Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Desktops (Apple) Graphics Power Software Hardware Technology

Razer Slims Down Blade, Debuts MacOS-Compatible eGPU Enclosure (arstechnica.com) 40

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Today, Razer debuted big updates to its Razer Blade laptop, focusing on design and performance to usher the gaming notebook into 2018. While the new Blade still looks unmistakably "Razer," its design has changed dramatically for the better. Razer upped the screen size from 14 inches to 15.6 inches, reducing the surrounding bezels to just 4.9mm so that the device fits in with the other nearly bezel-less ultrabooks popular today. Razer is offering 1080p 60Hz or 144Hz panels, along with a 4K touchscreen option as well. The larger display panel makes the laptop slightly heavier than its predecessor, and it's a bit wider overall, too (4.7 pounds and 9.3 inches, respectively). However, the slimmer bezels, sharper edges, and aluminum unibody make the new Razer Blade look like a clear upgrade from the previous model.

Another new addition to the Razer lineup is the Core X, a Thunderbolt 3 external graphics enclosure with space for large, three-slot wide graphics cards. The Core X joins the Core V2 graphics enclosure as one of Razer's solutions for gamers who want to add desktop-like graphics power to their laptops -- and it's more affordable than the V2 as well. While it's a bit stockier than Razer's existing enclosure, the Core X has an aluminum body with open vents to properly handle heat, regardless of the task at hand. The Core X connects to a compatible notebook through one Thunderbolt 3 port, providing eGPU access and 100W of power thanks to its 650 ATX power supply. It's both cheaper and seemingly easier to use than the V2, but that comes with some compromises: the Core X doesn't have Chroma lighting, and it lacks USB and Ethernet ports.
Some other specs of the new Blade include a Intel Core i7-8750H processor, Nvidia GTX 1060 or 1070 with Max-Q graphics, up to 32GB of RAM, up to 2TB of PCIe-based SSD, and 80Whr battery. There are three USB-A 3.1 ports, one proprietary charging port, one Thunderbolt 3 port, a Mini DisplayPort, and an HDMI port.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Razer Slims Down Blade, Debuts MacOS-Compatible eGPU Enclosure

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    If so, no thank you. I'll wait until they fix that dumpster fire.
  • Razer = Beats by Dre. Overpriced "premium" name. In actuality the mice, mics, keyboards and headphones are subpar. Just ask google about all the failures.

    • by hjf ( 703092 )

      check out their blade stealth ultrabook. I've been shopping for an ultrabook with thunderbolt and charge on the same USB-C connnector and theirs always comes up as the best choice, feature and price wise.
      i want that core V2 thing, but at $500 for a docking station with PCI-E? No thanks!!!

    • Can confirm. Bought a mouse of theirs years ago, total piece of shit. Damn thing completely stopped working after a few months.
  • eGPU case cost just as much as gpu for only x4 pci-e best case. And with most intels system that is TB over the X4 dmi bus that is sheard with so much other stuff like pci-e storage / networking / usb / etc.

    • Yeah but it seems like a really good match for an iMac Pro that can really take strong advantage of the enclosure, and people who would be happy to attach some powerful nVidea GPU's for deep learning work...

      • and people who would be happy to attach some powerful nVidea GPU's for deep learning work...

        It would literally be cheaper to build a separate PC, which would also be a superior solution. Also, *Nvidia

        • Since it would probably be running Windows, it would automatically be inferior in all respects. Even with Linux you'd have to administer it which is more annoying...

          Also, *Nvidia

          That's exactly the point of getting the eGPU, so you could use some really powerful Nvidia cards with the iMac Pro...

          • Even with Linux you'd have to administer it which is more annoying...

            Linux requires no more complex administration than MacOS. And when it does break, it's easier to fix.

            • Linux requires no more complex administration than MacOS.

              Look man, I have run many different Linux distributions at home and offices before and that is a FLAT OUT LIE. Come on.

              And when it does break, it's easier to fix.

              BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HO HE HA!!!

              Yeah it's easy to fix when you turn to your working internet connected device and hunt down possible solutions for fixing bad drivers or whatever....

              Mean while on OS X it is SO HARD to drive to a Genius Bar and say fix it. Yeah that is so much harder than a

              • Look man, I have run many different Linux distributions at home and offices before and that is a FLAT OUT LIE. Come on.

                Sorry to hear about your incompetence.

                Mean while on OS X it is SO HARD to drive to a Genius Bar and say fix it.

                You have to drive to the genius bar to get someone with less training than you to fix your computer? Now I'm really sorry to hear about it. That's the average mac user for you, though.

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      eGPU case cost just as much as gpu for only x4 pci-e best case. And with most intels system that is TB over the X4 dmi bus that is sheard with so much other stuff like pci-e storage / networking / usb / etc.

      And what's wrong with it?

      I can have a nice thin laptop for moving around mobile. And when I'm at the office, I can plug it into a dock and get high-powered graphics and all that nice stuff.

      It has uses for laptops, allowing them to be more mobile in the "mobile" mode, but having awesome power when you're

  • What does Intel think about using a similar name to their Core X-series processor range?
    https://www.intel.com/content/... [intel.com]

  • by Jason1729 ( 561790 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2018 @09:26PM (#56656772)
    I really wanted to buy a razer blade a couple of years ago, Then I got a Razer Blackwidow Chroma keyboard

    To use the keyboard as more than a dumb USB keyboard, you have to have an always-on connection to the internet. If they need that kind of invasive control of your computer to blink a few colored lights, how invasive is an actual computer from them? Never buy Razer products.
  • by Brian Kendig ( 1959 ) on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @09:16AM (#56659078)

    I've been a Mac fan for a long time, but I use the latest MacBook Pro for work and I don't like it - useless Touch Bar, poor keyboard, poor battery life, no USB-A or HDMI ports, high price (starts at $2400 with a dedicated graphics chip), &c.

    I recently played with a Razer Blade 14 and I was impressed; $1900 from Amazon for better specs. (Windows 10 is tolerable enough and unobtrusive enough for my tastes.) Though, the Razer reviews are extremely hot or cold; some people love them, others have had endless problems with hardware failures and recalcitrant tech support. Looks like this is the price of high-end Windows laptops at the moment.

    My next laptop might be a Razer Blade. Change my mind.

A committee takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom. -- Parkinson

Working...