Microsoft's Nadella Says Company Will Make More Phones, But They Won't Look Like Today's Devices (zdnet.com) 150
As he told the Make Me Smart podcast, Microsoft is looking for something far more transformative, like an entirely new category of smartphone that's so original and appealing that OEMs won't be able to resist tagging along. From a report: "At this point we're making sure that all of our software is available on iOS and Android and it's first class and we're looking for what's the next change in form and function," he said when asked whether Microsoft would make another phone. Nadella doesn't discuss what form these mobile devices could take, though Microsoft does have some candidates, like its HoloLens augmented reality (AR) headgear. No doubt he's keeping close tabs on Google's early progress with its Tango phone AR experiments.
Future Windows phone... (Score:3)
Re:Future Windows phone... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not a promotion problem. It's a device problem. Which Windows Phone devices compete with the Galaxy S8? The iPhone 7?
They are always 6-12 months late (especially if you compare to Android, where they use the same components).
You simply get more with the competition.
Re: (Score:1)
There advertising was OK, but they did not provide the necessary incentives to the carriers and their salespeople -- nothing like what the Android purveyors were offering. Microsoft could buy the entire markets for phones, game consoles, or whatever they want to sell, but they always seem to undermine their own investments. They spent over 7 billion on Nokia, but couldn't spend a couple hundred million to bribe some folks to sell the damn phones.
Re: (Score:1)
but they did not provide the necessary incentives to the carriers and their salespeople -- nothing like what the Android purveyors were offering.
*bzzzt*
Try again. Most of the "Android purveyors" (Samsung, HTC, LG, etc.) were the same OEMs hawking windows phones. The real answer is Windows Phones don't sell because Windows Phone OS sucks.
Re: Future Windows phone... (Score:1)
Microsoft did try to buy the market. Don't you remember the Nokia bribe, followed by the Nokia purchase when that didn't work?
They easily sunk 30 billion into that turd, and that's not even counting the free marketing that at&t gave to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Yep, and they really can't compete by just having a comparable product. It has to be better for a lot of people if they ever want market share.
That's a good thing... either it will be good and gain traction, or bad and go away.
Re: (Score:2)
Meaningless. There's no shortage of people running around with iPhone 5s in this day and age.
Of course. But they got it for cheaper, or they paid full price but got it when it was new.
Microsoft is asking full price for devices which are already 6-12 months late when they release.
Re: (Score:2)
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Re:Future Windows phone... (Score:4, Insightful)
What they didn't do is allow carriers to completely rebuild the OS like Google does.
I've been around a while and I recall quite clearly how the windows phone fanboys were crowing about how Nokia had an arrangement with MS where they could do exactly this to the Windows Phone OS and how they were going to crush Android and all the other OEMs. We see how that worked out.
The fact is that people just don't like what MS was offering. I had a Windows Phone with version 7 of the OS a few years ago just to play around with. You know what? It sucked.
The Nokia phones were very nice phones. The problem with the Windows Phone OS is the lack of Apps. For example, when I got my Surface Pro 4 I tried to find the same apps that I use on my Android tablet and my iPhone and they just don't exist for Windows. Granted, with a full fledged tablet computer like the Surface Pro 4 you don't need apps, but they tend to be simpler and quicker to launch than the full web page.
Re: (Score:3)
It looks like MS is giving up on ARM altogether and doubling
Re: (Score:2)
It looks like MS is giving up on ARM altogether and doubling down on x86. They probably see Intel weakening and figure they can get cheap chips out of them.
I take it you missed the announcement of the ARMv8 version of Windows 10 with an emulator that allows running x86 programs natively?
Re: (Score:1)
I take it you missed the announcement of the ARMv8 version of Windows 10 with an emulator that allows running x86 programs natively?
The Courier will be released before this shitshow has any kind of an impact. Phones are slow enough as it is, yes even phones with the heralded SD 835, and you think emulating x86 on top of it and running any relevant application is going to be useful in any way? Yeah fucking right. Not to mention with this announcement, they've basically admitted Windows Phone is finished.
Re: Future Windows phone... (Score:1)
> emulator
> runs natively
Choose one
Re:Future Windows phone... (Score:4, Insightful)
"Natively". You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Re: (Score:2)
Give him a break, he just made a typo and meant to write: "Nadilely".
Re: (Score:2)
Keep in mind, for all of Microsoft's bullshit about cross compatibility, there are plenty of windows phone apps that wont even show up in windows store on PC. When i look on Windows Store on my PC, Spotify doesnt exist, so for a long time i just assumed Spotify wasnt on Windows Store at all. Turns out there is an app, but you can only see it if you are on Windows Mobile. I couldnt believe MS wouldnt give me an option to look at the whole store. It looks like MS is giving up on ARM altogether and doubling down on x86. They probably see Intel weakening and figure they can get cheap chips out of them. As to your last point, the Netflix app absolutely sucks on my Surface 3, but netflix runs perfect in Chrome on the same system.
Your first statement - about phone apps that don't show up on the PC store - is correct, not just about Spotify, but others like Yelp & Fandango. But your second statement doesn't follow from that - that Microsoft is giving up on ARM and doubling down on x86. In fact, on the rumored Surface Phones, it was said that they'd be building it w/ the Snapdragon and then emulating x86 in order to run native x86 binaries. Which would suck as far as battery life goes.
The apps do have to be actually cross-c
Re: (Score:2)
Since no Windows Phone apps are compiled exclusively for Intel, we're talking desktop programs here. In which case the user would typically not care about batteries in doing the Continuum thing - dock the phone to a power supply and external keyboard, mouse and hotel TV.
Re: (Score:1)
In which case the user would typically not care about batteries in doing the Continuum thing - dock the phone to a power supply and external keyboard, mouse and hotel TV.
I cannot believe we are still waiting for a phone with dock that runs Windows x32/64 natively at 'good enough' speed. With the right integration into Enterprise tools and systems, a single Windows mobile phone could replace desktops, laptops, tablets, desk phones and mobile phones . Heck MS could charge enough to recoup the lost revenue from Windows desktop OS and we'd still be ahead on device management and integration. So many other things could become easier to manage & track.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been around a while and I recall quite clearly how the windows phone fanboys were crowing about how Nokia had an arrangement with MS where they could do exactly this to the Windows Phone OS and how they were going to crush Android and all the other OEMs. We see how that worked out.
The fact is that people just don't like what MS was offering. I had a Windows Phone with version 7 of the OS a few years ago just to play around with. You know what? It sucked.
I've never had a 7 phone, but from what I recall, it was based on CE and its screen looked like an XP desktop screen. Which was a horrible UI for a phone. The Windows Phone 8 was a completely different beast - being based on the same kernel as Windows 8. Incidentally, the same Metro UI, which sucked on laptops w/o a touch screen, was great on a Windows phone.
I've had 3 Windows phones overall - a Lumia 520, 929 (Icon) and now a 550. The first 2 were upgradable to Windows Phone 8.1, while the 550
Re: (Score:3)
I've never had a 7 phone, but from what I recall, it was based on CE and its screen looked like an XP desktop screen.
Nope. The 7 was the first iteration of the departure from the XP-esque desktop. It had what used to be called the Metro interface and the whole bit.
Re: (Score:2)
If carriers could ignore the momentum of the brand, they'd keep iOS phones in the storage room hidden from view also.
iOS phones sell themselves. It's the other phone manufacturers that have to fund marketing campaigns to get noticed.
Re: (Score:3)
I've noticed that whenever I get a spammail from AT&T wanting me to buy their crap, it's almost always an Android phone they're pushing.
Re: (Score:2)
you're friend is a fuckwit.
In what way?
Re: (Score:2)
My friend works at a Sprint store. They have a Microsoft Windows phone that sits in the storage room and no one ever asks to see it. Unless Microsoft is willing to put money behind their promotions like Samsung, HTC and LG, my friend has no incentives to sell a Microsoft Windows phone.
They tried this while I was in Spain. They spent a fortune on advertising and discounts as well as unleashed a full on FUD campaign against Android. It worked, sortof, Their share jumped by 7% but many people switched back when they bought their next phone and now Windows Mobile is back down to almost nothing.
Oooh ooh, I have an idea! (Score:2)
How about a phone that folds in half!
It's gonna be revolutionary!!
Re: (Score:2)
They could make two models. A small one to carry in your pocket, and a big one with a full sized keyboard. Revolutionary, indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe. Is it possible to port Linux to it?
Re: (Score:2)
Never heard of it, is it something like Microsoft Bob?
Re: (Score:2)
Outsourced contractors?
They'll keep wasting billions on mobile... (Score:2)
and get no where. That ship has sailed, and IOS and Android own the mobile market. But M$ will toss endless amounts of money after it in a vain hope to gain traction, much like they keep pouring money into Bing to no end.
Re:They'll keep wasting billions on mobile... (Score:5, Interesting)
It would've been a lot easier for them if they'd actually thought ahead to what the future might bring, instead of copying others. Back in the 1990s they managed to displace Palm as the market leader for PDA OSes (by copying Palm but promising to make their OS share the Windows API). By the late 1990s it was obvious to most everyone that PDAs and phones would converge. All Microsoft had to do was add phone support to WinCE (which became Windows Mobile). But a few WinCE PDA companies tried to add phone functionality to their PDAs, and got no help from Microsoft. Their products were panned by reviewers for failing to work consistently as a phone, which is kinda important since phones are historically very reliable. The new smartphone market instead ended up being taken over by Blackberry (in North America) and Nokia (in Europe) who added PDA capability to their phones. And Microsoft has been trying to play catch-up ever since.
Re:They'll keep wasting billions on mobile... (Score:4, Interesting)
"Success" only in the sense that it wasn't an outright failure. Xbox never "took over the market" like Microsoft's more Windows-centric conquests. The Playstation 2 massively outsold the original Xbox, which only just edged out the GameCube. The Playstation 3 was neck and neck with the Xbox 360, both of which got outsold by the Wii. The Xbox One has lost decisively to the Playstation 4 and has been outsold by the Wii U.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think Microsoft is still hemorrhaging from their struggles in the early 00's, I think there's more to it.
First off, Microsoft didn't monopolize the market, but the Palm/Blackberry/WinMo split was vaguely even. I forget who was who, but even a 20% share of that three legged race was a good place to be. Microsoft also competed quite well with Blackberry for control in the server room - BES was an excellent product that made devices basically-interchangeable and management a breeze, but was much more e
Re: (Score:2)
One of the issues Nokia had was too many models. This was something they did previously w/ their Symbian phones, and which they continued to do now. So if you shopped, there was no good reason to prefer a certain phone to another. Also, on some of the initial phones, the case colors were too gaudy, and looked like kids phones. The first smartphone I ever had was the Lumia 520, which was a great phone. I used HERE maps & directions, OneNote, and it was the first time I started to text regularly. P
Re: (Score:2)
Just a correction, the phones were backwards compatible with apps but old phones weren't forwards compatible. WP8 phones could run WP7 apps, and similarly, W10M phones could run WP8 and WP7 apps, but WP7 devices were stuck with WP7 apps.
The big problem was that developersprogressively stopped supporting the platform, and last year, for instance has been really bad. WP7 and WP8 apps were getting pulled, while no replacement for W10M was being offered. I think the reboots caused a lot of this, and in hindsigh
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
As much as I despise MS and their slimy tricks, I don't want only two co's to control most of phone tech. A third (or more) player would be helpful overall.
Re: (Score:1)
Problem is M$ is far worse than the other companies in so many ways. Better for them to die and allow other new players in the market to compete against Google and Apple. M$ is just a rotting corpse sucking up market space due to product lock in. Currently mainly PC games and office. I for one stopped purchasing PC games 6 months ago and only use LibreOffice when it become obvious that M$ was not going to stop it's privacy invasive ways and forced software installs, done, finished, no more. They are just di
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They'll keep wasting billions on personal computers... and get no where. That ship has sailed, and the Apple ][ and Commodore 64 own the personal computer market. But M$ will toss endless amounts of money after it in a vain hope to gain traction, much like they keep pouring money into MS BASIC to no end.
Microsoft wasn't pushing the DOS-based PC, they were selling DOS to IBM, who used their dominance in the business computing market to push it and Microsoft rode their coat tails.
They'll keep wasting billions on GUI desktops... and get no where. That ship has sailed, and the Macintosh and IBM's OS/2 own the GUI desktop market. But M$ will toss endless amounts of money after it in a vain hope to gain traction, much like they keep pouring money into DOS to no end.
Windows 3 had a dominant market position before OS/2 shipped. The Mac had an advantage, but Microsoft could sell Windows as a DOS upgrade to a huge installed base, whereas switching to a Mac required buying a new machine. As long as DOS (specifically, DOS-running PC clones) were controlling the business computing market, they were
Same Company Had Mock Funeral for iPhone (Score:1)
Remember boyz and girlz, this is the same company that held a mock funeral for the iPhone at Windows Phone 7 launch.
I'd take any announcement like this with a huge grain of salt.
M$ : always relevant (Score:2)
What are they going to do with them? (Score:1)
So they will make more phones that nobody will buy. What will they do with them? Hand them out for free? Force them in bundles onto customers that buy other goods or services from Microsoft?
Re: (Score:1)
Require you to buy one in order to get security updates for Windows 10.
Re: (Score:1)
They will as soon as people start needing them for fixes instead of avoiding them because of breakage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now presenting.. (Score:2)
MS, stay out of markets you do not understand and are far to late an entry to get any appreciable market share.
Re: (Score:1)
The Xbox Phone - with Zune technology.
MS, stay out of markets you do not understand and are far to late an entry to get any appreciable market share.
Comes in Unicorn Stripe and Fluffy Candy options. With real stickiness for the keys!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1. I use my phone as my communications center. I do a lot of correspondence on it, and the fact that I can get fast turnaround makes it pretty damned useful, if not outright critical, to my job.
2. It's convenient. I can read a book, watch a movie, mindlessly surf, without having to lug out a laptop. As a device to consume media, my smartphone can't be beat.
3. There are a million ways to be surveilled nowadays. Why not criticize people for using debit or credit cards, or going into buildings with CCTV?
4. I h
Re: (Score:2)
I have a smartphone, but it seems to me that I have also bought into the hype and think perhaps trading down to a simple phone would be better. First, the voice quality on all these phones suck... Consumer Reports doesn't give a good rating to anybody.
I do use my phone for correspondence - mostly text messaging though. It wouldn't be a problem for me to wait until I get home or to the office - if there's really an emergency, you wouldn't send email anyway, you'd call or text, both of which are available o
Oh no.... (Score:2)
Insider Info (Score:2)
Similar in concept to the new laptop with the thin carpet on the keys, the new phones will have 1.5" shag carpeting.
This will serve several purposes:
1. Make it softer in one's pocket.
2. No need for a third party case (not even possible)
3. A convenient towel that one will always carry around.
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking it would look like a very large paperclip, you could clip it on any article of clothing or body part. It will have a snappy name, like Clippy.
Re:Insider Info (Bindy) (Score:1)
I was thinking it would look like a very large paperclip, you could clip it on any article of clothing or body part. It will have a snappy name, like Clippy.
The new Microsoft Phone AI assistant is actually a binder clip, called Bindy. He's into BDM. Sometimes he gets a little needy. Just slap him.
They won't stop chasing Apple (Score:2)
I don't doubt there will eventually be something new on the horizon, but I think it's definitely time for them to stop trying to force their way into the phone market. While it was in full swing, it bled over into every single product they made (Windows 8 and 10, the current Office design and subscription model, etc.) For a while it seemed they were obsessed with getting access to the magic ATM that is the 30% cut on all customer purchases. That's where the Store, Windows RT and now WIndows 10 S is coming f
Re: (Score:2)
The problem MS has is that they can't ignore mobile. Yes their phone business is dead, but the industry isn't. MS's core business is seriously under threat if they ignore mobile or even fail to adequately provide for it.
For instance, the new surface laptop is a direct assault on chromebooks. Google is keen on displacing windows/microsoft, and they're going about it rather methodically. I think that the future of any company is hinged on mobile, it's just how a very large amount of people access the internet
Phone Idea (Score:2)
Will be like the Zune but more unusable (Score:1)
The new Microsoft Phones will be more like the Zune, but even more unusable. You have to go down five menu levels to change the volume, and the menus will change depending on how often you use them.
For example, let's say you get a lot of spam cell calls. If you ignore them, the new Microsoft Phone will realize you really like them, but are afraid to admit it, and make the rings even louder and add phone vibration effects so that your car crashes when someone spam calls you from India.
Especially India.
Goodie! (Score:2)
I can't wait to see the next device Microsoft puts out, then abandons 6 months later because it doesn't mystically sell like hotcakes right out of the gate.
Not a solution (Score:2)
Problem with today's Windows phones: they don't look or work like Apple or Android, so nobody wants them.
Nardella's solution: promise new phones that won't look like Apple or Android products.
Pardon me, I'm off to short some Microsoft stock.
Re: (Score:2)
Nadella more and more reminds me of the Soviet leaders of the old days. Things got worse and worse and they kept promising that it's all going to be really awesome really soon now.
We know how this ended.
And I have high hopes for a repetition of history!
Leaked details of new Windows phone. (Score:2)
It's so damned simple (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Crap, even at $800, I'd buy one since I don't need a $700 laptop and $300 phone anymore.
Now you know why they won't do it. You and many, many people will stop buying Windows licenses. For a huge number of people, once the phone docks to KVM, they are completely done with buying real computers anymore. At best its a net-zero long-term business prospect for Microsoft, at worst its an awful burden because they have to keep supporting a PC-centric Windows for the remaining (1/3?) of the market that wants an actual PC.
You can also just hear the version 1 criticism if its not x86 compatible -- "M
Re: (Score:2)
I've been waiting for something like that to come along, and found one on Indiegogo (Turn Your Smartphone Into A Laptop [goo.gl]). I don't own a compatible phone, nor do I see buying one any time soon, but I'd get the four pack for my family in a heartbeat if I did. It is compatible (in addition to Apple and Android) with some Windows phones.
It's inevitable to me that we ultimately will have just the one device we take everywhere that can be used on it's own, but also attached to something that makes it more usabl
Re: (Score:2)
I agree :-)
Unless a 'phone' can replace ordinary users laptops (eg. sales, finance, mgmt, marketing even), then it's nothing new and no use. A phone that can be controlled via a 'group policy' type mechanism, that stores all of it's data in 'the cloud' via a background sync mechanism (like OneDrive) and still allows the end user to do some personalisation and install a few apps (presumably from a controlled store, maybe even controlled by the company they work for).
If it's anything less that this, then the
Re: (Score:2)
What's funny is they did most of this years ago.
My ex worked at Intel and had brought a Wintel phone home (windows 8, low-power Atom chip). It was actually a very responsive, nice phone. Being x86 it could have handled a lot of different tasks. Unfortunately it didn't quite have the battery life it needed, the form factor was too blocky (think Nokia with less rounded edges) and plagued by Windows CE/8 Mobile (~5 years ago).
I would have bought one if the kinks had been worked out. And I had one of the old wi
Re: (Score:2)
Damn right! I can fail at this long before MS gets a chance!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, doesn't it say the opposite of the headline? (Score:2)
If Microsoft is looking for the "next change in form and function" wouldn't that imply it's something entirely different than a phone? I mean phones have been rectangular-ish slabs for the last ~20 years. Multi-touch smart phones is now ~10 years old. None of those concepts seem likely to change. Maybe you can invent something totally different that can sorta function like a phone just like a PC with a headset, but nobody's going to call that a phone. In fact, the name is pretty much an anachronism by now b
Re: (Score:2)
That would then be a text massage, wouldn't it?
Coming Soon (Score:1)
Oh look, hot air! (Score:2)
Not sure if it's a markedroid speaking or vaporware.
Probably both.
kill, steal, control - lather rinse repeat (Score:3)
What's he on about? (Score:2)
What's the silly bugger on about? Are they going to be triangular or something?
So in other words... (Score:2)
so original and appealing that OEMs won't be able to resist tagging along
We have no fucking idea what we're going to do next, but we're totally playing it off like shits about to get real. Please, buy our phones! We will literally give you an HP laptop and a Windows Phone if you just promise to let everyone you know, know that you are using a Windows phone and you, like this guy [imgur.com], are really enjoying the phone and think it is hip. Why are you all not buying our phones!!?
Re: (Score:2)