Femtosecond Lasers Used To Color Metals 166
Maximum Prophet writes "An optics professor and a postgrad have developed a way to use ultra-short pulses of laser light to etch nano features into the surface of metals so that they can absorb or reflect specific wavelengths of light. This is very similar to the way that butterflies get the color in their wings."
WOW! (Score:5, Funny)
How could you possibly mention lasers and insects (Score:1, Funny)
Re:WOW! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Double negative... Must - not - not - imagine - this - scenario
Re: (Score:2)
It's even more similar to the way CDs have rainbows on them.
taste the rainbow (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Muhammed Ali vs the CD (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You think butterflies are bad? Wait until the sharks hear about this!!
Re: (Score:2)
New upgrades to "Shark Army(tm)" project (Score:3, Funny)
Forget the sharks !
Let's make an army of butterflies with freakin' femto lasers on their head and take over the world with them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:WOW! (Score:5, Informative)
Most of the colors in my parrot are due to the same diffraction effect from the spacing of the barbs in his feathers. There are two interesting things you can observe. One, when you get him thoroughly soaked in a shower, he becomes all dull except for the yellow feathers on his head (which are pigmented); it's a pretty dramatic color change. Two, when the tips of a feather passes in front of another feather, you get neat Moire patterns.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:WOW! (Score:4, Informative)
The article says nothing of the sort. In fact, it says just the opposite: "Blue light has a wavelength range from 400-480 nm, and is the only wavelength that is interfered with constructively by the slits of the morpho, which are 200 nm apart."
Your article completely undercuts your argument.
Re: (Score:2)
uh huh... (Score:3, Funny)
<0)
( \
X
8====D
Not that there's anything wrong with owning a p3n15 b1rd.
only one way to answer that... (Score:2)
Re:WOW! (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, butterfly wing-scales are the color of the underlying wing cells that produce the scales (and not blue, etc..) The scales are actually not blue, they are probably the color of butterfly skin cells.
The intense powder blue colors observed in butterfly scales are caused by Optical Interference Filter phenomenons in the microscopic slits in the surface of the scales *only* and not from a pigment or dye. Think of it as a mirror that adsorbs light in all optical wavelengths and reflects only the shades of blue observed. If you were to shine light of different wavelengths like pure green or red, the wings would be appear dark or mostly black as they absorb wavelengths of light that are not those specific to those shades of blue light they reflect.
Traditional colors (in most things we see daily) are caused by pigments and dyes (subtractive color) or from CRT/LCD/Plasma display RGB techniques (additive color).
This 'new' technology using "Femtosecond Lasers" creates precise cuts in the surface of metals (or other substances), to create these precise interference pattern slits to produce brilliant colors. These slits act as a slit interference light reflector/absorber as they brightly reflect specific wavelengths like a selective mirror and adsorb others. This method is vastly more efficient than colored subtractive filters and therefore produce colors far more intense than any pigment or dye could produce.
All butterfly and moth scales are made of non-living insect cuticle. Insect cuticle comes from epithelial cells and is made up of chitin and protein. These Chitins and Proteins are not necessarily colored or pigmented. Their observed 'colors' virtually all come from their nano-scale *structures* which have microscopic optical interference reflectors/absorbers. Some insects use these 'scales' to very efficiently absorb light to stay warm in sunlight and the light reflected is very brilliant and is essentially a mirror to particular wavelengths.
The important thing FTA is that now mankind has learned how to use lasers to be able to modify the surface of metal substrates (of whatever native 'color') to adsorb and reflect specific wavelengths of light in the visual range. This can be used to make better coatings and even better camouflage. The USAF already uses similar technology in their "stealth paint" with radar-adsorbing interference filtering "stuff" in the paint itself (as well as the shape). This new technology reads to me to to be a good step in the direction of daylight stealth and camouflage, but just like the butterfly wings. Once touched or structurally affected, the surface structure changes and so does the color absorption/reflection. This is why it is very necessary to carefully clean stealth aircraft just before missions, otherwise combustion particles, dust, etc.. can reflect radar and defeat some of the paint's stealth properties. This would have a similar optical effect on the "Femtosecond Laser-colored Metals" referred FTA.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Diffraction gratings using parallel lines to produce the colours; interference filters using layers of differing refractive indices.
Re: (Score:2)
Interestingly, this technique might be combined with the "forests of nanotubes" discussed last month to make some interesting coatings and material finishes. http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/17/0424232 [slashdot.org]
Butterflies... (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This is very similar to the way that butterflies get the color in their wings.
Oh sure, they're just using the lasers to etch colourful designs onto their wings now, but give the little buggers a chance and they'll scale up the energy output. It's them or us, I tells you!
Hmm good bye automotive paint?? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hmm good bye automotive paint?? (Score:5, Insightful)
paints and paint equipment improvements (Score:2)
It might be cheaper given the cost of disposing of hazardous waste associated with conventional painting processes
Because the health and environmental problems cause expenses for body shops and manufacturers (like needing to give employees expensive respirators, special filters, etc)...paint companies have been going to more and more eco-friendly painting systems.
Improvements are both in equipment and the paint systems themselves. HVLP (High Volume Low Pressure) guns came out at least a decade ago and
Re: (Score:2)
I suspect that the clear paint would destroy the color-producing effect of the metal surface anyways.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Clear coat -will protect - easy to repair color (Score:2)
Ugh - crappy work keyboard (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Better seal it to prevent it from rusting. (Score:2)
I think they'd better have a clear coat of some form or else the finish will turn a brilliant rust-colored orange after experiencing contact with moisture. Stainless steel and aluminum also oxidize, but not to the extent of mild steel. Such oxidation would probably be sufficient to dull the color significantly.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I really don't see it being much of an advantage over regular paint in most cases, but it's a cool technology to have anyway and we may find something it's real
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that where a paint coating of measurable thickness will take a certain amount of time to wear once direct exposure sets in, the super thin modified metal layer will only take an extremely short time to wear away. You'd have to be careful when waxing the car to apply very gently.
Well, that's kind of the point of applying a fresh clearcoat periodically, it provides a transparent paint layer that will wear away at a certain rate and can be replenished. You wouldn't need to be gentle when waxing because you would be waxing the clearcoat not the bare metal (which could potentially fade if you simply smudged the surface). Really the tech isn't a compelling replacement for painting cars, although it might be useful for something else we haven't discovered yet, which was kind of the poin
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Hence the need for the clear coat the GP mentioned.
Re: (Score:2)
That's because ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I, for one (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Neat! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I have to be honest, reading the paper it is just, odd. It is not the results that are odd or anything like that, but it is just a bit flaky. They start off wittering on about Alchemy & turning base metal into gold (even referencing it) - then concede the aren't doing anything like that at all (this is an academic paper - wittering is not good). Details are light (ok, it is a letter) and in g
I've got to call bulls**t (Score:2, Redundant)
There's no way in hell a butterfly has the discipline to set still while being laser-etched.
Re: (Score:1)
Black Ring (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, how can Jed Clampett turn his black gold into a ring for Ellie Mae?
Layne
(Joking aside, I think it would a cool looking ring, too.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or if you wanted to suck on your ring.
Oblig. XKCD (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I was considering posting that, but couldn't think of anything witty enough. Apparently I wasn't the only one who couldn't.
Let's try this: with this process, we could make precision butterflies that could eddy the air currents in such a way that amazing data densities could be achieved on the hard disks. The hard part is getting the butterflies to sit still without damaging them, but considering what we've done with silicon, I doubt it'd be that hard once there's interest.
Hope that's good enough.
Wilford Brimley Lied To Me! (Score:1)
This is very similar to the way that butterflies get the color in their wings.
Butterflies with lasers (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Butterflies with lasers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Butterflies with lasers (Score:4, Funny)
Phew!
Stop playing with the timestream folks, our universe was almost pinched off in a temporal loop.
Did anyone else (Score:1)
What colour are the butterfly's lasers? (Score:1)
Sure it was the butterfly (Score:5, Funny)
A novel way to mark items for identification. (Score:5, Interesting)
It might be a novel way to unobtrusively mark equipment or vehicles with permanent serial numbers or some kind of identification method for recognition by, say, machine vision, but which would not be visible to the unaided eye.
For robots to begin work in our everyday world, I feel that at first they are going to need some special markers around the house and office to help them recognize important objects more easily - this could be a very efficient and elegant way to accomplish just that.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, thin metal aluminum paper for printing on coul
Re: (Score:2)
Otherwise, a quick sanding, or a couple whacks with a hammer will ruin your serial #.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
*And how well a given metal accepts these markings will depend heavily o
Colour me cynical (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This argument is like the quarterback vs the coach.
While the postgrad may have done 99.9999999% of the annoying and tedious labor-intensive development of the concept, it is often the case that such partnerships start with a short conversation in a hallway, where either one of them could rightly claim to have spawned the insightful flash that led to the exercise in the first place, and neither one of them could rightly deny the claim of the other. Add that to the fact that the lab is provided by the prof
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Next steps (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First, this has to do with surface reflection, and transparency would require the light to go _through_ the material, not simply absorbed or reflected. And second, for it to be far behind, that'd suggest it hasn't already been done:
Re: (Score:2)
Yes (Score:2)
One word replies usually get moderated insightful.
Lippman color process (Score:2)
Hey! Where's the (Score:5, Funny)
Might be good for body jewlery (Score:2)
poll (Score:5, Funny)
Did the poster and/or editor intentionally make the ambiguous statement about butterflies, knowing that it would lead to a discussion 80% about laser-wielding butterflies, with real article-related content left to battle with the usual jokes/OT garbage/etc for the remaining 20% of comments?
Possible Answers:
() Yes, and it's awesome.
() Yes, and it sucks.
() No, but it's awesome.
() No, and it sucks.
() CowboyNeal forced them to.
Options? (Score:2)
hmm (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Coloured MacBook Pro? (Score:3)
Stealth Applications (Score:2, Insightful)
Prior Art (Score:3, Funny)
Paging Mr. Tufnel... (Score:2)
We were able to reach Mr. Tufnel, an expert in the field, about this amazing technology:
Deathklok was unavailable for comment, citing t
Use this in paint? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)