Toshiba Adds Two-Way Wi-Fi To SD Card 77
judgecorp writes "Toshiba has announced an SD card with Wi-Fi. This is an advance on previous products such as the Eye-Fi Pro X2, as it allows two-way transfers over Wi-Fi. This will be a very convenient feature. It has been labelled a security worry — but most of us already have cameras with wireless connections ... called phones."
Summary misses the point. (Score:5, Interesting)
We may all already have phones - but this would be invaluable for someone who takes a professional-quality image or video of say, law enforcement. Any data recorded stands a better chance of being immediately put out of reach from your average plod
"You want me to erase all the evidence I just recorded of you officer? Of course."
Re:Summary misses the point. (Score:4, Informative)
So what's new about this? This was available 10 years ago: http://www.mobiletechreview.com/tips/sandisk_SD_wifi.htm [mobiletechreview.com]
Or are they applying for a patent?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What's new is that Toshiba sent out a press release, so all media outlets must comply with the requisite awe and wonder.
That's how this works.
Re:Summary misses the point. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, no, this is not just normal WiFi, this is two-way WiFi. With old one-way WiFi, you had to send a packet, then eject the card, turn it around, and insert it the other way around to receive the reply. With this new two-way wireless magic your card can both send and receive! It's exciting and new!
LOL!
The next one in the making (and I didn't tell you this; SHHHHH!) introduces Valid Strict Capability and a subset of Comprehensive Logistical Programming that will maximize security, and efficiently assure upgradeable firmware functionality! It will increase market share by over 35%.
No, I didn't use BuzzWord Generator (http://www.outofservice.com/buzzword/); I swear! /humor
Re: (Score:2)
With old one-way WiFi, you had to send a packet, then eject the card, turn it around, and insert it the other way around to receive the reply.
Now before anyone tries this at home: You forgot to mention that this won't work unless you punch out a hole on the side of the sd card to change it from r/o to rw!
Re: (Score:2)
What's new is that Toshiba sent out a press release, so all media outlets must comply with the requisite awe and wonder.
That's how this works.
Heh.. Yeah.. You're right, IMHO. Old news is often the best profit-driving news.
Someone go out there and find that this isn't the case. C'mon. I challenge you! :)
Re:Summary misses the point. (Score:4, Informative)
This appears to be a real sd card, not just some gadget that uses the SD card slot.
That it could be used for this, I guess it's not surprise to anyone, that you could incorporate it in a real size SD card, could be news.
Re: (Score:3)
that you could incorporate it in a real size SD card, could be news.
Nope, still not a surprise, since over 200,000,000 photos have already been uploaded through Eye-Fi cards: http://www.eye.fi/ [www.eye.fi]
Re: (Score:2)
According to their website, of course. Even if it's half that, it's nothing new.
Re: (Score:2)
Is that two way communication?
Re: (Score:2)
Eye-Fi is a real SD card, and appears to be a storage SD card to the camera. Instead of Wifi card using SD as interface.
Consider this is a USB Flash drive - but it can do two-way sync to the Wifi (Wifi configured separated, not with convention tools, and you cannot get network connection with that Wifi either). And this is not USB Wifi stick. Now s/USB/SD/g and you see the different.
Like she said, size matters (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
the storage capability matters because you can't upload sdio drivers to your camera.. that's the only reason, really, miniaturising them wouldn't have been the problem, but doing the storage link needs sw and engineering, and something at the other end. still, how does one configure it?
(and there's that direct upload wifi sd card that has been out for a while, so two way probably means you could stick this in your smartphone and upload stuff back too, and that's why this is different from the sdio wifi card
Re: (Score:2)
That's one of the reasons why I hate SD cards and most of the other cards. CF cards are a bit larger, but it's nice to know that pretty much any device with a CF slot will take a CF card, no matter how new. I think the only compatibility questions are for CF type 2, because they're a bit thicker and for Microdrives.
But, even my 11 year old Canon s10 is limited only by the filesystem that Canon chose to use, it will take a modern CF card because the card itself has the necessary controller embedded.
To be fair (Score:2)
3rd parties did write drivers for other PDAs too back then. Palm had a driver for most Palm OS devices. So the disclaimer isn't 100% correct.
WiFi adapter vs. Memory with embed server. (Score:2)
BACK THEN:
What Sandisk did 10 years ago was a network card running over a SPI bus. (It's just like you classic network card, but over an SDIO slots' bus instead of PCIe or USB)
That means that, using correct drivers, a PalmOS or a WindowsCE PDA could use the card to access WiFi network. (At a time where most built-in options were IrDA and maybe bluetooth for the top-level PDAs).
I did use similar card to get WiFi access on my Plam Tungsten T3 and Tapwave Zodiac.
They are similar to the CF Wifi cards for PDA (
Re: (Score:2)
In that case, I don't think they'd "ask" or "want" you to erase anything. Best case scenario, it's taken away from you. Worst case scenario, you never see it again. (bonus points for getting physically assaulted)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Summary misses the point. (Score:4, Interesting)
Its a first as in "fully comply with the SD standard" i.e. no drivers needed for a unique very small subset of units.
For law enforcement and rent a spooks (or ex special forces) it means your very public photography/movie clip is safe from a software or "hard"ware deleting.
From a Guardian story having its images removed
"One of the policewomen smiled. "Delete photos and you can go, no trouble.""
The "London Street Photography Festival" shows some sides of image/movie making in public places http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJH9F7Hcluo [youtube.com] or
the parts of the world where police know to look around and 'remove' all cards/devices after a beating/death.
Re: (Score:1)
It's still nothing more than a product release announcement, as opposed to "OMG NEW TECH," since this very product has been available from others for some time now, and is in (more or less) wide use already: http://www.eye.fi/ [www.eye.fi]
Implementation problems? (Score:2)
How would this work?
SD cards are just block storage. Surely it wouldn't modify the underlying filesystem while being connected to a host? Wouldn't that potentially corrupt the filesystem?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#SDIO
Re: (Score:3)
This isn't a SDIO card but rather from the host device appears as a standard block storage card. Presumably finding a way of modifying the file-system without causing corruption is what qualifies this as news.
The easy way way would have been to have placeholder files that were always visible to the host device. Which when read where blank, until new files where actually received.
I expect they have gone an extra step and found a way of forcing the host to reload the FAT (so the files get relevant filenames),
Re: (Score:2)
I have had a SD wifi card for years. It was for a PDA that i had at the time that didn't come with it nativity. I don't see the big deal here, but don't doubt the have made one, again.
Re: (Score:2)
Cell phone camera's (Score:1)
It has been labelled a security worry â" but most of us already have cameras with wireless connections ... called phones
Please, even the best cellphone camera is a toy compared to what a pro or semi pro would be using. Most cell phone camera's are pretty much a point and shoot whereas I'd be using a digital slr with a wide range of lenses. I'm not putting down cell phone camera's. I'm just saying that comparing (example) my Iphone 4 camera to a digital SLR is like apples to oranges.
Re: (Score:1)
what is best current cameraphone? It is N8.
and it is terrible camera.
- limited to 28mm wide = terrible for person photographing (you want 50mm, 85mm or 110mm usually) and even for most landscape situations (you want to zoom on those as well)
- no macro function at all. macro means at least 1:1 ration and N8 has only a close-up functionality.
- Almost infinite DOF, even with 2.8f what means no great videos, potrait or even landscape photos. only because camera is build to so small case that you are forced to w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
even the best cellphone camera is a toy compared to what a pro or semi pro would be using
I agree, but we should be careful not to underestimate cellphone cameras, they can be surprisingly good:
iPhone @ New York streets [blogspot.com]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonatasluzia/6103884318/ [flickr.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/08/1382010.html [blogspot.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/08/2882011.html [blogspot.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/08/2382011_24.html [blogspot.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/08/2082011.html [blogspot.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/08/1782011_17.html [blogspot.com]
http://365iphone.blogspot.com/2011/07/1872011_18.html [blogspot.com]
Apples and Oranges -- A Comparison (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just saying that comparing (example) my Iphone 4 camera to a digital SLR is like apples to oranges.
"Apples" to Oranges? Hmmm....... [ohinternet.com]
;-)
FWIW, Apples' phones may be restricted by their being stuck in a mobile phone, but so are Oranges'. [engadget.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, cell phones are a much more serious threat as far as security goes. Sure you can hook a 1.4x teleconverter to a 2x teleconverter to a 500mm lens and be taking pictures from a quarter mile away, but you still need to be close enough to have an unobstructed line of site, which is tough and while you're doing it you're going to have all sorts of folks wondering why you're using bird photography gear in an urban environment. And have to answer questions when the police confront you for being suspiciou
Monthly fee (Score:1)
but most of us already have cameras with wireless connections ... called phones.
Not everybody wants to have a separate $60 per month data or data+voice plan for every separate camera that the family owns.
Re: (Score:2)
And WiFi helps this how? It's not like there's an open WiFi available at the average photo scenery.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
These devices are primarily for studio work. Previously the work would be done tethered to a computer, but now they can do it wirelessly using a WiFi device. It's nice in that it makes it a bit easier to move around in the studio, but this technology is unlikely to be of much value outside of a studio environment.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and this manufacturer has been making devices like this for years. What's special is that it's compatible with standards slots and works bidirectionally.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
yea and when compact flash was king in PDA's you could get wifi, ethernet, gps, modems you name it
2 way? (Score:2)
Wow! 2 way WiFi you mean it sends as well as receives?
Re: (Score:2)
Article misses the point, I think (Score:3)
No, what it means is that you can have a scheme something like:
What this means is that a photographer can shoot until their battery runs out while a nearby notebook or WiFi enabled SAN device records the images. Instead of being limited to 32 GB, you can happily fill a terabyte drive or more.
Or if you're concerned about the data's safety locally (journalist working in a dangerous area, someone taking pictures of authorities who might take the camera away) you can even set the device that's receiving the images to upload into a remote FTP or some kind of cloud based service.
Or am I missing something?
Re: (Score:1)
Yet most mid tier DSLRs do not(my D90 does not). This is a nice add on for such cameras. Pros may already have such devices, the majority of DSLR owners don't.
Re: (Score:2)
Or if you're concerned about the data's safety locally (journalist working in a dangerous area, someone taking pictures of authorities who might take the camera away) you can even set the device that's receiving the images to upload into a remote FTP or some kind of cloud based service.
That is how my fairly inexpensive Nikon point and shoot works now, it sends pictures to a ftp/http site for later retrieval. Rather annoying that its tied to THEIR service however as i would rather it just hook to my server at home.
Re: (Score:2)
It would probably be easier to just build the wireless networking into the camera, than to build it into each SD card. That way you also don't risk having the antenna buried inside the camera along with the SD card.
Re: (Score:2)
Some cameras already do this, but this way they can get a piece of the camera market that won't buy a whole other phone to get Wi-Fi.
I just paid $50 for a used 10 MP Fuji with a 2GB card at a flea market, basically what I'd have paid on eBay but without having to pay for shipping or the memory card. Should have paid forty but anyway. I'm not in the market for an expensive new camera for Wi-Fi, but if I could get one of these on sale or something I might think about it :)
Re: (Score:2)
That would be, to descend into the vernacular, "fucking SWEET".
PRO... but the top-end cameras use compact flash ! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
no one even makes compact flash anymore, besides its just an ide interface not magic
Wrong security worry (Score:2)
I think the higher security worry should be that this could be used to silently plug a pre-configured Wifi device on a PC. What if you make it discreet, using some sort of rootkit and use a program to extract data from the device - and the networks it has access to?
People already use this today, see Stuxnet. This would allow for an extra communication device and could come handy. You'd avoid wired networks security measures, and short of scambling wireless frequencies or scanning for odd signals, which not
New product? (Score:1)
Non-Unique. (Score:2)
one [amazon.com]
two [amazon.com]
Larry Niven's "Flash Crowd" newstaper gear (1973) (Score:2)