Over Half of Norway Car Sales Are Now Electric (reuters.com) 345
The Norwegian Road Federation (NRF) said on Monday that almost 60 percent of all new cars sold in the country last month were fully electric, "a global record as the country seeks to end fossil-fueled vehicles sales by 2025," reports Reuters. From the report: Exempting battery engines from taxes imposed on diesel and petrol cars has upended Norway's auto market, elevating brands like Tesla and Nissan, with its Leaf model, while hurting sales of Toyota, Daimler and others. In 2018, Norway's fully electric car sales rose to a record 31.2 percent market share from 20.8 percent in 2017, far ahead of any other nation, and buyers had to wait as producers struggled to keep up with demand.
The surge of electric cars to a 58.4 percent market share in March came as Tesla ramped up delivery of its mid-sized Model 3, which retails from 442,000 crowns ($51,400), while Audi began deliveries of its 652,000-crowns e-tron sports utility vehicle. The sales figures consolidate Norway's global lead in electric car sales per capita, part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas to transform to a greener economy.
The surge of electric cars to a 58.4 percent market share in March came as Tesla ramped up delivery of its mid-sized Model 3, which retails from 442,000 crowns ($51,400), while Audi began deliveries of its 652,000-crowns e-tron sports utility vehicle. The sales figures consolidate Norway's global lead in electric car sales per capita, part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas to transform to a greener economy.
Proof of viability (Score:5, Insightful)
Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.
Norway put in the infrastructure. Charging everywhere. EVs work great there.
Well done Norway.
Re: (Score:2)
Btw: Am I the only one not receiving slashdot reply notifications anymore?
Re: (Score:2)
Nope. Been going on for a few days now.
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Informative)
Very little of this is significant and barely even true. I live there. Most Norwegian live in areas where is just goes under freezing for 3-4 months at most, heavy snow is uncommon, cleared very effectively and few people commute very far at all.
They are a success because of tax. Petrol cars have a 100% tax, electric have zero, so a Telsa cost a similar amount to a medium sized car, a Leaf was cheaper than a well equipped hatchback. Plus they travel free on the toll roads and Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending. In fact it was so successful the government had significant issues with the hole in the budget caused by the lack of income from reduced taxable car sales.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You need to bring in more diversity like Sweden and pay everything for them, that will solve that problem.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
When you say that English "has been the common language pretty much since inception" you'd be ... wrong.
A couple of examples: Until the USA entered WWI, there were more German language newspapers in Pennsylvania than English. Dwight David Eisenhower spoke German growing up. You may have heard of him.
It's only recently that Americans (mostly right-wingers, mostly xenophobic) have insisted that everybody speak American. It's only recently that said assholes accost people in public and scream at them for not s
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Interesting)
Very little of this is significant and barely even true. I live there. Most Norwegian live in areas where is just goes under freezing for 3-4 months at most, heavy snow is uncommon, cleared very effectively and few people commute very far at all.
It's all relative though. If I have one day where it's still freezing by noon I consider that pretty darn cold nowadays. What you consider not so bad a winter, many people on here would consider pretty severe. I've lived in 3 countries and never seen more than 7cm of snow fall, I'm sure 7cm is nothing to you though . I've seen how 3 inches can cause havoc on a city not prepared for snow. Heck, I've driven in my car behind a dump truck that had two men standing in the back shoveling sand on to the road as it slowly rolled forwards- that's the best remedy the city I lived in had to deal with the snow (that was in the mid-South, US). They didn't even have salt. "Heavy Snow is uncommon" vs "Heavy Snow would bring the city to a complete grinding halt."
What people were worried about is that sub-freezing temps would make the electric car not work. Norway has definitely proven this wrong.
There are few heavily populated places on earth that have REALLY severe weather- there's a reason most Norwegians live in the less severe parts of the country, I'm sure. Nonetheless, electric cars have proven they can do well in Norway, they've proven they can do well in almost any HEAVILY-POPULATED area. Maybe they won't do as well North of Trondheim (maybe they would), but people in those conditions represent a very small percent of the world's population.
They are a success because of tax. Petrol cars have a 100% tax, electric have zero, so a Telsa cost a similar amount to a medium sized car, a Leaf was cheaper than a well equipped hatchback. Plus they travel free on the toll roads and Norwegians have a lot of money they need to try to find a way of spending. In fact it was so successful the government had significant issues with the hole in the budget caused by the lack of income from reduced taxable car sales.
Aye, and that's a good model for the rest of us to follow.
Re: (Score:3)
Aye, and that's a good model for the rest of us to follow.
What additional tax are you willing to pay to subsidize EV buyers?
Re: (Score:3)
OK, quick reality check. Electric cars will work in the cold. Also, they will not work as efficiently in the cold. Batteries just act like this. How many times do you have issues with a starting battery in an ICE vehicle in the summer as apposed to the winter? Still usually works, but not as well.
The other really misleading part of this article is the numbers. Really, Tesla sold 5,822 cars and had 31.7% of the market share in a year? Not alot of demand for cars there, but if there is good alternatives
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe "heavy snow" means something different to you, but looking at Bjorn Nyland's videos there is plenty of snow and he has no trouble doing very long trips with multiple charges.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Insightful? None of these are the actual reasons for the success. All about money, lower cost of ownership.
EVs are just better cars (mostly) (Score:3)
Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.
People who say such things are people who do not own and/or have not driven EVs. Yes there are some infrastructure issues for long distance travel still to be ironed out but the solutions are in sight. Furthermore in the mean time if I really need to drive a long distance I still own a gas powered truck or I can easily rent a car for a very reasonable price for my rare trip longer than the 238 mile range of my EV. It's not like the gasoline infrastructure is going to disappear any time soon.
I own an EV (
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you have really "tested" an EV unless you have lived with it for a month in -30C weather.
I would never go somewhere with -30C weather! Why would I subject myself to that?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm watching the Rivian and Tesla offerings closely and hoping they motivate Ford/GM/FCA to get seriously busy with EV versions of their trucks too.
I like the Rivian from all I've seen. Tesla often seems to go for flair rather than function- like their gullwing doors. Rivian seems all practical. I'd love a Rivian, there again- they're projecting them to cost $70k... there is no way I would spend that much on a car. I'm amazed that the average new car price in the US is now $35k; I have a good job that pays well and I'd never pay anything like that much for a new car so $70K is totally beyond my willingness to spend.
I'd rather spend the money on som
Rivian headlamps = ugly (Score:3)
I'd rather spend the money on something else... although if I COULD get any car I wanted and money wasn't an issue- it'd be the Rivian Truck.
Only style critique I have of the Rivian trucks is those headlights are UGLY. I have no idea why they thought that was a good look. Maybe they work great but they look like shit. Functionally it seems like a good truck presuming the build quality and interior functions are up to par.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Making the population to have to save up and get an electric car. Pay a huge new tax on a non electric car.
Re:Proof of viability (Score:4, Insightful)
Norway has severe weather, sub zero temperatures for much of the year, heavy snow, and people need to travel long distances. All the things that people say make EVs unsuitable.
Norway put in the infrastructure. Charging everywhere. EVs work great there.
Well done Norway.
You forget to add: Norway has the billions of tons of oil exports to pay for it.
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Insightful)
You forget to add: Norway has the billions of tons of oil exports to pay for it.
So has the US. So has the UK. So have lots of countries. But only Norway did it.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah,
but what are they going to do when the "Dunkelflaute" comes? No sun in winter, no wind anymore, and all the water power plants frozen??
I expect a drastic increase of birth rate next winter!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It certainly does. The average daily North American commute is well below the maximum range of most charged EVs. But we'll hear all kinds of stories about how the majority of North Americans own cabins in the woods, or something.
Re: (Score:3)
And they burn their garbage for energy.
Getting rid of garbage is probably the greater motivation. It's not like they have too few energy sources.
Re: (Score:2)
Even so, electricity isn't free. So when you do burn trash, capturing that heat and putting it into warming homes is a nice bonus (it's distributed via hot water pipes).
Re: (Score:3)
And they burn their garbage for energy.
Well, gee, when the idea of burning garbage for energy was promoted in the film "Back to the Future" everybody seemed to like it.
And I, for one, would have more of an incentive to take out the garbage every week, if my car could run on it.
I bet if my city was surrounded by waterfalls instead of even more people, we could do that too. But then again, we'd probably be a lake. ;)
Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yër ?
See the løveli lakes
The wøndërful telephøne system
And mäni interesting furry animals
Including the majestik møøse
A Møøse once bit my sister...
Re: (Score:2)
If only batteries warmed themselves up when charging/discharging.
Resistive-element technology to warm them up in advance? At least 100 years away!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
many car parks in northern Scandinavian countries have power outlets for block heaters, which can be used to great benefit for heating up electric car batteries and keeping the car's interior warm. This mitigates a disadvantage of electric cars in polar conditions.
"Mitigates a disadvantage"? One would think it does more than that. The batteries could be heated from these power outlets *by charging them*. On the other hand, heating the engine block on an ICE car won't make it magically materialize more gasoline in its tank.
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Interesting)
They have this problem as well with fossil fueled cars, that is why many cars in colder climates (e.g. Scandiavian countries, Canada) are equipped with a block heater.
Finally - I'm amazed that it took someone this long to point out the truth. We have petrophiles complaining about cold batteries, and ignoring that some folks start fires under their oil sump to get their vehicles warm enough to start.
In Alaska cities, parking meters have electrical outlets to plug your car into to keep it warm.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Average low in Bergen: 4C
Ok admittedly an EV may start to have problems at -11C but still not very cold. I think I could drive in a car and not heat the cabin at all at -11C.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Proof of viability (Score:4, Insightful)
Apparently several people didn't get your joke.
Actually the other classic anti-EV argument, the off-grid remote cabin with no possibility of solar or wind power, is actually a thing in Norway too.
Re:Proof of viability (Score:5, Interesting)
"Actually the other classic anti-EV argument, the off-grid remote cabin with no possibility of solar or wind power, is actually a thing in Norway too."
They get 95% of their power from hydro and those all in the sticks as well.
Re: (Score:2)
No idea what your -3C meme is about.
Norway is big, there are plenty of places where it goes below -30C.
Perhaps Oslo only was -3C last winter?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So, you have been there often enough to know that for sure?
Sorry, you are an idiot.
Even Germany has bad winter nights when we have -30C ...
Oslo never goes below an average low of 4C. ... perhaps you should check your math skills. ...
-10 versus +20 is an average of +15
Obviously half the numbers are below the average and the other half is above
Frankly: no idea why you ride on the temperature meme anyway, it is completely irrelevant for your other arguments.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. These people are buying $80,000+ cars because there are other benefits, including toll-free roads, HOV-lane access, free parking, and free charging. This is just rich people buying convenience.
You think the majority of Norweigan's are rich?
Admit it, the electric car is winning. Give it a decade and no-one will be surprised to hear of electric cars topping ICE cars in ANY country. It is the future- they just make more sense than ICE in almost every way.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Norway is a bit of a special case here (Score:5, Informative)
Large EV sales in norway are due to subsidies to the tune of the equivalent of USD~10-30000 pr. car:
* Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000)
* Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars.
* There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured)
* Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)
For usability: Most roads are limited to 80km/h and most drivers do not drive excessively long distances. 15000 km annually is the average.
The parts of norway where very long driving distances are common (Northern Norway) BEV penetration is very low.
Winter range of BEVs can drop a bit on the coldest days but norway is mostly temperate. Subzero temperatures usually only occur 30-60 days pr. year in most populated areaes. (Though it varies greatly, but so does BEV adoption)
Note that the high numbers of EV sales in march is significantly due to that Tesla delivered ~5000 cars in. Tesla tends to deliver cars towards the end of the quarter, and Q1 saw the first availability of model 3 which had a large pent up demand, so do not expect next month to repeat this number.
Re: (Score:3)
Large EV sales in norway are due to subsidies to the tune of the equivalent of USD~10-30000 pr. car:
* Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000) * Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars. * There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured) * Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)
For usability: Most roads are limited to 80km/h and most drivers do not drive excessively long distances. 15000 km annually is the average. The parts of norway where very long driving distances are common (Northern Norway) BEV penetration is very low. Winter range of BEVs can drop a bit on the coldest days but norway is mostly temperate. Subzero temperatures usually only occur 30-60 days pr. year in most populated areaes. (Though it varies greatly, but so does BEV adoption)
Note that the high numbers of EV sales in march is significantly due to that Tesla delivered ~5000 cars in. Tesla tends to deliver cars towards the end of the quarter, and Q1 saw the first availability of model 3 which had a large pent up demand, so do not expect next month to repeat this number.
The Norwegian BEV exertion on road tolls has been ended and even with when a sales tax is levied on on BEV's you still no longer have to pay the carbon taxes you are saddled with when buying a fossil fuel powered car. I don't think that internal combustion powered cars will make a resurgence once the incentives are dropped. Only the current US government is betting its bottom dollar that the future of the car industry is to be found in 19th century vintage internal combustion engine technology.
Re: (Score:2)
The BEV exemption on toll roads have not effectively been ended yet. Over the next few years it will however be reduced to a 50% discount. The schedule varies by region as there will be individual decision pr. toll road. F.ex in Oslo the discount will be changed from 100% to 75% in june. Most toll roads still have 100% discount, but yes it will change.
*New* car sales (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
* Goods (including cars) normally carry a 25% VAT. BEVs are exempted. (Easily worth USD 10-20000)
* Non BEV cars additionally carry taxes calculated from emissions and weight. Additional taxes for cars tend to range from the USD equivalent of USD 2000 to many tens of thousands for large performance cars.
* There are a lot of toll roads in norway. Many car drivers can spend the equivalent of USD 3000 annually on tolls. BEVs are expempted from tolls. (This benefit will likely be reduced shortly, but a 50% saving has been assured)
* Many cities have free parking for BEVs (Also likely to be a reduced benefit going forward)
So the bulk isn't actually a subsidy, it's them not collecting taxes. And the emissions taxes are directly to offset the externalized costs of running a fossil car, so actually just a part of the TCO that some countries allow you to pass on to other people.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely, but unless your country starts out with high car taxes it will be very hard for others to replicate these results. It is much more popular to give a tax exemption than to give a tax hike. The reason Norway got here is that we have historically had very very high car taxes, then essentially dropped them all for BEVs.
A history note: The reason that was done was to support Think! a now defunct norwegian BEV startup from a time when there were much less EVs than today.
An American Car Company is Winning. (Score:3, Interesting)
Even /. that is tolerant of pot and porn is hostile and call the CEO a pot smoking fraud. Well orchestrated campaign is on to oust the star CEO to hobble its ability to raise capital.
Structure the tax break to punish the ones that take early lead and risk. Tax break for Tesla and GM EVs are being phased out while the imports enjoy full benefit.
Re: (Score:3)
Success of Tesla threatens the stealership network (6% margin on 300 billion sales) , the gasoline car makers (300 billion annual sales in USA alone), the oil industry (450 billion/pa in USA alone). Tesla does not advertise so media makes it the whipping boy to burnish their fearless journalistic credentials.
Re: (Score:2)
Look at the documented predictions of death of Tesla stretching back 11 years.
Re: (Score:3)
Beating the pants off the Germans and the Japanese. So how do we reward it?
Even /. that is tolerant of pot and porn is hostile and call the CEO a pot smoking fraud. Well orchestrated campaign is on to oust the star CEO to hobble its ability to raise capital.
Structure the tax break to punish the ones that take early lead and risk. Tax break for Tesla and GM EVs are being phased out while the imports enjoy full benefit.
Well, Tesla is a left-wing libtart tree-hugger company. Good right thinking christian conservatives can't tolerate that now can they? So, they go for the only other alternative which is try to kill Tesla by any means possible and then equating the use of coal/oil/gas and producing massive CO2 emissions with patriotism. They send people to energy industry conventions to promote coal fed power plants and get laughed at.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Tesla already benefited from the tax break. It's structured to try to get as many players in the field as possible (because that competition should be good for consumers). First mover advantage is covered by Tesla's trademarks and patents.
Re: (Score:2)
Beating the pants off the Germans and the Japanese
Not really. Tesla had a big month as they cleared a backlog due to delivery problems, but the Nissan Leaf is still the top seller.
All good until... (Score:3, Interesting)
The EV's are no longer EXEMPT from taxes. Gotta pay for all the infrastructure somehow. Eliminate gas vehicles and gas taxes and the money will HAVE to come from somewhere else... Just saying...
Oh and ask the Norwegians what the battery life is in those vehicles with the harsh winters. I live in Wisconsin and our winters make batteries have short lives. I have to buy batteries for vehicles every 3 years. EV's are not a good solution for areas with harsh winter cold temperatures - period! People with their Toyota Prius's are using more gas in them as the batteries don't run as long in the harsh winters - I know 3 people with them. I went kind of in the middle and got a Smart car. The only problem with them is they don't do well on snow and ice covered roads. They are small and lightweight. But I get 50 MPG with it and an 8 gallon gas tank actually gives me a decent driving range.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:All good until... (Score:4, Informative)
It may startle you to learn that the LiPo batteries in electric cars are not grandpa’s old lead acid batteries, not the Prius NiMh either, and that they have different properties.
Re:All good until... (Score:5, Informative)
Presumably you are talking about replacing lead acid batteries every three years.
EV batteries are different. Warranty on most is around 8 years and 100k miles, some offering considerably more. So if it did die after three years you would get a free replacement.
People have been driving around EVs for getting on a decade now in places like Norway, Scotland and northern Japan and the batteries have proven durable. Even something like the original Nissan Leaf which has minimal thermal management for the battery turns out to be fine.
Modern EVs can both heat and cool the battery as required. For very cold climates they can pre-heat before you set off, ideally while plugged in so it doesn't cost you any range.
Norway is the perfect place for EVs (Score:2, Interesting)
- Norway artifically makes ICE cars more expensive and subsidizes EVs with oil money yet people still have trouble finding chargers. They are non-existant in the mountains.
- Norway never goes below -3C
- All of Norway is 1619 km long. We have a completely ice road in Canada that is 750km by comparison.
Norway is basically the perfect place for these cars.
Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs (Score:5, Informative)
- Norway never goes below -3C ... on what planet do yo live?
If you would write:
- Norway never goes below -30C it still would be wrong
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Average temperature is completely irrelevant ... ... because the golf stream hits there the coast. ... so height comes into play, and it stretches up far north, like Alaska.
Norway has hot summers and cold winters.
At the coast there are many towns, especially on the islands, that indeed are always above 0C
However Norway also has "mountains"
If you had looked on a map, then you had no problem judging its temperature.
Re: (Score:3)
Others are saying that it rarely freezes where most people live.
That is not true. The most populous region in Norway is around Oslo. There are about 2M people living within commuting distance to Oslo. This region usually sees a few weeks each winter with temperatures around -10 to -20C throughout the day, with a more common winter temperature of -5 to 0C. Winter is roughly end of december to early/mid march.
Re: (Score:3)
Norway reached -32 last year: https://www.thelocal.no/201802... [thelocal.no]
If we look at somewhere like Troms we see that the AVERAGE minimum temperature is -8 in January: https://weather-and-climate.co... [weather-and-climate.com]
In fact Oslo, in the south, is due to hit -7 on Wednesday, and it's April: https://www.worldweatheronline... [worldweatheronline.com]
Check out Bjorn Nyland's videos on YouTube, he regularly travels through mountain regions in a variety of EVs.
Re:Norway is the perfect place for EVs (Score:5, Informative)
Norwegian Tesla owner here ..
I was out driving in less than -20C here in Norway this winter, so that bit is patently false.
There's plenty of chargers.
Norway might be small area wise, but length wise (south to north) .. think San Diego to Vancouver.
Yes, but it's Europe (Score:3)
Just a reminder about the old joke, that in Europe, 100 miles is a long distance, and in America, 100 years is a long time.
I have nothing bad to say about all-electric cars. But a 300-mile range will not even get to my parents' houses. That's why i can't buy one.
Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... (Score:5, Informative)
Oh, a bit of digging says that they are almost entirely hydroelectric production, so this is an actual real reduction in fossil fuel dependance. Awesome!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Oh, a bit of digging says that they are almost entirely hydroelectric production, so this is an actual real reduction in fossil fuel dependance. Awesome!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
But this is entirely offset by Norway being one of the biggest net contributors to CO2 emissions world wide through their oil exports.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
> But this is entirely offset by Norway being one of the biggest net contributors to CO2 emissions world wide through their oil exports.
Oil is a fungible commodity. If Norway wasn't supplying it, someone else would be (or we'd be burning more natural gas to make up the balance)... so CO2 would not be significantly impacted if they weren't exporting it.
But they are moving away from burning it themselves, which is a net positive. They are also demonstrating viability of the technology, while establishing a
Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... (Score:4, Interesting)
Norway is a massive oil exporter. Every drop of oil they don't burn in cars they export as oil instead. Norway moving to electric cars does nothing at all to reduce the overall problem because they just export the difference.
The demand in oil won't go up over-seas because Norway is exporting a larger % of what they earn. In fact as electric cars are beginning to take a larger share of the market in many places, and power stations switch from using oil, the demand for oil will decrease. It won't go away completely any time soon- but demand for oil is going to drop- and production of oil will drop in many places too- to keep the prices from free falling.
Oil is slowly fading away.
Re:I wonder where their electricity comes from... (Score:5, Insightful)
Every drop of oil not burned in Norway is a drop that might not be burned at all: if not used as fuel, it could instead be used in plastics, lubricants, or petrochemicals.
Re: (Score:2)
With gasoline cars, there is never an end. We have to get rid of diesel trucks and gasoline cars.
Re: (Score:2)
We could produce enough power by plopping down a few nukes. Modern designs that can reuse some of the "spent" fuel we already have lying about.
That would give us the time to perfect all those technologies that are not there yet and incrementally supplant the nukes as time goes by.
What we are doing now is hoping for the lottery jackpot to happen while not wanting to sell auntie Mabel's villa on the hill because it has sentimental value.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gasoline lasts a whole lot more miles per 100kg of fuel, than 100kg of batteries do.
Which only makes sense if you want to ride more than 2000 km without stopping. For all other uses, this is totally irrelevant.
Driver further, get around corners better, break faster.
The last two are purely a design problem, if they actually exist. And most people will never be able to tell the difference.
And you can "recharge" in seconds.
This is only relevant if you are recharging while on a trip. But a normal car sits in a parking lot 22 to 23 hrs a day, time enough for recharging.
And your tank does not get smaller every time you use it.
But the efficiency of your energy conversoin gets worse every time you use it.
And gasoline has no lithium in it. Plus you can actually put the fires out that it causes. :)
This is only relevant for today's bat
Re: (Score:2)
get around corners better, Erm, no? Why would they?
break faster. Erm, no? Why would they?
Re: (Score:2)
Driver further, get around corners better, break faster.
WRONG! The only part of that, that is true (for now) is the Drive further!
Electric cars handle better than ICE. They accelerate faster, CORNER FASTER, can tow more and how they break is entirely dependent car-by-car and often depends on the type of breaks used and the weight of the car. Some electric vehicles are heavier- but electric vehicles also can capture energy from breaking whereas ICE lose the breaking energy as heat.
Electric cars are superior to ICE for everything except for range on a given cha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From what I can tell, turning CO2 back into gasoline using solar power towers in deserts, and "burning" that in fuel cells, is still more efficient than the whole solar-to-hvdc-to-battery-charging-to-battery-using-to-electric-motors procedure.
"More efficient" how? Even just electrolysis+fuel cell with pure hydrogen has a 40% round trip efficiency, and that's even before you try to make a hydrocarbon out of it. "The whole solar-to-hvdc-to-battery-charging-to-battery-using-to-electric-motors" is somewhere around 80% or so.
Re: (Score:2)
Even just electrolysis+fuel cell with pure hydrogen has a 40% round trip efficiency, ... high end systems obviously reaching over 90%.
No, depending how you do it it is between 65% and 70%
No idea where this misconception that fuel cells or electrolysis is inefficient comes from. Must be a 1970s school myth which hold up till today.
If you do it at home with a simple battery and two cables going into water you already are around 70% efficiency ...
Re: (Score:2)
Socialism is Easy when you are an oil-rich country with a low population.
Surely you are talking about the USA?
Re: (Score:2)
Norway is not a socialist country.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Definitely sounds like your average Joe cant afford those. @ $50k US?
The median salary in Norway is more than $60k USD [smartepenger.no], and both adult family members work - so $120k total, pre tax. Compared to fossil cars, you would save on fuel, road pricing and the yearly road tax.
.
Re:Cold climate people are screwed (Score:4, Informative)