Samsung To Roll Out In-TV Ads To Legacy Displays Via Software Update 304
An anonymous reader writes: According to an insider at Samsung's growing advertising team in New York, the second-largest consumer tech manufacturer in the world is planning to retrofit older network-connected TVs to display tiled ads via a software update. The South Korean company, which has seen a 20.9% decline in television sales in Q1 of 2016 under fierce competition from China, has included 'baked' ads into the interface of its recent TV offerings, and also experimented with injecting ads into users' streamed video, transmitting voice commands to a third party -- and, ironically, battling Android over its own AdBlocking technology.
Let me get this straight... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"The South Korean company, which has seen a 20.9% decline in television sales in Q1 of 2016 under fierce competition from China..." So they give consumers MORE reasons NOT to buy their TVs?!!!
Yes, of course. Doesn't this make sense? If it doesn't, I'm sure they have an app you can download that will explain it, with pretty ads...
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course, that's how short term bonuses work. My local council did the same thing. Revenue from parking was declining because the city is a shitty and no-one wants to visit it, so the jacked up the prices to above the level of much more attractive destinations. For a few months it worked and the consultant justified his fees and buggered off.
Once people had been stung once or revenues declined even further, naturally. But who cares, the guy got his bonus, another great success to put on his CV. Next quarter is someone else's problem.
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm a long time Samsung customer: Samsung TVs, fridge, dishwasher, multiple phones, and probably a few other things. I'm telling you right now - if they start injecting ads into my products I will NEVER buy from them again.
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:5, Informative)
100% agree.
Samsung used to be my go-to for monitors and TVs and such, but if they're going to start injecting ads on my TV, I will remove them from consideration next time I need to update.
I will remove any TV from consideration that exhibits this behavior. I will vote with my wallet.
Re: (Score:2)
I used to respect Samsung, but if they keep doing that, I will just buy my next TV from their Chinese competitors, which won't have that issue.
I'm content with TVs being TVs... no WAN connection needed. Plus, there are many devices which do the job better than "smart" TVs. A Roku model, Chromecast, AppleTV, or a HTPC is a lot more useful.
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:4, Interesting)
Roku/Chromecast/AppleTV/HTPC + dumb computer monitor.
Sure, you won't be able to find a 60" display but at least you'll be 100% sure that your display won't start spying on you or display unwanted things.
Re: (Score:3)
I thought about doing something like this, but when I went looking for a "dumb computer monitor" of appropriate size, it turned out it was *much* more expensive than any TV.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't just stop buying from them. They've noticed a drop in sales and are doing these stupid things in response. Send them an email explaining why you won't buy their products until they change their ways. They probably won't even respond let alone change their ways. But at the very least how can you expect them to change if you don't inform them. Maybe if enough people did this then they would change. Perhaps they aren't getting hit by the Chinese manufacturers but it's just many people not buying their
Re: (Score:2)
lovely let's start an annoying ad campaign to get people to sign a petition against annoying ads
Re: (Score:2)
Where did I say start an ad campaign? I just said to write a letter. I didn't say anything about trying to get other people to write letters.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I just thought that's where it would have to go before it would do any good.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, in order for it to do any good many people would have to do this. I don't know how to achieve this. It's just something that I do when I take my business elsewhere because a company can't change if they don't know why I'm moving. It's also handy when dealing with the new business if they make me unhappy because I can remind them that they only have my business as I switched to them. They normally shape up pretty quick.
I stopped buying from Adidas because they continued supporting FIFA. I wrote them but
Re: (Score:3)
Even better: Tweet them, let the rest of the world see your complaint.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't buy a Samsung TV anyway: they're all "smart TVs" now so naturally they're going to be prone to this kind of crap. Stick with the dumb TVs. I'm pretty sure Seiki still sells good-quality dumb TVs, maybe Vizio too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
2016 Vizios beat the pants off of 2016 Samsungs in terms of quality. At half the price. (I couldn't believe it either. I read all about it on AVS forum then I schlepped out to a Best Buy to see it for myself. 2016 Vizio P series.)
If ads are their response, then it's over.
Re: (Score:2)
No kidding, my first reaction was "Guess who I won't be buying my next TV from"
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like Color Printers. Buy them cheap and then pay a lot of money on the consumables. But wait - I spent $2,000 buying my fancy TV and now they want to "inject" ads into it?
My problems with this ad model is that I can't opt out. Think of regular TV - I can watch network TV "for free" and view ads.... or purchase HBO/Netflix/etc for the ad-free experience. How will I opt out in this model?
Spending $2,000 apparently wasn't enough.
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:4, Interesting)
not to mention all the spying features built into 'smart' tv's - you think they'd learn something!
They did... That most people are fucking idiots that will trade their privacy for a $5 off coupon.
What the fing f ?! (Score:3)
Seriously what the hell!
Re:What the fing f ?! (Score:5, Insightful)
It's times like this when Stallman's vociferous demand for nothing less than fully free software as a necessary condition of user control looks more like lucid foresight and less like blinkered monomania. The issue was largely dormant back when firmware upgrades were hard and internet connections were the exception rather than the rule; but now it is eminently practical for a vendor to extend their control over something they supposedly sold to you more or less in perpetuity.
Re: (Score:2)
What happens if you decline the new EULA?
If my TV did this I'd return it to the shop for a refund. I bought it to avoid ads (that's what the smart features are for, watching media without ads) and now it's not fit for purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Exactly: people laughed and mocked Stallman for his principles and advocacy of Free software, and now look at how things are turning out: he's been proven right. But people made their choice, and now the chickens are coming home to roost. Part of me is laughing my ass off about a lot of stuff going on these days like this, or like Windows 10 and all the stuff people complain about there, because people have done it to themselves. I think the future is likely to turn out like a hellish cross between 1984
Re: (Score:2)
So if I want more ads (Score:2)
I should buy a Samsung TV
But what if I don't want ads?
Re:So if I want more ads (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't connect the TV to the internet. No internet, no ads. Use an external device for providing content.
Re:So if I want more ads (Score:5, Funny)
That's what I did years ago when I had a Samsung TV. I never connected it to my network and just played torrented content.
OK, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
However, for Samsung to start injecting commercials into the non-program parts of the TV [for example in the menus] would be a complete breach of the terms and conditions under which the set was purchased. It would be a bit like you purchasing a car, running it for 6 months, then being told by the manufacturer that, "Hey, we've decided your car is now a taxi. You'll have to take fee-paying passengers about when you drive. We won't ask you to change the route, but we will keep all the proceeds of the free rides you need to give."
Not happening.
In the UK at least I think this would fall fall of the "Goods and Services Act", might likely be "false advertising" [for failing to disclose the intent to push adverts], etc, etc.
Interestingly, this isn't the first time that Samsung have tried this. They did it a couple of years ago in Australia and New Zealand, where subscribers to paid network services [like NetFlix] suddenly saw crude, badly-formatted adverts appearing in the middle of (paused) Amazon Prime streaming content. There was uproad, and Samsung pulled the firmware update, hastily claiming it was pushed in error...
We might need to get ready for the same level of uproar if they try again...
Re: (Score:2)
It's another way of saying that one party (Samsung) try to push another party (their customers) into a contract which is completely one-sided.
But even the basics of contract law should defend us here. A
Re:So if I want more ads (Score:4, Insightful)
Get used to it, it's the inevitable future of TV. [blogspot.com]
no ads on Apple TV (Score:3)
just saying...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
... yet.
Nor likely ever.
Afterall, Apple just DISMANTLED its foray into the Banner-Ad space ("iAd"); and considering the time and effort that went into creating that infrastructure having to be taken as a loss on their next Quarter's statement, I doubt seriously if their Board is going to want to venture back into those waters again anytime soon.
Plus, iAd was definitely outside of what Apple considers their most important and main profit-center: Hardware sales.
Re: (Score:2)
To be honest, there are some ads creeping up over there. Was watching a show on the history channel app via apple TV the other day. Showtime add about every three minutes. Same one every time. Was annoying as hell.
More of a history channel app issue than an Apple TV issue. But it's still there.
Re: (Score:2)
Why am I under the impression that it still has advertising only it's more subtle than new cars and feminine hygiene products because it's top movies, shows, and new releases.
Re: (Score:2)
Does someone really need to explain to you the underlying concept of using "Apple TV" features rather than the built-in "Samsung TV" features?
Just means still get a smart TV but use the smarts from some other device or get a dumb TV and do the same.
Re: (Score:2)
But what if I don't want ads?
Then don't watch TV. You may have to wear a blindfold and earplugs if you need to avoid ads entirely in this world.
Lawyer-bait! (Score:3)
A key success metric will be milliseconds-to-first-lawsuit. 4 digits? 5? It'll sure be a non-Samsung shopping opportunity for me if my TV starts exhibiting this behavior.
Re: (Score:2)
What are you going to sue for? You agree to this when you agreed to the EULA. Have fun with all your ads, suckers!
used to be a huge samsung fan (Score:2)
they can now go and fuck themselves
Fuck All Ads. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but this TV will show you ads with your pirated content. The ads are separate from what is being shown so it doesn't matter if you are watching a DVD, cable, streaming content, or something you downloaded.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm done with ads. I will pirate ad free. Forever and ever. You can't make me like your ads. I am not watching nor participating.
Find another way to make money or fuck off forever.
They already have.
http://www.consumerreports.org... [consumerreports.org]
Out of the box (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the TV can't connect to the DRM server to check whether it has been reported as stolen, it must assume it is, to prevent a thief from using it. It is for your own protection, honored customer. It's because Samsung cares about you.
Why do I get ads (Score:4, Insightful)
On something that I paid full price for?
This seems like bait-and-switch to me, and potentially actionable fraud.
Finally! New Functionality! (Score:5, Funny)
I've got a few years old Samsung Smart TV.
Every month or two, I get a notice about another service being discontinued. I think I'm down to maybe three whole apps that still work on it.
Sure, these are invasive ads that weren't a part of the product I bought. But at least Samsung is finally adding in place of their constant stripping of functionality.
When you're a Smart TV owner, you take victories where you can find them.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm having similar experiences with my 5 year old Sony. The Netflix app is lame & slow by today's standards. These days my TV is just a monitor with an AppleTV/Amazon-thingy plugged into it. I'd be pissed if the TV suddenly started showing ads.
I learned this back in the 1970's as a kid watching the Betamax vs VHS wars. Betamax was sweet sounding. But it lost out. Instead buy everything as components (at least things that might last)... and if not a component buy it cheap so it isn't so painful
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Dear Samsung (Score:2)
Dear Samsung,
What part of "NO" was unclear?
Signed,
Every Consumer In The World
Re: (Score:2)
That's the problem. This nastiness wasn't part of the deal. The TV they bought didn't do this. Samsung are altering the deal and telling people to pray they don't alter it further.
This is why I insisted on a dumb TV with a VGA input and no network connection last time.
This is your fault people! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck finding a "dumb" TV.
Everything you say is right, except that more and more "don't buy a smart TV" is equivalent to "don't buy a TV."
Well, almost everything. Curved TVs are every bit as useful as smart TVs (which is to say, not at all.)
Simpler times (Score:2)
About once a month my current TV will become unresponsive to all controls (remote and buttons on the back). My only course of action is to pull everything from the wall and unplug the damn thing for 30 seconds.
At least it doesn't play ads. Our current one is connected to the internet only because my wife cannot figure out the Roku or the Xbox One to stream......
Why the hell would you PAY for this??? (Score:4, Insightful)
I will NEVER buy a 'smart TV'. Ever.
How will these be displayed exactly? (Score:2)
Just curious, how will these sorts of ads be displayed to viewers, and when?
Are they talking about doing this while watching Cable TV programming? While streaming using one of the built-in apps, like Netflix or Vudu? Just while viewing the Smarthub screen?
Does anyone know?
Re: (Score:3)
But the retrofit to older models is a plain annoyance that should not happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Current ad free TV: $599
Future ad-supported TV: $499
Future ad-free TV: $799
Margins on TVs are pretty thin, so they'd have to make a LOT of money from the ads to be able to offer the equipment at a meaningful discount. And the best way to ensure more ad revenue is to entice more people to get the ad-supported version. So increasing the price of the regular equipment gives them a higher profit margin on that equipment, it makes the ad laden version t
Re: (Score:2)
And what would happen if you kept your TV off the network and used something like a Roku to display Netflix and other online content? Would the ads not display? Would they display some default "No Ads Found" message? Would the TV refuse to work unless you hooked it up online? Would someone be able to get the discounted "give me ads" rate, not hook their TV to their network, and then get the no ads experience while saving money?
If the last one is true, then I'll gladly opt in to ads for a reduced price.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ad data could be broadcast. It would less targeted, but they could make it work, degraded video over HDMI, border for ads the TV finds itself. Edge would be more than fast enough, considering how repetitive ads are.
It could still be targeted. TV knows what you are watching and can pick an ad or 20.
Re: (Score:3)
Exposed as a 720p device over HDMI. The borders are for ads. Idiocracy style.
If they really get desperate, they degrade your device further and show more ads.
Re:Samsung employs the footgun ! (Score:4, Insightful)
If you haven't seen it yet, see the "15 Million Merits" episode of "Black Mirror". (ad-free from Netflix, if you're not on a Samsung TV)
Re:Samsung employs the footgun ! (Score:4)
Until they decide they need more money then your future ad-free TV becomes a TV showing ads and you spent an extra $300 for nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
Future ad supported tv: 599
Re: (Score:2)
Only if there's 60" of TV left over once the adspace is deducted.
/ not even then
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
and if it looks like something from idiocracy or the 90's news app "Pointcast" , where the viewable area of the screen is surrounded by blocks of ads with only a small window in the middle with actual content? no thanks, and good day Sir,....I said GOOD DAY SIR!
I'm always reminded of the (then) hilarious SNL sketch "Newsforce" [nbc.com], fake news broadcast, where Chyrons progressively take over the screen, until the announcers are eventually completely squeezed (squozen?) out of the picture entirely.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You won't get much of a bargain on that considering how much of that 60 inches will be consumed by commercials.
Re:Samsung employs the footgun ! (Score:5, Insightful)
Depends what they do with it. If they sell ads to sell you a less expensive TV, maybe a lot of people could jump in. If they sell me a 60" LCD 3DTV for 199$, I could accept the ads.
All this does is fuel a death spiral to the bottom. Before you know it every TV is $199 and buying a display that does not demand an Internet connection, constant data collection (e.g. cyber stalking) and ad pushing are no longer for sale at any price.
This very same thing that happened with the app stores. Everything must be free or token cost because that's what people expect. Before you know it the entirety of the business model for software is indistinguishable from spy/mal/ad ware. Those left willing to pay cost are then summarily ignored by the market.
Re:Kick the TV off the Network (Score:4, Insightful)
Just kick the TV off the network and it can't possibly get ads injected into it's interface.
Most of these things default to ads for their own products if they aren't able to find the network or ad hosts. That's how they've been dealing with people who put DNS-based ad blocking on their networks.
I remember the old days, when a TV was just a TV. About all you could do with it was use an antenna or attach it to a cable service. But even cable ended up being a scam, it originally was not supposed to have ads. As the subscriptions were supposed to be split between the carrier and the networks, but I guess businesses figured out they could change the deal on us and we weren't going to do anything to stop them.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of these things default to ads for their own products if they aren't able to find the network or ad hosts.
Or it'll be made so it "needs" to be connected to the internet to "validate" something or other and won't work unless it gets to phone home once a minute or so.
Re: (Score:2)
These companies really suck.
Re: (Score:2)
These companies really suck.
It's worse than that. To them, advertising is the Holy Grail and nothing but nothing is more important.
Customers? Fuck 'em!
User experience? Who gives a shit?
Re: (Score:3)
Doesn't roku still have ads on its main screen?
Or did they change their mind on that?
Re: (Score:3)
Smart TVs are a decent idea but like everything else related to communication or multimedia, it needs to run Free Software. We have all already been given tons of proof that nearly anything that you use to interface with the rest of the world (even if the user is just a "consumer" but moreso when they're not) is too easy to abuse if it can be made to primarily serve the interests of anyone else.
The user needs to be the top, final authority and master, and Free Software is the only way anyone has come up wit
Soon... (Score:5, Funny)
In the aftermath of which, humans will evolve wings and curse the ground.
Re: (Score:2)
In the meantime, I'll go buy myself a new pair of shoes.
Re: (Score:2)
Could we stop for ice cream on the way back?
Re:Soon... (Score:5, Interesting)
But lowering my exposure has also lowered my tolerance to almost nothing. I can not watch TV when it is on at a friends house at all. And telemarketers get a rapid "fuckoff" in the first three words.
I am the future advertising has made.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm with you on the lost tolerance for ads. Whenever I go to my parent's house they all they a kick out of how repulsed I am at the TV commercials.
As for telemarketers, especially for Time Warner who try ever few months to sell me a cable package I love pointing out how much of a ripoff it is. 'So you're telling me for $100 dollars a month I get to watch TV with 5 minute commercial breaks every 15 minutes? If I watch an 'hour long' TV show 15 minutes of my life was wasted on ads. And I have to pay for that?
Re:Soon... (Score:4, Informative)
I'm with you on the lost tolerance for ads. Whenever I go to my parent's house they all they a kick out of how repulsed I am at the TV commercials.
As for telemarketers, especially for Time Warner who try ever few months to sell me a cable package I love pointing out how much of a ripoff it is. 'So you're telling me for $100 dollars a month I get to watch TV with 5 minute commercial breaks every 15 minutes? If I watch an 'hour long' TV show 15 minutes of my life was wasted on ads. And I have to pay for that?' I'm usually met with 'wow, yeah when you put it that way...um....have a nice day'
I'm old enough to remember when cable TV came around, TV you had to pay for instead of getting it free over the air. And I thought that it seemed like an ok tradeoff if we were going to be able to watch TV without ads. Seriously, I thought originally that was the whole point of cable TV. Somehow it slipped in that we were going to pay for the channels, and there would be JUST as much advertising as their was before, or even more.
Re: (Score:3)
Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"
Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.
Re:Typical (Score:5, Insightful)
They're at least one-upping Google. Samsung makes you pay for it, stuffs it full of ads anyway. They're even stuffing ads into older devices you already paid full price for fair and square.
And to complete the idiocy, they can't figure out why sales are down.
Re: (Score:3)
And to complete the idiocy, they can't figure out why sales are down.
I wonder if the next owners will? I actually like the TVs if you do not connect them to the Internet.
Re: (Score:3)
Take $100 of the price then I'll watch the ads. Advertisements are supposed to make the product cheaper, as in free television content, coupons, etc. But full price with ads, no thank you. If i'm really worth as much money when I watch ads as advertisers claim then they should be giving me some kickbacks. As much money as advertisers claim to generate you could replace welfare programs by having people watch TV all day.
Ads coming in my snail mail cost money. So there's a weekly flier (and at election ti
Re: (Score:3)
Advertisements are supposed to make the product cheaper,
Interesting perspective. Someone pays for the ads to be made, which is paid for through the retail price of whatever was being advertised, which means you end up paying for the content one way or another. Unless you refuse to purchase anything that's advertised, in which case you'll probably have to live in the mountains and eat only what you can kill.
Re: (Score:3)
This is because in the torrent of companies and brands out there, businesses are being coached by MBAs to get while the getting is good.
Probably because in the dot-com days you had a number of businesses with half-way decent ideas but pushed the "bring the revenue in" phase too far out into the future to help the company.
One company I was at back in the 90s did some of the first online hosting of newscasts. That is, TV news stations would partner with my company who would install internet connections and a few of our boxes at the station. Those boxes would convert the newscast into video clips which we hosted and bolstered with additional c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've got a probably 5 year old LG "Smart TV". Once in a while it pops up a message saying it wants to download and install a 400 MB software update. Stupidly, it does this when you turn it on to watch something. Sure, I have 22 minutes to watch the Big Bang Theory that I recorded on TiVo. Let's spend that time updating the damn TV. Not. The first few times, I let it do that - hoping beyond hope that it would fix the god damned thing. You see, it takes 30 seconds to switch inputs on this terrible TV. Press the menu button, wait while it loads, choose input select, wait while that loads and finds any DLNA sources, etc. Realize that "HDMI 1" is conveniently on screen two. Switch to screen two. Select the input and press it. Select it again because it didn't "highlight" the first time. It finally changes. But their software updates are more designed to spy on you than fix issues. It turns out it is better to not connect the damn thing to your network at all. Looks like Samsung is now another that just won't get connected to a network. There is no point in connecting these anyway. Their apps are all terrible junk that is beaten all to hell by Roku, Chromecast, etc.
I have an LG "Smart TV" from about 4 years ago (that came with a DAMNABLE, hard-to-use, Wii-like Remote. But my TV has the same terrible menu structure as what you described.
However, because the TV actually DOES support both IR and WiFi commands to do many of the menu'ed things with a single command, there are two ways around it:
1. Get one of the free LG "controller" Apps for your favorite Mobile Device. I know of at least two on the iOS App Store. I assume that there is at least one on Google Play. At
Re: (Score:2)
I have a 550 series Samsung LCD TV, and giving it a garbage DNS setting (its own static IP address as the DNS address) seems to prevent it from "connecting" to the internet while still letting me stream to it from my PC.
I'm baffled at this sort of thing. I just have an HDMI cable from my PC to my TV - why on Earth would I "stream"?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I remember when /. wasn't a bunch of whiny babi (Score:4, Insightful)