Broadcom To Buy NetLogic For $3.7 Billion 35
An anonymous reader writes "Bloomberg reports that chip-maker Broadcom will be spending $3.7 billion to acquire NetLogic Microsystems in an effort to shore up their wireless infrastructure business. 'Customers such as Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp. use NetLogic processors in the equipment that controls the flow of video and other data across the Internet. The deal gives Broadcom, which also makes chips for mobile handsets, a more profitable way to harness the boom in tablets and smartphones, said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.' The Register cites this as evidence that corporate tax breaks don't create jobs, as companies look to spend spare cash instead on acquisitions. The deal is expected to be completed during the first half of next year."
Tax Breaks (Score:5, Insightful)
You'd think 15-20 years of offshoring and outsourcing would have made the governments of the world realize the only thing tax breaks do is line the pockets of big corporations. There is no "trickle down" effect any more. Companies don't "expand"; they "acquire." And then they cut duplicate jobs.
Re: (Score:3)
the only thing tax breaks do is line the pockets of big corporations. There is no "trickle down" effect any more.
Umm, a very large number of people in the US with any sort of retirement savings have them in stocks of some form or another (either through direct ownership or through mutual funds). So, when a public company becomes more profitable, the price of its stock increases, which in turn helps out many people. But then, I guess I was always a "glass half full" sort of person.
Hahahahahahaha! (Score:2)
Hahahahahahaha!
No, really,
Hahahahahahaha!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Re: (Score:2)
There have been times when Google have posted not merely record profits but record increase in profits but their share price has gone down because investors felt the profits should have been higher. Most of the Dot Coms posted negative income over their short lives and yet recorded massive increases in share value.
The stock value has nothing to do with profits, it has to do with the rate of change of perceived net worth with respect to actual net worth.
Re: (Score:2)
You are trying to make a negative point about stock value in the context of assets for the everyman, and you pick Google??? Have you seen the chart? Pick the old GM or some other big corporation that tanked - not a stock that is up around 600% since it's IPO.
The stock value has nothing to do with profits, it has to do with the rate of change of perceived net worth with respect to actual net worth.
How does that change the parent's point? Don't improved profits increase the perceived value of the company? Unless you are a very short-term investor, being off by a few cents either way on earnings won't change your investment performance very much.
How cute (Score:2)
*Also all 6.72 million would need to be filthy rich.
Re:Tax Breaks (Score:5, Insightful)
There was a parable in the Bible that's kind of like this, about a guy who was about to be fired as manager of an estate so he went out and forgave everybody's debts. Cost the master of the estate a lot of money, but the guy was getting fired anyway and he ended up with a lot of friends who would keep him from ending up on the street. Government works the same way.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but tax breaks buy votes. When you've only got four years in office before the next election, you've got to prioritize. Four years isn't enough time to actually fix anything that's broken, but it's enough time to campaign.
Oh, I see. Four years isnt enough to do anything (which, Im sure, is a relief for Obama to hear), so we need to give Obama 4 more years. Obama 2012-- because the first four were just for practice!
Also, if tax breaks dont do anything, any thoughts / commentary on the Regan years? I would be sincerely to hear your explanation for what happened after Reagan implemented his tax cuts.
There was a parable in the Bible that's kind of like this, about a guy who was about to be fired as manager of an estate so he went out and forgave everybody's debts. Cost the master of the estate a lot of money, but the guy was getting fired anyway and he ended up with a lot of friends who would keep him from ending up on the street.
My memory's not perfect, but Im pretty sure thats not how that went. I may be wrong, of course, so would be interested to see
Re: (Score:2)
Also, if tax breaks dont do anything, any thoughts / commentary on the Regan years? I would be sincerely to hear your explanation for what happened after Reagan implemented his tax cuts.
The difference lies in the confidence of the market, back then they still wanted to invest. Right now it's like giving a ship that's battened down the hatches new sails, they'll stuff them away and when you ask why they're not setting sail they'll look at you like you're crazy and point out the gloomy outlook. So they'll keep the savings and consolidate, they might buy out some others to be ready to leap when the market recovers but they won't expand now. Of course this is all a bit of a Catch 22 since the
Re: (Score:2)
Jesus told his disciples: "There was a rich man whose manager was accused of wasting his possessions. So he called him in and asked him, 'What is this I hear about you? Give an account of your management, because you cannot be manager any longer.' "The manager said to himself, 'What shall I do now? My master is taking away my job. I'm not strong enough to dig, and I'm ashamed to beg– I know what I'll do so that, when I lose my job here, people will welcome me into their houses. So he called in each one of his master's debtors. He asked the first, 'How much do you owe my master?' 'Eight hundred gallons of olive oil,' he replied. The manager told him, 'Take your bill, sit down quickly, and make it four hundred.' Then he asked the second, 'And how much do you owe?' 'A thousand bushels of wheat,' he replied. He told him, 'Take your bill and make it eight hundred.'
Kind of sounds like a politician to me. He's about to lose his job because he's wasting someone else's money, so he goes out and makes as many friends as he can so he won't have to work.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm with you (and the Register) that in this case the tax breaks offered to Broadcomm went primarily into acquisitions, which will probably result in a net loss of jobs from the combined companies in the short term (who knows about the long term, but from the sound of things, Broadcomm really just wants to buy some patents anyway).
I'm not sure I agree with you (and the Register) that tax breaks have been demonstrated to be useless in general. Of course, tax breaks "line the pockets of big [and small] corpo
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The interesting thing is, the corporate tax rate in the USA is one of the highest in the world. However, most big companies here don't pay that rate, because they pull all kinds of tricks, such as basing themselves in someplace like Bahamas even though they don't really do anything. Of course, the small companies are screwed.
If the US government actually bothered to enforce its tax laws on the large corporations, then they'd bring in a lot more revenue to fix the budget problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they do that !?! (Score:1)
So to spend that much??? Are they crazy, that all I could think off.
Re: (Score:2)
Broadcom have a... reputation... that could indicate them being a few bits short of a byte. 8 of them, probably.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I miss the days when their (then?) CEO was still in the news. Your garden variety tax-dodging and securities fraud are boring; but a CEO who secretly builds a sex dungeon under his mansion while his wife is out of town, or is accused of drugging drinks during business meetings, that is almost enough to make me forgive the state of BCM linux drivers...
Collectively, in an almost unconscious, hypnotic, not-deliberately-planned sort of manner ... there is a strong tendency to train, nurture, and greatly reward the sociopaths we breed in numbers. It makes said fevered egos think they are completely invincible and may do anything they please, confident their wealth and connections and status will get them out of any real trouble. Until, of course, we are finally sickened or outraged and decide in a sudden way that they may not. That boundary determines wha
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that NetLogic has patents that would take 5 years for Broadcom to rival makes it a very worthwhile investment.
But I found those that first link very informative however. All investors do need to read that, especially with the ongoing lawsuit.
Re: (Score:1)
NetLogic owns the TCAM market. You can't build high-end router without TCAMs.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe not for long though. [yahoo.com]. Disclaimer: I work for Cavium, a competitor to NetLogic.
Broadcom's Suspicious Acquisition Track Record (Score:1)
This is going to end up in court, big time. (Score:2)
What the article doesn't point out is that is that there is a strong possibility of a class-action lawsuit on the payouts of shares, as the Board of Directors of NETL did not properly hold the sales process and shop it out.
It seems that $50 for what was a $30 share a few days ago is quite generous, but there's a rather long legal history of boards that breach their fiduciary duties getting into serious legal trouble.
The fact that something like a dozen law firms are already trying to get involved the second
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that something like a dozen law firms are already trying to get involved the second this happened shows lawyers are opportunistic bastards that would sue their own mother if they thought she'd settle.
There, FTFY.
MOD parent up (Score:2)
Parent is exactly right - there is nothing fishy about law firms immediately putting out press releases about pending "investigations" when a public company gets an offer to be bought. Just go research any notable purchase over the past few years. It's really sad.
Re: (Score:1)
NetLogic must be happy (Score:1)