players.
Yes, there won't be any DVD/BD players in a hundred years, let alone a thousand; but when that starts to be an issue, at least the source will still be readable to transfer to the next popular format.
https://www.pcworld.com/articl... [pcworld.com]
Re: (Score:3)
M-Disc media looks like it will last over a thousand years (hence the "M"), when stored in office-environment-like conditions
So did CDs and LaserDiscs for the first 20 years, then disc rot started happening.
Hopefully Project Silica media is monolithic.
Re: (Score:2)
For 35mm movies the frame is 25mm wide. Given the limitations of both camera lenses and film grain, 80 lp/mm line pairs per mm is good quality for a camera negative, even if you're happy with less than 50% contrast. That translates to about 4000 pixels wide AKA 4K. If you don't have the original negatives then quality will be less. For the best quality films you might see minor improvements above 4K but 8K is overkill for 35mm material. It's more important to capture as much of the film's dynamic range
Re: (Score:2)
The standard bit depth for professional film scanners has been at least 10 bits since 1993, and is probably higher today.
RGB was typically stored as 3x10 bits in a 32 bit location, with the extra 2 bits unused or for alpha indications.
Dynamic range was done by storing the log of the film intensity, with about 90 being the "black" (the density of clear negative) and 640 or so being "white" (the color that should be shown as white on a computer monitor), with the top value approximately 16x "white".
Still waiting for promised Holographic storage (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You simply misunderstood. It was the storage technology in Star Trek: the Next Generation.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it was supposed to be "Microsoft has teamed up with Warner Bros. to Word."
Re: (Score:2)
The outlook is hazy.
Re: (Score:2)
Phantom Zone (Score:2)
Makes sense, since Microsoft and Warner Bros are run by supervillains. ;)
Perpetuity (Score:2)
Drop it into public domain, as it ought to be. Somebody with a large hard disk will mirror it.
What's the use of common culture goods if they under the lock of artificial scarcity for centuries? That was never the deal.
For all I care, Casablanca and Superman can disappear in a fire, like most of the rest of (valuable) works will anyway, not being popular enough to make it above the glass disk bar.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of those movies should trickle into the public domain by the late 21st Century, unless another Disney copyright extension happens. Until then, we need something like this. Remember the fire at Universal that destroyed a lot of irreplaceable master tapes.
Re: Perpetuity (Score:3)
Should have already, if Disney hadn't come along earlier.
But they came along, and lawmakers did their bidding. Repeatedly. What makes you believe they'll stop, ever?
MS Glass Storage (Score:2)
It's rather funny to hear of Microsoft talking about this sort of thing - technology that can be used thousands of years into the future. After all, they're constantly reinventing everything. And like everything else microsoft, the structure of the glass, the shape of the glass, the size of the glass, the thickness of the glass, the color of the glass, the machine that reads the glass, the operating system required to run on said machine... all of these things will constantly change as needed to monopoliz
Re: (Score:2)
All good points, but the biggest point is that while the data might be stable for a millennium, the ability to extract and understand it won't be. That's a fundamental problem with digital data: it's not readable without a machine to decode it and translate it to something that's understandable by a human (or other species). So finding a millennium-stable storage medium is good, if it's also impervious to the slings and arrows of storage buildings and filling cabinets and fires (like the one that destroyed
First sentence of summary? (Score:1)
"Microsoft has teamed up with Warner Bros. to text."
What does that have to do with the rest of the summary/article? Teamed up to text?
"Nooooooo!!" (Score:2)
Microsoft and Warner Bros. Archived the Original 'Superman' Movie on a Futuristic Glass Disc
Now do the original Star Wars.
Centuries from now aliens dig up our artifacts. (Score:2)
Our mission is to preserve those original assets.. (Score:2)
"Our mission is to preserve those original assets in perpetuity"
But of course it is. As Universal learned when it was discovered they hid that they let irreplaceable master recordings going back to the beginning of recorded music burn, if you don't have the masters, it's legal grey area if you actually own the "assets"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0... [nytimes.com]
How are they storing it? (Score:2)
I seem to remember that conventional glass is technically a liquid state, it just has a very very slow flow rate. Hence glass windows that are hundreds of years old are thicker at the bottom than the top.
So stacking the glass disks vertically may not be advisable if the goal is "thousands of years". They'd need to stack flat, and even then, I'd expect the diameter of the disk to get fractionally larger over geological periods of time.
The rules change when we're talking about *real* time periods.
Re:How are they storing it? (Score:4, Informative)
The glass flows slowly/window thicker at the bottom thing is a myth. My middle school science teacher told me that one back in the day, too. However, with the power of the internet today, you can find out for yourself. Glass, and especially glass that they would pick for this purpose, is unlikely to change shape in the time frames they are targeting.
Re: (Score:2)
I did the research, and you are correct. Wow, my high school physics teacher believed this. What other things did he tell us that aren't true? (Is gravity real?)
"We want to have more than one copy." (Score:2)
Consumers have been saying that for years. They're called backups. And you've fought us for years over letting us have the rights to do so. Just sayin'. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Rights are not given. Rights exist independently of what someone else says. What you are referring to as "rights" granted by your overlords are privileges (or licenses). In order to hold the belief that someone else can grant you privileges and license requires that first you promote that other to master and denigrate yourself to the status of chattel -- that you grant them superiority and authority over you. Why would you do that?
Re: (Score:2)
Because some of us think past advanced placement high school English and deal with the real world.
Superman is a god? (Score:2)
Not that historical movies aren't important but I sort of wonder if years from now it isn't misinterpreted as people of our era had some weird beliefs in some really weird gods. I'd much prefer them store things like fossil records or at least things that make us look smarter.
Re: (Score:2)
Bah (Score:2)
If it's not talking rings [youtube.com], I'm not interested.