Big Money, Big Dreams, Big Expectations and a Lot of Hype: Magic Leap One AR Headset Goes on Sale for $2,295 in Certain US Markets (cnet.com) 62
After earning the moniker "tech's most secretive startup" from Wired and telling Forbes in 2016 it was going to ship its system "soon-ish," the company is finally releasing the $2,295 Magic Leap One. For now, it will be available for purchase in limit U.S. markets. CNET: It includes a high-powered, moon pie-shaped computer called the Lightpack, a handheld remote called Control and a steampunk-inspired headset with round lenses and patented optics. That's called Lightwear. There's just one thing: Regular folks like us aren't the intended audience. At least not yet. This "Creator Edition," says CEO Abovitz, is part of a "controlled market release" in just a handful of cities in the United States for the developers and creative types Magic Leap will woo this year and next. The goal: for those makers to dream up the experiences (aka content) it needs to convince us to become Leapers. The company is already showing investors and partners prototypes of its smaller (and hopefully less expensive) Magic Leap Two and Magic Leap Three, but won't say when they'll be released. Magic Leap, valued at $6.3 billion as of two months ago, counts Google, Alibaba, Warner Bros, AT&T, and several top Silicon Valley venture capital firms and about a dozen other big names as its investors. More about the product going on sale here.
The suckers are lining up right now (Score:3, Insightful)
All the hallmarks of a classic Silicon Valley startup scam: initial, extremely high-priced product made available in limited quantities, illustrious sponsors spoken of in hushed tones, and absolutely no value proposition of any kind whatsoever.
Re: (Score:1)
yo does this fit over my snapchat spectacles
i need to livestream my unboxing
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or in the 90's, everything had "2000" at the end of it.
Century21 has Century22 as as a registered trademark [merrillshop.com], but haven't updated their signs yet.
LONG LIVE THE NEW FLESH! (Score:2)
biomechanical creatures called Leapers that attach to people through a bio-tether proboscis and induce hallucinatory visions of an imaginary world
OMGWTFLOLBBQ
anyone find a link to the comic book?
swirl the KOOLAID around in your mouth! (Score:2)
And good grief: [vrroom.buzz]
"My name is Sparkydog. You can call me Zander, all my friends do"
No they do not. That's no-friend-having-guy talk. Also that zoot-suit makes you look like a child molester.
Re: (Score:2)
a Sanrio facehugger
Yeah, thanks for the fresh nightmare fuel...
Re: (Score:1)
^
+---- TFA said the AR googles were not intended for regular folks, so I tried schpeaking mit a German accent. Maybe I qualify as one of ze irregulars?
Re: (Score:2)
try french
Ouch, well good luck? (Score:3)
I hate to say this but the product seems a little too expensive compared to what people are willing to pay for. Occulus Rift and HTC Vive which are both working VR solutions are at least half this amount (not including needing a really powerful PC) are struggling to survive. I don't see how this is going to work. Also people joked about Google Glasses looking goofy considering it was a version of AR overlay. So good luck, but it seems destined to fail.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't competing with Rift or Vive, it's competing with the Meta2 ($1000 tethered) and the HoloLens ($3000 and 3 years old). Expect to see more adoption in the industrial and enterprise markets before you see much in the way of home-based entertainment for this kind of device.
Re: (Score:2)
Mr. Foxalopex, Occilis Rift is not made for kids. HTC Vive is not made for kids. The only thing that even comes *close*, is this product!
Re: (Score:2)
The preview there clearly says it's a developers package.
Progress is being made... (Score:1)
Re:Progress is being made... (Score:4, Funny)
It's exciting to see another computer independent headset coming out this year
Apparently it's so exciting that it was easy to miss this in TFS: It includes a high-powered, moon pie-shaped computer called the Lightpack.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
My point was that it doesn't require a desktop, or even a laptop, but instead an easily portable computing device.
Well, TFA really didn't have much to say about the computer other than "high powered" (which I took to imply not all that small/lightweight) and "moon pie-shaped (which I thought was an odd way to characterize a squat cylinder). And "easily portable" is in the eye of the beholder - the early VHS camcorders came with a large, heavy battery pack that the user carried by a shoulder strap, but we're considered easily portable at the time. Ditto for the first portable computers like the Compaq "luggable". Guess
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
It includes a high-powered, moon pie-shaped computer called the Lightpack.
But it's only visible once you have them on.
The Goggles -- they do nothing [youtube.com]
Re: Progress is being made... (Score:2)
Lemme guess, you are an investor.
Re: (Score:1)
No thanks (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure but obviously not for indie developers, basically they are tring to convince software houses with deep products that a non existent market will materialize so they should spend 2,300 on test equipment and a million on building software content. but I just don't believe they have a market. What makes their augmented reality so much better then Microsoft? Or how about a google android headset with a camera added to it?
Magic Leap off a cliff (Score:1)
At that pricing and with the mystery market it was released on Magic Leap does not anyone to buy ML1.
"cities" (Score:2, Interesting)
"Handful of cities"? What does that mean? You have to prove residency in L.A. to buy one? You have to queue up in line physically in one of these "cities" to get one?
Re: (Score:2)
According to the article, devices must be tailored to each individual (e.g. eye separation distance). So yes, a physical presence is required.
Re: (Score:2)
According to this [wired.com]:
This is a concierge-based trial release - don't buy it unless you have $2500 you can throw out the window without major pain.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, thanks.
(I don't think I want representatives from a company called "Enjoy" anywhere near my body :-)
Only in Sillycon Valley (Score:1)
is $2,295 considered to be a good price.
Wait, what? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Steve Jobs was a brilliant businessman and Apple did turn out polished products at somewhat reasonable prices (I typically don't buy Apple, but many do). The iPhone, iPod, computers all worked "out of the box" wonderfully, and came with lots of software and features. This is everything Jobs would have hated.
Re: (Score:2)
no he wouldn't hate this at all, he would wait till its well developed with a good eco system and software then release it as an iGlass (hehe) call it a a brave, unprecedented, courageous and innovative product. and people would line up to buy it.
Wow... what a waste (Score:2)
At $2,295, this is no longer an easy purchase for a developer. Especially for something which at this time should be seen as â€oeI as a developer add more value to the platform than the platform adds to my productsâ€
At that price, I would have to go through way too much pain to order the 3 units I would need to even consider using time on this. There needs to be one for developers, one for QA and one for business folks. Thatâ&
Re: (Score:2)
The whole article seems directionless and that is likely due to the lack of direction of the product. Reading it feels like asking what have you got? and hearing well, you know, there's this thing we're building, and I think when it's fully done and people are onboard with it it's going to be cool, in part because we believe that...
How it looks? (Score:2)
It looks like the peak of sophistication [cbsistatic.com].