Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
Intel Hardware

The Intel 4004 Microprocessor Turns 44 60

mcpublic writes: Today is the 44th anniversary of the Intel 4004, the pioneering 4-bit microprocessor that powered the first electronic taxi meters. According to the unaffiliated (and newly renamed) Intel 4004 45th Anniversary Project web site, they have just re-created the complete set of VLSI mask artwork for the 4004 using scalable vector graphics, and updated their Busicom 141-PF calculator replica aimed at collectors and hobbyists. Included is some interesting historical perspective: Back in the early 1970s, there was no electrical CAD software, design-rule checkers were people, and VLSI lithographic masks were hand-crafted on giant light tables by unsung "rubylith cutters."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Intel 4004 Microprocessor Turns 44

Comments Filter:
  • by ganjadude ( 952775 ) on Sunday November 15, 2015 @05:21PM (#50936443) Homepage
    a beowulf cluster of 4004s!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 15, 2015 @05:29PM (#50936491)

    Weird, tell it to IBM that was routing ICs and backplanes in the 1960s by computer.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Are you sure ?

      In the 60's, ICs had a few tens of transistors, for op-amps or apollo's famous 3 inputs NOR gate.
      Memory were based or ferrite cores.

      Maybe they had CAD for PCB routing, but ICs ?

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward

        1967

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

        look at some of the stuff hanging on the walls. The problem is that the text references I have about what IBM was doing in the 1960s is on dead trees only.

    • Intel was a tiny company back then, they probably had to do it by hand. Even in the 1980s companies like Commodore had lots of manual input to chip design even though they had CAD.

  • by kyubre ( 1186117 ) on Sunday November 15, 2015 @05:59PM (#50936581)

    I was one of those kids who built up simple bread board computers using stock standard TTL parts. I learned more about digital machinery in reading about and figuring out how processors work by trying to create my own bits of programmable/sequence-able logic using the astonishingly complete range of commodity TTL parts that where cheaply available in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    The 4004 was an important inspiration, but TTL is what launched our pervasive digital age.

    Unlike the 4004, it blows my mind how much of the original TTL part library is STILL available.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

    • Same here - I remember all of those TTL things.

      A few years after this, we got some *very* early 8086 chips on an educational discount. We breadboarded the thing by attaching power, clock, and wired up the memory lines to make it look like it was just reading NOP instructions from ever address, and then watched the address lines to see the thing count up.

    • by creimer ( 824291 )
      I got into electronics as a teenager and even took a few courses in college, but I never got far with it. Didn't have the information and money to get beyond the basics. Fast forward 30 years, the Internet has plenty of information and as senior I.T. technician I got plenty of money. I'm fiddling around with 555 timer circuits and looking up designs for a TTL computer in. Rather than buying a handful of parts from Radio Shack (back then) I'm ordering lots of 100 from Jameco to build up my parts inventory.
      • by kyubre ( 1186117 ) on Sunday November 15, 2015 @07:15PM (#50936875)

        Similar story on this end. I learned all kinds of electronics as teenager and then went off, first working on Air Force Radar for a number of years and then transitioning to software engineering as a civilian. A couple of years ago, I got my highly coveted treasure trove of TTL parts trays from my dad. Started playing around again on the same old breadboards, discovered SparkFun, EBay, and rediscovered Jameco.

        Seems nobody personally knows much of anything about the 4004 anymore, but Don Lancaster's TTL cookbook is just as applicable today as it was 30 years ago.

    • I was the same but with the 4000 CMOS range. OK, it was slower, but it was far less finicky about fanout, fan-in, power supply voltages and general interfacing. If I needed a fast section of circuitry I might use TTL, but CMOS elsewhere. Just so much less fuss. By the mid-80s it had caught up in speed and eventually surpassed it.

      CPU-wise, it was 6502 FTW, though the 8051 wasn't bad as a stop-gap until the 680x0 was cheap enough. 4004? A bit before my time, but also pretty hard to use and do much with comp
    • by Anonymous Coward

      oh man, excellent post and link! ahhh, the memories.

      yeah I built lots of stuff with TTL. I love the 74181, built a CPU with it, used a 74189 for registers. why does a 4 bit machine need 16 registers?!?!! ridiculous instruction set. but I was a kid.

      there was an improved ALU, 74381? found the spec, drooled, never found one retail...

    • A few years ago - 5 or 10 by memory - there was a story on Slashdot about someone who built a logical equivalent of an 8086 or 80386 or some such 1980s era processor.

      This story [slashdot.org] perhaps? No.

  • Those mask cutters look like Bond girls
    • by Mashiki ( 184564 )

      Impossible, everyone knows there are no women in technology related areas. Just look at the amount of whining over it.

  • by Terje Mathisen ( 128806 ) on Sunday November 15, 2015 @07:58PM (#50937063)

    My father spent months at his home-made light table back around 1965 cutting traces in rubylith film in order to create the offset masks for orienteering maps.

    He needed one such mask for each color in the finished map, any mistakes had to be fixed with small amounts of red lacquer which then had to dry completely before it could be recut.

    The big advantage for VLSI vs a map was that most lines were straight so you didn't need to trace curved lines like you do for the contours on a map.

    Terje

  • by bsharma ( 577257 ) on Monday November 16, 2015 @12:55AM (#50937871)
    Back in the early 1970s, there was no electrical CAD software, design-rule checkers were people, and VLSI lithographic masks were hand-crafted on giant light tables by unsung "rubylith cutters." In early 1970s, there was no VLSI, not even LSI; It was MSI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
    • It's always fascinating to track the progression of a 'tools', where creating the tool aids in the development of something more advanced. It's obvious that you cannot design an advanced chip without a computer.

  • by advocate_one ( 662832 ) on Monday November 16, 2015 @02:49AM (#50938143)
    had a 16 bit 'processor' made by using four of these chips in parallel...
  • The 4004 is VLSI? I don't think it means what you think it means...

"Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery.'" -- Comedian Jay Leno

Working...