World's First Electrified Road For Charging Vehicles Opens In Sweden (theguardian.com) 102
A 1.2-mile stretch of road with electric rails has been installed in Stockholm, Sweden, allowing electric vehicles to charge up their batteries as they drive across it. "The technology behind the electrification of the road linking Stockholm Arlanda airport to a logistics site outside the capital city aims to solve the thorny problems of keeping electric vehicles charged, and the manufacture of their batteries affordable," reports The Guardian. From the report: Energy is transferred from two tracks of rail in the road via a movable arm attached to the bottom of a vehicle. The design is not dissimilar to that of a Scalextric track, although should the vehicle overtake, the arm is automatically disconnected. The electrified road is divided into 50m sections, with an individual section powered only when a vehicle is above it. When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected. The system is able to calculate the vehicle's energy consumption, which enables electricity costs to be debited per vehicle and user. The "dynamic charging" -- as opposed to the use of roadside charging posts -- means the vehicle's batteries can be smaller, along with their manufacturing costs. A former diesel-fuelled truck owned by the logistics firm, PostNord, is the first to use the road.
Wow. (Score:2, Funny)
I bet pedestrians are in for a "shock" ...
Re:Wow. (Score:5, Informative)
Säll said: “There is no electricity on the surface. There are two tracks, just like an outlet in the wall. Five or six centimetres down is where the electricity is. But if you flood the road with salt water then we have found that the electricity level at the surface is just one volt. You could walk on it barefoot.”
Re: Wow. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
1.2 miles of road? (Score:4, Insightful)
Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh don't worry, gasoline producers already have a competing solution [youtube.com].
1.2 miles down a Califorinan Freeway (Score:3)
Could take an hour or more...
Re: (Score:2)
What can a really good battery take given the average speed and the length of the electric rail down the road?
Re:1.2 miles of road? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:1.2 miles of road? (Score:5, Insightful)
Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?
Also, the very first fax machine was a completely useless product, since there was nobody to send faxes to or receive faxes from. I don't know why they even bothered to manufacture it.
Re: (Score:2)
actually, the first faxes were at the telco center, not to user machines.
Not very big, either (4"? I forget).
And expensive per transmission.
hawk
Re: (Score:3)
I'm guessing you skipped the bit in the article that says that it's a trial and they're planning to role it out across the country.
Re: (Score:1)
That seems unlikely even
"When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected."
This leads me to believe it is a proof of concept, and not a charger. The idea is that cars would use the power instead of batteries, and not charge off of it. Eventually, long haul roads would be powered like this and batteries would only need to cover what ever the automobile equivalent of last mile is (last ten miles I guess ?).
Re: (Score:2)
This leads me to believe it is a proof of concept, and not a charger. The idea is that cars would use the power instead of batteries, and not charge off of it.
Really? TFA leads me to believe you might be incorrect:
Headline: World's first electrified road for charging vehicles opens in SwedenWorld's first electrified road for charging vehicles opens in Sweden
Sub-head: Stretch of road outside Stockholm transfers energy from two tracks of rail in the road, recharging the batteries of electric cars and trucks
First sentence: The world’s first electrified road that recharges the batteries of cars and trucks driving on it has been opened in Sweden.
Re: (Score:1)
Fair enough.
Why does it not charge stopped cars then?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Fair enough.
Why does it not charge stopped cars then?
TFA didn't explain that design decision. Since I have to guess, I'm going to go with, "The number of cars the system would have to charge if traffic were bumper-to-bumper and stopped or barely moving (e.g., Los Angeles' I405 during rush hour) would exceed the power delivery of the system."
Your original post mentioned covering the last mile. TFA covered something very similar -- the long-term plan is to electrify highways, but not local roads. I believe they said the average distance between highways is some
Re: (Score:3)
It's a test track. To be useful it would have to be deployed on over longer distances.
Re: (Score:1)
Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?
Since we are going to nitpick like autistic retards, the source says it is 'about' 2 km.
It could be anywhere between 0.9 and 1.6 miles.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Opportunity charging" is nothing new but it's been mostly used for public transport (collectors at bus stops). How long does a bus stop at a bus stop?
Re: (Score:2)
How long does a bus stop at a bus stop?
About 20 seconds on average?
From what I've seen (could be wrong), the buses that recharge shortly at every stop (or every third or fourth stop) use supercapacitors that can be charged very quickly. The buses with batteries recharge for a longer time at fewer locations where the bus holds for several minutes, or more (e.g. places where the driver takes a break, or end-points of a line).
Re: (Score:2)
i think this is a great idea, but as you said, the distance is too short.
but what if you would put those chargerroads in highly congested places?
instead of 5 minutes, it would take 30, 40 or even more minutes to cross and that should be plenty of time to charge the batts to a reasonable level.
Re: (Score:3)
Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?
Meanwhile, there are all kinds of places where cars are parked that would make much better charging sites. Spending millions of dollars a mile - okay, okay, Euros per kilometer - for a charging road is the ultimate in dead end projects.
From below is easier ,,, (Score:3)
Energy is transferred from two tracks of rail in the road via a movable arm attached to the bottom of a vehicle.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
"... crud doesn't build up"
Quit being pragmatic. We're talking The Guardian here.
Also, unlike overhead wires, this sounds like maintenance nightmare.
1.2-"mile" (Score:1)
Very exclusive and isolationist...
Re: (Score:2)
These days, about the only jaw-dropping tech coming out of the America
This is not "jaw-dropping tech" except in its stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
You obviously don't know what "jaw-dropping" means. I'll explain: It means off-the-wall. Mind boggling. Crazy. Something jaw-dropping might be world changing, or it might be headed at Mach 3 for the scrap pile of failed ideas.
The point, which you missed, is that there was a time when anything like that probably originated in the United States. If it failed, the next potentially world changing idea would be coming along in prototype form a week later. The US used to be a hotbed of innovation and new t
Re: (Score:2)
People need to stop voting for those candidates who are supported by people with a strong financial interest in existing technology, such as the Koch Brothers.
Re: (Score:1)
The point, which you missed, is that there was a time when anything like that probably originated in the United States. If it failed, the next potentially world changing idea would be coming along in prototype form a week later. The US used to be a hotbed of innovation and new takes on old ideas. Americans dared.
You mean immigrants to America. America was a hotbed of innovation not because of anything other than America was a relatively safe place for smart people to migrate to in turbulent times. Those days are mostly over but ironically the common man believes that the path back to greatness is by persecuting immigrants.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be trolling, or confusing government innovation with innovation in general. There is obviously innovation in the American private sector, even if we restrict our view to transportation. Tesla, SpaceX, Hyperloop, Uber/Lyft, self-driving cars in general.
This is a cool idea. I disagree with those saying this is pointless... the point is they are sharing the energy supply burden rather than making each car keep its own energy supply via batteries. This means an all-electric car doesn't need a 200+ mile
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Go fuck yourself with a broken bottle, you AC POS.
Re: (Score:2)
Some cultures actually have a desire to lower air and noise pollution, or to reduce foreign dependence.
By constantly running power throughout the road at all times? Guess I may as well leave the lights on in my house when no one is home.
Re: (Score:1)
From the Fine Summary:
"The electrified road is divided into 50m sections, with an individual section powered only when a vehicle is above it. When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected."
Re: (Score:2)
I'm old enough to recall electric street trolleys. All the trolleys I saw used overhead wires. Sometimes the wires were (are?) used with the buses that replaced the trolleys. Subways, of course, did, and do, use electrified "third rails"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Stupid question, but how is it that gasoline makes busses not appealing to the masses?
Does electric power somehow keep the junkies from shooting up in the back?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Does traffic patterns never change over there? In San Antonio lanes are often rebuilt as population changes.
Does the section break if there is road damage? And how big is that section?
Re: save on cost of batteries (Score:2)
You didn't even read the summary, let alone the article. Individual drivers will be billed by the system. No freeloaders.
Re: (Score:2)
How? Like a toll road?
Re: (Score:3)
Does this mean that jay walkers will be electrocuted?
Yes. Of course.
Re: (Score:2)
Jay-walkers? Are they not allowed to cross that section of road?
That is Dumb (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Duh. They could have done this in a much much better way. Make it wireless charging!
Depends how you define "better". Wireless charging is usually much less efficient.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends how you define "better". Wireless charging is usually much less efficient.
What is worse, somewhat more inefficient, or not working at all?
What happens as soon as a bit of road debris is left to accumulate in the tracks, which causes the vehicle contact to become damaged and disfunctional? At least a large inductive coil buried under asphalt would be protected and not require moving parts.
Re: (Score:2)
What is worse, somewhat more inefficient, or not working at all?
What happens as soon as a bit of road debris is left to accumulate in the tracks, which causes the vehicle contact to become damaged and disfunctional? At least a large inductive coil buried under asphalt would be protected and not require moving parts.
Well, this is a test track, so we will see how it works. Personally, I'm skeptical. That doesn't mean that wireless charging is the answer, though.
Despite all of the brou-ha-ha and countless research into wireless charging, most things that charge (and especially moving things like streetcars, trains, and trolleybuses) do so via physical contact. There are reasons why this is so.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't mean that wireless charging isn't the best tradeoff between convenience and functionality and reliability, either. Sometimes even the most simple and direct solution turns out to be more complicated, as I'm sure this test track will soon demonstrate.
Wireless brou-ha-ha... I hope you wrote that from a mobile device. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So even more moving parts, which can be affected by freezing conditions and electrolysis.
This is turning out to be a really amazing system.
Re: (Score:2)
Streetcar tech (Score:2)
One of two in Sweden (Score:5, Informative)
The first one was built a bit further north and uses a dual overhead catenary and has a counterpart in a warmer climate in USA.
Both built to test how the technologies will work in practical conditions.
https://www.trafikverket.se/en... [trafikverket.se]
Re: (Score:3)
Siemens have built a pilot of the overhead catenary in Carson, California [insideevs.com]. They're building another just south of Frankfurt in Germany [siemens.com].
From the picture it looks like the overhead version will only work with trucks, but the rails embedded in tarmac version will work most vehicles.
Old technology is new again (Score:2)
And now we just need (Score:2, Insightful)
Solar freaking roadways to make this system into a truley worthless money pit.
Electric car ? (Score:1)
Great idea (Score:2)
Now when that truck has miscalculated and is almost out of juice, it will go at 2 kmh on that stretch of road to get some meaningful charge...
This is a great idea, but I can improve upon it! (Score:1)
This is a great first step, but let's make this at least mostly autonomous. Already autonomous cars are coming, but with the carnage they seem to be leaving on the roadways, what if we could come up with a way to make them more or less idiot-proof?
This electrifying track is a great first step in making electric cars feasible, but what if we added a couple more of them that could interface with the wheels of the car to keep it moving in exactly the right direction? If there is no ambiguity or variance in the
So ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)