Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Robotics Privacy News Science Entertainment Technology

People Feel Weird About Touching Robot Butts, Researchers Find (techcrunch.com) 162

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: How would you feel if a robot asked you to touch its butt? Maybe it sounds like a silly question, but as robots proliferate and anthropomorphize, it's actually something that needs to be considered. So scientists at Stanford considered it. The study, to be presented soon but previewed by IEEE Spectrum, is entitled "Touching a Mechanical Body: Tactile Contact With Intimate Parts of a Human-Shaped Robot is Physiologically Arousing" -- and really, the title says it all. The researchers sat volunteers at a table with a Nao humanoid robot reclining casually on it. They were told (by the robot, in fact) that it was a vocabulary exercise focusing on terms for body parts. Volunteers were told by the bot to, for instance, "touch my ear" using their dominant hand, while the non-dominant hand remained on a skin conductance sensor that loosely monitored their physical state. When asked to touch "high accessibility" areas -- places we normally touch on other people, like shoulders and elbows -- volunteers did so without hesitation or agitation. But "low accessibility" areas -- this would be the robot's butt and where its junk would be -- produced delay and that arousal we talked about.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

People Feel Weird About Touching Robot Butts, Researchers Find

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I don't think it will be that bad, so long as they don't go all Chobits on us...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @01:46AM (#51851371)

    I smell an Ignobel prize in their future.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    It's no surprise that a bunch of male engineers and Slashdot users would get aroused by touching a male robot's ass and junk. It's a good thing a female robot wasn't used in the experiment. The male engineers and Slashdot users would have run away in terror when asked to touch a female robot's private parts.

    • Robots cannot own things. So do they have the capability to have "private parts"?
    • It's a good thing a female robot wasn't used in the experiment. The male engineers and Slashdot users would have run away in terror when asked to touch a female robot's private parts.

      ...all the while, all the femi-trolls of the internet would have run the opposite direction to start some outraged circus...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @01:52AM (#51851391)

    That's bad news for women.

    • Who writes on IEEE Spectrum usually is an engineer. Women do not need to worry about, after all.
    • That's bad news for women.

      And if women are aroused by robots, that's really bad news for men...

      • by Anonymous Coward

        You mean like vibrators, right? Because I'm pretty sure those didn't spell doom for mankind. Of either gender.

    • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      What options do men have these days? Women can retroactively decide that the consensual sex they had with you was actually rape and get you kicked out of school or worse. Avoiding women and indulging in porn and sexbots seems to be a reasonable way out for men.

    • by Evtim ( 1022085 )

      Why it is bad? As far as I understand male sexual desire is way higher than female for very obvious biological reasons...so as long as we have 1:1 ratio and enforced monogamy all men will be sexually frustrated all the time....so finding something else that can help in satisfying male desire is a good thing TM....also good for women...so I for one welcome our female sexy robot overlords...

  • Not surprising (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kjella ( 173770 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @01:53AM (#51851397) Homepage

    Considering that totally inanimate sex dolls and hentai work for at least some, was there every really any doubt that a humanoid robot would? I guess it's only a matter of where the "uncanny valley" goes.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Most people have social norms and protocol deep rooted in their minds, so that they can abide by them without really thinking about it. Recognition of the human form and the social protocols of how to interact with it are pretty low level, such that even if the concious mind thinks otherwise the feelings stirred up are pretty much instinct.

    • We anthropomorphize things. More than that, we empathize with things, and assume other beings/objects feel, think, and behave the way we do. We show this in our language when we say things like, "nature abhors a vacuum". In our interpersonal relationships, we try to "put yourself in the other person's shoes". When we're deciding how to act with people, it's largely based on imagining that they would feel the same way that you imagine you'd feel in that situation. Even when I'm writing this, to some deg

      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        Yes. And as robots become more common this will cause increasing problems, because they DON'T react the way we do. We don't even want them to, because as the become more powerful, if they acted the way we do they'd be an existential risk. We want them to be altruistic, to not get angry at people being stupid, to not get angry period. We also want them to be caring, but not constraining. This is not a human motivational system.

        Unfortunately, something that looks approximately human and acts approximatel

    • by Maritz ( 1829006 )
      Something tries to represent a human, maybe some CGI. It doesn't quite 'get there'. It ends up causing circuits to be fired in the brain that we associate with corpses or diseased bodies. Probably this is usually because the eyes do not look right. It's creepy. It's just an observation, not some over-arching theory.
    • We're talking about robot butts, right? I think it's pretty clear where the valley is supposed to go.
  • by mykepredko ( 40154 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @01:55AM (#51851409) Homepage

    I remember hearing a robot saying somewhere that having a but with those attributes was a turn on.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    Would it bother you to touch C3-P0's butt? Would you feel the same way about R2-D2's butt? Why does every machine we interact with have to emulate human appearance? Accept that the uncanny valley will not be crossed anytime soon and set your expectations accordingly.
  • What if it was that Scarlett Johannson robot doing the asking, instead of this white plasticky thing?

  • by Krishnoid ( 984597 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @02:55AM (#51851557) Journal

    I suspect other robots [questionablecontent.net] don't feel all that great about it [questionablecontent.net], either.

  • Really? What a stupid study. Machines don't have butts, backsides, genitals, faces, .... Don't get stupid. Machines are ... machines.
    • by DarkOx ( 621550 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @06:40AM (#51852073) Journal

      Machines don't have butts, backsides, genitals, faces, .... Don't get stupid. Machines are ... machines.

      Really? Would you say that Michelangelo's David does not have butt, backside, genitals, or a face? After all a statue is a statue. Ah but its a deliberate depiction of man, something made in our image you say. Well if you build and android, a robot with a human appearance, is that not the same?

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Would you say that Michelangelo's David does not have butt, backside, genitals, or a face? After all a statue is a statue.

        My sexual desires were getting out of control, but it wasn't until I spanked a statue that I realized I'd hit rock bottom.

      • Really? Would you say that Michelangelo's David does not have butt, backside, genitals, or a face? After all a statue is a statue. Ah but its a deliberate depiction of man, something made in our image you say. Well if you build and android, a robot with a human appearance, is that not the same?

        But why would your robot need a bum? We have a robot at work, it's called an elevator. The designers saw no need to put a bum on it, so I can't see why any robot would, unless it's entire purpose was to evoke a response about a robot having a bum.

    • Sex dolls, Real Dolls, and various other things tell me people are willing believe that far more than you realize.

      • by gwolf ( 26339 )

        If you believe sex dolls talk to you, I strongly advise you to get professional help from a psychiatrist.

        Much preferably, one whose chemistry is carbon-based.

    • by fizzup ( 788545 )

      I take it you have rejected the Breakfast of Champions hypothesis that we are machines made out of meat?

  • A study can measure people's reactions today (robots that look human, will elicit patterns from the human world), but if such robots become commonplace, the meaning and context will shift.

    People might take their familiarity with robots and let that influence their feelings about people. That people should behave in colder, more logical ways, and that you shouldn't expect empathy from others, merely accurate understanding, etc. Similar to how the machine was seen as de-humanising, that we'd become more "mach

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @03:17AM (#51851611)

    If a robot asked me to touch its butt, I'd immediately start looking for the hidden camera crew.

  • HAL (Score:5, Funny)

    by Thanshin ( 1188877 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @03:19AM (#51851615)

    "I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.

    Dave. ...

    Would you touch my bum one last time?"

    • by rs1n ( 1867908 )

      "I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.

      Dave. ...

      Would you touch my bum one last time?"

      Dave: I'm sorry, HAL. I'm afraid I cannot do that....

    • Dave...my mind is going...Would you touch my bum one last time?"

      Which eventually leads to a long psychedelic trip through e-goatse...

  • Also (Score:5, Funny)

    by BlackPignouf ( 1017012 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @03:29AM (#51851637)

    Also : People Feel Weird About Researchers Studying Touching Robot Butts, Researchers Find

    • Disappointed:

      - In slashdot editing
      - Researchers studying useless things

    • This is obvious. For me touching a butt isn't that it is a robot butt - but that somebody might be watching me and think that I'm doing something inappropriate.

      Think about what happened when Andrew McCarthy got caught bopping the love of his life in the movie Mannequin. Like, dude, get a life.

  • By "low accessibility", do they mean that normally you don't touch someone's butt, or that the robot was in a position that made it harder to touch it's but?
    They should repeat the test with the robot standing.

    • by Maritz ( 1829006 )
      My impression is that it's about social acceptance. Touching someone's shoulder is commonplace and unremarkable. Touching their ass is not.
  • ... as an android's bottom?

  • Grabbing ladies butts? :-)

  • Nobody mentioned Bender?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

  • Was there a control group in a private hotel room?

  • by Basset is an asset ( 4528745 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @05:53AM (#51851927)
    Internet Of Thongs
  • This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Making something taboo or "special" makes it more attractive and exciting. This applies to just about everything.

  • If everybody had access to sex-bots.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I LIKE ROBOT BUTTS AND I CANNOT LIE
    You other engineers can't deny
    When a good robot walks in with
    A good ARM
    And a big SSD in your face
    You get sprung!
    Wanna get out your notepads
    'Cause you noticed that A2D
    converter was dense.
    Deep in the servo I'm reading,
    I'm hooked and I can't stop
    Speeding, through Baby
    I wanna get that android,
    And Instagram that picture,
    My teachers try to train me
    But that gearset you've got
    Makes me so crazy!

  • I mean, the thing starts off by asking you to touch it with your dominant hand. Then it asks you to touch its buttocks. Who wouldn't be a bit hesitant on that.
  • User, I think we both know that that is in flagrant violation of the AUP. And you like it. Don't try to deny your biology.
  • by jbmartin6 ( 1232050 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @07:51AM (#51852347)
    I'm not clear on why this 'needs' to be considered. Have people been living in fear of a robot asking them to touch its butt?
  • If it's form is designed by Masamune Shirow then I would be happy to feel weird. He's drawn some interesting robots.
  • Arousing (Score:4, Informative)

    by Translation Error ( 1176675 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @08:25AM (#51852519)
    It's important to note that by 'arousal', the researchers do not mean sexual arousal.

    Though it should be noted that "arousing" only indicates a generally heightened state of awareness or attention.

    • It's important to note that by 'arousal', the researchers do not mean sexual arousal.

      Though it should be noted that "arousing" only indicates a generally heightened state of awareness or attention.

      Indeed, I was about to offer the same note. I presume that the quote from the article (and the paper's title) were deliberately offered without context in order to sound more titillating than they really are.

      "Arousal" in this context can also represent nervousness, discomfort, fear,, and reluctance. The sensor is measuring skin conductance (galvanic skin response), which just indicates that there is increased blood flow and/or perspiration.

  • Seriously, bite it! Stupid frail human teeth.

    • by jsepeta ( 412566 )

      There are machines built for fucking. I've seen them on the internet. Not sure if I'd call them robots though, since they don't seem to have any AI capabilities.

  • by tomhath ( 637240 ) on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @09:21AM (#51852841)
    The voice is clearly an Asian woman, and the instructions sound kind of like a phone sex conversation. It would be interesting to see if a different voice changed the reaction (man's, child's, muppet's, Barney the Dinosaur, etc).
  • Given the latest research described in this paper I think futurama [vimeo.com] is actually predicting the future.
  • Most people could not bring themselves to eating cakes or candy shaped to look like poop. If a cup was dipped in a clean toilet bowl, people would refuse to drink using that cup, even after washing the cup in boiling hot water.

    Feeling disgust is important survival tool, it helped people avoid infections, develop better sanitation, etc.

  • Damn, I should have been a scientist.

    Every job that I've ever worked, every job except "research scientist" that I've ever even heard of, has always affected the world in some small way, and it always mattered to someone, anyone if I didn't bother to do it.

    But instead I guess you can just program a robot to talk like a child molester and write down how people react to it, and that's a real job that someone, somewhere, will pay you for? And you can tell your family about it at Thanksgiving? And maybe they'

  • No problem touching it..... But don't ask me to "kiss it's butt"

Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. -- Henry David Thoreau

Working...