Twitter User Hacks 50,000 Printers To Tell People To Subscribe To a YouTube Channel (zdnet.com) 94
An anonymous reader writes: A Twitter user using the pseudonym of @TheHackerGiraffe has hacked over 50,000 printers to print out flyers telling people to subscribe to PewDiePie's YouTube channel. The message the printers received was a simple one. It urged people to subscribe to PewDiePie's YouTube channel in order for PewDiePie -- a famous YouTuber from Sweden, real name Felix Kjellberg -- to keep the crown of most subscribed to YouTube channel.
If this sounds ...odd... it's because over the past month, an Indian record label called T-Series has caught up andsurpassed PewDiePie, once considered untouchable in terms of YouTube followers. The Swedish Youtube star made a comeback after his fans banded together in various social media campaigns, but T-Series is catching up with PewDiePie again.
If this sounds ...odd... it's because over the past month, an Indian record label called T-Series has caught up andsurpassed PewDiePie, once considered untouchable in terms of YouTube followers. The Swedish Youtube star made a comeback after his fans banded together in various social media campaigns, but T-Series is catching up with PewDiePie again.
Printers today, IoT tomorrow (Score:5, Insightful)
Can't "wait" for the inevitable day when Internet of Things devices get mass hacked. Can we start calling them: Insecure of Things or "Insecure on 'Tubes" instead ? :/
Re: (Score:1)
You mean the FSB puppiet Putin I guess, the KGB dies noe exsist any more. I have no problem with you blsming russian inteligence but at least refer to them by a nsme that is not 23 years out of date. And no I’m not affiliated with them or ibdeed any russian organisation (as far as I know). Have a nice day
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, missed that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you may have missed a lot. Not only have we had mass hacked IoT devices causing issues (recently an attack on DNS root servers was brought to you by Chinese internet connected webcams) but we've even had whitehat hackers hacking IoT devices to force them to apply updates to make them more secure, and grey hats hacking the devices to brick them so they stop polluting the web.
I think we covered both here on Slashdot but I'm on time constraints so I'll leave the searching to you :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't "wait" for the inevitable day when Internet of Things devices get mass hacked.
You don't read the news much, do you?
Re:Printers today, IoT tomorrow (Score:4, Interesting)
Can't "wait" for the inevitable day when Internet of Things devices get mass hacked.
It's already happened many times over.
Can we start calling them: Insecure of Things or "Insecure on 'Tubes" instead ? :/
Get with it, grandpa! It's called the Internet of Shit [youtube.com]. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't "wait" for the inevitable day when Internet of Things devices get mass hacked.
That day is here [wikipedia.org]. Mostly they are used in botnets, fwiw.
Re: (Score:2)
Add this to the list (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
of things I care nothing about
Re: Add this to the list (Score:2)
Careful, you might not have paper left to print that list.
Wow (Score:1)
I weep for humanity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Print solid black sheets until the ink is empty.
Re: (Score:1)
Fake Anarchist? You mean, like one that doesn't actually have a real membership?
Re: (Score:2)
This predates 4chan by a long time.
Mass delusion (Score:2)
So, what are you in for? (Score:1)
> I hacked printers to pimp a Youtube channel.
If that doesn't make you someone's bitch I don't know what will.
Like the good old days (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Like the good old days (Score:4, Funny)
I'm out of paper, could you fax me some more?
Re:Like the good old days (Score:4, Funny)
I'm out of paper, could you fax me some more?
I managed to feed the paper in but the machine broke when I tried to feed the shipping box through. It made that same funny cluking sound as it did when I tried to fax that floppy last week.
Some "hack" (Score:5, Insightful)
The only condition was that the printer was connected to the Internet, used old firmware, and had "printing" ports left exposed online.
The hack relies on using automated scripts to send print messages to printers that have IPP (Internet Printing Protocol) ports, LPD (Line Printer Daemon) ports, and port 9100 left open over the Internet.
So in other words... he printed to printers.
Re:Some "hack" (Score:5, Funny)
Considering how many of the people in my office can't print to the printer that's been specifically set up for them, it probably sounds like arcane wizardry to most people.
Re: (Score:2)
I can usually find the right printer, but getting the printout right the first time is pretty hit and miss. You have a 50/50 chance with portrait A4 document, but anything else will probably need several attempts to get the right paper size, orientation, scaling, page selection and collation.
Re: (Score:2)
It's amazing this stuff makes slashdot, especially in it's 'unfiltered' form. TFS is awful, exactly as you point out. The further 'enragement' is that the hacker used Twitter. Shocking indeed. If we ever find out he used blockchain, we could see a financial meltdown to rival the time when some coins fell through a hole in my pocket.
Re: (Score:3)
The only condition was that the printer was connected to the Internet, used old firmware, and had "printing" ports left exposed online.
So in other words... he printed to printers.
Not just that, but the firmware doesn't even have to be old. There's newer printers with LPD support. Naturally, you should disable it.
Re: (Score:2)
That doesn't follow. LPD is a perfectly cromulent printing protocol. What you should do is the same as for all other services on your LAN -- firewall them off from the outside world.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, please let me rephrase that. If you're not using it, you should disable it. What if someone/thing gets loose inside your network?
Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Who or what is a PewDiePie and why should I care? Never heard of him/it so it can't be important.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a whole generation for whom YouTube stars are who they look up to. It's frightening.
Re: (Score:3)
Not any worse than football/basketball stars and movie stars. All have about the same track record of being ahem "quality" role models for out children. Since we idolize them instead of doctors, scientists, etc., the race for the first to spin down the drain picks up pace.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but even football/basketball stars don't constantly have a window at the bottom of their games wearing headphones and narrating the stupid shit you're watching.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Physical strength, dexterity beyond thumb-twitch skill. Balance, the ability to work in team strategy with other players on a real physical field.
Real world stuff you probably wouldn't understand.
Re: (Score:1)
He do have 70 million subscribers.
More than that know about his existence.
If 100+ million people know who you are how isn't that famous?
Maybe not Michael Jackson famous but still pretty famous.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe not Michael Jackson famous but still pretty famous.
He's famous for being famous. Michael Jackson was famous for his musical abilities, and later for his alleged inappropriate interests/conduct with children.
If PewDiePie wants to keep his #1 spot, maybe he should consider fondling a few kids. Anything for the fans, right?
Re: (Score:1)
Originally he wasn't famous though. I assume he become famous for people enjoying watching he play games and possibly for thinking he was cute.
I don't see how it matter why you are famous though. He definitely is famous.
T-series (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Come on now Felix. Be a good sport.
Mystified (Score:1)
I'm baffled.
Re: (Score:1)
How is the number of subscribers one has on YouTube even a thing that people care about?
Everything that's popular/trending on YouTube is utter tripe. The only things worth watching on there are from the handful of content creators who don't give a shit about regularly spewing out clickbait garbage just to keep their rankings up.
It's about YouTube ad revenue (Score:2)
How is the number of subscribers one has on YouTube even a thing that people care about?
You need at least a minimum number of subscribers to be eligible to put ads on your videos. The more subscribers, in theory, the more ad revenue you can earn.
Re: (Score:2)
Easy, more subscribers, more money. PewDiePie, former #1 on YouTube probably easily pulled in a few hundred thousand every month in YouTube money.
If you've got a silver play button (100K subs) you generally can pull in a couple grand a month, not quite enough to live on, so you either have to supplement with a regular job or a Patreon account.
Re: (Score:2)
One major difference is that Twitter can ban a user from its platform, but because email is a protocol as opposed to being a single point of failure, email can't ban a user.
Been there, done that (Score:5, Funny)
Some years ago I quietly programmed one of our office printers to display INSERT COIN when it was idle. This confused one of our summer students, but they all tended to be easily confused. It also caused some consternation when my former boss noticed and asked our sysadmin for an explanation.
...laura
can PewDiePie handle prison / jail or will buy his (Score:2)
can PewDiePie handle prison / jail or will buy his way out? or the very least fight fight extradition??
https://mic.com/articles/10913... [mic.com]
Re: (Score:2)