




Engineering Students Build Robotic Foosball Players 59
Andre writes "As their final-year project, an eight-man team of fourth-year electrical and computer-engineering students at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada, constructed a robot-controlled, motor-and-actuator foosball table capable of playing against human opponents in a two-on-two fashion; one mechanical player controls two defensive rods (goalies and full-backs) and the other controls two offensive rods (half-backs and forwards). They considered the computers 'medium-skilled' players in that they were very competitive against beginners and fairly competitive against intermediates."
Not that easy, it would appear (Score:3, Funny)
FTA: 'After a year of software development and testing, the team and faculty consultant Sebastion Fischmeister demoed their bionic foosball superstars in January 2009 at the university's Senior Design Symposium to a positive reception.'
Guess Beckham et al. are safe for a while...
Easy and done before in Austria (Score:2, Informative)
I don't understand why this is a /. story.
This has been done before by an Austrian University?
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Tischfussball-Roboter-aus-Oberoesterreich--/meldung/135390
(German)
Re: (Score:1)
and a model designed at the University of Freiburg is commercially available since ~ 2002...
Re: (Score:1)
sorry, I was wrong.
the development started in 2001, the cooperation with the company was signed in 2003 and introduction of the "Star Kick" was as late as 2005.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Link, for completeness' sake:
http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~kiro/english/index.html
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and the "intermediate" tag is wrong.
They're okay against bar hacks. Against even an average rookie-level tournament player, both systems get totally smoked.
His "anyone with a fast pull shot" includes bottom-tier players from local city tournament, let alone anyone with a shot of breaking even in amateur events on tour.
It'd be like saying a computer chess program is "intermediate" because it does okay against the average joe off the street, when even a poor tournament player beats it easily. Or like s
What if? (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder how the "players" would do if they had their positions switched. Would the algorithms want re-writing?
Re: (Score:2)
At what point did it become passe to do meaningful work as an engineering student?
A completely valid point. How about building something "useful"?
Re: (Score:3)
Come on, they're going to spend the rest of their careers working on useful - and incredibly dull - things like dishwasher door bearings or toilet flush controllers.
So let them have a bit of fun. Even if the device is frivolous, isn't the point to demonstrate and apply the subject matter learned on the course?
Re:Uhh...great. (Score:4, Insightful)
Umm... This is an experimental platform that can track a massive 3-dimensional object, calculate its position and build a sufficient model of where it's going (at least as good as a human being), and then actuate mechanisms (with their own inherent delay, displacement, physical characteristics, and nonlinearities w/r/t the ball) in order to cause a state change in the ball, with the goal of delivering the ball to a set of state vectors at the goal.
It seems "silly," but there's dozens of very difficult engineering problems to be solved here, and all of this is relates to real-world problems. The sorts of problems can often lead to new thinking about old, "serious" problems and novel solutions.
Video is slashdotted (Score:2)
Medium Skill? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
And who could forget the famous "pawn rush" strategy that beat Deep Blue?
Well ... (Score:2)
So.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Next project (Score:2)
Build a robotic bully which will go back to our high school and beat up all those mean kids who took our lunch money!
Not a new idea. (Score:1)
I remember reading about a robot called TriKiTrain at a college in Austria a while ago.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Tischfussball-Roboter-aus-Oberoesterreich--/meldung/135390 [heise.de]
Of course, it's in German. I didn't find any english articles on it, but google translator might help.
progress (Score:1)
If you think this is a waste of time... (Score:2)
reverse engineer real sports (Score:2, Interesting)
One of the more interesting aspects is that a different group engineered the defense from the offense.
Human sports are often decomposable in similar fashions. A team may have separate coaches for attacking and defending, but more generally a sport could have a complete separation of roles. Instead of two teams each responsible for both offense and defense, a game could involve four teams in two pairs. Award points to the defenders according to saves.
This would be trivial in sports like baseball and Ameri
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
That would actually make things incredibly boring. One of the aspects that makes football (soccer) interesting is the fluid definitions of roles. A good defender, especially the full backs, will play an important role in attack. Similarly, the midfielders are expected to defend. By setting up teams constrained to one role, you go back to the football of the beginning of last century.
Incorrect terminology used.... (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That might be true in the most common formation on a real football pitch. But a table football isn't real football. There is no row of four players, just look at the photos. Epic fail!
Re: (Score:1)
Foosball? (Score:2)
Re:Foosball? (Score:4, Informative)
For the Brits here, Foosball is table football. No idea why it's called that over there. Maybe from the German, Fußball?
"Foosball" does come from the German word. The game increased in popularity in the USA in the wake of WWII, although the first American patent dates to 1901. One helpful article to read is http://www.foosball.com/learn/knowledge/chp1hist.html [foosball.com] from the book The Complete Book Of Foosball (Lott & Brainard, 1980)
I've never heard an exact explanation for why Foosball (or just Foos) specifically caught on as a name. Maybe "table soccer" is just too awkward. Obviously, Americans couldn't call it "table football," since football is a different sport there.
Video demonstration of the robotic foosball player (Score:1)
http://watch.discoverychannel.ca/daily-planet/february-2009/daily-planet-february-3-2009/#clip136425 [discoverychannel.ca]
Re: (Score:1)
Bubble Hockey (Score:2)
Call me when your puny machine can play the king of all arcade games, USA vs USSR bubble hockey.
This just in... robotic cars (Score:1, Interesting)
This is an old concept- hardly newsworthy.
I played against a table like this at the Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2003.
There are even sites with instructions to build your own: http://www.instructables.com/id/Autonomous-Foosball-Table/
Nothing New (Score:1)
My group built a fully automated electro-mechanical chess board (nothing new here either). Any other cool projects out there?
Re: (Score:2)
Hey! (Score:1)
Yet another one... (Score:1)
RE: (Score:1)
More foosball robots (Score:1)
2002 (Score:1)