McDonald's Is To Replace Human Workers With Voice-Based Tech In US Drive-Throughs (bbc.com) 345
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: McDonald's is to replace human servers with voice-based technology in its U.S. drive-throughs. The fast-food chain hopes the AI technology will make the ordering process more efficient. McDonald's is implementing the technology with the help of start-up Apprente, which it acquired this week. The move comes amid concern about workers whose jobs may become obsolete as a result of automation and new technologies. McDonald's plans to expand its newly formed McD Tech team by hiring more engineers and data scientists. The report notes that the company recently "invested in technology that could automatically alter individual drive-through menu panels, depending on factors such as the weather, for example automatically suggesting McFlurry ice cream on hot days or telling customers which items were already proving popular at that particular restaurant that day."
Welcome to the future (Score:5, Funny)
Remember when technology was new and exciting? When we were all heady with the promise of it making the world a better place?
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:5, Informative)
If the boxes can get my order right it will be making the world a better place. Where I live there are plenty of drive through drones that cannot enter the order accurately on the screen, let alone deliver a correct order at the window.
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:5, Insightful)
Combine that will all the mush-mouths that can't speak clearly (or in recognizable english), this should be fun.
Re: (Score:3)
In the city where I live they're trying to ban drive-thru lanes altogether, since they want to forcibly take away people's cars but haven't figured out how to do it yet, so even the jobs that are working to obsolete the McJobs might themselves become obsolete
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you sure they are trying to take your car away? Or just better manage traffic and pollution.
I have found lately that the Drive-Thru doesn't save me any time, in my experience, as most fast food chains in the process of increasing food quality, are no longer mass producing sandwiches and placing them under hot lamps for quick pickup So where you would pickup a cheap burger the drive thru process would take only a couple minutes, is now taking 5-10 minutes per car. Where you could walk into the place, order the food and leave is less time, as there can be mutable people at the counter taking the order in parallel. Thus not waiting in the slow queue. So it is more convent to get out of your car and pick up the food then using the Drive-Thru.
Being that Drive-Thru are no longer efficient that means the stores themselves are probably better off using their property to place more parking spots.
Being that you are not giving any details or references, we could expect that some places are no longer using drive thru as a market force, not some government control as well.
Because it is always the Damn Governments fault for us not to being able to sell products that people do not want to buy.
Purpose of Drive Thru (Score:4, Interesting)
Are you sure they are trying to take your car away? Or just better manage traffic and pollution.
I have found lately that the Drive-Thru doesn't save me any time, in my experience, as most fast food chains in the process of increasing food quality, are no longer mass producing sandwiches and placing them under hot lamps for quick pickup So where you would pickup a cheap burger the drive thru process would take only a couple minutes, is now taking 5-10 minutes per car. Where you could walk into the place, order the food and leave is less time, as there can be mutable people at the counter taking the order in parallel. Thus not waiting in the slow queue. So it is more convent to get out of your car and pick up the food then using the Drive-Thru.
Being that Drive-Thru are no longer efficient that means the stores themselves are probably better off using their property to place more parking spots.
Being that you are not giving any details or references, we could expect that some places are no longer using drive thru as a market force, not some government control as well.
Because it is always the Damn Governments fault for us not to being able to sell products that people do not want to buy.
I see a few advantages of a drive thru. I have small children; with a drive thru I don't have to take them into the fast food joint. No messing with child seat belts, no chasing them all over, no begging to spend an hour on the playground. As a husband and father, my wife sometimes have time to cook dinner, so she asks me to pick up dinner. My family is large enough that I might need to make multiple trips between from inside the restaurant and my car.
Some places have multiple lanes to order from the drive thru, while others have multiple pick up lanes. Some popular fast food joints even have workers walk up to cars in the queue, so your order is done (or nearly so) by the time you reach the pick-up window. Companies need to evolve to keep up with current needs and expectations.
Re: (Score:2)
Instead of improving public transportation they're just trying to make driving a car miserable
Re: (Score:2)
My main retort (why are you eating that shit) is irrelevant.
Re: (Score:3)
Why are we so judgemental on what people decide to eat?
Sometimes I want a good high quality juicy hamburger made by an actual chief. Sometimes I just want a thin little bit dry, burger with just basic ingredients, because I am in a hurry and do not really have the time to appreciate quality food.
Yes we see celebrity chiefs on TV who will spit out food that is less then ideal. But that is TV, and largely meant for show. Not really a good roll model for people to be so picky about food.
Especially to insult p
Re: Welcome to the future (Score:2)
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember when fast food workers were fighting for massive increases in wages, expecting that no other shoe would drop?
One just did, and it was just about as predictable as the sun rising. Make yourself more expensive and error-prone than automating the job, and eventually your position will be eliminated in favor of automation.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
...the politicians calculated that either the workers would get the higher wages, or they would be pushed onto welfare. Either way, those politicians would win.
Exactly.
Re: (Score:3)
problem appears when "minimum wage" ends up being 50% below what is required to pay for rent / food. one can't do 3 jobs and have a sane life.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:4, Insightful)
Minimum wage workers make up 2% of all hourly employees, about 1% of all employees total.
Kids under 18 make up about 1.5% of all employees total.
So, no, minimum wage jobs are not a career for "many people". In fact, most working CHILDREN have jobs at better than minimum wage. .
That fails to consider all the jobs pegged to minimum wage, ie I'll pay you $0.50 more than minimum wage. Woohoo!
Raising the minimum benefits them too, and if it doesn't, then you can be secure in knowing your hamburger won't cost an extra dime after all.
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Really? Because I like the people around me to be employed.
BINGO. I fully agree. Not to mention it's good to have entry-level jobs that kids can apply for with no previous experience. Otherwise, where will experience come from?
For these reasons I boycott things like self-checkout lines at Walmart, etc. I've already been trained to be my own bank teller and to pump my own gas. Damned if I'm going to be my own cashier as well.
As for McDonalds, they're already trying self-checkout. If they start firing the kids working their drive-thru windows, I'll stop driving throu
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:4, Interesting)
Inevitable (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
The minimum wage lunacy has certainly accelerated the development and adoption of the technology though. Increased costs are always the driver.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:5, Insightful)
What;s so loony about a job paying enough that you can support yourself? Even people working unskilled jobs deserve that.
Agreed, and props to them for wanting to work. The alternative for many is social assistance. The whiners trying to drag everyone down instead of building everyone up should realize they are better off paying an extra dime for their hamburger than paying the whole shot via their taxes.
Re:Welcome to the future (Score:4, Funny)
Remains to be seen if it will be less error prone. I speak pretty clearly and with a neutral accent (I.E. news anchor speak) and I still have trouble with voice recognition.
Not looking forward to yelling at the box, I SAID A BURGER WITH CHEESE, not BEES!
Re: (Score:3)
Our wealth as a society is limited by our ability to produce it, and while job positions l
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
On the other hand, it's hard for anyone to be an engineer at Tesla or go to medical school when the masses are setting fire to everything in sight and shooting anyone who even looks to be either rich or educated because the oligarchs have impoverished just about everyone, and no one has anything even resembling a useful function or purpose at all in life.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see how this is a case where it isn't making the world a better place?
If Alexa and Google Home are anything to go by, it's just going to make the world a more frustrating place for people with British accents. I'd say I have less than 50% accuracy with those things (maybe because the ones in the US are tuned for an American accent- don't know if the ones released in Britain have any better understanding of a British accent).
Heck, I can "wake" Alexa by saying "MyLegsAche" fast and as one word. If Alexa mistakes "MyLegsAche" as "Alexa"- dog only knows what I will get if I pl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
as long as we make it easy for people to start new businesses
What everybody glosses over is that the average new business launch costs as much as a midrange family sedan, and few people have that kind of money lying around.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I disagree...they are wonderful First/Starting jobs for teens coming into the work force.
They teach you responsibility for showing up on time, doing work, making sure you are dressed presentable int he proscribed fashion of the establishment....AND, I think this is more important than ever in todays situation of teen isolation via so
McVoices (Score:2)
I almost never eat McDonald's. But this reminds me of what the drive thru experience was like a while back. They would play some automated pre-recorded voice when you first drive up. So you'd hear:
Happy perky young girl: HI! WELCOME TO MCDONALDS! I hope you are having a WONDERFUL DAY, would you like to try our new chicken whatever sandwich???!?
1-2 seconds later as you are in the middle of declining, dull bored guy: "wah yoo wan"
Though it also reminds me of something from like...... 10 years ago w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Only those unable to think for themselves care about popularity.
I don't agree entirely. I think that there is much to be learned from other human beings and that is what society and civilization is built on. "Popularity" is based on the learned responses of the rest of civilization. WIth crappy discount burger joints that's probably less important than other things, but the premise is the same. When it comes to ordering breakfast, that may be of less importance than say, societies favoured method for harvesting wheat; but the premise is the same, other people have g
Re:McVoices (Score:4, Insightful)
Who cares what's popular? Are people really going to eat based off of "Oh I wanted a wrap but everyone today ordered a burger I'll get that!"?
McDonald's cares what's popular. This is advertising. And the fact that McDonalds actually exists is proof that advertising works, and that they know how to do it.
Do you actually think this will really show what's popular? No fucking chance. This is going to show you what they want you to buy. Running low on chicken? Push the burger. New product? Push that. High margin product when business is slow? Push that one.
Advertising in print, on the radio, on TV, in movies, with an app, and on billboards is no longer sufficient. Now they're going to advertise on the menu.
Voice-based tech in the drive-thru... (Score:2)
This will go over like a lead balloon seeing as how most brain-dead rednecks in my area talk. The drive-thru lanes will be backed up into the next county. Aforementioned hairball will try a dozen times to use the voice interface, give up, SLOWLY pull forward to the pick-up window and place the order with a live person who will no doubt be in a CHEERFUL mood in the midst of this clusterf*ck.
Re:Voice-based tech in the drive-thru... (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
If their speech is the norm, it will be you that the AI doesn't recognize.
Re: (Score:3)
voice based tech... (Score:2)
the potential for epic fails is staggering... ;-)
prepare for epic laughs on receiving your bungled orders
Re: (Score:2)
the potential for epic fails is staggering... ;-)
prepare for epic laughs on receiving your bungled orders
To be fair, I get that with human operators of drive throughs already.
Progress? (Score:2)
Aaw, now who will be rude to me and spit in my Coke?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh brother (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
This type of scenario is exactly where my mind instantly jumped to. Orders with a significant amount of customization on the customer's end seem like they'd be a potential nightmare for the customer and all those waiting behind them.
Re: (Score:3)
And you look forward to it now? As a former picky eater, I can tell you that most minimum wage slaves fucked it up on the regular. At least with the technology I have the hope that it'll improve.
The end... (Score:2)
Soon there won't be any jobs left between this, the order kiosks in store, self-checkouts replacing employees in stores....
Where will people get money to buy anything?
Re: (Score:2)
just as in "Demolition Man", we'll be raiding the Pontiac Trans-Port that deliver Taco-Bell ;-)
Is voice recognition good enough for this? (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder whether today's voice recognition is already good enough to deal with heavy accents and background noises from wind, rain and car stereos. Given my limited experience with the voice menu labyrinths in phone systems, I'm not certain.
Re: Is voice recognition good enough for this? (Score:2)
Less than "is the tech ready" the problem is "can McDonald's tell"?
Their kisok ordering machine has such poor HCI that everybody just goes to the cashier. Burger King actually did a decent job - somebody there deserves a raise. I'd say the performance penalty at McD's is 3-4x slower. Somehow they thought it was good enough to deploy.
That should drive them... (Score:2)
That should allow them to keep the slowest fast food designation this year and for many years into the future (they won last year, too) as they disambiguate misunderstood food orders.
Minimum wage (Score:2, Insightful)
Here it is. How is that $15.00 per hour minimum wage for unskilled work looking now?
Next up, burger flippers, burger builders, fry makers/packers, burrito folders, and drink dispensers.
Re:Minimum wage (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Minimum wage (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Are they? Dave didn't appear to say that in his post. Do you have evidence that he has said it elsewhere, or evidence that there is a trend of people making these two claims at the same time?
It's like you said: it probably accelerated the timeline a bit. That means some people will lose jobs sooner. And
normally ... (Score:3, Insightful)
... with the state of consumer voice recognition tech I'd be leery of this.
That said, it couldn't possibly be worse than the average drive through human at comprehending my order.
Re: (Score:2)
So instead of human garbled voices taking orders (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Gibberish FTW (Score:3)
If this ever comes to pass then just speak gibberish to the system until a human intervenes. Then drive away (just do it for fun!).
"I'd like a ham-aghtufaughy no haufins, add extra ketpah".
I'm OK with automation for food quality, for fast food. Frankly it is needed.
McDs' in-store order kiosks appear to be designed by Windows 10 UI rejects, they should just have boxing gloves so you can just punch the thing repeatedly (and then pickup whatever you ordered).
For the record I just get Egg McMuffins, but only when on sale. And yeah, they do have good fries (if made properly, we need robots for this).
Re: (Score:2)
If this ever comes to pass then just speak gibberish to the system until a human intervenes. Then drive away (just do it for fun!).
"I'd like a ham-aghtufaughy no haufins, add extra ketpah".
I'll have an order of hamberders and a large covfefe please.
Re: (Score:2)
It's actually more about reducing revenue, slowing the system down. Pushing for, not change, just reverting to a better system.
Thinking is what I do with my time, I can be wasting other people's time and be doing other things like working on a song melody or pondering pretty much anything.
In my office they installed a hands-free paper-towel machine in the bathroom. Now it takes 30-40 seconds to get paper-towels. rather than 5 seconds. That wastes my time.
Obligatory Idiocracy (Score:2)
You are an unfit mother. Your children will be placed in the custody of Carl’s Jr. Carl’s Jr ‘F*ck You, I’m Eating.’”
I hope it is not like these self service counters (Score:3)
I hate the self-service counters at McDonalds.
If you want to pay cash, here is what happens:
- Go to the self-service machine
- During rush hours, you may have to wait in line
- Prepare your order, skip all ads, extras, etc...
- Get your ticket
- Wait for your ticket number to appear on cash counter screen, you need to pay attention
- Pay for your order, only then they start preparing it
- Wait for your ticket number to appear on the pickup counter screen, you also need to pay attention
- Pick your order...
Even if you skip the "cash" part, this is a terrible experience. As a result, I stopped going to McDonalds, but that's not like I went often before... Maybe it helped their profits, but I am going to make sure that I don't contribute to them.
I am not anti-automation. But I am against the kind of automation that make consumers life worse. There are plenty of cool high-tech stuff in shops. Vibrating pucks that tell your order is ready in self-service restaurants, individual tablets so that you can order from your table without struggling to get the waiter's attention, cash registers where you just need to put your stuff in a basket and identify everything instantly, cash machine where you just dump all your loose change in a basket, add a few bills and it counts everything and gives you change in the least amount of coins. These are cool, the McDonald's stuff isn't.
McDonalds tried similar already (Score:3)
A few years back, McDonald's had some drive-thrus route to an Indian call center. Sometimes it would be one drive-through that had the remote order taker; sometimes both.
Did this help much? Not really, and it was eventually discontinued, where the guy at the window had to take orders from both lanes.
Seems like history is repeating itself. I'm hoping that the AI works better, but I have my doubts.
Re:Post work future (Score:5, Insightful)
the most interesting question: can capitalism work with only 5% of the population receiving a salary and being able to buy stuff ?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Crime will be a main economic driver.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps, but not Western model of capitalism. You could create a service economy around 5% of the population that still works, but that means paying that 5% enough to afford to employ the bulk of remaining 95%.
Re:Post work future (Score:5, Informative)
5% of people will never drive enough goods and services needs to employ even 50% of the population.Think of all of the things that the ultra-rich never want or if they want it, will build or buy their own private version. Public education systems. Public transportation. Libraries. Parks. Expressways. Power grid. Fast food outlets. Corner stores. Dive bars. Live music venues.
All of these things don't cater to the people who can chopper or jet wherever they need to go. They have their own carved out niche where they don't come into contact with the vast majority of the non rich.
These places and things that the rich pretend don't exist employ a giant percent of our population. Every time I go to one of our little local restaurants, capacity 100, there are 10 people working and another 20-50 enjoying themselves there. The rich are at the ritzy restaurants a few blocks away, enjoying their $150 three course meal paired with french wines. No matter how expensive that meal gets, it's never going to pay the 10 people at the restaurant down the block. And it won't pay the bartender who's grabbing a quick bite to eat there before heading to his dive bar.
We really can't have the trappings of modern day life if the bulk of the population doesn't have an income. Say goodbye to major league sports teams, movies, and most music and arts. Say goodbye to publicly maintained spaces.
A healthy economy is one where the poor have spending money. Why? Because they keep the money moving and don't hoard it. Every time money changes hands it gets taxed, and that funds pretty much everything. Schools, roads, power grids, public transportation, police, fire, EMS, the justice system, health inspectors, hospitals, etc., etc. Once those things are funded we can build civilization on top of them.
Re: (Score:2)
"but that means paying that 5% enough to afford to employ the bulk of remaining 95%."
The question "Can capitalism work when most people are unemployed" can not be be answered by suggesting that the few people who work just need to employ the rest.
If they are employed by the 5% (or anyone else) then by definition they are NOT unemployed.
Re:Post work future (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes. Gladiatorial combat will provide amusement for the 5%, a glimmer of hope for the masses, and reduce unemployment the old fashioned way.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
no, if you don't cover the plebs basic means (food, housing, clothing, keeping them busy), you only get a revolution on your hands
Re: (Score:3)
Automated military means uprisings are off the table too.
Maybe at some point in the future, but not today and not in US where population is armed to the teeth. Also, you need to not only defend few hard points, but also all supporting infrastructure. Could such hypothetical automated military operate without fuel, electricity, spare parts and with the entirety of IT field working day and night on hacking them? Also who do you think running backed servers to support such automated military? Certainly not the rich themselves.
Re: (Score:3)
I find it confusing the people who say they need small arms to defend against an out of control government are the same ones that demand we have by far the largest and most deadly military on the planet that could carpet bomb civilians with small arms 24/7 and not lose a single plane.
Re: (Score:2)
Automated military means uprisings are off the table too.
Maybe at some point in the future, but not today and not in US where population is armed to the teeth. .... Also who do you think running backed servers to support such automated military? Certainly not the rich themselves.
You can always hire one half of the poor to kill the other half.
Re: (Score:3)
can capitalism work with only 5% of the population in debt ?
Money only has value because of a debt that it represents.
--BringsApples
Re: (Score:2)
No and it does not have to. There is always more work to be done. For example I don't do a lot of landscaping now because its as much as I want to invest in terms of time to just get the lawn mowed and hte blow downs picked up etc. I *would* do some other stuff like plant a garden etc if wages fell enough I could afford to pay someone to do the mowing, and clean up -or- if technology could make me productive enough to generate more wealth to pay prevailing wages for that type of work without more investm
Re:Post work future (Score:5, Insightful)
With the rise in universal basic income and a worker-less society, social status will ossify into Owners, Basic, and Criminals.
In fact, crime will be the only way for a person to raise their standard of living if they are on Basic.
Re:Post work future (Score:4, Insightful)
In fact, crime will be the only way for a person to raise their standard of living if they are on Basic.
which is already the case, billionaires exist only because they cheat the taxman as much as they can...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it's another form of cheating, with a government member as an accomplice !
Re: (Score:2)
When the president does it, it means it's not illegal.
--Nixon
Re: (Score:2)
Not as long as the wealthy still exist and remain greedier than the worst demon...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
that's an excellent question... still haven't gotten a sensible answer from the powers that be
Re: (Score:2)
How will they get caviar, Alaskan salmon, truffles, coconuts, Argentinian wines, wagu beef, or saffron if there isn't a global transportation network and people employed to cultivate, harvest, process, pack, ship, receive, transport, inventory, cook, and serve those things?
Maybe they'll employ thousands of people all around to world dedicated to bringing them what they want? But that will get very expensive, even for the ultra-rich. Far simpler is to not hoard all the money, and make sure that the plebs hav
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
society as a whole still needs to manage "unskilled scumbag now non workers", which won't disappear any time soon
Re: (Score:2)
50% of population is below average intelligence. By definition. We can't change that even if we find a way to make everyone into super-geniuses. So what is there to do for these people in post unskilled work society?
Re: (Score:2)
50% of the population is below the median intelligence by definition.
Re: (Score:2)
For this case you often have a person taking orders. Where they could be doing other work and making the turn around time much less. Where you have a person capable for more, are just punching orders into the register. Often for low volume times, you will see a person cooking the food and taking orders and everything. So you are waiting minutes just to get your order because one person is doing everything. You can probably speed up your time without cutting labor.
Technology actually doesn't overall red
Re: (Score:2)
it's not automated, it's actually someone in Somalia greeting people all day ;-)