Mac Mini Teardown Reveals User-Upgradable RAM, But Soldered Down CPU and Storage (macrumors.com) 242
iFixit has released their teardown of the new Mac mini, providing a look inside the portable desktop computer. Some of the notable findings include user-upgradable RAM and soldered CPU and SSD. Mac Rumors reports: While the RAM in the previous-gen Mac mini from 2014 was soldered to the logic board, the new Mac mini has user-upgradeable RAM, as discovered earlier this week. As seen in older iMacs, the RAM is protected by a perforated shield that allows the memory modules to operate at a high frequency of 2666 MHz without interfering with other device functions, according to iFixit. To upgrade the RAM, the shield can be removed by unfastening four Torx screws.
Other silicon on the logic board of this particular Mac mini includes the Apple T2 security chip, a 3.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i3 processor, Intel UHD Graphics 630, 128GB of flash storage from Toshiba, an Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 controller, and a Gigabit Ethernet controller from Broadcom. Despite the good news about the RAM, the CPU and SSD are soldered to the logic board, as are many ports, so this isn't a truly modular Mac mini. iFixit awarded the new Mac mini a repairability score of 6/10, with 10 being the easiest to repair, topping the latest MacBook Air, MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac, and iMac Pro, and trailing only the 2013 Mac Pro.
Other silicon on the logic board of this particular Mac mini includes the Apple T2 security chip, a 3.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i3 processor, Intel UHD Graphics 630, 128GB of flash storage from Toshiba, an Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 controller, and a Gigabit Ethernet controller from Broadcom. Despite the good news about the RAM, the CPU and SSD are soldered to the logic board, as are many ports, so this isn't a truly modular Mac mini. iFixit awarded the new Mac mini a repairability score of 6/10, with 10 being the easiest to repair, topping the latest MacBook Air, MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac, and iMac Pro, and trailing only the 2013 Mac Pro.
Soldered CPU? (Score:5, Insightful)
There might be a point to be made regarding the SSD; but aren't we getting a bit ridiculous, expecting a socketed CPU in a computer the size of a ham sandwich?
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
aren't we getting a bit ridiculous, expecting a socketed CPU in a computer the size of a ham sandwich?
no.
there are other computers, "the size of a ham sandwich", costing much less with much better specifications btw, which can be upgraded.
Re: Soldered CPU? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Soldered CPU? (Score:5, Interesting)
If you actually want to do something with it, Mini-ITX makes a lot more sense, lots of AM4/Ryzen motherboards available for cheap. Stick in a 2600 for a highly respectable compact PC.
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe 2400G to fit in a tiny case. Some decent onboard vega punch and just say no to Apple's external GPU, what a bad idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe 2400G to fit in a tiny case. Some decent onboard vega punch and just say no to Apple's external GPU, what a bad idea.
External GPUs are a fantastic idea. Reduce the number of configurations of the computer (reducing costs), and allows you sell another accessory at good margin (increasing revenue). You're just looking from the wrong perspective.
Ugh (Score:2)
FTFY.
External GPUs are just more insecure, mechanically-at-risk, wire-nest making desk turds.
Re: (Score:2)
External GPUs are a fantastic idea.
Please explain to me the logic of getting a mini then sticking a bunch of peripherals onto it to make up for its defects, making it not mini after all, instead a mass of cables taking up deskspace all for a stupid amount of budget.
External GPU, what a bad idea. (Score:2)
Oh, you mean the people who are removing audio jacks, putting notches in phones, going without memory card slots on phones and pads, and puking out designs like Apple's trashcan? The ones that want to litter our desks with cords and wall warts and little boxes? The ones that pulled magsafe off of laptops? The ones that obsoleted PPC binaries by dropping the "we'll keep your stuff running PPC-on-Intel engine"? Those people?
Huh.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, just the people who think those things are good.
Got it.
That's nonsense. Rosetta can still be run in a VM (and yes, I do run it in a VM, so I'm quite sure.) If those companies wanted to rest on their laurels, they certainly could. But they didn't, so your entire thesis here is nonsensical.
Re: (Score:2)
So where, pray tell, in a case like that, is a Vega going to find sufficient cooling?
Dumbass, the 2400G has Vega on board.
Re: (Score:2)
That is a COMPONENT in a computer, NOT A COMPUTER!!!
WTF? You're seriously claiming the 2400G isn't a computer? Four Zen cores, sorry I had to explain it in one syllable words. Hey maybe you better just keep your mouth shut when it comes to anything technical. Or just keep your mouth shut period.
it has a TDP OF 100W
Wipe the drool off your chin. It's configurable 45 - 65 watts. [wikipedia.org]
And that's my point. Mac Mini is a piece of shit, it's thermally challenged for anything serious and stupidly overpriced for low power roles a NUC does perfectly well. Why did Apple even bother, oh right, b
Re: (Score:2)
Even an Apple thug like you knows the I-mac mini is an overpriced piece of shit that nobody needs.
Re: (Score:2)
I see you're not even trying to defend the indefensible.
BTW, you are obsessed with my posts, are you ok?
Re: (Score:2)
Got your attention, haven't I.
Re: (Score:2)
So where were we with the Apple meltdown? Right, down 5% today. And 15% for the month. Because I-phone suppliers had their orders cut.
Who is right? :)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple slimeball just can't tear his eyes away from my posts. I hope you own AAPL stock. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Just kidding, you don't own anything.
Re: (Score:3)
No matter how you slice it (Score:3)
There are more ham sandwich sizes in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Re: (Score:2)
You could easily put together a Mini ITX PC that was the same size as a Mac Mini...for quite a bit less money and with better specs.
I doubt you could fit in a power supply in the 2cm X 2cm area that is difference between a mini-itx case and the Mac Mini footprint.
Re: Soldered CPU? (Score:2)
In my reality the Mac Mini is 3.6 cm tall and the inside of one is not empty space. There are other components like fans that take up space.
Also in reality very few case manufacturers make an itx case as small as a Mac Mini. The Silverstone PT13 comes close; however, you have to use a special itx board and SO-DIMM and must use specific CPU fans.
The only models that really compete with the Mac Mini are Intel NUCs but they are custom boards with soldered CPUs. So before you accuse someone of being a shill, I
Re: (Score:2)
Which is a motherboard, not a computer from an OEM. Any DIY computer will be cheaper than an OEM (i.e. not just Apple). So, got a real example?
Re: (Score:2)
Not even remotely close, Hateboi.
So, still no example of an equivalent product selling for less money (or offering much better specs). If Apple sucks so bad that would be easy for you to do....
Re: (Score:2)
So, still no example of an equivalent product selling for less money (or offering much better specs). If Apple sucks so bad that would be easy for you to do....
Re: (Score:2)
Still learning that it's the job of the person making the assertion to back up said assertion?
"That which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence" - Christopher Hitchens
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like typical lazy Hateboi projection. Y'know, if Apple sucks so bad and there are so many equivalent products for far lower prices, it would be easy for you to find one...but all you got is Hatorade.
Re: (Score:2)
Whines the hater with completely irrational feelings towards a company who's products he's free not to buy. And whines some more about valid arguments when he can't provide an example to back up his assertion.
Re: Soldered CPU? (Score:2)
I suppose the "ham sandwich" could be the size of the pizza box enclosure a Sun Sparcstation 20 came in. It's the same or a similar form factor.
Re: Soldered CPU? (Score:2)
Wow, the literal use of fishing jargon by an infamous troll.
Re: (Score:2)
What, Hitchens? That the guy was a racist warmonger does nothing to change the fact that his simple quote is a direct, easy answer to the lazy people who say "don't believe me? Google it!"
Re: (Score:2)
No problem - I wish I'd come up with it, but thus the citation. The context was Hitchens debating creationists and getting fed up with them saying 'XYZ is true because the Bible says so!'
Hmmm, tenderloin...
Re:Soldered CPU? (Score:5, Insightful)
both cpu and ssd soldering have only one goal: to make money
simply look at what premium prices apple charges for ssds and ram,...
Re: (Score:3)
Wow! And you say Apple is trying to make money? Those bastards!!
Re:Soldered CPU? (Score:4, Informative)
There's a difference between a company making an honest amount of money, and a company gouging their customer base. Looking at Apple Canada's site today (because I'm in Canada) I see that going from 128GB of storage to 256GB on the new Mini Apple is charging $240 CDN. Like fuck right off - dozens of brand new 256GB m2 SSDs on newegg.ca are selling for between $100-$120. For the whole 256GB, not an "upgrade". Apple is making at least a $180 of pure profit off that $240. That's horseshit.
Re: Soldered CPU? (Score:2)
Some of us are happy to pay a premium for hardware and software that doesnâ(TM)t look like dogshit.
Indeed - there are cheaper ways to go. Iâ(TM)m happy to pay for good hardware - and it turns out, you can make a lot of money writing software for people who are willing to pay for things.
Thereâ(TM)s another end of the calculation youâ(TM)re too short sighted to see, and thatâ(TM)s cost recovery - I flip Apple stuff every 18 months or so and recover most of my funds. That cheaper stuff
Re: (Score:2)
> Indeed - there are cheaper ways to go. Iâ(TM)m happy to pay for good hardware
So happy you're not posting in the standard ANSI character set? There is paying for good hardware and then there is OVERpaying. And that's what you're doing. If Intel can fit m2 slots into a NUC that is 1/4 the size of a Mac Mini, Apple could do it too. They just chose not to because they know their fanbase will happily pay them too much money. Courageous even, according to Tim Cook.
> . Enjoy your Chinese smartpho
Re: (Score:2)
Look at the connector density between a socketed chip (lands for Intel) and a BGA chip ((solder)balls) and be enlightened. Apple have some obsession to make things smaller, going with a soldered BGA reduces build height and area. It also reduces build costs and can reduce some forms of malfunctions.
Re: (Score:3)
both cpu and ssd soldering have only one goal: to make money
Not so fast. ALL my failures have been portability, misuse and abuse related. Reliability is tantamount and no computer manufacturer exceeds Apple's reliability. That's right on target with soldered down. I concede that soldered CPU is throwaway motherboard should it should fail. BUT since 1975 I've never experienced a CPU failure over the span of mainframe, mini, desktop, laptop nor iDevice.
It's not the CPU that concerns me (Score:2)
SSD memory, however... that is a point of failure unless it is superseded by an external drive. And this machine has it soldered in.
Re: (Score:2)
Reliability is tantamount and no computer manufacturer exceeds Apple's reliability.
Tantamount to what?
In writing, clarity is important. One might even say it's paramount.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just because you lack the skill to desolder a cpu doesn't make it unrepairable. We have techs at work that do it all the time.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't really matter, this thing is way too expensive for anybody to want it. What is Apple thinking, I love it.
You want a small computer, get a NUC. You want a decent computer don't get a mini.
Re: (Score:2)
You want a small computer, get a NUC.
Seriously. They're using real CPUs, upgradable, and you can get the VESA brackets to stick 'em on the back of your display if space is at a premium. They're also available in a wide range of performance/price specs to meet most needs.
Re: (Score:2)
They're available with the same USB3 and Thunderbolt ports as the Macs are. Sure, if you have a need for 4 Thunderbolt ports you might be out of luck, but I'm betting there are going to be very few people for whom that's worth the price premium. Additionally, lower-cost variants are available for those that don't need TB at all.
Re: (Score:2)
The mini appears to have a USB 3, an HDMI, four Thunderbolt 3, and an Ethernet port. The first NUC I looked at on Newegg has four USB 3.1, two USB 2.0, an HDMI, one Thunderbolt 3, and Ethernet. It also has a microSDXC port, and sockets for CPU as well as SATA and M.2 internal drives in a 4.4 x 4.6 x 2.5 in. case. I know which I would find more useful.
Re: (Score:2)
So buy it and STFU.
Nice try. Simply dismiss that which you cannot defend against. Now where have I heard this before?
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't dismiss anything. Your statement "And almost no I/O". was provably false. I showed that it was false, and I guess you can't handle that. Go argue somewhere else, kid.
Re:Soldered CPU? (Score:5, Interesting)
There might be a point to be made regarding the SSD; but aren't we getting a bit ridiculous, expecting a socketed CPU in a computer the size of a ham sandwich?
"Ridiculous" left conversations about Apple hardware long ago. Apple went right past Ludicrous (too "Tesla-y") and went straight to Asinine mode in the last few years, and dismissive attitudes are why we now have soldered CPUs. Soon, people will be dismissing soldered hard drives and memory as "expected", and this mentality will infect every other company selling hardware.
A top-of-the-line Mac Mini (that still had user-replaceable storage and memory) was barely over $1000 in 2012. A top-of-the-line Mac Mini is now over $4000, and Apple labels this as their "entry-level" model. Speaking of memory upgrades, that'll cost you $1400 for 64GB of Apple memory. You've got to be fucking kidding me. If the CPI was tied to this company's profit margins, millionaire would describe poverty.
Not sure what I despise more; Apple's greed, or the consumers who demand it.
Re: (Score:2)
A top-of-the-line Mac Mini is now over $4000, and Apple labels this as their "entry-level" model.
You are being ridiculous. The "top-of-the-line" Mac Mini is so expensive because it can be upgraded to 64 GB Ram / 2TB SSD. Would it make you happier if it could be upgraded to 32GB / 1TB only for much less money?
BTW. You can upgrade the RAM yourself, and there are four thunderbolt parts where you can attach the fastest and biggest SSD drives you can find.
Re:Soldered CPU? (Score:4, Informative)
The "top-of-the-line" Mac Mini is so expensive because it can be upgraded to 64 GB Ram / 2TB SSD.
No it's expensive because they can overcharge for the 64GB of RAM and a 2TB SSD.
It took a couple of minutes on google to find a pair of 32GB sodimms of the right frequenct for about $650. A really good 2TB ssd is similar.
and there are four thunderbolt parts where you can attach the fastest and biggest SSD drives you can find.
It's not so much mini at that point as mini-but-with-a-bunch-of-shite-plugged-in.
Re: (Score:2)
A top-of-the-line Mac Mini is now over $4000, and Apple labels this as their "entry-level" model.
You are being ridiculous. The "top-of-the-line" Mac Mini is so expensive because it can be upgraded to 64 GB Ram / 2TB SSD. Would it make you happier if it could be upgraded to 32GB / 1TB only for much less money? BTW. You can upgrade the RAM yourself, and there are four thunderbolt parts where you can attach the fastest and biggest SSD drives you can find.
Mac Minis are not meant to be massive performance machines regardless of their configuration. The 2018 model is no different than the 2012 model in this regard (other than the now asinine price). A 2TB SSD option for $1400? Is that supposed to impress me in 2018? And a 32GB/1TB configuration is still almost $2000.
Re: (Score:2)
Soon, people will be dismissing soldered hard drives and memory as "expected", and this mentality will infect every other company selling hardware.
I remember when it was "expected" for a computer to have a built in modem. Before (and after) that people were "expected" to buy one as an external additional cost accessory if they wanted one. I remember when people "expected" an optical drive in their computers, are you still mad at Apple for not including that as standard equipment on their computers? I'm not sure if kids these days even know that a CD or DVD were used in computers, I mean other than to play music and movies on them.
A top-of-the-line Mac Mini (that still had user-replaceable storage and memory) was barely over $1000 in 2012. A top-of-the-line Mac Mini is now over $4000, and Apple labels this as their "entry-level" model.
That was 4 cores a
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if kids these days even know that a CD or DVD were used in computers
Or that the writable CD drive that costs $25 to include in a new build was once a hulking, $10,000 external peripheral that we could only lust after.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember when people "expected" an optical drive in their computers, are you still mad at Apple for not including that as standard equipment on their computers?
It's amazing you remember what people expected but completely ignore why they expected it. That oversight makes your entire comment incredibly dumb.
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't like it then don't buy one.
Until you no longer can because there is no choice at any vendor.
As your post demonstrates, today's tech industry is full of fans who don't realize they are proverbial boiling frogs. Long gone are the days of choice. We lose hardware and convenient models are retired while the prices just stall for years or rise (texas graphing calculators, anyone?).
Small form factor products (minis, tablets, phones) are a window into the PC market's future. We will be running tpm locked down OSs and mobile apps on our desk
Re: (Score:2)
I remember when people "expected" an optical drive in their computers, are you still mad at Apple for not including that as standard equipment on their computers? I'm not sure if kids these days even know that a CD or DVD were used in computers, I mean other than to play music and movies on them.
Perhaps you should sit and ponder about this. You might find that you answered your own question.
A top-of-the-line Mac Mini (that still had user-replaceable storage and memory) was barely over $1000 in 2012. A top-of-the-line Mac Mini is now over $4000, and Apple labels this as their "entry-level" model.
That was 4 cores and seven years ago. Also with that money comes a computer with ThunderBolt 3, 10Gb Ethernet, SSD, and far more RAM. Apparently some people believe it's worth the price.
I didn't even bother to include the 10Gb Ethernet option (winner for Most Pointless Feature) when configuring a $4000+ Mac Mini.
Thunderbolt 3 (runner-up for Most Pointless Feature) only impresses people who want to pay an equally asinine price for some peripheral that likely doesn't even justify that proprietary connection. No doubt it can perform. No doubt you're gonna pay a shitload of money to actually use
Re: (Score:2)
We're not in the '90s anymore, big breakthroughs in performance are not going to happen. There is no point in upgrading. We need reliable tools and that's what we, the majority of consumers, want. You nerds can wank off to raspies and other crap kit.
If you truly feel there's "no point" in supporting user-replaceable options, then tell me the fucking point of paying Apple $1400 for 64GB of Apple memory. Or $1400 for a 2TB SSD.
You're right. We're not in the 90's anymore. In the 90's, I didn't have to get a "gig" job just to afford this shit.
And consumers don't give a shit about reliability. If they did, they would demand their most expensive electronic investment (smartphones) have user-replaceable batteries to make them last more than a fucking yea
Re: (Score:3)
And consumers don't give a shit about reliability. If they did, they would demand their most expensive electronic investment (smartphones) have user-replaceable batteries to make them last more than a fucking year or two.
I doubt people are buying new phones every year or two because the battery is losing capacity. I'm guessing it's because they simply wanted a phone with more features. You are probably right about people not being concerned about the phone being reliable as they buy a phone knowing in advance they'll just trade it in for a new one next year.
I suspect that phone makers stopped offering user replaceable batteries because few people demanded them. There was a time when phones with replaceable batteries were
Re: (Score:3)
Do you have a source for 32GB DDR-4 SO-DIMMs for less than $700 each?
Because I can't find any for sale at all, much less find them for less than Apple is charging.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have a source for 32GB DDR-4 SO-DIMMs for less than $700 each?
Crucial sells 128GB (looks like one chip) DDR-4 chips for $3,299. No 64GB or 32GB chips on sale. Didn't check what form factor (SO-DIMM or else) they were.
Re: (Score:2)
What? 32GB DDR-4 SO-DIMMs Should cost around 200-300$. Wtf are you smoking.
Idiot. Read what I posted: I checked the Crucial website for 32GB DDR-4 chips, and they had _none_ on their website. If you say they should cost $200 - $300, post where you get them. And I mean not chips with "32 GB" printed on them, but chips with 32 working GB inside.
Re: (Score:3)
And consumers don't give a shit about reliability. If they did, they would demand their most expensive electronic investment (smartphones) have user-replaceable batteries to make them last more than a fucking year or two.
Users do care about reliability -- they just define "reliability" differently than you do.
What users want (and generally, these days, get) is a phone that reliably wakes up whenever they want it to, does the things they want to do quickly and without fuss, and doesn't run out of battery before they put it on its charger and go back to sleep.
If the phone's battery starts to wear after 3-5 years and has diminished capacity, that's fine -- they don't see that as "unreliability", because they knew in advance th
Re: (Score:2)
Cotton Candy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
I know you can use a 4K screen as a monitor to a smartphone using a special HDMI cable.
Re: (Score:2)
Lenvo sells their Tiny-In-One line that does much of what you describe, including sharing the power supply. I've also seen 3rd party "hacks" that will mount a Mac Mini behind a screen. Maybe calling it a "hack" is unkind, they look very nice and not like something hacked together. There's stuff out there that do this.
Re: (Score:2)
Storage fumble (Score:5, Interesting)
The CPU isn't much of an issue for me, as the failure rate of these parts has historically been low. Also, you can configure in a pretty performant CPU considering the size of the mini. It'll cost you, but still.
However, soldering in flash storage — I consider that a form of planned obsolescence. Especially as it is such a small bit of storage.
To make this machine last dependably, an external drive will have to be added, and (at least) all OS and application write targets (like logs, your files, etc.) need to be moved there so that the write rate to the flash is reduced as much as possible. Why? Because when that flash storage dies — and it will if you constantly write to it — the storage is useless, and you're right back to adding an external drive anyway. Better yet, outright make the external drive the boot drive and forget the internal drive exists.
Quite aside from the desk wart problem (so much for a nice, compact computer, one of the mini's real claims to fame), this means both extra cost and inconvenience.
Or IOW, Apple borks the mini again.
Unintentional? I don't think so.
I'm still waiting to see if they produce a Mac Pro worth my money. The trashcan certainly wasn't. That thing is just pitiful, design-wise.
On the plus side, EBay's a veritable gold mine of good Mac Pros from the pre-trashcan era, and I have picked up several of those. A 2010-era 12/24-core Mac Pro has a great case, can run 10.12.6 without problems, and can handle very large workloads. A 64 GB, 12-24-core, graphics-card-having, multiple REMOVABLE drive machine tends to land in the $1000-$2000 range, depending on your patience with auction hunting. For most tasks, that'll do ya. Cost you less up front than one of these minis tricked out to be reasonably powerful, too. You want SSD? Just throw one in a drive tray with an adapter, and Robert's your mother's brother. You want a better graphics card, more monitors? Just add (a) graphic(s) cards. You want to change / resize memory? Go ahead. So easy. You want connectivity? The machine has plenty, and there are card slots, too, and nice cards to go in 'em.
AC Clueless (Score:2)
Sure. If you don't write to them. And the smaller the SSD drive (and this machine comes with a small SSD drive), the faster they'll wear out when written to. If you depend on that drive, and actually, you know, do real work with the machine, you're going to be writing quite a bit. Flash is great — as long as you can replace it. With this machine, you can't. Hence, a smart setup will use an external drive, and suffer the inconveniences and risks of external desktop storage.
Re: (Score:2)
When it is time to change out the CPU there is a newer RAM type.
And probably a new CPU socket type too, since the newer RAM probably isn't just the same wires only a little faster. And then there's the TDP, which is limited in such a small device. RAM keeps a consistent interface over a much longer time than CPU generations. I am much more annoyed over soldered down SSD than CPU.
non-rotating rust (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not like SSDs naturally degrade during their service life by sticking their thumb into a high voltage socket every time you press the "erase" button.
And it's not like the mysterious T2 security chip couldn't prevent you from booting into a future macOS from external media if Apple decides the obsolescence message isn't penetrating your thick skull.
Trust, but keep replacement parts close to hand in a desk drawer.
Dear Moron Apple designer (Score:5, Insightful)
Non-removable storage is a deal killer. I don't know what gets stored on local computers so it MUST to be wiped before it goes off site for repair.
This means I'm not going to be buying any of these. We have been waiting for years to replace some of the older minis and now I have to figure out what I'm going to do for a replacement. For now banning new Apple stuff from the company will be the policy.
Don't you have to comply with any sort of security polices at Apple?
Re: (Score:3)
I think the problem was discovered with the iMacs - they had removable storage. Except they were not really removable.
As in, you couldn't take the storage media (it's actually raw flash) and put it in another iMac - it just wouldn't work. You see, the T1/T2 chip is also the SSD controller with the secure enclave and thus, the encryption keys.
So offering a removable module doesn't really do you any good - you certainly can't stick it in any other machine to recover your data because the security key is store
Re: (Score:2)
You can still ensure that the data doesn't leave the premises in that case - rip the Flash out before sending it in for repair and you know they can't get the data with some kind of back door. You can't read the data out yourself, but you had backups of the important stuff anyway, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Non-removable storage is a deal killer. I don't know what gets stored on local computers so it MUST to be wiped before it goes off site for repair.
Well then, you're in luck, because the Mac Mini isn't repairable anyway. Every time I've taken one of my Mac Mini's in to an Apple store, the only option they could offer me was a motherboard swap.
So if you do buy a Mac Mini and it goes bad, just remove the SSD from the motherboard yourself (using a blowtorch and pruning shears), then re-insert the motherboard and send it out for repair -- the result will be the same and your data won't leave your building.
Re: (Score:3)
> So if you do buy a Mac Mini and it goes bad, just
> remove the SSD from the motherboard yourself
> (using a blowtorch and pruning shears), then re-
> insert the motherboard and send it out for repair --
> the result will be the same and your data won't leave
> your building.
Not that you should count on it if you have business data that falls under a compliance regime; or if you're just personally very paranoid. But Apple wipes the storage of any Mac or iDevice they depot for repairs. The do
Re: (Score:2)
Wiping data sounds good, but what does that have to do with removable storage? You can boot from USB (or to the recovery partition) and do an erase right there.
I imagine yes, but that has nothing to do with the old style of punching holes through magnetic media.
I've worked with more than one comp
Re: (Score:2)
If the machine is somewhat dead, you can't boot from something else to erase the internal flash and you can't put it in what used to be called target mode.
Even with external storage, if a secret file got moved to swap and the machine dies, that secret is on the flash chips. Encrypted or not, the government mandated procedure says it doesn't leave my security zone until destroyed. These types of government regulations exist in the USA, Canada, Australia, EU, Japan, Russia and China.
I don't care if I can't
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. And our SOP for compliance states that we will physically destroy the encryption keys and that completes the procedure of destroying the data.
YMMV because you might have different sit policies, but that's ours :-)
Re:Dear Moron Apple designer (Score:5, Insightful)
That doesn't mean Apple can't decode the data anyway. Every government in the world is trying to make it a legal requirement to do so and building a new chip without that feature could be a billion dollar mistake. I suspect there is already a way to backdoor in the thing.
Until someone pulls the chips off and shows what is on them, I'm not convinced.
A simple M.2 port would have fixed this problem.
Re: (Score:3)
The entire idea behind the PC or "personal computer" was that the user can exchange parts.
No, that's not the entire idea.
The idea behind a personal computer was a computer small and inexpensive enough for a person to own. Before the personal computer they were very large and very expensive. Early personal computers were not much more than a video game console with a keyboard. The only parts you could exchange, if you could call it that, was a ROM cartridge. Not only was the RAM soldered to the motherboard but the keyboard was integral to the unit. If you didn't like the keyboard then you s
Re: (Score:3)
Here's what the average PC owner wants more than the ability to exchange parts, they want the computer to work. Parts stuck in sockets and slots are less reliable than soldered down parts.
I'm 99.9% sure that's bullshit otherwise servers would be the first to have soldered parts, not laptops. It's all about cost. Lower production cost and not dealing with support costs because people meddled with it, no logistics for parts, no repair instructions or tools. A lot of devices like the Surface Laptop 2 that got a 0/10 score by iFixit is clearly not designed to be repaired by anyone, including Microsoft. Inside warranty if it breaks they replace it, outside warranty you're shit out of luck.
Computers are appliances again, which is really what many people want.
Actuall
Re: (Score:2)
Here's what the average PC owner wants more than the ability to exchange parts, they want the computer to work. Parts stuck in sockets and slots are less reliable than soldered down parts.
I'm 99.9% sure that's bullshit otherwise servers would be the first to have soldered parts, not laptops. It's all about cost. Lower production cost and not dealing with support costs because people meddled with it, no logistics for parts, no repair instructions or tools. A lot of devices like the Surface Laptop 2 that got a 0/10 score by iFixit is clearly not designed to be repaired by anyone, including Microsoft. Inside warranty if it breaks they replace it, outside warranty you're shit out of luck.
Let's assume it is bullshit. Servers are a much smaller market, for people that can be expected to "tinker" a bit with the hardware, and on a far larger budget. The ability to swap out parts is far more valuable even if it comes at the cost of lowered reliability if that reliability comes with things like ease and speed of repairs. Even servers have become more "appliance like" in that they come with multiple Ethernet ports on the motherboard, built in video (crappy VGA video because it's a server, but v
Re: (Score:2)
Let's assume it is bullshit. Servers are a much smaller market, for people that can be expected to "tinker" a bit with the hardware, and on a far larger budget. The ability to swap out parts is far more valuable even if it comes at the cost of lowered reliability if that reliability comes with things like ease and speed of repairs.
Uhm... no. In the vast majority of cases the main cost is how often you need to pull a machine from service and replace it with another, not how long it's out for because that's rarely within your SLA. Redundancy, hot spare, cold spare, clustering, horizontal scaling, re-provisioning there's many ways but waiting for the technician to replace your faulty hardware is usually not it. Maybe if this is the SMB market but for data centers I think they'd easily swap replacement time for incident rate, people pay
Re: (Score:2)
There are plenty of camera nerds too.
Re: (Score:2)
Plus, there are different kinds of nerds/geeks/whatever.
I used to have my assortment of serial cables, grounding straps, and precision screwdrivers. I've built or repaired plenty of systems. I've replaced iPod and iPhone screens and batteries. I've cracked open my own iMacs to replace hard drives and to roll my own Fusion drive. I've burned myself with soldering irons. And I've left plenty of blood sacrifices on the backs of server racks. (My hands are too large to be a good cage monkey. But when the
I'm counting 28 mainboard versions (Score:3)
Based on the teardown, and fiddling with Apple's online purchase configuration, it looks like they must have 28 different versions of the 201 Mac Mini mainboard.
Options for components soldered onto the mainboard:
3 different CPUs (i3, i5 and i7)
5, 4 and 5 SSD options (128, 256, 512, 1TB and 2TB) depending on the CPU. i5 can't be equipped with 128GB, but i7 can as CPU upgrade from i3
2 different Ethernet NICs ( Gigabit and 10GB )
So ( 5 + 4 + 5 ) * 2 = 28 different sets of components soldered to the mainboard.
Even for Apple, that's a lot of variations. I'm somewhat surprised they didn't go with docketed storage, which would reduced the Mac Mini to 6 different mainboard configurations.
Re: (Score:2)
That is, unless they only have, say, 1 TB and 2 TB drives and maybe two or three physical memory configurations and they can factory disable the "extra" that the customer didn't pay for.
If Apple did that, if could actually be cheaper than managing the large number of variations and still allow them to maximize profits by price discrimination.
As I understand it, HP or IBM did something similar with their servers ages ago (maybe they still do), where you paid for additional CPU, memory, or whatever, and what
Re: (Score:2)
Apple wouldn't leave a lot 'money on table' with more expensive NAND so lets say they did 3 different sets of NAND flash: 512, 1TB and 2TB and fused off access to make 128 and 256GB configurations.
That's still 3 x 3 x 2 or 18 different main board variations, which is more than the 2014 Mini, which had 9 motherboard versions (the most for a Mini to that point in time). So not that likely.
I'm guessing Apples bigger plans regarding the T2 Chip and security trumped the streamlining of manufacturing issues an
FA (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple Lisa. Never forget
I can remember on CeBit seeing an Apple Lisa head to head against a Xerox Star at five times the price, and the Lisa ran rings around it.
OK guys... (Score:2)
Who doesn't know about built-in obsolescence? I think if you look you will find classes on best practices for this.
Foldered SSD = Disposable Computer (Score:2)
Apple customers don't object. Here's why: (Score:2)
For them Apple products are disposably cheap.
They don't need to upgrade parts because they replace obsolete computers.
They don't need to work on their own hardware.
They get the user experience they desire.
They love their machines or they wouldn't be repeat customers.
It really is that simple.
I've never wanted an Apple machine because my use case does not need that operating system or the severely limited hardware which goes with it. Apple doesn't need my custom and I don't need their hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Step 1: Put your Mac on eBay.
Step 2: Order a new Mac. Seriously, prices for used Macs on eBay are so high, it works out.
Re:Limited Space (Score:5, Interesting)
Compared to the previous model it seems Apple decided to ditch the 2.5" spinner in an effort to give us removable RAM in the same form factor. Let's face it, Apple was never going to increase the thickness of the Mac Mini to allow for both swappable RAM and storage. They only want to make things smaller and thinner.
Uh, hate to point out the obvious, but the dimensions of the 2018 Mac Mini are exactly the same as the 2012 Mac Mini that held two 2.5" hard drives, and had user-replaceable memory (2 slots).
Quite frankly, I'm shocked to find that the memory can be upgraded, but since they're charging consumers $1400 to max out the memory on this model, that's hardly a concession. 95% of consumers can't even spell RAM let alone know how to replace it, so Apple will continue ripping off consumers for memory upgrades.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, m.2 drives take up a bit of space as well which is why you find smaller PC mobos going through extra lengths like putting the m.2 socket on the backside of the board rather than the component side.
In a tiny design like this, on the bottom of the board is precisely where you should place the field-replaceable parts like RAM and, normally, storage.
Re: (Score:2)
idiots don't have backups
SSD can fail anyway, soldered or not