Lowe's To Sell Off Its 'Under-Performing' Iris Smart Home Automation Business (cepro.com) 119
CIStud shares a report from CE Pro: Giant home improvement retailer Lowe's is giving up on the smart home market. The company announced its "difficult decision" to exit the home automation market and is seeking a buyer for its Iris Smart Home business as part of a "strategic reassessment." The announcement is part of multiple other maneuvers by Lowe's that include closing its Orchard Supply Hardware business, dumping its Alacrity Renovation Service, shutting down all its locations in Mexico, and shutting more than 50 locations in the U.S. and Canada. Lowe's Iris was hailed as the only entry-level home automation system that handled ZigBee, Z-Wave and Wi-Fi when it came out in 2012. Speaking to investors, president and CEO Marvin Ellison [lumped Lowe's Iris in with other initiatives as an] "underperforming... non-core business."
Massively overpriced (Score:5, Insightful)
This is not about the specific product but home automation in general:
Am I just naive or is this whole sector massively overpriced?
I have not yet found a product line that would fit all my home automation needs (like lights, door lock, surveillance cameras, garage door, intrusion detection, shutters, smoke detection, home entertainment control and so on), has a UI that doesn't make you want to pull out your hair by the roots AND is actually affordable.
Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't. And then I keep seeing prices like 20 to 50 bucks a pop.... remember how many switches you need and do the math.
After all this time of home automation being a thing, especially with the smart home appliances Google, Amazon, etc are offering, one would think that doing it yourself with arduino or something comparable could not still be the more versatile and cheaper option. But my gut tells me it is.
So am I being naive or haven I just not yet stumbled upon the right product?
Re:Massively overpriced (Score:5, Interesting)
I have researched this at large, my one intervening factor is that I must have control over the devices (i.e. everything is accessible from my home network and the devices can never reach the internet). Z-wave fit the bill. I've used several z-wave switches and have realized one major issue with any device you are putting in your wall.. these things radiate a lot of heat and thus you want to make sure your devices use top quality components. This cuts out Crestron and Levitron. This leaves you with GE and Eaton. I went with Eaton first, and while their design isn't the greatest, you can tell from the specs that it can handle serious shit. The largest room with lights comes in at half it's rated wattage (700w or something like that). I was tempted with GE due to the lower price point for 3-way switches. Until I realized the second switch isn't really standalone and explains the lackluster power rating. GE has nicer design, but it doesn't export a lot of functionality to z-wave.
I ranted to explain that you get what you pay for. I have no worry of my house burning down and I get pretty granular control over my lights and switches. This did add almost 30% to the cost, so once again it's a situation of buyer beware. I didn't mention other zwave interfaces because they are so dirt cheap that it practically doesn't matter.. garage door openers for $50. locks for $200. automated blinds $50. thermostats around the $100 price point (although with the exception of two, they are all 1990 designs) Then there are the DIY z-wave interfaces that allow you to tuck away controllers into the bowels of your basement, or monitor electricity usage.
-dk
Re:Massively overpriced (Score:5, Insightful)
As for the price of this stuff, isn't the Z-Wave license fee a big part of that? Also: some jackass holds a patent on "instant notification", the idea that if you switch a light on using the wall switch, the central controller is instantly notified of the change rather than learning of it through a periodic status poll. That patent alone adds €s to the price; these days people expect that switches support that functionality. Still, with high prices (higher still in Europe, believe me...) I didn't find the total overall cost to be that daunting. I did spend a few thousand € on fully automating the house, but I do get a much lower heating bill out of it (Z-Wave allows me to control radiators separately in each room, so we only heat the ones that are in use). And the convenience is worth it - even according to the wife, which is the only real yardstick by which to measure such things.
What does surprise me about the home automation market is that a lot of manufacturers seem to think we want shoddy products that look like crap, while the functionality isn't very well thought through: there always seems to be one maddingly missing link that keeps us from doing what we want with them. Fibaro are an exception: I can't speak for their controller but their peripherals work very well, they are designed well and feel like premium products.
Re: (Score:2)
As for the price of this stuff, isn't the Z-Wave license fee a big part of that? Also: some jackass holds a patent on "instant notification", the idea that if you switch a light on using the wall switch, the central controller is instantly notified of the change rather than learning of it through a periodic status poll. That patent alone adds €s to the price; these days people expect that switches support that functionality.
The Z-Wave cost isn't too bad of an adder, and it's coming down. They got bought recently and that should help both the cost and performance. Z-Wave as a stack was great, as a radio it was years behind. Their new owner will fix that since Silabs makes solid radios. If I were to guess Z-Wave will be the one ring that rules them all before it's over.
Re: (Score:2)
Well Amazon bet big on zigbee incorporating it into their echo plus so it will be an interesting battle.
Re: (Score:2)
Never Heard of this Shit (Score:3)
And I'm in Lowe's quite a bit.
Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??
WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.
The surest way to not succeed in business is to shroud your products in mysterious names that do not convey their purpose and obscures how they work.
I guess the Alacrity people would come install this stuff for you? Why would you go to a DIY Home Center to get shot that others would install?
People go to Lowe's to buy hammers, tools, lumber,
Re: (Score:2)
And I'm in Lowe's quite a bit.
Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??
WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.
The surest way to not succeed in business is to shroud your products in mysterious names that do not convey their purpose and obscures how they work.
If your interested in this stuff, you do research and know - same for most other DIY projects. If you don't want to learn anything, you go with one of the all-in-one home automation kits offered buy your cable company, Sams, costco, etc
Re: (Score:2)
I'd do it this way.
* An entire Aisle for Home Automation. Right near the entrance.
* A complete setup for people to play with
* Each part labeled with function and cost.
* An entire webpage on Lowes.com about it, how it works, what it costs an cost savings.
I'd want people who came there for a light bulb to see it and think, "hey, that's cool!".
I wouldn't want to wait for people who are interested. I'd want to MAKE people interested.
Re: (Score:2)
Plus.... ZigBee, Z-Wave, Orchard Supply, Alacrity, Iris ??
WTF is this shit? What does it do? You sure as hell can't tell from the names.
It is like if a car advertised that it can run on pavement, gravel, dirt, even blacktop! Except, instead of saying that, they listed 5 companies that build roads, and said they were compatible with those.
Re: (Score:2)
dunno around here its a big display right in front of the electrical stuff
I have looked at it many times, but cost and compatibility keep me away cause it cost a fuckton and its compatibility is lower than anything else on the market
its hard to argue a 50$ smart outlet when you can get a 3 pack on amazon and it works with iris and 4 other controllers, including the voice command assistants
Re: (Score:2)
If they were using quality components, it already wouldn't generate a lot of heat.
Heat = inefficiency, and it implies they used a low cost, wasteful method of generating the low voltages they need. At quantity it would cost them 50 cents more per unit to use an efficient buck converter; so they don't.
This is a new industry = early adopters = you can't have quality parts unless you agree to pay for 300%+ gross margin for the brand. That's just not going to happen for these types of devices, the convenience t
Re: (Score:2)
Can you share what brand/model for the locks, blinds and thermostats? Thanks in advance.
Re: (Score:2)
Home automation keeps being judged by its silliest uses. Most of us don’t need multicolored floor lamps that we can control remotely. But all homes can benefit from sensors. Your older home was designed before today’s fire safety standards. Is the plumbing subject to leaks? Do wou want ti be advised of breaking glass or opening doors when you’re away from home?
There are a num,her of good HA sensor systems that will give you peace of mind.
Re: (Score:2)
Power saving uses too. Do you need to turn on all the lights in the chandelier or just one when your by yourself?
The home automation stuff really shouldn't be visible if done correctly. I'm not sure why a house would lose character
Re: (Score:2)
Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.
Re: (Score:2)
Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.
Depending on how far you go with automaion, home automation is not in the same ballpark as nice floors (even laminate cost me $5000) or a gas stove (estimates ranged from $3000 - $5000).
I've replaced all of the light switches on the 1st and 2nd floor of my house for less than $500, so now when I go to bed on the 3rd floor, I can push a single button to turn off all of the lights in the house, have timers to turn on the outside lights at sunset, off at sunrise, I get alerted if someone opens the little used
Re: (Score:2)
Those who are not lazy probably realize there is no real value in it. It will not raise the value of your home, will need to be updated regularly. You would be better off getting nice floors and a fire stove.
The networked home automation lights are useless, I agree. What a lot of people are forgetting, though, is plain old standalone motion sensor switches and timers.
We have motion sensor lights with variable timers depending on the location (closets 1min, dining room 20min). I'm lucky that my switch boxes are in good locations for this. My house is huge and walking over to the switch was driving me crazy. The switches I have bought are very sensitive in detecting people, and the dimmer models don't mak
Re: (Score:2)
A low or medium priced home is going to have a pretty standardized price, adding small things won't actually change the value. It would need to be one of the things on the list of things that contribute to value, like flooring, heating, roof, etc.
And a higher priced home, those details will likely get replaced by the buyer.
Fancy switches aren't going to increase home value. The value is in the convenience you get.
Re: (Score:1)
walk into your house
you fail at home automation
Re: Massively overpriced (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is an excellent point. Without standards and, yes, regulation how would you know a home automation system installed by someone else was actually under your complete control?
I have heard of "back doors" being left in nuclear power plants.
If I were buying a house an automation system might not only have negative value to me, but be a show stopper, unless it was removed as a condition of sale.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of it I'd pay $200 to have removed. ;)
Re: (Score:1)
Imagine you're me, and you just push a fucking button.
Imagine all the money I didn't spend on stupid shit, and the time I saved not setting it up.
Re: (Score:2)
You know the old line. Cheap, convenient, secure: pick any two.
If you want a well-designed system, you need to pay for it in either dollars or privacy. I recommend dollars.
Re: (Score:2)
Convenient/Secure are direct tradeoffs, so you only listed two things. And obviously you can't have them both.
That only gets you to choosing between making it cheap, or getting to select the security/convenience tradeoffs.
In the standard formulate, "fast, good, cheap; choose two" they're talking about the development process more than the product. All the product traits are bundled into the "good" part; if you want a good product, you have to either take a long time to engineer it, or else spend a lot of mo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.
Sure, if you don't count the R & D and engineers' salaries. And setup costs with the off-shore manufacturer. And any licensing fees for protocols like Z-Wave / Zigbee. And cost of getting it UL-certified. And the cost of shipping it from China (or wherever it's being made) to the US. And the % the retailer will charge you to sell it on Amazon, eBay, or in a brink and morter like Lowe's or
Re: (Score:2)
Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.
Sure, if you don't count the R & D and engineers' salaries. And setup costs with the off-shore manufacturer. And any licensing fees for protocols like Z-Wave / Zigbee. And cost of getting it UL-certified. And the cost of shipping it from China (or wherever it's being made) to the US. And the % the retailer will charge you to sell it on Amazon, eBay, or in a brink and morter like Lowe's or Home Depot. And any post-sale support / handling returns and exchanges when a customer can't figure out how to get it to work with their network or is just unlucky enough to receive a bad one. And oh yeah, some type of profit margin after all of this.
Yeah, 3 bucks sounds right. You should totally do it!
Let's assume you're correct, that the GP's math is off, and with all of the R&D/admin/retail markup, it's closer to $15/switch. That still means that $50/switch is more than triple the production cost. Moreover, if you're doing light switches, ten packs should help to amortize that far better...but they're not much of a savings even if it is possible to get that sort of a quantity back without going to a wholesaler.
Moreover, the underlying issue is not *only* cost, but the fiefdoms. I've got a bunch of
Re: (Score:2)
There is special UL testing for lighting; it is super-cheap. It gets tested, because insurance, but it is excepted from most rules.
They wrote the rules so that when you build an LED light bulb, even though it has a circuit board with computers on it, it doesn't get any of the emissions testing for electronics; it is tested the same way that an incandescent bulb is tested. It has a power supply in it, you can't run LEDs without one, but it doesn't get the testing normally required for power supplies where th
Bad financial incentives (Score:2)
I have not yet found a product line that would fit all my home automation needs (like lights, door lock, surveillance cameras, garage door, intrusion detection, shutters, smoke detection, home entertainment control and so on), has a UI that doesn't make you want to pull out your hair by the roots AND is actually affordable.
As the saying goes, you can have it good, fast, or cheap. Pick two. I agree that home automation tech to date is a clusterfuck of incompatible standards, sketchy hardware, poor security practices, and godawful interfaces. The problem is that they sell you a device but have no further incentives to actually keep it up to date or to use good network security practices or to actually make something that works well. They just are incentivized to sell you something Good Enough to buy it and don't give a shit
Re: (Score:2)
A big part is expectations-- a point for a commercial install will generally run $1,000 for parts, smarts, and install. Residential is generally much lower, closer to $150-200 all told.
I use Insteon, which is about $50 per control point for parts. I use a Universal Devices ISY994i which is about $300 with networking support and z-wave plus the Insteon power line modem. The setup can be completely firewalled from the Internet. I use it to control line voltage lights via plug or dimmer, Philips Hue lights,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I never found home automation all that appealing myself and not worth the effort.
There is a few things I would like automating most of which you stated.
I would like to double check to make sure the locks on my door are in place, turn on or off some key lights, and perhaps preheat the oven at a temperature.
However a lot of the stuff I see such as washing machines which you can start automatically is kinda stupid. Because it cannot load itself and unload itself. Thus needing manual intervention anyways.
A lot
Re: (Score:2)
Because let's be honest, a wireless light switch does not cost more than 3 bucks to produce. It just doesn't.
Actually, it just does. As someone who has been intimately involved in this area the cost is >$3. It's often >$6. And that's just the cost, not including any profit. They could focus on making something that would cost less but have no security, not unlike the one way security sensors of old. But then you'd likely complain about the lack of security ;-)
exactly right (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
YES! So overpriced. I have X-10 controllers and modules that I got in the 80s. I would love to retire this outdated protocol for something modern. When I look for replacements, I am shocked at how horribly overpriced everything is (except for some of the base units that seem reasonably priced).
I priced out a replacement for the modules I use to control my Christmas lights. It would have been over $700 just to do that. Are you kidding me? When X-10 was released, it was marketed to everyone (I discovered it
I guarantee (Score:2)
Vivint will take it over.
The whole automation is missing the point (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's look at light switches. What's the main requirement for a light switch? Yep, being able to reliably operate it blindly in the dark. Amazingly enough, quite a few vendors fail this. For example, GE ZigBee switches have almost a one second delay between pressing the switch and light coming on. Sounds trivial but it's actually quite a significant problem.
Let's look at smart outlets next. What is the requirement here? Simple, being able to replace existing outlets in existing electric boxes. Again, there are barely any products capable of doing this.
I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.
Re:The whole automation is missing the point (Score:5, Interesting)
I think the automation industry is expecting too much from their investments in the industry that have very thin margins already. And too early in the market. And missing the point as well, like the connected home appliance manufacturers usually do. Automation should make living in and maintaining the property easier instead of adding complexity and cost where there was none before.
Where are my moisture sensors in the concrete to automatically warn and measure damages from leaks? Where is the automatic traffic warning system that warns the maintenance crews in a large apartment complex from blocking the emergency drive ways so that the local resident board member wouldn't have to call the administrator, who calls the maintenance company or the contractor about the potential threat to the lives of the elderly residents? Where are the p2p connected reservation systems that enable turn based access to shared resources like the laundry machines without the monthly charge from the telecom, the cloud and the service companies?
Instead I can surf the internet with my fridge.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
and a sycophantic obsession on cloud dependence on requiring a connection to the vendors proprietary cloud offering else the hardware becomes a brick, stop it, people don't want to throw away hardware because a company went out of business or a product line got the axe from a merger.
Re: (Score:1)
Where are my moisture sensors in the concrete to automatically warn and measure damages from leaks? Where is the automatic traffic warning system that warns the maintenance crews [...]?
I'd wager that many of these sorts of things have been killed by pinheaded bureaucrats.
Posting as AC since I don't know how much of this is public, but some friends of mine did work recently for a sensor suite that was to be installed on all Texas Department of Transportation (TxDot) maintenance vehicles. The system was designed to identify potholes, spot poorly marked lanes, recognize guardrail damage, etc. and log it all in a TxDot database, with the idea being that as TxDot vehicles were driving around,
Re: (Score:3)
This is fine for lighting in your living room or whatever, but kind of useless for lighting in a utility room or bathroom or what have you. I like the home setup I have but it's definitely incomplete - I would like straightforward on/off switches to be easily available.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Should add - I'm in the UK and use LightwaveRF kit. Works well, but pure on/off is more complex and requires various relay installs etc.. I'd like a simple switch unit that is pure binary on/off, not dimmer. The reasons are as above - automation of things that do not accept dimming bulbs,
Ah, sounds like what you want is a light switch. Easy to use too, just walk up to it and touch it and the light will change to state it's not currently in. Brilliant technology and cheap to boot.
https://www.screwfix.com/p/mk-... [screwfix.com]
Re: (Score:2)
On a scale of 1 to world peace the problem is more at the 0.00001 level, but in the realm of home automation? I'm finding it limiting.
Re: (Score:2)
YES. And this illustrates the way that the industry doesn't understand itself.
You have a home automation system. You can dim your own damn lights. You don't need a dimmer slide on the switch. Just put a big, normal rocker switch on there with two positions. When it changes positions, you flip the state of the lights. If we want dim, we'll tell Alexa or Google to dim, or we can but a dimmer for the ROOM which is just a data presenter to the controlling hub -- and we can make that control a SET of switc
Re: (Score:2)
Alex has more like a 50% failure rate for my family. But there are alternatives, including buttons. The point is still the same -- we have all sorts of high-level systems to control the lights. The switches themselves do not need to present them.
Re: (Score:1)
The reason that you're finding it so hard to find non-dimmers in the UK is that we typically don't have a neutral wire in our lighting circuits.
With a dimmer, even when it's turned off it still allows a tiny vampiric current through the circuit - this is to keep the device powered and listening for commands. This current can occasionally be enough to make the bulbs react, which is why most dimmers recommend the inclusion of a bypass in the circuit.
With relays, and a hard on/off decision, there can be no vam
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.
Sounds like overkill. There's not much choice in switches, agreed, but the ones I use (Z-Wave from Düwi, Zwave.me and Fibaro) all have a local switch that turns the lights on and off pretty much instantly, even when the Z-wave network is down or the switch is not configured. The Fibaro modules can be wired to work with my existing mechanical switches, sitting behind it (a tight fit to be sure), and that also work instantly, though the module does need to be configured for that to work. I'd love some
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
GE ZigBee switches have almost a one second delay between pressing the switch and light coming on.
Yes, the stock firmware has that bug. Although I seem to recall it was the GE dimmers that did that - not the GE switches.
It was one of the first thing we fixed in our custom firmware (we deploy them in businesses/hotels).
I agree that a plain rocker-type switch would be preferable for switches instead of the springy-rocker-two-button thing. I think that an actuator would add too much cost. But hey -at least it is not as bad as the touch-sensitive flat glass panales some switches/dimmer have.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'll check with my boss and get back to you (I'm not 100% sure what the license terms were).
Out of curiosity: how many GE Zigbee switches/dimmers do you have?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My boss is all for sharing but have to look into if there is any liability. That'll take a few days.
Please email me at isj-firmware AT i1.dk so we can stay in contact.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. I think this is because there are too many players trying to grab the whole pie, which is impossible.
We just need a simple, expandable open standard. If you make a wifi switch, the z-wave guys are not going to buy you. If you make a z-wave one, the zigbee folks won't buy you. So the market is already divided by at least three (probably unequal) parts. A device made for this arena cannot sell as well as a dumb device. This sabotages the vendors from the start.
Because of this there's not much c
Re: (Score:2)
I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.
I'll save you some time, it's already been done.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm seriously considering funding a development of the wireless light switch done right - it'll behave like a regular switch but will have a mechanical actuator to flip it remotely.
That's not even close to "done right." It is wasteful, and has fire-starting failure modes. Worse, any low-cost models will have high peak current that will throw people's circuit breakers. The actuators will use more power than the lights!
If you want those features without it sucking, you need to build a separate power distribution system into the home, that just does the lighting, has limited power, and uses solid state relays, and soft switches. You can't use the solid state relays on circuits that suppo
Re: (Score:2)
The power draw is negligible, actuator is only used during switching. The fire-starting modes are the same as in the regular switch - the almost-open contacts that just barely touch, creating a high-resistance path. The ways to work around this are straightforward (make sure the actuator can't latch on, use the tried-and-true mechanical design).
Re: (Score:2)
If you want those features without it sucking, you need to build a separate power distribution system into the home, that just does the lighting, has limited power, and uses solid state relays, and soft switches. You can't use the solid state relays on circuits that support full power, and you can't have mechanical actuators+fire safety without also spending a lot of money. And you probably don't even want AC; maybe a 12V lighting circuit, controlled directly by the digital meter.
USB-PD?
I'm rolling my own now (Score:3)
Simply and plainly because there is not a single home automation system offered that isn't
- insecure as all hell
- phoning home even the most trivial things
- a combination of the two above, i.e. hands some company my house keys (and whoever else that manages to breach their nonexistent security)
- more expensive than the house it's supposed to automate
- simply and plainly broken out of the box
or a combination of all of them.
I know, home automation is still a rather new thing, but frankly, if I with my hobbyist level knowledge of mesh networking, sensors and embedded development can come up with a faster, cheaper, more robust and more secure solution that ANY of the systems I have seen so far, you know something's not right.
Re: (Score:2)
I would recommend looking into the Universal Devices ISY994 and Insteon line if you have a spouse. Keeps the marriage going better... doesn't leak data.
Re: (Score:2)
About 300 bucks for a device that offers the functionality of a RasPi.
We're at the price issue again.
Re: (Score:2)
Get a refurb unit for $99. While you can bit-bang a serial modem, it is a heck of a lot more painless for something that abstracts links and addresses for you. Just depends on scale though. One light that you want on at dusk and off at dawn is no big deal to script on a Pi.
I used to feel the same way, but so many little things are so much simpler. It pissed me off to pay $50 for the functional equivalent of 'curl' in a network license... but after a month of dealing with stupid issues on the Pi, I broke
Try the ELK M1 Gold platform (Score:3)
Smartthings now Hubitat HE (Score:2)
I looked at the Iris - The impression I got was they were really focused on their own line of devices which made me assume incorrectly that it was more proprietary than it was and I also wasn't impressed with the interface. Instead I opted for the SmartThings platform and ran that for a few years but have now switched to the Hubitat Elevation. Local control is best in life.
Lowes Going the Way of Sears (Score:2, Informative)
Lowes is circling the drain... they are quickly learning that the approach for Walmart does not work for home improvement stores. They cannot keep staffing Lowes stores with Walmart-grade employees who can't even tie their own shoes, let alone have a discussion about wire gauge vs. ampacity or concrete pressure ratings.
3 stooges, back to the future, and cartoons (Score:1)
Do I need more? (Score:3)