Lenovo Delivers SuSE Linux-Based ThinkPads 149
angryfirelord notes a DesktopLinux article on Lenovo's promise to deliver ThinkPads with pre-installed Novell SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 in the week of January 14. Quoting: "Lenovo will release pre-installed SLED 10 on its Intel Centrino processor-powered ThinkPad T61 and R61 14-inch-wide notebooks. In February, Lenovo's pre-integrated Novell Linux offering will expand to include some Penryn-based ThinkPads. The starting price for this system will be $949, $20 less than the same laptop with Vista Home Premium."
MS tax (Score:3, Interesting)
But since the OS is Suse, you still pay a Microsoft tax, am I right? I wonder when we will finally be able to buy laptops without any OS at all on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:MS tax (Score:5, Insightful)
The value of the royalties Novell will pay to MS from OEM installs is likely to be vanishingly small. The main benefit Microsoft got from the deal was the FUD, and that mostly backfired on them.
I have a HP laptop with SLED10 pre-installed, it even has a little green Suse logo where the XP one normally goes. It's one of the better Linux experiences around, especially for corporates and newcomers to Linux. And let's face it, even if you wipe SLED10 and install your own favorite, all the hardware will be supported and manufacturers will see there's demand for Linux compatibles.
I wouldn't worry about tacitly supporting Microsoft via Novell either. Now that innovators like Asus and Nokia have shown the way, I suspect the day of the big generic desktop Linux is over, and manufacturers will shrink-fit versions of Linux onto their own hardware.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
I've had *a lot* of problems with package management systems. One of the most frustrating things is when pe
Re: (Score:2)
My experience with SLED has not been so favorable. SuSE works well as long as you do only what it expects you to do. If you deviate too far from their expectations in software installed and configuration options used, you might be OK.
But I seriously doubt that you can wipe the system, install something else Linux, and expect it to work as well. SuSE, with Novell, with Microsoft, gives you an avenue into highly proprietary closed binary software that is otherwise not utilized by most Linux distributions.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't very well use my laptop for development unless I have that localhost server+php and mail server.
Specifically, if you try to configure postfix to be spam resistant, SuSE won't support it in the configuration meta files. And if you are a fan of Postgresql over MySQL you are also in a pickle. Of course, if you were doing any kind of development work, these configuration options would be pretty important. It gets even worse if you have to extend into the world of modules for your favoriate language
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
But since the OS is Suse, you still pay a Microsoft tax, am I right?
Unless there's something I missed in Microsoft's patent deal, the only money Microsoft gets is by buying SuSE coupons from Novell. Then, they distribute the coupons to its "customers" and collect the revenue. Unless Lenovo bought these coupons from Microsoft, I don't think M$ is getting any cash.
Even if it still has a Microsoft tax, I think choosing SUSE over another distro such as Ubuntu is a better idea. I don't have anything against Ubuntu at all, but SUSE has a nice control center (YaST) and a polis
Re: (Score:2)
Not exactly, in the MS Novell deal MS actually paid novell.
Re:MS tax (Score:5, Insightful)
Why? There is absolutely no reason why users need to know how to install any desktop OS.
I have installed Linux for several people who manage updates and configuration fine but who would be likely to to run into problems if they installed from scratch themselves.
Servers are different, of course, and so are many corporate desktops that need a standardised installation. However, this is a laptop that is being sold to people who want a pre-installed OS.
Re: (Score:2)
What proportion of users do you think understand that? There is no way the average person will ever learn. It would be nice if they did, but they will not. They will take any pre-installed OS over any that they have to install themselves.
Incidentally they have all worked out
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually, I work remotely. So, I had a non-technical guy setup two new machines. He had never installed Linux before. He works in the accounting office and didn't even know what the term Operating System meant. I gave him instructions up front as follows: what to name the machine and to use a fixed IP address which I gave him.
He installed Ubuntu without further
Re: (Score:2)
Why is something as basic as a desktop OS something that one needs to "know how to install"? Why do we still have a concept of "installation" as something that's nontrivial?
Your statement sounds as bizarre to me as "There is absolutely no reason why users need to know how to connect to the internet". It was a reasonable concern, when connecting to the internet required a bunch of obscure knowledge. Today, though, I can walk into any coffee shop in the country (except Starbucks, I guess, because they charge for it), select "Turn AirPort On", and I'm done.
Installation should be as easy as insert DVD, turn on computer, click "Install $(os_name) on blank hard disk", wait 10 minutes.
It should be that simple. But the hardware and software industries have been going their own ways for far too long.
In reality. No OS "just works" otherwise there would be no help forums. And you Apple fanboys can stop looking smug.. I read about the problems some people had with Leopard, so even OSX isn't completely free of issues.
Re: (Score:2)
the first is partitioning, you could of course make an installer that just wiped everything out and enforced it's preffered structure by default but many many people would complain if you did.
the second and more significant one is the huge huge range of PC hardware out there. This makes it practically impossible for an OS vendor to test on every possible configuration of hardware and the OS vendor can on
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's why I personally don't see Linux happening on the desktop. If two comparable laptops have a price differential of max 50 USD I think most people would say, "Oh hey why not Windows after all most stuff is compatible with Windows." Linux doe
Re:MS tax (Score:5, Interesting)
I managed to buy a thinkpad T60 in the Netherlands a few weeks ago with a preemptive windows (XP) refund. The dealer removed the OS and gave me a discount for the OEM price, which was 129.71 euros, about 190 dollars.
I would have been happy for Lenovo to give that money to a random linux distribution, but now I can decide myself which one gets it.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This is certainly the case right now for Windows XP and Vista, as numerous laptop and desktop retailers have learned to their dismay.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I managed to buy a thinkpad T60 in the Netherlands a few weeks ago with a preemptive windows (XP) refund. The dealer removed the OS and gave me a discount for the OEM price, which was 129.71 euros, about 190 dollars.
I also live in the NL, and would love to know how you pulled this out. When I bought my laptop I fought tooth and nail not to pay WinXP tax but failed.
Please consider writing something on the LXER newsgroups, or even on this thread so that other people can get more info about this.
Cheers,
Re:MS tax (Score:4, Informative)
IBM/Lenovo were actually very easy to convince. I called them because I had heard of the plans discussed in this article. They even offered to talk to unhelpful dealers for me. Bluelink needed a little more convincing, but I just kept politely and clearly invalidating any arguments they came up with against giving me a refund. This article by Serge Wroclawski http://www.linux.com/articles/59381 [linux.com] was very useful. The counters to all the arguments they came up with are there. I remained friendly and polite the whole time, but the people at Bluelink probably still thought I was some kind of crazy zealot making a fuss.
After my initial phone call to Bluelink asking for a written offer, all communication with them went via email. That way I had more time to think about what I said and compose a convincing message (I can be a bit clumsy on the phone), and there was a written record as well. I also took IBM/Lenovo up on the offer to talk to Bluelink for me. I have no idea what the IBM/Lenovo guy said to Bluelink to make it work, though, because I never saw that communication.
There must be other manufacturers and vendors where this could work as well. My previous laptop was an ASUS, which I bought without any OS on it about 5 years ago. Back then manufacturers were a lot less helpful. I remember talking to several manufacturers before buying the ASUS and being completely stonewalled. Because of my good experience with ASUS, I contacted them this time around too, and they seemed quite willing to help. But I didn't manage to get the store where I bought my previous laptop to cave quickly enough, so I didn't pursue it when I could get an acceptable configuration from http://zepto.com/ [zepto.com], where you can buy empty notebooks. I still preferred the specs of the thinkpad. I had almost given up on it when I got an offer with a preemptive windows refund from Bluelink.
Hope this helps!
Syonax
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All you get with an MS Windows OEM install is a pre-built version of a MS Wind
Dumping (Score:2, Interesting)
Then the real question is why do the OEMs get all that discount? Is that legal?
OK, I could pay the cost of distribution and all that, but in the end that would be something like 20% of the total. Boxed software doesn't even come with printed manuals these days, and selling through internet stores reduces the overall retail expenses.
Re:Dumping (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Dumping (Score:4, Interesting)
1) OEM is responsible for distribution and support. You buy a retail box, and you can call Microsoft for help. You buy a Dell... you call dell. (And if you bought sn OEM at newegg... call newegg for support.) Not that OEM support is worth anything, but its still a phone call MS doesn't have to try to answer.
2) With OEM editions MS tries hard to bind the OS to the physical unit to effectively strip you of your right to resell or transfer the software. They 'require' that you put the sticker on the case, and the language in the EULA is more restrictive, etc. In any case its often more a PITA to exercise your rights with OEM Windows. When you pay retail, they don't get in your way nearly as much over stuff like this. No stickers. No fuss.
3) Its been rumored, and im not sure if ever confirmed, that windows activation is less forgiving of OEM versions than retail. (in that OEM versions will require you to call microsoft for a manual activation in circumstances that the retail go through on automatic. (e.g. after a few transfers or hardware changes.) This being predicated on the logic that an OEM version doesn't get transferred, so it doesn't need as much leniency. If this is true, its not a big deal, but again, makes retail a little neater to deal with.
----
I typically buy my Windows at Retail, in the upgrade edition, as its about as cheap as the OEM, without any of the OEM hassles. (And I have enough copies to qualify for upgrades.) And the upgrade edition typically just required the previous media. Not a big deal considering it knocked half the price off.
For vista... what a Pain. The upgrade requires you actually install the previous edition then upgrade. (Makes sense from a certain point of view, given that iso's are trivial to obtain.) But its beyond stupid in practice. If my HD dies, I shouldn't have to install XP, before installing Vista.
What happens in 2020... I buy a new PC and decide to transfer Windows 9 on it...and put Ubuntu Zippy Zebra on the old one, and I've been upgrading windows all along so now I have to install windows 8 on it first for the v9 installer to run... but to do that I have to install windows 7, and to do that I have to install windows Vista, and to that I have to install XP? Good luck installing XP on a new PC in 2020... will there even be XP drivers for the ultra-hddvd-bluray-3.0 drive I'll be installing with on the BIOS-free EFI-2-superZ.22/q based motherboard using an intel octo 4 hyper III-2 cpu?
With Vista, at least there is a workaround, but its clearly an oversight on microsofts part. And I don't think it'll be their next time round.
They ought to go the OSX route, lower the price of full retail... (almost NOBODY buys that anyway on windows), and get rid of the 'upgrade editions'.
Re: (Score:1)
No, it's clearly a deliberate part of their policy to make any activity that negatively affects the "bottom line" a complete PITA. Their shareholders are counting on you to replace your copy of Windows every two years and always pay full price for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, on the subject of cost, have you any idea how much it
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Do you know that it will cost more than training support for Windows?
One thing I do know is that the DRM in Windows makes support a big pain. You can't easily roll out a custom boot disc, for instance, to solve problems. In fact, I sometimes use Linux boot discs to fix Windows myself.
Also, Thinkpads are made by "Lenovo", not "IBM" these days. Though IBM probably still provides many services.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even though SuSE itself is free, Lenovo does have some costs associated with the offering that they'll need to recover. For one thing, I'm sure they've done quite a bit of work porting their excellent ThinkVantage utility software to Linux.
My ThinkPad is about a year old with Windows XP. I installed Ubuntu and Grub in a separate partition, but nothing happens in Ubuntu when I press the blue button. I'd love to have those utilities
Re: (Score:2)
MS & Novell, sitin in a tree. (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Is there no other laptop besides the eee PC that is only sold with Linux on it?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Votes were about 23,000 for Ubuntu and about 800 for SuSe.
So, in an effort to listen to their customers, and make a success of Linux on Lenovo laptops, Lenovo have decided to offer
Re: (Score:1)
Lenovo have decided to offer ...
...the distro that Microsoft backs.
Re: (Score:1)
Too late (Score:1)
Any one thing this is possible?
MS-Blessed Linux (Score:2, Interesting)
Strange, that, how when Microsoft officially blesses a Linux distribution by investing in it and making all sorts of ridiculous patent/IP claims, a major PC manufacturer brings out a line of laptops with MS Linux. You can bet that Microsoft is making exactly the same amount of money on each Linux "sale" as each Windows sale, or maybe more.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Have you ever bought machines from Dell? Microsoft had them all sewn up too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:MS-Blessed Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
I care about Microsoft trying to subvert Linux. I couldn't care less about the money per se, but I worry about the lies and FUD they're putting before the PHBs of this world. And the implied legal threats.
Re: (Score:2)
Bait-and-switch, softening their anti-Free Software image, making claims regarding "giving permission" for SuSE/Novell customers to use the Microsoft intellectual property allegedly infringed by Linux, the implications for Linux in general, selling more Microsoft software to SuSE Linux shops.
Mark my words, I was right about itanium and I'll be right about this too. The deal is fishy.
Re: (Score:2)
Mr Ballmer is doing a grand enough job of destroying Microsoft in the long term. It's the next 5 years that could be difficult for the rest of us. Some of us have to work for PHBs to earn a living, and yes, I have taken my ball and gone home so to speak when the PHB gets too stupid.
Re:MS-Blessed Linux (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has traditionally always made sure that companies selling computers either only offer Windows or offer other operating systems that are substantially more expensive than Windows.
For example, I used to buy servers and workstations from Dell for developing an operating systems which shall remain nameless. They wouldn't sell me machines without an OS "for piracy reasons" despite the fact we (at the time) were running our own OS and Linux. The price quotes with Linux instead of Windows were significa
Re: (Score:1)
The deal was regarding compatibility issues. It was a good thing in that it insured MS having to work with the OSS community to enable software to be at least somewhat compatible between platforms. It has, in some respects, worked. Also, it's important to remember that it was an agreement made due to a court case (http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/inde
Good news (Score:2, Informative)
Overview of Laptops without "Microsoft-Tax" (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I hope they do better than Dell ... (Score:5, Interesting)
That, or I'm getting an Eee.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I hope they do better than Dell ... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's important to signal that there is a market for Linux machines, when you think about device drivers for example. First of all, when you buy a Linux machine, you know that the devices will work with Linux, even if you install another distro. More importantly, this sends a message to the hardware makers that mostly write Windows-only drivers.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I recently bought ThinkPad R61, and although most of the hardware worked out of the box, I still after quite a few hours didn't get the wifi to work.
Also, the fingerprint reader is a true nightmare - even after finding free Linux driver I find out that it's a bit different model and thus returns "USB device not found" every time I want to use it.
That and oh, also the graphics driver doesn't seem to work so you have to force it to install a different driver that says i
Re:I hope they do better than Dell ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Support. I know linux, i work with linux, i can install it myself, but however, since i am working as a pysicist it is not my job to do so. I want to buy a computer and problems should be solved by calling the support.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Branding is extremely important (Score:5, Insightful)
No. Dell did the right thing by slowly growing their Linux desktop market and now everyone is copying them.
Branding matters a lot.
It's the reason Microsoft runs it's Get the facts [microsoft.com] campaign against Linux. Having Linux associated with big brands that people have heard of increases your chance of people picking your product. It doesn't matter that Linux runs on the top 8 super computers [top500.org] of the world because people will make judgements based of how familiar they are with a product.
This is why Ubuntu is more popular then other distributions, because Mark S. has associated Ubuntu with larger brands. More people know about Ubuntu and are more likely to pick it compared to another distributions. A lot of people here on
Another branding example..
Have you noticed recently how "Windows Server" adverts keep popping up on websites such as top500.org, sourceforge, etc? Places that decision makers might see them, but also developers. Sourceforge in particular seems to have tons of Microsoft adverts that it is starting to put me off visiting that website at all.
Re:Branding is extremely important (Score:5, Insightful)
As someone who actually uses Ubuntu and has in the past used (trying some extensively, some still in use) such Linuxen as PCLinuxOS, puppy, DSL, SUSE, CentOS, Mepis, and probably a few others I forget, I think I'm qualified to say that the difference is not just in the branding. I've also developed nothing in Ubuntu nor hold any financial interest in its success. I have used it solely for about 6 months and the last time I booted my XP HDD for any reason was at least 4 months ago. And I really didn't want to like it because of the ugly default shit brown theme, the name and icon seemed like something more appropriate to a Michael Jackson music video than an operating system, and just because it was too popular already. But in the end I succumbed.
Ubuntu succeeds because it is amazingly polished and stable compared to other linux distributions, with a focus on the newbie and a shockingly vast array of software in the repositories that Just Works. No one uses an OS to use an OS, they use an OS for their favorite applications.
If you want help, you are more likely to find success through googling ubuntuforums.org or posting there yourself. This is because the forums are moderated in a specifically newbie friendly fashion where RTFM is banned.
http://ubuntuforums.org/index.php?page=policy [ubuntuforums.org]
And now network effect is reinforcing the utility of Ubuntu. Basically anything FOSS gets a concerted effort to put it in the repos if it is any good, or a howto gets written for it. And any hardware has someone using Ubuntu having a hack at it to get it to go first.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I probably exaggerated saying that it was extremely polished _compared_ to other linux distros. There is not a lot of difference in usability between say, that and PCLinuxOS for example. But there was enough to notice. That last 10% of polish does take a lot more than 10% of the total work.
As you say, the difference is in the repos. Ub
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The ThinkPad, de facto, is term used by Lenovo to demarcate their business-class machines. "Home" laptops are sold purely under the Lenovo brand.
Hope that helps; cheers.
They do both (Score:1)
I prefer the X series (their 12" models), but it is not as common as the óther two. It is also both slower and more expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope they do better than Dell ...
... and actually put Linux on some of their really good business-class machines, as opposed to their cheaper "entry-level" "home" flaky laptops.
[snip]
I'm not sure if you count Dell's Precision workstations as "business-class," but they do offer Red Hat Enterprise Linux pre-installed on several workstations (desktop and mobile). Note that the ThinkPads use an "enterprise-grade" Linux OS (like Dell's Precisions) while Dell's cheaper Linux laptops use the free-as-in-beer Ubuntu OS with less included support.
The Precisions ain't cheap, but the cheaper ones can be considered "high end" business-class machines. For example:
Odd, given IBM's support for Ubuntu (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What people ignore (Score:2)
Yes, offer Linux pre-installed, but at the same time, offer me the ability to say, "no, I don't want an operating system at all, I just want the laptop, and I'll obtain an oper
Linux? Cool. but let's add real security (Score:1)
"computer security" is the laughing stock of the world
I am hoping that as some of these new systems come out, based on Linux, or perhaps Solaris x.86 that the makers will delete the concept of remote updates to software
yep, I said delete that bad idea
download is OK, but after the download customer needs a chance to review what the material is, check signatures, etc and decide whether he wants to update his machine or not
NO SIGNATURE? NO EXECUTE.
It's time to get serious about security before something b
Can you elaborate on this? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You answered a different question, that's superficially similar, but not one that supports the argument that automated updates themselves are a security problem. Automatic updates cause a lot of problems, yes, and I would rather Microsoft backed away from them... but unless you know of a specific attack vector that they enable then focussing on them is ignoring the underlying problems and stopping them won't fix the underlying problems.
The biggest systematic design flaws in Win
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmm, like this [debian.org] perhaps? Debian has implemented integrity-checking of updates for quite some time now...
small ThinkPads please! (Score:2, Offtopic)
14-inch-wide notebooks
Good for aeroplanes I suppose, but still not small enough.
Small is good. For me, I prefer carrying 3.5-5" PDAs and 9-12" subnotebooks. And even 12" is already too big. What I realy want is a robust ThinkPad with modern technology at or below 12".
What can you do on a small screen? Well, lots of things. What you lose in screen size you gain it three times in productivity thanks to flexibility in using your machine anywhere you want. I use my PDA (HTC Universal) and my 8.9" Flybook while walking, f
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Has it occured to you that there might be more to life than just working and worrying about your "earning power"?
Two questions... (Score:3, Insightful)
2. Why SuSE? Did Lenovo somehow broker an unbeatable deal on support contracts, or... ?
While googling for more news on the current development, I found an old Lenovo blog entry [lenovoblogs.com] from September of 2007 asking "What Linux distribution would you most like to see supported on a ThinkPad?". Now I'm sure that every kind of online poll has some amount of ballot-stuffing, but out of the 64572 responses, 37% chose Ubuntu, 17% chose Mandrivia, and (much farther down the list) a mere 5% chose SuSE, SLED, or OpenSuSE. SLED got only 312 votes, giving it less than 0.5% of the votes.
As unscientific as the poll was, the author of the blog admitted in the lead-up to the poll that he figured that he needed to try out Ubuntu and that he was pretty sure what linux distribution was going to be chosen. So with all this user interest in Ubuntu, why did Lenovo go the Novell/SuSE route?
Oh well -- as long as the Thinkpad hardware is fully supported by some modern Linux distro, I figure that Ubuntu should have no problems supporting it.
Re: (Score:2)
I also think Lenovo is smart about keeping Ubuntu off their corporate laptops for now, they look at Ubuntu as being a consumer Linux distribution where SuSE is geared for the corporate env
good fit (Score:2)
Where's the IPS(Flexview) screens, first of all? (Score:1)
It's one of the things that made a Thinkpad (for having it available). It doesn't matter much on what software is shipped, but the hardware faces you every day.
Re: (Score:2)
Last I checked, they were phasing out the Flexview screens at about the same rate as their 4:3 screens. Supposedly their suppliers don't produce either anymore, so we're stuck with trashy widescreen monitors everywhere. I haven't been following it that closely though, as I've got a T60 with a 1400x1050 Flexview screen already.
Yep, I know. That's why I still have a T42p. (Score:2)
Right now, the highest IPS equipped model you can get that is still common is the 2623DDU.
The only good thing Lenovo has done is remove the exclusivity to their Reserve Edition, the rest is iffy at best.
Lenovo T61p (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Happy to see the Linux desktop gaining ground, anyhow.
Re: (Score:2)
1. Linux absolutely flies on a Vista-capable machine. Smokin.
2. You don't have to run Vista on your nice machine.
3 Guaranteed Linux compatible hardware.
So you are free to wipe Suse out and put your favorite Linux distro on it without having to worry about reduced functionality due to unsupported hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Linux hardly needs even 25% of the specs that Vista takes to boot up.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
No that's not what it means because SLED 10 is not cost free. In fact it is more expensive than Windows because it carries a yearly subscription price tag of $50. Add it up over the 5 or 6 years that Windows Vista will last and I don't think that you will find that SLED is cheaper. Of course it includes more than the OS, as do all Linux distros, and it guarantees that the machine is well supported by Linux, so well worth the initial cost. SLED is
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)