Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI Businesses Printer Software Technology

Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That Aims To Remove Signs of Aging (bbc.com) 147

In a video for the BBC, technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones uses Procter and Gamble's new device to maker him look younger. Called Opte, the device scans the skin and precisely applies tiny amounts of make-up to remove age spots, burst blood vessels and other blemishes. Opte has a camera in it that captures 200 frames per second and processes that data by looking at the difference of the color of your skin. It then sends it to a microprocessor and 120 thermal inkjet printers print the product directly on your skin. The company says it works with all skin colors via three different cartridges: light, medium, and dark. Procter and Gamble is planning to release the device in late 2019 or 2020.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That Aims To Remove Signs of Aging

Comments Filter:
  • " the device scans the skin and precisely applies tiny amounts of make-up " = You fuck right off with that.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    " The company says it works with all skin colors via three different cartridges: light, medium, and dark. " What color is your skin? Medium. Oh right.

  • by Scoldog ( 875927 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:29PM (#57941604)
    I have something a lot cheaper that will make you look years younger. It's a nappy and a rattle.
    • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

      Better answer, I don't give one fuck about the whole old I look, I care about how old I feel, how my crappy carcase is handling the very uncomfortable ageing process. I'm already old, you come up with ways of making look young without actually feeling younger, as in physiologically feeling not emotional delusions and I will call you a fucking idiot. How well I recover from the knocks and bruises of life, how will my carcase handles my abuse of it, how well my shit works and if all that shit works, well, you

      • Ah, but looking younger *can* help you feel younger. ...younger women, younger men... whatever your taste. Or at least that seems to be the central, sometimes unspoken, marketing pillar for most of these kinds of products and surgeries.

        • This, and to less extent looking younger means other people would likely treat you as a younger person, so THAT helps some feel younger as well.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    First tech gets invaded by people from the social sciences telling us how bad we are (based on dubious statistical methods), and that it's our fault women don't want to study math.

    Now we have stories on Slashdot about how to look younger. Next week are we going to have a story about how to increase our popularity?
  • by phantomfive ( 622387 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:40PM (#57941630) Journal
    This is really cool tech, micro-makeup application. I can see a use for it, but I never want to use it.

    I don't mind looking old, I mind being old. The appearance isn't the problem.
  • Will it shave my ears, too?

  • Question (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:50PM (#57941680)
    My wife wears a relative minimum of makeup, mostly a little eyeshadow and mascara. Point is, it was never a surprise to see what she looks like in the morning.

    But I'd be interested in what men's reaction was the first time they saw their wife or girlfriend without makeup. Today's style is pretty much flat monocolor. many women even hid their freckles (a mortal sin).

    She does have one friend who's husband has never seen her without. She puts it on in the morning, sleeps in it, then washes her face and goes through it again.

    Just curious - women hiding behind excessive makeup to me is the equivalent of a male wearing a braunschweiger in his pants.

    • Today's style is pretty much flat monocolor. many women even hid their freckles (a mortal sin).

      Someone will hack this thing and use it to, first, apply freckles - as many as you want. The Trill look could be a big thing. Next, they'll use it to apply patterns. Nazca lines. Circuitry. Hell, mix in some metallic powder and they could paint actual circuit traces on their fizzogs (That's a British colloquialism for "face, btw, and probably not what you thought).

      I still want to know if it washes off, or if you can use it like a 3D printer to slowly change your facial geometry and avoid the attention of s

      • Today's style is pretty much flat monocolor. many women even hid their freckles (a mortal sin).

        Someone will hack this thing and use it to, first, apply freckles - as many as you want. The Trill look could be a big thing. Next, they'll use it to apply patterns. Nazca lines. Circuitry. Hell, mix in some metallic powder and they could paint actual circuit traces on their fizzogs (That's a British colloquialism for "face, btw, and probably not what you thought).

        I still want to know if it washes off, or if you can use it like a 3D printer to slowly change your facial geometry and avoid the attention of security cameras.

        In Victorian times, women would give themselves "beauty marks" using silver nitrate. A dab on a swab, and light would darken the silver nitrate. The effect would last several weeks.

        But modern women have beaten you to the whacky! Here's some of the weirdest makeup trends that males have supposedly forced on women. Looks like shit to me, although I laugh too. https://blush.media/the-most-r... [blush.media] https://www.chaostrophic.com/t... [chaostrophic.com] http://www.whiskeyriff.com/201... [whiskeyriff.com]

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Today's style is pretty much flat monocolor. many women even hid their freckles (a mortal sin).

        Someone will hack this thing and use it to, first, apply freckles - as many as you want. The Trill look could be a big thing. Next, they'll use it to apply patterns. Nazca lines. Circuitry. Hell, mix in some metallic powder and they could paint actual circuit traces on their fizzogs (That's a British colloquialism for "face, btw, and probably not what you thought).

        I still want to know if it washes off, or if you can use it like a 3D printer to slowly change your facial geometry and avoid the attention of security cameras.

        Be more interesting to mod tech like this to break facial recognition.

      • Cool idea to subvert it for artistic decoration, but I'm English and I've never heard the word fizzogs in my life.
    • My wife wears a relative minimum of makeup, mostly a little eyeshadow and mascara. Point is, it was never a surprise to see what she looks like in the morning.

      Similar here except that my wife wears no makeup at all most of the time. She has little time and no real interest in painting her face for vanity and she's allergic and/or sensitive to a lot of that stuff anyway. I think she's beautiful with or without makeup so she doesn't have to wear it on my account. If I don't find her attractive in her natural state, no amount of makeup is really going to fix that.

      But I'd be interested in what men's reaction was the first time they saw their wife or girlfriend without makeup.

      If someone is surprised what their lady looks like without makeup then they are involved with a very

      • My wife wears a relative minimum of makeup, mostly a little eyeshadow and mascara. Point is, it was never a surprise to see what she looks like in the morning.

        Similar here except that my wife wears no makeup at all most of the time. She has little time and no real interest in painting her face for vanity and she's allergic and/or sensitive to a lot of that stuff anyway. I think she's beautiful with or without makeup so she doesn't have to wear it on my account. If I don't find her attractive in her natural state, no amount of makeup is really going to fix that.

        Speaking of no makeup - here is Taylor Swift without it: https://i0.wp.com/youmeandtren... [wp.com].

  • If the inkjet like product that is applied to the skin is found to cause cancer (and ultimately does), the product was aimed at older people! If the determination takes longer than 20 years, they may not get sued. Even if it takes less, it will be tied up in litigation for years, and the plaintiffs will all be gone. Either way, there is plenty of profit to be made off of vanity.
    P.S. We already know that it has been found by the state of California to cause cancer, because California has found nearly eve

  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @08:59PM (#57941712)

    We guys aren’t the target demographic.

    • by Rufty ( 37223 )

      I dunno. What CPU is this running? Can I reflash it? Anyone got a repo for the "Star Trek alien" firmware? (Not one of the old ones, obviously.)

      • Anyone got a repo for the "Star Trek alien" firmware?

        I’ve got a general “Star Trek” firmware available as a beta, but you might want to hack at it a bit first before relying on it. Rght now, it keeps trying to color any shirt red.

  • by psperl ( 1704658 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @09:10PM (#57941730) Homepage
    This product lets people use much less makeup while achieving a more natural look. It also helps people who don't know how to apply makeup well. I'm all for this if we see less of the painted-on face look.

    Additionally, cosmetics are regularly scrutinized for containing potentially dangerous chemicals, and this product reduces the amount needed significantly.
  • Does it work on orange skin? Asking for a big wet friend.

  • And speaking of cosmetically enhanced corpses, our political class will flock to this.
  • by Psion ( 2244 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @09:42PM (#57941818)
    How much are refill cartridges, and can I buy third-party refill kits?
  • Back then we called them "beer goggles". As in, "that chick is bufugly" went to "hmm, I'll go for it" in the span of a few hours. I suspect women did the same in reverse, but as I have a dick and failed big time at the game I'm, um, shit I just said I've been a loser all my life. We'll just stop posting here. Seriously, STFU. Do not drink that drink.

    For once I'm (kinda?) glad my blood pressure meds don't let me ", um, get a hard on? No, die sooner? Fukifino. Oh, question. Die or get laid pretty
    • but as I have a dick and failed big time at the game I'm, um, shit I just said I've been a loser all my life.

      No shame in that.

  • Does nobody remember Homer's makeup gun? [youtube.com]

  • by VeryFluffyBunny ( 5037285 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @10:46PM (#57942018)

    The printer itself costs only $50 but the inkjet cartridges cost $1,500 each, & contain all 3 shades; light, medium, & dark. If one shade runs out the machine refuses to print anymore until you've replace the whole cartridge. Cartridges are digitally signed & can't be refilled & used again. Would actually be cheaper to hire a professional make-up artist, plus they'd make you look a lot better.

    BTW, since IT & therefore /. is predominantly male, does it have a drag-queen mode?

  • Am I the only one that feels embarassed for anyone who would actually use such a thing, male or female?
    Have we become so vain and narcissistic that there's actually a market for a device like this?

    ..and you all thought people Photoshopping themselves was bad enough.
    • by N1AK ( 864906 )
      If I was you I'd be more embarrassed about being so out of touch that I don't realise people doing effectively the same thing manually has been going on for millennia and that given the value of the beauty product market it will almost certainly find users.
      • Oh for fuck's sake do you really believe that drivel you just posted? Of course people use makeup since time immemorial, but someone making an automatic machine to do it for you? That probably costs thousands of dollars? It's pathetic if you buy one of these, especially if you're male.
    • by Livius ( 318358 )

      Have we become so vain and narcissistic

      Rhetorical question, right?

  • by ChrisMaple ( 607946 ) on Thursday January 10, 2019 @11:25PM (#57942108)
  • Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That.... applies makeup.

  • "Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That Aims To Hide Signs of Ageing"

    There, fixed that for yer.

  • Why stop at the signs? Why not simply stop the aging all together?

  • She said the ink only prints to blemishes and contains "anti-aging chemicals" so "they should start to fade over time with use of the device." If they have fucking "anti-aging chemicals" why bother with the printer? Are they just calling cell-killing chemicals "anti-aging" and taking advantage of the fact the ink only prints over blemishes while healthy cells can fill in when they die?
  • Cant it give you back the metabolism and energy you had when you were in your 20's or 30's?

    Because otherwise, it's just another makeup scam... making people think that just by very superficially *looking* younger, you could somehow supposedly feel any younger than you actually are, or enjoy the kind of life you had when you were younger.

    Because that is what would be important in the fight against aging... not purely exterior shit like age spots or what have you.

  • The only signs of aging that matter are the decline in physical and mental abilities. If P&G have got a device that can restore muscle mass, sexual stamina, memory and .... I've forgotten what else, then I'm in.

    If it is merely a bit of robot-applied slap then forget it.

    • The only signs of aging that matter are the decline in physical and mental abilities. If P&G have got a device that can restore muscle mass, sexual stamina, memory and .... I've forgotten what else, then I'm in.

      If it is merely a bit of robot-applied slap then forget it.

      It's hilarious how angry people here seem to be that this isn't some sort of immortality treatment.

    • by Shotgun ( 30919 )

      The goal is to convince someone of the opposite that you have sexual stamina, not to actually improve it.

  • Got to admit this is an interesting idea, but it's not doing anything more than lightly applying some colouring to cover a blemish. Something you could do with the tip of a finger and some pan-stick.

    I also expect when these things appear on the market, that the cost of the device and/or the filler will be eye watering. And that when self applied by a person, or in natural light looks less convincing than it might on video.

  • So this new product will incorporate tools from the photographic version like Spot Healing Brush and global color shifting (use the White Balance eyedropper to get rid of that sallow complexion!) But will the Ex-Wife Removal Tool, or Content-Aware Fill as Photoshop calls it, be included?

  • It does not remove age spots, it hids them with makeup. And why is this advertisement on /.?
  • As a hip and trendy middle-aged metrosexual male, I have to ask whether this will cope with my beard? And can gingers expect their freckles to be airbrushed out? Only joking, the concept sounds awesome but I have trouble brushing my teeth in the morning, let alone spending valuable time to look like a gameshow host!
  • Come on, people. This is funny.

  • Can I flip this into reverse and sell 'age up' wipes to teens wanting to buy alcohol?

  • Asking for a friend.

There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann

Working...