Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Power Transportation Hardware

Not Just Samsung? The Increasing Frequency Of Battery Fires (sltrib.com) 89

Dozens of aircraft fires have been caused by lithium batteries, and after 2013 Tesla even strengthened their battery shields after several of their cars caught on fire. An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes the AP: Samsung's Note 7 isn't the only gadget to catch fire thanks to lithium-battery problems, which have afflicted everything from iPhones to Tesla cars to Boeing jetliners. Blame chemistry and the fact that the batteries we rely on for everyday life are prone to leaking and even bursting into flame if damaged, defective or exposed to excessive heat...

Still, lithium batteries are so ubiquitous that ordinary users of phones and computers shouldn't worry. Research suggests that you're more likely to get hurt by a kitchen grease fire or a drunk driver than the battery powering your iPhone, Kindle or laptop. "It's not like we live in a world where people's smartphones spontaneously combust," said Ramon Llamas, research manager of research firm IDC's mobile phones team. He said owners of Galaxy Note 7s should err on the side of caution and contact Samsung for a replacement that doesn't run the same risk.

The article also reports that hoverboards were linked to at least 99 electrical fires in America that were presumably caused by battery problems. "Amazon, Best Buy and other retailers dumped the products after videos of burning hoverboards went viral."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Not Just Samsung? The Increasing Frequency Of Battery Fires

Comments Filter:
  • by thundercattt ( 4205847 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @04:40PM (#52822497)
    This was a big issue with Asus also when I worked there. Took them awhile to figure out that it was the camera wire that crossed the battery that was causing it.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Like gasoline, or propane, or radioactive plutonium.

  • excessive heat (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @04:45PM (#52822515)

    there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat. the basic issue is that if you exceed a certain rate of charge or discharge then your battery is going to go up in flames. this is why battery cells are rated for maximum charge and discharge rate. when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

    • Re:excessive heat (Score:4, Insightful)

      by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @06:24PM (#52822847)

      when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

      Except that few if any of these fires are caused by improper charging speeds. Nearly all product recall related fires have been due to quality control issues on the cells themselves, or faults in the circuit that overcharge individual cells in a pack, not due to engineering fault on the charging rate.

      Especially since overdoing the rates of charges and discharges cause premature battery failure long before it causes batteries to catch fire.

      • This is 2016! Quality control was abandoned years ago in favor of lower cost and faster delivery times. Eating the cost for having to replace or rework stuff is considered cheaper than preventing bad things from happening, although it rarely is.
        • Given the number of lithium batteries in the world, the number of fires, and the quick recall, your statement is unfounded. Not only because of the rarity of events, but given the volumes of production when compared with the rarity of events, it probably truly is cheaper to simply replace all devices than to do many years of QC to catch such a rare event.

        • This is 2016! Quality control was abandoned years ago in favor of lower cost and faster delivery times. Eating the cost for having to replace or rework stuff is considered cheaper than preventing bad things from happening, although it rarely is.

          Sorry, but that might be an issue if all the batteries burst into flame, or even a majority of them.

          Its actually a difficult task to pack that much energy into a tiny little battery, and while its possible to have QC issues, there is a whole lot of QC happening, or else the things wouldn't function at all.

          We're so used to these little gadgets, that when we get a phone that's half as thin as the last one, but the battery lasts twice as long, we just say 'Kewl", and don't give a second thought to it, unt

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat. the basic issue is that if you exceed a certain rate of charge or discharge then your battery is going to go up in flames. this is why battery cells are rated for maximum charge and discharge rate. when companies ignore the charge/discharge ratings you end up with devices that are prone to combusting.

      Excepting a Tesla, most battery powered devices are charged from current-limited sou

    • Or if companies making the batteries claim that their product can handle the charge/discharge rates just to get the multimillion order from Samsung. Would not be the first time where vendors make all kinds of claims and promises just to close a deal.
    • there is one critical thing about the excessive heat that is being left out, the batteries are generating the excessive heat.

      It all comes down to energy density. As customers demand long battery life, and marketing forces push thinner and lighter, we have largely accommodated them. But the margins between safe operation and a big problem become razr thin.

      And the high energy density packed into a small space is just asking for trouble. It's a tribute to manufacturing that we've had a little trouble with battery fires as we have so far.

  • Technology improves every year. Batteries just get better and better. This must be a lie.
  • by BigSlowTarget ( 325940 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @04:53PM (#52822551) Journal

    I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

    • Also, it needs a less fumblefingery keyboard.

    • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

      I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

      They said that only batteries from one of their two battery suppliers had problem, so I'm guessing the fix is to identify whether your battery is from that battery manufacturer or not. If not, it would come back as "no problem found", else they would replace it

      • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

        Lowest tender wins, everybody else loses. Just a fact of psychopathic capitalism and being able to claim bonuses and make money disappear prior to declaring bankruptcy as a result of all the damages and as a bonus claiming a golden parachute. The reward buying politicians for decades, those doing the buying basically get away with fraud and greed driven murder.

        • Don't blame it on capitalism and big wigs. It is us who rather buy the lower priced gadget than one that is much more expensive...unless, of course, it has an Apple logo on it, but that no longer stands for superior design or high quality either, only for high prices.
      • I'm submitting from one of these. The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire for a 1 in 1 chamce of crappy charging and low battery life. If the problem was an aggressive charge cycle the resolution might well ne to wimpify it.

        They said that only batteries from one of their two battery suppliers had problem, so I'm guessing the fix is to identify whether your battery is from that battery manufacturer or not. If not, it would come back as "no problem found", else they would replace it with a battery from the other supplier while trying to find a third supplier to ensure that there aren't supply problems later.

        So just unclip the battery and take a look. Oh wait...

    • The problem is, the aggressive charge/discharge cycle is what's giving these batteries a competitive energy density compared to other battery chemistry and other energy storage solutions.

      I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that the solution will be to partition the two reactants in the battery chemistry with something more than a 24 micrometer separator [batteryuniversity.com]. Possibly even switch to a chemistry which doesn't require carrying around one of the reactants at all, and getting it from the air. You know, like
    • The question I have is am I trading a 1 in 50,000 chance of fire

      Are you? On day one the chance was 1 in infinity because there were no fires. Only 16 days later were down to the 1 in 50000. What happens in another 16 days? If this was guaranteed to randomly burst into flames sometime in the next year, would you consider returning it then? I wonder what your insurance company would think if your house burnt down as a result of a device you knew had a product recall notice out?

      As for crappy charging and low battery life, you don't know that. You don't know the exact probl

  • by Kohath ( 38547 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @05:01PM (#52822587)

    It's not Apple, so "ho hum, this has been happening to everyone more and more often".

  • Unit growth in Li-ion sales has been 18%+ for quite a while and is projected to continue at around 18% for years to come.
    • by mysidia ( 191772 )

      I think we need industry authorities to come to conclusion that the Lithium-Ion chemistry is too unstable and mandate the use of a safer option such as LiFePO4.

    • by Dahamma ( 304068 )

      Exactly. Increasing frequency does not mean increasing rate.

      There are a lot more automobile-related deaths than there were 70 years ago, does that mean cars are less safe?

  • Energy density (Score:5, Insightful)

    by goodmanj ( 234846 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @05:44PM (#52822691)

    It's all about our expectations of energy density. Think about it: would you be surprised to hear that a small container of gasoline caught fire? Of course not, and the risks involved in a gas-powered phone are obvious. Modern batteries don't store as much energy per mass as gasoline -- not even close -- but as we push in that direction we shouldn't be surprised that they start behaving less like electronics and more like explosives.

    • I was hoping someone else figured this one out. I explain to non-technical people all the time that it's not hard to store large amounts of energy in a small space, it's hard to keep that energy from being released all at once in a KB malfunction.

      The smart ones ask what KB stands for. The really smart ones figure out it means "KaBoom" on their own.

    • batteries don't store as much energy per mass as gasoline -- not even close -- but as we push in that direction we shouldn't be surprised that they start behaving less like electronics and more like explosives.

      That's moronic. NiMH has about 2/3rds the energy density by volume (not weight) of Li-Ion batteries, and NiMH is about the most stable battery you can get, which won't explode or burn no matter how badly you abuse them. Similarly, LiFePo4 batteries are slightly less powerful than the more common Li-

  • Lithium iron phosphate batteries have about the same energy density and yet they won't randomly explode or catch fire. You can shoot them, use them as bowling balls and Intentionally destroy them by massively over charging or pulling current down yet they are not going to explode or catch fire.

    There is obvious still risk with stored energy. You could short a conductor and start a fire by resistive heating yet the assertion this is unavoidable "cuz energy density" is BS. Food in your fridge has a much hig

    • It's not the same energy density, it's about half. This is workable for a car - although it wouldn't have Tesla like range or handling, but you'd get 600k miles before the batteries were under 80% capacity - but impractical for a competitive phone.

      • It's not the same energy density, it's about half. This is workable for a car - although it wouldn't have Tesla like range or handling, but you'd get 600k miles before the batteries were under 80% capacity - but impractical for a competitive phone.

        I think people are confusing weight with density. Yes the battery itself would weigh twice as much but wouldn't necessarily be any bigger.

        • Per wikipedia, "Energy density is the amount of energy stored in a given system or region of space per unit volume or mass". So other people aren't confused, they are just choosing the more relevant of the 2 measures. The reason it's generally more relevant is because weight more directly determines the energy required to carry the energy storage medium. For phones, obviously both a heavier weight and a bigger size are disadvantages, and the ~1000 cycles you get from lithium-cobalt is close to the ~3 yea

  • by retroworks ( 652802 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @06:18PM (#52822817) Homepage Journal

    I manage an electronics recycling company. We are all hand disassembly, but even we have seen lithium battery fires. The companies which switched to shredding (to reduce labor costs) have had a serious and growing problem with fires from charged lithium batteries exposed to oxygen.

    We use this youtube video for staff training

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

    • I was taking apart an old failed tablet, was going to use the battery for a fun project with mw daughter. When trying to cut away some adhesive I accidentally sliced the battery which immediately sparked and smoked. I was aware of that possibility but it was surprisingly easy to cause.
  • Tesla? Really? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @06:20PM (#52822831)

    Isn't it a bit disingenious to lump a whole lot of unprovoked fires started during standard normal operation of a device in with Tesla having major accidents? I mean every time we hear of a Tesla fire it's after the car got airborne, flew through a brick wall, and impaled itself on road debris. It's like lumping deaths due to mobster killings in with death due to medical conditions.

  • ...apparently not [google.com], but it looks like Christmas might have something to do with it.

    RECALL JESUS.

  • by Stan92057 ( 737634 ) on Saturday September 03, 2016 @08:38PM (#52823167)
    Stop calling them hoverboards!! They do not hover in any shape or form the are a device that carried its load on WHEELS.And the wheels are firmly planted on the ground.
    • Stop calling them hoverboards!! They do not hover in any shape or form

      Sure. Just as soon as you stop calling cars by animal names... It's not a mustang, not a jaguar, not a ram, not a cougar. None of those animals have cup-holders. It's false-advertising!

  • I don't worry about the one off situations that occur for the end user. The real issue is what brought down the UPS 747 outside of Dubai in 2010. While this was a freight aircraft, pallets of these things are routinely shipped as cargo commercial airlines. Scores of lithium batteries left unattended in the cargo hold does concern me.
  • About six weeks ago I woke up to a fire started by a lithium-ion battery. It was pure luck I woke up because I had disconnected the smoke detector while seasoning cast iron cookware the evening before and hadn't yet reconnected it.

    It was a cheap chinese LED camping lantern with an integrated USB charger. I had it charging and went to bed. I woke up and put the fire out, and put the hot melty charred items in the freshly-seasoned cast iron skillet and let it cool off. Once it was cool enough I started disass

    • Li-ion cells are inherently hazardous because they're not safe to be used without a working cut-out and even then can catch fire when damaged. How many of these fires are down to dodgy remanufacturing practices like those you describe and how many to imperfect quality control when the cells were first made? How often do properly made Li-ion cells catch fire?

  • I strap propellers to 1300mah lipos and drain them at rates exceeding 100amps. I will drain said Lipo in approximately 180 seconds. Sometimes less. And when they land they are often exceeding 60c.

    Not only that but I will often slam them into hard surfaces, trees, rocks, or pieces of plastic that are rotating at 30,000 rpm +. Despite this I have yet to have a single one spontaneously go up in flames. I have seen the after effects of over charging lipos when people decided to charge them to too high a vo

    • by GuB-42 ( 2483988 )

      You may be using LFP batteries, which are much safer and support much greater loads than the LCO batteries found in phones.
      The downside is that they have about half the energy density.

      • I'm honestly not sure. They are always referred to as Lithium Poly. Claimed power density is 0.15-0.17kw/kg. They are 4 cells in parallel and operate at 16v

        http://www.hobbyking.com/hobby... [hobbyking.com]

        • by GuB-42 ( 2483988 )

          Your batteries seem to weight about twice as much as my cell phone batteries per Wh. They are however much, much more powerful.
          It seems to match a phosphate or manganese chemistry rather than the more common and more energy dense cobalt. I am no expert though.

          See : http://batteryuniversity.com/l... [batteryuniversity.com]

          • They are also a lot larger. I don't know what the internal chemistry of them is.

            I do know though if you puncture them they will burn, especially when they are fully charged.

            The real risk comes though when people charge them the wrong way.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...