HTC Introduces Eye-Tracking 'VR Ad Service' (pcgamer.com) 87
We all knew this day would come: HTC has introduced a "VR Ad Service" that knows when viewers are actively looking at ads. "Ads that appear in immersive VR environments can not only provide more effective impressions, they can also track whether the users have viewed them or have turned away their gaze. Accordingly, the multiplied effect of effective impressions and verified viewings will bring you higher advertising revenue!" HTC explains. PC Gamer reports: Advertisers will only pay for ads after they've been viewed, according to Business Insider. Some of the formats they will use include loading scenes, 2D and 3D in-app placements, app recommendation banners, and big screen video. This will be an opt-in ad service for developers. HTC notes that by opting in, "all of your free apps would be automatically put on the list which can be used to integrate VR Ads." News of in-game ads coming to VR isn't exactly the sort of thing that will excite gamers. If there's a silver lining here, it's that ads are more likely to be relevant to the viewer's interests over time, at least in theory. "Compared to ordinary ad impressions, ads that are seen by users in a immersive VR environment can not only meet the user's needs by means of precise re-targeting, but can also be detected if they are viewed effectively by users," HTC states. "Therefore, promotion of your applications would have much more effective impression, which not only arouses the attention of potential users and enhance brand image, but further attracts interested users directly to download your apps in the VR environment!"
Is this is still the obnoxious 1st april prank ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"If there's a silver lining here" no there isn't any. Advertiser knowing more about us is not a silver lining it is an invasion of our privacy.
It's an invasion of privacy if your attention is being tracked by their software.
And if you're wearing one of their VR helmets.
And if anybody bothers to create any content for their VR system.
And if people actually buy it.
And if they aren't using a cracked version that has the ad-tracking software disabled, or fudged to make their software think you have an unnatural obsession with one particular advertisement.
That's a lot of ifs.
For the rest of us in the mundane quotidian real world, it's not so muc
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
See above for why I advocate for the elimination of AC posts, and the addition of an ignore option.
Re: (Score:2)
See above for why I advocate for the elimination of AC posts, and the addition of an ignore option.
I support your suggestion. I appreciate the idea behind anonymous posting, but I think the disadvantages outweigh the benefits.
Also some keyword and phrase filters might not hurt. I don't see many places where the words "JUDEN SLIME!!!" would be a valid part of the legitimate discussions here (yes, there may be a few corner cases, but they'd be far and few between).
Remember when... (Score:1)
Remember when this sort of thing would be considered an april fool's joke? Now it's just too realistic.
Anyone seen Black Mirror's Fifteen Million Merits? (Score:5, Interesting)
S01E02.
One of the things they had were these weird cubes people lived in where all the walls and ceiling were basically LCD panels. Occasionally they'd get blasted by advertisements, and when the protagonist closed his eyes or averted his gaze, all the screens would lock down with this red warning that said "RESUME VIEWING" while a high pitched alternating tone filled the room.
Here's one of the scenes in question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5eGo1vE41w
I was wondering how long it'd take before some company implemented something exactly like that. Looks like we're already there...
Re: (Score:1)
Well, does anyone have an advice on how to stop spammer from reaching me? Not because I hate it, not because their products are bad, but because I am broke. I owe about one million dollars, I dont have a job, I dont have a girlfrien, I dont need a bigger dick, I am not fat or bald, and I dont want neither do I need to look at their ads, Please, is there some way io can inform these spammers that I am broke? They are wasting their time, please bother someone else who has money.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like you need a beer, BUY CHEAP BEER ONLINE...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. I actually seached cuz I figured someone would have posted it before me.
And don't close your eyes!
Re: (Score:1)
I HATE advertisements! (Score:3, Informative)
I really think advertisements are a curse upon humanity. Surely HTC and app developers can survive without VR ads -- and, yet, HTC wants to tap in to the same revenue stream which made Google huge. I know companies with shareholders are driven to seek profit almost anywhere within legal limits, but I wish we lived in a world where consideration of the experiences of fellow humans had a higher priority than profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Let's here it
Where?
for the increased ignorance that lack of advertising could bring!
We could still find out about new products without advertising as we know it today. They would be reported upon.
Re: (Score:2)
I still consciously avoid products that have been promoted in annoying advertisements, if there is an alternative brand available.
There are only a very small number of advertisements which I have seen (the first 2 times anyway) and noted to be a clever, amusing and/or non-annoying ad. Can't recall if that has encouraged me to buy that particular brand instead of another tho.
Re: (Score:2)
The suggestion that advertising could be included in "free" apps is hard to debate, tho I prefer to pay for the games I use and not be bothered with suggestions of other things I could pay for, while playing the game.
I guess it would be different if the advertisers wanted to provide us with the VR gear for free tho... bring on your free games with ads if you give me the hardware to use it on my PS4 : )
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Never ever forget targeted ads are actually a scam. The advertising was targeted but it was not targeted at end users, it was targeted at advertisers. Reality of targeted advertising;
1. Search for new car
2. Buy new car based upon specs and price
3. Data miner recognises you 'WERE' looking for a new car.
4. Where the fuck are all the stupid car ads coming from, I just bought a car why the fuck would I buy another one.
5. Convince advertisers this works.
6. Profit (until the advertisers go broke targeting ads
Its my eyeballs ... (Score:2)
don't I get a say in this ?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, you do. You get to say whether you wear a VR headset or not. Just like now you can decide to watch TV or not.
For instance, I watch Netflix. Haven't seen an ad in years....
This isn't going to go over well. (Score:5, Insightful)
While cheapy smartphone games may be so plentiful and cheap that they can be used for cannon fodder, VR games are still relatively few in number and costly. Nobody is going to pay for $60 game to get blasted by ads. If the games were free, people would put up with it but VR games are costly to develop and ads easily spoil any type of emotional environment they work at constructing. I don't foresee this getting any traction.
Re: (Score:2)
I think there's actually more room for ads in VR, because you can use product placement in the same way that they use it in movies and TV. For example, the character is consuming a fizzy canned beverage. On TV, different labels can be mapped onto the beverage for different markets. In VR, different labels can be mapped onto the beverage for different customers. When done tastefully, you'll hardly even notice. Of course, with ubiquitous tracking bugs, ads will be able to follow you from websites into games,
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody is going to pay for $60 game to get blasted by ads.
That's what you think [kym-cdn.com]
April Fools! (Score:4, Interesting)
Not eye-tracking ads, that's totally plausible. The idea that you're not going to have to pay for ad impressions unless someone looks at your ad is the joke. They might give you some eye-tracking information if someone looks at your ad, though, and maybe you'll pay more.
The "engaging ad" lie (Score:3)
Dear advertising customers. Yes, you out there who fall for the lie that ad companies tell you. That you can actually "engage" or otherwise get anyone interested in your ad by making it topical, or making it about something the person is actually interested in. The sad truth is that your ad can be as topical and engaging as could be about something I want and still it would be considered a nuisance. Allow me to inform you why.
Take YouTube. You know, that online TV-Replacement. Where I, as a user, can decide that "hey, I want to see a video". Now, let's imagine I want to see a video of my favorite music band. I type in the name of the band and the name of the song, expecting to watch the video to said song.
Now you could come with the most on-topic ad one could imagine: Imagine you're a music promoter and you'd want to promote a gig of that band in my home town. It does not get any more on-topic, engaging and interesting to the customer than this. And STILL I would not even see what you are promoting but rather annoyed click on the 5 second ticker that ticks down to "skip". Because at that very moment, my expectation and my "want" was to see that video. Not your ad, not anything else, I want that video. Anything that stands between me and that video is a nuisance, distraction and generally something I do NOT want.
You see the problem? When people are actively trying to get something specific, anything that blocks their access to it is seen as an interruption and nuisance that they want to get rid of. No matter what it is.
What does work a lot better is when people watch some videos of one of their YouTube favorites and you can get them to endorse your product, especially if they have the skill to weave that in an interesting way into their presentation. Because more often than not they watch the channel for the person and his or her presenting style, not exclusively for the content presented, so the person they like presenting your product in an engaging way can actually work. Provided your product is in any way sensibly connected with the show at hand.
Re: The "engaging ad" lie (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Fun fact: "Everyone thinks they are immune to the effects of advertising, but studies show everyone is mistaken."
I don't think I'm immune to the effects, I think I have fostered in myself other effects which are stronger. For example, the "I'm not going to buy your shit because I hate your commercial" effect.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, name 3 products you have seen YouTube ads for.
Hell, I'd fail at naming one. All I see is 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, skip.
Re: (Score:2)
What does work a lot better is when people watch some videos of one of their YouTube favorites and you can get them to endorse your product, especially if they have the skill to weave that in an interesting way into their presentation. Because more often than not they watch the channel for the person and his or her presenting style, not exclusively for the content presented, so the person they like presenting your product in an engaging way can actually work. Provided your product is in any way sensibly connected with the show at hand.
As a side note, in the early days of TV, ALL commercials were like this, simply because it wasn't technically feasible to 'cut' to a pre-recorded commercial. Commercials were all done live within the show itself, sometimes with a product endorsement, sometimes by panning the camera over to an off-stage table with a product display, and sometimes by just holding a sign in front of the camera with a live voice-over.
Re: (Score:2)
This can actually have way more impact than a prerecorded ad if (and only if) a few criteria are met.
First and foremost, the viewer not only has to trust the person doing the promotion, but he also has to believe the person. The ad subject has to match the person doing it. Imagine I'm doing a show about how to keep your computer and home network safe and free of spyware and other nuisance, you'd probably not really consider me too believable if I run ads for, say, dishwasher detergent. Of course I might use
Shitty ads with shitty VR (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For a second, I read that as "Samsung Gear VR sucks boobs" and I was willing to give it a chance.
Why do companies insist that things like this... (Score:3)
Why do companies insist that things like this... are somehow a service?
serv.ice: noun:
1. the action of helping someone.
2. a system supplying a public need such as transport, communications, or utilities such as electricity and water.
Re: (Score:3)
How can a user NOT see the ads? (Score:2)
Putting the cart before the horse (Score:2)
Before HTC starts talking about using eye-tracking in VR to measure ad-views, they need to actually add eye-tracking to the Vive first (there is a 3rd party working on this, but not HTC itself)
Oh Joy! (Score:2)
I don't even use my HTC Vive anymore... (Score:2)
...so good luck with that.
One of the reasons I opted for the HTC Vive back then, was the promise of Oculus users being tracked by facebook at any time, whatever you watched and did.
Sounds like you wish VR an early death. We don't even have proper AAA titles for it yet, just tons of weird "Look ma! I can create an Unity VR game in less than a day!" games.
Billboards in game worlds (Score:1)
If I'm playing a car racing game, I won't think it out of place to see billboards on the side of the road. If they advertise Coke/Pepsi, and the developer makes some money, that's fine.
So long as the ads are no more intrusive than the real world, and actually add to the game world, I'd be ok with this.