Interactive, Emotion-Detecting Robot Developed 58
cylonlover writes "A team of Cambridge University researchers have now developed a system that can not only detect a user's emotional state, but can also make expressive responses of its own. Using a robotic likeness of the godfather of the programmable computer, Charles Babbage, the team has hooked the system up to a driving simulator and created a computerized driving companion and navigator that reacts to the driver in much the same way as a human passenger."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Great (Score:2)
Creepy dead-faced robotic backseat drivers.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it scream like my passengers?
No. TF clip: the guy's "driving" on the wrong side of the road and the "mummy" on his left is, like, "good idea, let's try that".
Re: (Score:1)
Why? (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
We cant even get voice recognition to work because of tonal changes and ascents.
Recently an article was published talking about the human synapse which describes it far as more complex than original thought. See http://www.medicaldaily.com/news/20101117/3877/new-imaging-method-developed-at-stanford-reveals-stunning-details-of-brain-connections.htm [medicaldaily.com]
I recon we should start focusing creating LtCmdr Data before we progress on figuring out how to build Lore.
Re: (Score:2)
Voice Recognition works perfectly! [google.com]
Because... (Score:3)
I don't think the eventual aim of this work is to have a talking head of Charles Babbage on your computer. The aim is to understand the nature of subliminal communications, and the first stage of doing that is by direct mimicry using an accurate dummy.
So, what's this got to do with computer interfaces? Well, when most people get annoyed with their computer, they shout at the screen. Why? If the system has locked up, then the error happened in the CPU or the GPU which both sit in the body of the machine u
Re:Why? (Score:5, Funny)
No, we need hidden sensors in our glasses capable of telling us secret things that we cannot detect in the real world:
"She's being sarcastic, she didn't really mean that."
"She's really mad, even if she says she ain't"
"By 'nothing' she meant you did a major screw-up"
etc
Re: (Score:2)
Or assassinated by about 51% of the population, who likes that no one knows what they mean.
Has author never used computers? (Score:3)
Voice recognition software is now quite a capable means of entering information into a computer system.
guffaw.
Still, where do I get two of these bots from so I can use the T3 lanes on the way to work in the morning?
Re: (Score:1)
From TFA:
Voice recognition software is now quite a capable means of entering information into a computer system.
guffaw.
You guffaw, but I entered this comment with voice recognition.
Dear aunt, let’s set so double the killer delete select all
er.... oops?
Re: (Score:2)
guffaw.
Still, where do I get two of these bots from so I can use the T3 lanes on the way to work in the morning?
Lots of places on the Internet [racy.com].
Re:Has author never used computers? (Score:5, Interesting)
I have what would be described in science as a "fucking awful" voice. I remember playing with some VR technology a few years back and I couldn't even make it through the training. I adjusted my mic and everything like it asked and then got to the prompts: "Say 'dog.'" "Dog." "You said 'b93r.' Say 'dog.'" After six or seven tries of that kind of nonsense I pretty much gave up.
I was actually playing with a copy of Dragon Naturally Speaking a month or two ago and was surprised by how good it was. I could tell it was struggling with my voice; the instructions at the start of the training said that most people wouldn't need to read the whole story for the training to be comfortable, and I had to go all the way through and more, but it was pretty good. It could recognize whole sentences at a time, whereas previous technology couldn't even manage words. I finished up the training and busted open Word to give it a try (I could have trained it further but I was just playing with it) and it was very accurate. And this, quite obviously, is with a voice that gives VR technology fits and a general vocabulary where it couldn't even attempt to muff the results by choosing from known word lists.
I have little trouble believing that with a bit more training and a little more user training on my part (working to enunciate a little better, etc) that it could be a very capable means of entering information. Doubly so if the information I'm entering is predictable such that it has (for lack of a better term) a smaller dictionary to guess from.
VR is probably pitiful compared to where we thought we would be in 2010 years ago, but it's actually getting to be quite respectable.
Re: (Score:2)
Speaker-dependant speech recognition software can do reasonably well, given enough training as you have mentioned. Speaker-independent speech recognition software, on the other hand, is still very much in its infancy.
One of the telcos in our country, Telstra, has rolled out a service that I'd like to opt-out of... voicemail to SMS. If you miss a call, instead of a voicemail being recorded for you to listen to later on, a computer answers the call and gives the speaker 10 seconds to state their business with
Re: (Score:2)
Yep I have the same problem.
I emigrated to the US from England about 8 years ago so have an English accent. I don't believe I have a strong UK regional accent, as British regional accents go, my home area (south west) is probably nearest to 'generic' BBC English. Yet still most voice recognition software can't figure me out. Personally I find products like Dragon more effort than they are worh so avoid them ( I can type faster anyway) but its getting ever harder to avoid those very annoying corporate ph
Fear (Score:2)
How long before it can smell fear?
Disney Mr. Potato Head comes to mind... (Score:1)
Disney has a lead on this and their work looks good to me. They have Mr. Potato-head that recognizes people and their interactions then reacts accordingly. It is leading edge stuff but it has been going on for quite some time.
Charles Babbage? WTF? (Score:2)
If you're going to make a robotic person, it should look like Summer Glau. Come on, people!
Re: (Score:1)
I thought they should've stopped there and rolled with it.
Re: (Score:2)
I think he's a good choice, being a bit of an eccentric jerk type of guy. I quote wikipedia:
'Babbage's distaste for commoners ("the Mob") included writing "Observations of Street Nuisances" in 1864, as well as tallying up 165 "nuisances" over a period of 80 days. He especially hated street music, and in particular the music of organ grinders, against whom he railed in various venues. The following quotation is typical:
It is difficult to estimate the misery inflicted upon thousands of persons, and the absolu
Re: (Score:2)
Here you go: http://sydneypadua.com/2dgoggles/lovelace-and-babbage-vs-the-organist-pt-1/ [sydneypadua.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can it detect... (Score:1)
Brain the size of a planet... (Score:2)
Now the world has gone to bed
Darkness won't engulf my head
I can see by infra-red
How I hate the night
Now I lay me down to sleep
Try to count electric sheep
Sweet dream wishes you can keep
How I hate the night
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone here knows where that came from, and if they don't, they're probably at the wrong website.
Microexpressions (Score:1)
They developed a computer system that tracks feature points on a user's face via a camera and then compares the input with entries in a database of hundreds of predefined mental states to interpret the combinations of gestures as emotions.
Could this be used to analyse microexpressions [wikipedia.org]? Microexpression analysis has significant potential for improving lie detector tests beyond simple polygraphs.
am deeply... (Score:1)
...unimpressed...
Turing, meet Maori (Score:1)
Seriously. One of the subsets of the Turing Test should be how the system responds to a 'typical' Maori war dance (we'll even allow the All-Blacks as performers of the ritual), without any pedagogical knowledge of the Maori.
You know, be a diplomat. Or, god forbid, a missionary. That's worked out pretty well for lots of intelligences (the human kind, of a sort).
carpool lanes (Score:1)
Strange choice of representation (Score:2)
great, an artificial back seat driver (Score:1)
moving forward (Score:2)
Combine that with the robot that learned to shoot a bow and arrow [redicecreations.com] and the robots that learned to lie to each other [popsci.com] and we're either living in very interesting or very scary times... or both.
Damn! (Score:2)
Really? (Score:1)
Terminator (Score:2)
Emotion-Detecting Robot Developed eh? What could possibly go wrong?
10 Detect Emotion
20 Kill
30 GOTO 10