Google Lollipop Bricking Nexus 5 and Nexus 7 Devices 179
First time accepted submitter Zape (303550) writes The Lollipop update has turned sour for me and several other Nexus 7, Gen 2 (and Nexus 5) owners. It seems that I'm not alone in having my tablet boot to the Google Logo since a couple of days after updating to Android 5.0.2. Now Nexus 5 owners are reporting a reboot loop in Android 5.1. My device, like many others, is a couple of months out of warranty, but worked great until the latest OTA update from Google. They branded it, and they updated it, but Google claims it is between the buyers and ASUS, the manufacturer.
Google updates (Score:1)
Google updates their core services without asking to get around fragmentation. They can't bring everything into core services, but they can bring a lot. The downside is accidentally doing something like this.
Re:Google updates (Score:4, Insightful)
If they let people upgrade their own phones this wouldn't happen
Re:Google updates (Score:4, Interesting)
But that's the provider's problem, isn't it?
Google can't force providers to use AOSP, and unlocked bootloaders, and all that...
Re: (Score:3)
So what would be if you buy a PC and then Microsoft won't sell you or let you update to any new version?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They can force manufacturers to use unlocked bootloaders if they want the official Google version.
But hardly anyone is running the stock Android anyways. They've all expended on the code, and made it different. Almost no one actually uses the "official Google version" at all...
There's no reason whatsoever why Google can't make the same thing a requirement
But they can't because it's open source software. No one could make all of the Linux Distros use the same official kernel... it's not possible, because it's open source, and you can make it yourself.
and would prefer shipping a version of Android with no Google services
But this is already the case. Amazon and Barnes and Noble do not sell Android devices with Google services on them.
I don't get why pe
Re: Google updates (Score:1)
They do. Nexus devices have unlocked bootloaders and easy root access. They are still developer phones, you know. Install your favourite ROM and enjoy (a much better experience than stock android as well, in most cases)
Re: (Score:2)
Nexus devices have unlocked bootloaders
Nope. But unlocking it is easy and does not void your warranty.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they could update the core services, and they could fix bugs quickly, but they don't.
There are quite a few battery drain bugs still in the core services, especially in the location service. It is embarrassing.
But not surprising. Core services were never about faster upgrades or better Android, but about control. Once apps rely on core services, they can no longer run on a plain Android device with the Google apps. Android is getting more and more closed.
Re: (Score:2)
Fused Location is absurd. I have an unrooted phone that was upgraded to, but did not come with, Android 4.3.
Using the program CPU Memory Monitor, Fused Location right now is at 48 CPU minutes. Google+ is legitimately at 59 CPU minutes because it's backing up a bunch of photos and videos I took last night. The next highest process is at 5 CPU minutes. Except for this unusual workload, Fused Location almost always consumes many times the amount of CPU time as the next process.
I think Google has great ideas bu
Not Brick (Score:3, Insightful)
Boot Loop does not equal brick.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Not Brick (Score:2)
as the article states, nexus 7s are bricked, nexus 5s are in a boot loop. You'll find a lot of Twitter activity under #nexus7bricked.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Have you tried changing the usb connector? It's a known failure in the Nexus 7 2012, that after some time the connector becomes loose and won't make contact. You can find replacements on ebay from $3 (need to solder) to $12 (no soldering required), or you can do what I did: carefully pry the metal of the connector so it becomes a bit tighter.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
I don't trust or use eBay so I can not speak for them nor their pricing. I do use Amazon a lot. Okay, so I use Amazon way too much. Anyhow, when it comes to cables my first stop is here: https://www.cablesdirect.com/d... [cablesdirect.com] as they usually have good/great pricing on the cable(s) I require. They have great customer service where you can call them up and say, "So I have this funny looking cable with 18 pins and...." and they are great at helping you out. I am not affiliated but I am a fan and certainly recommend
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy a replacement board, it takes like 5 minutes to pry the case open, remove a few screws, pull out a couple of ribbon cables and slap the new charging/headphone board in. I've had to do it twice now, on a pair of Nexus 7 2012's I got for my daughters. Of course, there's a good chance the replacement boards are getting the same problem...
Re: (Score:3)
I had this problem and after trying several things I finally found a solution: Buy an Anker USB cable [amazon.com]. I tried just about everything else with my tablet. I have a USB power meter. The Nexus 7 2012 seems to be extremely sensitive to the resistance in the USB cable. The Anker cable is much fatter than most cables I've tried. Before I switched to this cable I've had my tablet go dead while plugged into the charger.
Here's what else I tried:
I replaced the USB connector on my tablet (fairly easy to do). This help
I had the same problem (Score:5, Informative)
My Nexus 5 went into a reboot loop, after a lot of research online (and taking the phone apart to see if the power switch was damaged (it appeared to be working fine with a good "click" when pressed) -- I managed to get to boot by repeatedly and rapidly hitting the power button while it was booting, then quickly unlocked the phone and rebooted into safe mode by holding down the power button.
After it booted into safe mode, I left it in the charger overnight, and in the morning, rebooted back into normal mode and it was fine. Mostly. It was no longer in the reboot loop, but kept powering itself off throughout the day.
I replaced it with a new phone, moved my SIM over, and then the Nexus appeared to be fine, no more poweroffs, no reboot loops, I used it as a Wifi-only tablet for a day and then it got a Lolipop 5.1 OTA upgrade, so I upgraded. It's been over a week since then, and it's still working fine as a wifi-only tablet, I haven't tried moving the SIM back
I still have no idea what was wrong with the phone, maybe it was a hardware problem with the switch, or maybe it was a software problem. My Nexus 7 tablet (also running lollipop) is fine.
I replaced my Nexus 5 with a Samsung Galaxy S5 -- I really like the S5 (and removable SIM), but I hate Samsung's Touchwiz interface. I really wanted to stick with the Nexus line, but am not willing to pay $700 for a 64GB Nexus 6 when the S5 cost about half that and I wasn't going to buy another Nexus 5 after what happened to this one.
Re:I had the same problem (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I replaced my Nexus 5 with a Samsung Galaxy S5 -- I really like the S5 (and removable SIM), but I hate Samsung's Touchwiz interface.
Which is one of the reasons I bought a T-Mobile S5 even though I'm on AT&T. Unlocked it, rooted it, installed Lollipop months before AT&T or T-Mobile released it. Been happy ever since.
I only had to suffer through Touchwiz and bloatware for a few days.
This doesn't match my experience. (Score:3)
5.0.1 totally killed the battery in my Nexus 5, but I replaced it (thanks, Amazon for the battery and iFixit for the spudgers) and stuck with 4.4.4 until 5.1 came out. I'm running 5.1 now with no issues. I'm not saying that there are no problems, but this is probably a configuration-dependent issue, so a factory reset ought to fix it.
Re: (Score:2)
Is there some sense in which this comment is meaningful or useful?
Make no mistake here (Score:1)
this is NOT between the buyers and Asus, it is entirely between the buyers and Google, whose software have now broken devices that were fully working.
This opens a door for Ubuntu Touch (Score:1)
Pass on Google and give Ubuntu Touch a shot:
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/ubuntu-for-devices/devices/
Re: (Score:1)
Thank god that Ubuntu doesn't screw things up
lollipop sucks you (Score:2)
1. Can't connect to camera error often.
2. Play Music simply won't play music.
These are new on my Nexus 5 on 5.1.
And the one issue I hoped 5.1 would fix:
3. Play Music skipping on Bluetooth
Didn't go away.
This lollipop sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
Lollipop is perfectly fine on my SGS4. It's much faster, totally lag-free, full of nice animations and new shiny UI. I think it's the shitty hardware that's the problem with the Nexus devices.
I haven't heard of this; am not affected (Score:5, Informative)
I have a Nexus 5, with Lollipop 5.1 on it. No boot loop issues. Coworkers with Nexus 5 aren't reporting this, either. /shrug/
Re: (Score:3)
Not a hugely useful comment... Yes of course it isn't bricking every unit, but if it's causing such a serious problem on even 1%, this is a fuck up.
Re: (Score:2)
Look you twat, there is post after post of people bitching that they have issues. One person points out that he's been fine, and you lay into him?
He didn't say that nobody had the issue, he's highlighting that not everybody has the issue.
Fix your own fucking Nexus 5.
KitKat (Score:1)
Something odd here (Score:2)
The current version on a 2012 Nexus 7 is 5.2. 5.0 was months ago.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not sure you have your facts straight.
https://source.android.com/sou... [android.com]
Code name Version API level
Lollipop 5.1 API level 22
Lollipop 5.0 API level 21
KitKat 4.4 - 4.4.4 API level 19
Jelly Bean 4.3.x API level 18
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A... [wikipedia.org]
Latest release 5.1 "Lollipop" / March 10, 2015; 32 days ago
Sam not Sung (Score:1)
Because they used java, its a dud again. If they had used lisp then the whole thing wouldn't have happened and they could have used a recursive tail call function to do it as well. If anything had of happened they could of rolled it back using emacs. Why wouldnt everyone program in lisp then. hey. ponk.
Solution: Stay off the bleeding edge (Score:2)
I have a hard and fast rule at work: unless it's a real lab device, never ever ever install anything that has been out less than 6 months and is not on its 3rd patch.
It doesn't matter how much a customer wants (read: is willing to pay for) a feature that's out in the next release, if the product version is X.0 or even X.4.0 - if the last number is a not a 3 - I'm not installing it unless I've had it in the lab for 6 months and have thrown everything I can think of at it, including production size load &
Re: (Score:1)
^^ - if the last number is not a 3 or greater -
for all the pedants out there, like me.
Re: (Score:3)
Wait? Don't go with anything under patch 3 - so basically refusing to ever update to software that works first time, or need just a single patch.
That's bloody stupid to start with. But then you admit that you're using beta software.
You have no clue. You're inept. You're stupid. You're fucking scaring me. How is it possible to be that fucking incompetent?
Re: (Score:2)
Reading comprehension 101:
He said "never ever install anything that has been out less than 6 months and is not on its third patch.
In other words, he'll use things at patch levels less than 3, but only once they've been in the wild for 6 months or more and hence any bugs are likely to have been identified and resolved in one of the patches (even if that patch has a number less than 3!).
Two Years (Score:2)
My first generation Nexus 7 died after two years.
Maybe they are designed to last only two years.
I took it apart, pierced its storage chip with a screwdriver, put it back together, and recycled it.
Maybe its on a barge to a third-world country now.
Similar experience with Nexus 4 and Android 4.3 (Score:2)
After installing the OTA update from 4.2.2 > 4.3 (August 2013), my Nexus 4 wouldn't boot. A quick scan of the interwebs found that lots of people had the same problem. I could load Cyanogenmod (based on 4.2.2) or the stock Google 4.2.2 image but other attempts to load 4.3 did not work. Eventually, I shipped back to Google and they gave me a new phone.
Just started today (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nexus7bricked (Score:1)
The Somebody Else's Problem Field (Score:3)
Sale of Goods Act 1979 (Score:5, Informative)
If you bought your device in the UK, then you entered into a contract under laws such as the Sale of Goods Act 1979 with the retailer (not the manufacturer). In my case I bought my N5 from the Google Play store, so my contract is with Google, not with LG and as such Google are solely responsible for providing a replacement, repair or refund. Alternatively, because these devices cost more than £100, if the item was either partially or fully purchased on a credit card you benefit from an additional right to seek compensation from the credit card company under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act as well as the manufacturer.
Sadly this "go to the manufacturer" response is so common from customer service staff (and their managers) in the UK who haven't been correctly trained.
Mine did the same, but now works OK! (Score:3)
I own a Nexus 7 2013 (Non-cellular, WiFi only) unit.
Two weeks after accepting the latest OTA update, my tablet froze on the lock screen and would refuse to accept any key presses on-screen. Forced a reset via the power button, and got the described symptoms (Boot loop). None of the bootloader options allowed me to get it to boot all the way.
I guess that I must have been a little frustrated at this point, because I held the tablet so hard that it gave slightly (held in Portrait with my hands on each side and fingers pushing from back to front gently, but enough to cause mild screen distortion). After doing this a final restart allowed the device to boot normally. I have since carried out the same procedure with three other examples of the same model of tablet (OK, so one of them was the LTE variant) and seen it resolve the same symptoms in each case without any adverse affect (other than a look of mild horror on one of the owners' faces until I handed it back working!).
The only thing I can think of (and I haven't bothered to crack the case to check, so this is literally just a guess) is that the touchscreen connector may not be as sturdy as it could be, and that the device will fail to boot if it doesn't detect a properly working touchscreen connection.
I'm not suggesting that everyone should try this, but if you're going to crack the case to replace the motherboard anyway, try re-seating the connectors (particularly the screen) and reassembling it first before going as far as replacing any parts and see if it sorts the issue out for you!
I had flash failure out of the box with a Nexus 10 (Score:2)
This bricking sounds similar to the first Nexus 10 the Google Play UK store sent me. I could boot it initially, but then the device would spontaneously reboot. Each time, the reboot intervals reduced (and weird graphical glitches started appearing) - within a matter of hours, it was just stuck on the Google logo and never got any further.
It was indeed Google I contacted to return it and they sent me a pre-paid courier wrapper (I had to weigh and measure the Nexus 10 packaging/tablet), but they also charged
Re: not bricking but breaking (Score:1)
Ditto my n7 2012 is unusably slow. Things take minutes to start or react. can't wait to go back to 4.4.4...
Re: (Score:2)
That's easier said than done. If only there was a simple "restore to previous OS" function. It's a hassle to go through all the steps to do a hard reset, lose all the data and roll back to an older OS.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, same here. It's so slow in fact that I have turned it off and kept it away.
Re: (Score:1)
You don't use adb to downgrade, you use fastboot. Are you sure you know how the flashing stuff works?
Anyway, if you have the multi-mode drivers installed, you may need to switch your usb cable to a different usb port on your pc for the drivers to recognize it in the right mode.
Re: (Score:1)
Been flashing custom roms on various Nexus devices for years. Haven't been able to break one bad enough that flashing a factory image couldn't fix.
Fastboot is your friend, the term "brick" is way over used... Like you said, I think they need to read up on flashing.
Re: (Score:2)
Bring it to the bootloader, and use fastboot from the SDK. You can flash disk images this way (which you can get here [google.com], if you're well and truly stuck)
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:4, Funny)
Google takes 6-9 months to release updates to their devices. It took 5 weeks for my nexus 7 to get the update.
Google should ask apple how to transmit updates to lots of users at once.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I would rather Google ask users if they really want to download an update that's going to completely screw up their tablet.
The first Lollipop update made my Nexus 7 unusable until I turned off a lot of the services that made the Nexus 7 useful to begin with. Every subsequent update has made things a little bit worse. At the moment, my Nexus 7 is barely usable as a media player, and only because I've had to learn more about hidden sett
Re: (Score:2)
Google takes 6-9 months to release updates to their devices. It took 5 weeks for my nexus 7 to get the update.
Google should ask apple how to transmit updates to lots of users at once.
Doesn't it make sense to stagger updates, in case a problem like this occurs that didn't reveal itself in testing, so they can stop the updates?
I'm typically in no rush to get my android updates if my device is working fine, but it seems there are many that 'want it now' for some reason.
Re: (Score:2)
And without their approval, too!
Re: (Score:2)
Since Google sells these directly, they also have the purchase and delivery dates and device id's for most Nexus devices. Perhaps the delay is designed to roll out the update shortly after the warranty expires? They could easily do that... would they? It would save them a hell of a lot of support dollars.
Re: Cutting edge journalism (Score:1)
How about those carrier-less Nexus 7s, because, you know, they only carry WiFi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:5, Informative)
It takes a few weeks for the various devices to get the update as Google does a staggered release by device. Not sure on the exact order but it does seem to be somewhat by the device's original release date.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry for my doubting you. I've since been corrected and now have a better understanding. I Googled before I asked and, well, all the results in my quick scan looked like ads for carriers and the only Nexus devices I've seen are all carrier branded. Even in my quick Google the Google link looked like an ad for a carrier. My most sincere apologies are offered if you want them,
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:4, Informative)
I own many nexus devices, the phones all bought directly from google (about have the price of buying them from my carrier). Current gen I can put a sim in and work on every major us carrier CMDA or GSM with one phone. Hell my carrier (ting) is working on phones that are on the GSM and CDMA networks and roam freely between them. The radio does get updates from the carrier PRL updates and the like.
Google figured out that the carriers were a barrier so they went around them.
Re: (Score:2)
I do think I like the process. All the Nexus devices I had come across prior to this were from carriers - thank you for the correction.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.google.co.uk/nexus/ [google.co.uk]
There is a "buy" button for direct Google sales.
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:5, Interesting)
Google figured out that the carriers were a barrier so they went around them.
Google didn't, Apple did. Not one iPhone ever sold has ever been touched by a carrier before getting into the hands of the final user, where the vast majority of Android devices get crapped by carriers before they get sold.
Apple said: Carriers are crap, let's protect all of our phones (and thus users) from them.
Google said: Carriers are crap, we're going to provide users that care with phones that are untouched by them.
As always, Apple forced their views on everyone while Google offered a choice. I think Apple was right on this one.
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple limited carrier choice for a very long time, that whole 5 year exclusive to AT&T.
Re: Cutting edge journalism (Score:3)
Apple "limited choice" because other carriers weren't willing to allow Apple to update phones directly and wanted to put carrier crap on it. Apple went to Verizon first.
Hindsight being what it is, which was the better choice? Allowing carriers to put their own crap on the phone and to control updates or to force their hand?
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:5, Informative)
Not sure why you're confused. The post clearly begins with "The whole point of the Nexus branded devices." Yes, this is true for Nexus branded hardware. It's Google's Android OS with no carrier bloatware. The updates come straight from Google. I own a Nexus 7 2013. I've updated many times - comes straight from Google.
Here's the link on Google's support site to confirm it: Click on the "Nexus Devices" to expand to see the below text.
https://support.google.com/nex... [google.com]
Nexus 4, Nexus 5, Nexus 6, Nexus 7, Nexus 9, and Nexus 10 devices receive the latest version of Android directly from Google. Once an update is available, it can take up to two weeks for it to reach your device. Based on your carrier, it may take longer than two weeks after release to get an update.
Nexus devices may not receive the latest version of Android if they fall outside of the update window, which is usually around 18 months after a device has been released.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for the correction. The "Nexus branded devices..." could just as easily mean from a carrier. My Motorola is a Motorola not a US Cellular.
HOWEVER... I was still clearly mistaken and confused. I even Googled before commenting and the results seemed to indicate that they were all carrier devices, All I did was a quick scan so even the Google link looked like a Google ad for a carrier. It was/is my mistake and I thank you, again, for the correction.
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:4, Informative)
Ah. No worries. In your defense, Google has not been very good about advertising this unique aspect of the Nexus line of products. Other than Apple, it's not exactly the norm for how devices are updated either. Still, it's unique in that, apparently, Google is pushing some of the support to the hardware manufacturers instead of handling it themselves (though I could be mistaken). I find this disheartening as it's Google's flagship name and I believe Google should handle any issues unless there's a hardware malfunction rather than a software glitch - possibly caused by Google's update.
Basically, Google chooses a specific manufacturer and works with them to develop a model that has its requirements, labels the product a "Nexus" , then supports the OS directly. They even sell Nexus items straight from Google rather than through a carrier. Nexus phones can typically switch carriers as long as the phone supports the proper tech and frequencies - same for the tablets. My Nexus 7 is made by ASUS, but I knew buying it that I'd be supported by Google - which is why I got it instead of a similar ASUS tablet with a standard USB port (Nexus products are notorious for not having expansion ports - Google thinks you should use them and the cloud for everything). I'd rather have the assurance that my hardware will be supported by the latest Android (so many manufacturers sell you a device, then don't bother updating it) than to have a few extra features.
I could be wrong, but last I checked, Nexus 5 had the proper tech to run on Verizon's network, but Verizon won't approve it - I suspect because the don't like that it's not locked down. They already hate that the iPhone doesn't have their bloatware and artificial restrictions.
But, yeah, if you see the name Nexus, that's Google's flagship product line and they'll update it first and directly while all other Android devices will take you months to get an update - if ever.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if my old(ish) Motorola RAZR is like that as it was the flagship phone at the time, It is still an excellent phone and it has my favorite feature - the slide out keyboard. The size and weight are worth it to me. It is able to take a SIM card too,
Re: (Score:3)
Man, those RAZRs were awesome. I'm actually looking for something similar now for my father who is just now learning to text - he has a flip phone now and a slide-out keyboard would be best. It's getting more difficult to find one that doesn't require a data plan. Verizon charges for data based on the type of phone - doesn't matter if you actually intend to use the data or not :-/
Re: (Score:2)
I am right there with ya, brother. I have a flip phone. My tablet was my way of testing out this mobile nonsense. Eh, it's a cheap toy that has worked out rather well for me, though.
The problem with mobiles is they have to flash the OS onto the device and rather than a standard x64 chip, there's bloody dozens of processors and configurations to support. Basically, it's the whole embedded OS market that's the issue. Give it another decade when they've settled on some standard architectures and storage
Re: (Score:2)
People will figure out they want control over their devices rather than buying new ones every couple years and just taking whatever setup comes with them.
The PC market has been heading in the opposite direction for as long as I can remember. What makes you think the mobile market will be any different?
Re: (Score:2)
Nexus 4, Nexus 5, Nexus 6, Nexus 7, Nexus 9, and Nexus 10 devices receive the latest version of Android directly from Google. Once an update is available, it can take up to two weeks for it to reach your device.
That's the theory. I got the 5.0 OTA update for my 2013 LTE Nexus 7 in mid-Februrary, some two weeks before I got 5.0 on my Z2. Now Sony had promised Lollipop in early 2015, early March is stretching it; still, I don't think that's as worse as having a Nexus device with such a ridiculously long update cycle.
Re: (Score:1)
You're right. His opening of "The whole point of the Nexus branded devices is..." totally indecipherable.
Re: (Score:2)
I see where I was mistaken - thank you all for the corrections. I shall now go through the comments and see what more people add and what more I can learn. That/this is why I love /. so much and have stuck around all these years. Some of you might be tough or rough but by tomorrow all is forgiven or forgotten (unless you are a continued asshole and then you get what you deserve).
Re: (Score:2)
Now unless you are speaking of JUST the Nexus branded device
The whole point of the Nexus branded devices
(your comment is tough to determine your intent)
Not for someone with reading comprehension...
Re: (Score:2)
As I've mentioned (with my foot in my mouth) the only Nexus devices I have seen where all carrier phones and when I did a quick Google prior to saying anything it looked like all of them were carrier devices. The Google ad looked like, well, a Google ad.
Re:Cutting edge journalism (Score:4, Insightful)
I guess that's why he suggested Google ask Apple how they handle it. The article is specifically talking about Google branded phones (which are only available from Google, not through carriers, no?), not Samsungs running Android or something. If you get an iPhone from AT&T, Vodaphone or Ethiopia Tel, Apple takes responsibility for updates to that phone. They absolutely can "go on to the Verizon/T-mobile/AT&T/Sprint network and update your phone. It's called the Internet. It's a good system that works well.
Re: (Score:1)
It's called the Internet. It's a good system that works well.
*Well, sometimes the magic works. Sometimes, it doesn't...*
Re: (Score:2)
we're talking about bricking here
It's not like Apple has dome that recently [readwrite.com] or anything, is it?
also on this thread i learned that google's upgrade cycle is, at least de facto, 18 months
Except that the N4, released November 2012, got this update. 27 months and still supported. A damn sight better than Apple's support for the first-gen iPad paperweight I have sitting in a box, for sure. Their excuse is that the older hardware isn't capable of running the new OS; Google also used that excuse when they released Jellybean, but worked on the system requirements for KitKat so that those older devices were once again supported; Lollipo
Re: (Score:1)
That is what I was thinking. This isn't a Google issue, they most certainly did NOT perform the OTA update. They provide vendors (and probably manufacturers) with the update. They are then supposed to vet the update, ensure all is well, and then do an OTA update. The issue really has (and I'm not trying to make excuses here) nothing whatsoever with Google. Google did their part completely and should not be subject to the blame. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of the vendor.
Re: Cutting edge journalism (Score:4, Informative)
Wrong. Many people, including myself, bought their device directly from Google, and Google themselves create and release the updates for these devices. You can install factory images directly from Google or wait for the over-thr-air updates.
I believe there are also carriers modified versions. For example, I think T-Mo has Nexus devices with proprietary WiFi calling added. In those cases then yes, the carrier must manage the update. Nexus program guidelines suggest how quickly carriers must release such updates.
Nevertheless, many people are on the Google-direct update train.
Google are really hit and miss with updates. They don't offer pre-releases to enthusiasts like they ought to (a pre-5.0 build was an exception and that's only because they were changing the runtime out and literally had to do it for dev support). They announce releases then don't roll them out to their most popular devices for weeks/months, and they release fix versions that don't address some of the worst bugs.
I like Android but my biggest gripe is not being in control of my own updates. When Apple announces a new OS everyone can get it. When Google announces a new OS you better pray you can get it a month later, and that the bug fix version won't be three months behind. That's if your device manufacturer even supports the update.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for the correction. As I read the remainder of the thread I was wondering about that aspect. I think something like that should be included in the summary so we know if it is vendor specific or if it is from Google directly. You can not turn off automatic OTA updates?
Re: (Score:2)
For example, I think T-Mo has Nexus devices with proprietary WiFi calling added.
They do not. It's supposed to be coming shortly, but it will be a carrier app, not baked into the firmware. In fact, carrier apps are no longer supposed to be baked into the firmware in Lollipop (though carriers, I'm sure, are still doing this for non-Nexus devices). Instead, carrier apps are installed during the setup process [slashgear.com], as normal apps that can be removed by the user. As a bonus, if you set up the phone without a SIM installed, it doesn't know which carrier's apps to install, so you get no carrier ap
Re: (Score:2)
Wait... Google provides your cellphone directly? How did you get on their corporate plan?
Seeing that google sells phones on Google Play, don't give a crap about what carrier you have, and these phones works, I'd say your sarcasm is seriously misplaced.
Or are you talking about those Nexuses that are provided by a different carrier, and as such that carrier retains the right to do whatever they want to the OSS Android underneath?
If you believe that there only exist phones with carrier-specific/altered OS, you're the perfect client for them. All the crap they keep doing to phones (locking them on specific networks, adding crapware, removing legitimate options/tools) is totally irrelevant regarding the ability to use a mobile phone...
You know... because Google can't just go on to the Verizon/T-Mobile/AT&T/Sprint network and update everyone's phone. The provider provides the specific Android build.
Let's look at the Nexus5. Google produce
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
google provides the builds to them... they're unlikely to want to push something that breaks things though.
besides, vast majority isn't on any verizon,tmobile/at whatever plan with their nexus7. you see, majority of people with these devices bought them and didn't rent them(like, case of poster, he bought the device from asus. but google branded it and sells it like it's a google device.).
and it's not really a secret why they don't update them all at once: they're beta testing on some regions, like poland o
Re: Cutting edge journalism (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a big loss since Nexus 5 camera was always shit. Since you knew that and still bought it means you don't really care about picture-taking abilities. So it is a little disingenuous to whine about it now.